aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/functional/wallet_accounts.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/wallet_accounts.py')
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/wallet_accounts.py206
1 files changed, 206 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_accounts.py b/test/functional/wallet_accounts.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..ecd1cfc82b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_accounts.py
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+# Copyright (c) 2016-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
+# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
+# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
+"""Test account RPCs.
+
+RPCs tested are:
+ - getaccountaddress
+ - getaddressesbyaccount
+ - listaddressgroupings
+ - setaccount
+ - sendfrom (with account arguments)
+ - move (with account arguments)
+"""
+
+from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
+from test_framework.util import assert_equal
+
+class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
+ def set_test_params(self):
+ self.setup_clean_chain = True
+ self.num_nodes = 1
+ self.extra_args = [[]]
+
+ def run_test(self):
+ node = self.nodes[0]
+ # Check that there's no UTXO on any of the nodes
+ assert_equal(len(node.listunspent()), 0)
+
+ # Note each time we call generate, all generated coins go into
+ # the same address, so we call twice to get two addresses w/50 each
+ node.generate(1)
+ node.generate(101)
+ assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 100)
+
+ # there should be 2 address groups
+ # each with 1 address with a balance of 50 Bitcoins
+ address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings()
+ assert_equal(len(address_groups), 2)
+ # the addresses aren't linked now, but will be after we send to the
+ # common address
+ linked_addresses = set()
+ for address_group in address_groups:
+ assert_equal(len(address_group), 1)
+ assert_equal(len(address_group[0]), 2)
+ assert_equal(address_group[0][1], 50)
+ linked_addresses.add(address_group[0][0])
+
+ # send 50 from each address to a third address not in this wallet
+ # There's some fee that will come back to us when the miner reward
+ # matures.
+ common_address = "msf4WtN1YQKXvNtvdFYt9JBnUD2FB41kjr"
+ txid = node.sendmany(
+ fromaccount="",
+ amounts={common_address: 100},
+ subtractfeefrom=[common_address],
+ minconf=1,
+ )
+ tx_details = node.gettransaction(txid)
+ fee = -tx_details['details'][0]['fee']
+ # there should be 1 address group, with the previously
+ # unlinked addresses now linked (they both have 0 balance)
+ address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings()
+ assert_equal(len(address_groups), 1)
+ assert_equal(len(address_groups[0]), 2)
+ assert_equal(set([a[0] for a in address_groups[0]]), linked_addresses)
+ assert_equal([a[1] for a in address_groups[0]], [0, 0])
+
+ node.generate(1)
+
+ # we want to reset so that the "" account has what's expected.
+ # otherwise we're off by exactly the fee amount as that's mined
+ # and matures in the next 100 blocks
+ node.sendfrom("", common_address, fee)
+ amount_to_send = 1.0
+
+ # Create accounts and make sure subsequent account API calls
+ # recognize the account/address associations.
+ accounts = [Account(name) for name in ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e")]
+ for account in accounts:
+ account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name))
+ account.verify(node)
+
+ # Send a transaction to each account, and make sure this forces
+ # getaccountaddress to generate a new receiving address.
+ for account in accounts:
+ node.sendtoaddress(account.receive_address, amount_to_send)
+ account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name))
+ account.verify(node)
+
+ # Check the amounts received.
+ node.generate(1)
+ for account in accounts:
+ assert_equal(
+ node.getreceivedbyaddress(account.addresses[0]), amount_to_send)
+ assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account.name), amount_to_send)
+
+ # Check that sendfrom account reduces listaccounts balances.
+ for i, account in enumerate(accounts):
+ to_account = accounts[(i+1) % len(accounts)]
+ node.sendfrom(account.name, to_account.receive_address, amount_to_send)
+ node.generate(1)
+ for account in accounts:
+ account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name))
+ account.verify(node)
+ assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account.name), 2)
+ node.move(account.name, "", node.getbalance(account.name))
+ account.verify(node)
+ node.generate(101)
+ expected_account_balances = {"": 5200}
+ for account in accounts:
+ expected_account_balances[account.name] = 0
+ assert_equal(node.listaccounts(), expected_account_balances)
+ assert_equal(node.getbalance(""), 5200)
+
+ # Check that setaccount can assign an account to a new unused address.
+ for account in accounts:
+ address = node.getaccountaddress("")
+ node.setaccount(address, account.name)
+ account.add_address(address)
+ account.verify(node)
+ assert(address not in node.getaddressesbyaccount(""))
+
+ # Check that addmultisigaddress can assign accounts.
+ for account in accounts:
+ addresses = []
+ for x in range(10):
+ addresses.append(node.getnewaddress())
+ multisig_address = node.addmultisigaddress(5, addresses, account.name)['address']
+ account.add_address(multisig_address)
+ account.verify(node)
+ node.sendfrom("", multisig_address, 50)
+ node.generate(101)
+ for account in accounts:
+ assert_equal(node.getbalance(account.name), 50)
+
+ # Check that setaccount can change the account of an address from a
+ # different account.
+ change_account(node, accounts[0].addresses[0], accounts[0], accounts[1])
+
+ # Check that setaccount can change the account of an address which
+ # is the receiving address of a different account.
+ change_account(node, accounts[0].receive_address, accounts[0], accounts[1])
+
+ # Check that setaccount can set the account of an address already
+ # in the account. This is a no-op.
+ change_account(node, accounts[2].addresses[0], accounts[2], accounts[2])
+
+ # Check that setaccount can set the account of an address which is
+ # already the receiving address of the account. It would probably make
+ # sense for this to be a no-op, but right now it resets the receiving
+ # address, causing getaccountaddress to return a brand new address.
+ change_account(node, accounts[2].receive_address, accounts[2], accounts[2])
+
+class Account:
+ def __init__(self, name):
+ # Account name
+ self.name = name
+ # Current receiving address associated with this account.
+ self.receive_address = None
+ # List of all addresses assigned with this account
+ self.addresses = []
+
+ def add_address(self, address):
+ assert_equal(address not in self.addresses, True)
+ self.addresses.append(address)
+
+ def add_receive_address(self, address):
+ self.add_address(address)
+ self.receive_address = address
+
+ def verify(self, node):
+ if self.receive_address is not None:
+ assert self.receive_address in self.addresses
+ assert_equal(node.getaccountaddress(self.name), self.receive_address)
+
+ for address in self.addresses:
+ assert_equal(node.getaccount(address), self.name)
+
+ assert_equal(
+ set(node.getaddressesbyaccount(self.name)), set(self.addresses))
+
+
+def change_account(node, address, old_account, new_account):
+ assert_equal(address in old_account.addresses, True)
+ node.setaccount(address, new_account.name)
+
+ old_account.addresses.remove(address)
+ new_account.add_address(address)
+
+ # Calling setaccount on an address which was previously the receiving
+ # address of a different account should reset the receiving address of
+ # the old account, causing getaccountaddress to return a brand new
+ # address.
+ if address == old_account.receive_address:
+ new_address = node.getaccountaddress(old_account.name)
+ assert_equal(new_address not in old_account.addresses, True)
+ assert_equal(new_address not in new_account.addresses, True)
+ old_account.add_receive_address(new_address)
+
+ old_account.verify(node)
+ new_account.verify(node)
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+ WalletAccountsTest().main()