diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py')
| -rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py | 39 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py b/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py index 6365840041..8f54e50598 100755 --- a/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py +++ b/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py @@ -120,6 +120,14 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("30")) balance = newbalance + self.log.info("Check abandoned transactions in listsinceblock") + listsinceblock = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock() + txAB1_listsinceblock = [d for d in listsinceblock['transactions'] if d['txid'] == txAB1 and d['category'] == 'send'] + for tx in txAB1_listsinceblock: + assert_equal(tx['abandoned'], True) + assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 0) + assert_equal(tx['trusted'], False) + # Verify that even with a low min relay fee, the tx is not reaccepted from wallet on startup once abandoned self.restart_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"]) assert self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded'] @@ -149,6 +157,7 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996")) balance = newbalance + self.log.info("Test transactions conflicted by a double spend") # Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output # Mine double spend from node 1 inputs = [] @@ -163,6 +172,34 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework): self.connect_nodes(0, 1) self.sync_blocks() + tx_list = self.nodes[0].listtransactions() + + conflicted = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["confirmations"] < 0] + assert_equal(4, len(conflicted)) + + wallet_conflicts = [tx for tx in conflicted if tx["walletconflicts"]] + assert_equal(2, len(wallet_conflicts)) + + double_spends = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["walletconflicts"] and tx["confirmations"] > 0] + assert_equal(1, len(double_spends)) + double_spend = double_spends[0] + + # Test the properties of the conflicted transactions, i.e. with confirmations < 0. + for tx in conflicted: + assert_equal(tx["abandoned"], False) + assert_equal(tx["confirmations"], -1) + assert_equal(tx["trusted"], False) + + # Test the properties of the double-spend transaction, i.e. having wallet conflicts and confirmations > 0. + assert_equal(double_spend["abandoned"], False) + assert_equal(double_spend["confirmations"], 1) + assert "trusted" not in double_spend.keys() # "trusted" only returned if tx has 0 or negative confirmations. + + # Test the walletconflicts field of each. + for tx in wallet_conflicts: + assert_equal(double_spend["walletconflicts"], [tx["txid"]]) + assert_equal(tx["walletconflicts"], [double_spend["txid"]]) + # Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance() assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20")) @@ -176,7 +213,7 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework): #assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10")) self.log.info("If balance has not declined after invalidateblock then out of mempool wallet tx which is no longer") self.log.info("conflicted has not resumed causing its inputs to be seen as spent. See Issue #7315") - self.log.info(str(balance) + " -> " + str(newbalance) + " ?") + assert_equal(balance, newbalance) if __name__ == '__main__': |