aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py')
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py280
1 files changed, 280 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py b/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..67e7744bf8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+# Copyright (c) 2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
+# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
+# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
+"""Test the listsincelast RPC."""
+
+from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
+from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_array_result, assert_raises_rpc_error
+
+class ListSinceBlockTest (BitcoinTestFramework):
+ def set_test_params(self):
+ self.num_nodes = 4
+ self.setup_clean_chain = True
+
+ def run_test(self):
+ self.nodes[2].generate(101)
+ self.sync_all()
+
+ self.test_no_blockhash()
+ self.test_invalid_blockhash()
+ self.test_reorg()
+ self.test_double_spend()
+ self.test_double_send()
+
+ def test_no_blockhash(self):
+ txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1)
+ blockhash, = self.nodes[2].generate(1)
+ self.sync_all()
+
+ txs = self.nodes[0].listtransactions()
+ assert_array_result(txs, {"txid": txid}, {
+ "category": "receive",
+ "amount": 1,
+ "blockhash": blockhash,
+ "confirmations": 1,
+ })
+ assert_equal(
+ self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(),
+ {"lastblock": blockhash,
+ "removed": [],
+ "transactions": txs})
+ assert_equal(
+ self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(""),
+ {"lastblock": blockhash,
+ "removed": [],
+ "transactions": txs})
+
+ def test_invalid_blockhash(self):
+ assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
+ "42759cde25462784395a337460bde75f58e73d3f08bd31fdc3507cbac856a2c4")
+ assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
+ "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
+ assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
+ "invalid-hex")
+
+ def test_reorg(self):
+ '''
+ `listsinceblock` did not behave correctly when handed a block that was
+ no longer in the main chain:
+
+ ab0
+ / \
+ aa1 [tx0] bb1
+ | |
+ aa2 bb2
+ | |
+ aa3 bb3
+ |
+ bb4
+
+ Consider a client that has only seen block `aa3` above. It asks the node
+ to `listsinceblock aa3`. But at some point prior the main chain switched
+ to the bb chain.
+
+ Previously: listsinceblock would find height=4 for block aa3 and compare
+ this to height=5 for the tip of the chain (bb4). It would then return
+ results restricted to bb3-bb4.
+
+ Now: listsinceblock finds the fork at ab0 and returns results in the
+ range bb1-bb4.
+
+ This test only checks that [tx0] is present.
+ '''
+
+ # Split network into two
+ self.split_network()
+
+ # send to nodes[0] from nodes[2]
+ senttx = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1)
+
+ # generate on both sides
+ lastblockhash = self.nodes[1].generate(6)[5]
+ self.nodes[2].generate(7)
+ self.log.info('lastblockhash=%s' % (lastblockhash))
+
+ self.sync_all([self.nodes[:2], self.nodes[2:]])
+
+ self.join_network()
+
+ # listsinceblock(lastblockhash) should now include tx, as seen from nodes[0]
+ lsbres = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(lastblockhash)
+ found = False
+ for tx in lsbres['transactions']:
+ if tx['txid'] == senttx:
+ found = True
+ break
+ assert found
+
+ def test_double_spend(self):
+ '''
+ This tests the case where the same UTXO is spent twice on two separate
+ blocks as part of a reorg.
+
+ ab0
+ / \
+ aa1 [tx1] bb1 [tx2]
+ | |
+ aa2 bb2
+ | |
+ aa3 bb3
+ |
+ bb4
+
+ Problematic case:
+
+ 1. User 1 receives BTC in tx1 from utxo1 in block aa1.
+ 2. User 2 receives BTC in tx2 from utxo1 (same) in block bb1
+ 3. User 1 sees 2 confirmations at block aa3.
+ 4. Reorg into bb chain.
+ 5. User 1 asks `listsinceblock aa3` and does not see that tx1 is now
+ invalidated.
+
+ Currently the solution to this is to detect that a reorg'd block is
+ asked for in listsinceblock, and to iterate back over existing blocks up
+ until the fork point, and to include all transactions that relate to the
+ node wallet.
+ '''
+
+ self.sync_all()
+
+ # Split network into two
+ self.split_network()
+
+ # share utxo between nodes[1] and nodes[2]
+ utxos = self.nodes[2].listunspent()
+ utxo = utxos[0]
+ privkey = self.nodes[2].dumpprivkey(utxo['address'])
+ self.nodes[1].importprivkey(privkey)
+
+ # send from nodes[1] using utxo to nodes[0]
+ change = '%.8f' % (float(utxo['amount']) - 1.0003)
+ recipientDict = {
+ self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): 1,
+ self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(): change,
+ }
+ utxoDicts = [{
+ 'txid': utxo['txid'],
+ 'vout': utxo['vout'],
+ }]
+ txid1 = self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(
+ self.nodes[1].signrawtransaction(
+ self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction(utxoDicts, recipientDict))['hex'])
+
+ # send from nodes[2] using utxo to nodes[3]
+ recipientDict2 = {
+ self.nodes[3].getnewaddress(): 1,
+ self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(): change,
+ }
+ self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(
+ self.nodes[2].signrawtransaction(
+ self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(utxoDicts, recipientDict2))['hex'])
+
+ # generate on both sides
+ lastblockhash = self.nodes[1].generate(3)[2]
+ self.nodes[2].generate(4)
+
+ self.join_network()
+
+ self.sync_all()
+
+ # gettransaction should work for txid1
+ assert self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1)['txid'] == txid1, "gettransaction failed to find txid1"
+
+ # listsinceblock(lastblockhash) should now include txid1, as seen from nodes[0]
+ lsbres = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(lastblockhash)
+ assert any(tx['txid'] == txid1 for tx in lsbres['removed'])
+
+ # but it should not include 'removed' if include_removed=false
+ lsbres2 = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blockhash=lastblockhash, include_removed=False)
+ assert 'removed' not in lsbres2
+
+ def test_double_send(self):
+ '''
+ This tests the case where the same transaction is submitted twice on two
+ separate blocks as part of a reorg. The former will vanish and the
+ latter will appear as the true transaction (with confirmations dropping
+ as a result).
+
+ ab0
+ / \
+ aa1 [tx1] bb1
+ | |
+ aa2 bb2
+ | |
+ aa3 bb3 [tx1]
+ |
+ bb4
+
+ Asserted:
+
+ 1. tx1 is listed in listsinceblock.
+ 2. It is included in 'removed' as it was removed, even though it is now
+ present in a different block.
+ 3. It is listed with a confirmations count of 2 (bb3, bb4), not
+ 3 (aa1, aa2, aa3).
+ '''
+
+ self.sync_all()
+
+ # Split network into two
+ self.split_network()
+
+ # create and sign a transaction
+ utxos = self.nodes[2].listunspent()
+ utxo = utxos[0]
+ change = '%.8f' % (float(utxo['amount']) - 1.0003)
+ recipientDict = {
+ self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): 1,
+ self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(): change,
+ }
+ utxoDicts = [{
+ 'txid': utxo['txid'],
+ 'vout': utxo['vout'],
+ }]
+ signedtxres = self.nodes[2].signrawtransaction(
+ self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(utxoDicts, recipientDict))
+ assert signedtxres['complete']
+
+ signedtx = signedtxres['hex']
+
+ # send from nodes[1]; this will end up in aa1
+ txid1 = self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signedtx)
+
+ # generate bb1-bb2 on right side
+ self.nodes[2].generate(2)
+
+ # send from nodes[2]; this will end up in bb3
+ txid2 = self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(signedtx)
+
+ assert_equal(txid1, txid2)
+
+ # generate on both sides
+ lastblockhash = self.nodes[1].generate(3)[2]
+ self.nodes[2].generate(2)
+
+ self.join_network()
+
+ self.sync_all()
+
+ # gettransaction should work for txid1
+ self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1)
+
+ # listsinceblock(lastblockhash) should now include txid1 in transactions
+ # as well as in removed
+ lsbres = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(lastblockhash)
+ assert any(tx['txid'] == txid1 for tx in lsbres['transactions'])
+ assert any(tx['txid'] == txid1 for tx in lsbres['removed'])
+
+ # find transaction and ensure confirmations is valid
+ for tx in lsbres['transactions']:
+ if tx['txid'] == txid1:
+ assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 2)
+
+ # the same check for the removed array; confirmations should STILL be 2
+ for tx in lsbres['removed']:
+ if tx['txid'] == txid1:
+ assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 2)
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+ ListSinceBlockTest().main()