aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp249
1 files changed, 201 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp b/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp
index c7ce6fd243..c94491ca21 100644
--- a/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp
@@ -9,10 +9,16 @@
#include <utility>
#include <vector>
+#include "rpc/server.h"
+#include "test/test_bitcoin.h"
+#include "validation.h"
#include "wallet/test/wallet_test_fixture.h"
#include <boost/foreach.hpp>
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
+#include <univalue.h>
+
+extern UniValue importmulti(const JSONRPCRequest& request);
// how many times to run all the tests to have a chance to catch errors that only show up with particular random shuffles
#define RUN_TESTS 100
@@ -21,14 +27,14 @@
// we repeat those tests this many times and only complain if all iterations of the test fail
#define RANDOM_REPEATS 5
-using namespace std;
+std::vector<std::unique_ptr<CWalletTx>> wtxn;
-typedef set<pair<const CWalletTx*,unsigned int> > CoinSet;
+typedef std::set<std::pair<const CWalletTx*,unsigned int> > CoinSet;
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(wallet_tests, WalletTestingSetup)
-static const CWallet wallet;
-static vector<COutput> vCoins;
+static const CWallet testWallet;
+static std::vector<COutput> vCoins;
static void add_coin(const CAmount& nValue, int nAge = 6*24, bool fIsFromMe = false, int nInput=0)
{
@@ -42,26 +48,26 @@ static void add_coin(const CAmount& nValue, int nAge = 6*24, bool fIsFromMe = fa
// so stop vin being empty, and cache a non-zero Debit to fake out IsFromMe()
tx.vin.resize(1);
}
- CWalletTx* wtx = new CWalletTx(&wallet, MakeTransactionRef(std::move(tx)));
+ std::unique_ptr<CWalletTx> wtx(new CWalletTx(&testWallet, MakeTransactionRef(std::move(tx))));
if (fIsFromMe)
{
wtx->fDebitCached = true;
wtx->nDebitCached = 1;
}
- COutput output(wtx, nInput, nAge, true, true);
+ COutput output(wtx.get(), nInput, nAge, true, true);
vCoins.push_back(output);
+ wtxn.emplace_back(std::move(wtx));
}
static void empty_wallet(void)
{
- BOOST_FOREACH(COutput output, vCoins)
- delete output.tx;
vCoins.clear();
+ wtxn.clear();
}
static bool equal_sets(CoinSet a, CoinSet b)
{
- pair<CoinSet::iterator, CoinSet::iterator> ret = mismatch(a.begin(), a.end(), b.begin());
+ std::pair<CoinSet::iterator, CoinSet::iterator> ret = mismatch(a.begin(), a.end(), b.begin());
return ret.first == a.end() && ret.second == b.end();
}
@@ -70,7 +76,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
CoinSet setCoinsRet, setCoinsRet2;
CAmount nValueRet;
- LOCK(wallet.cs_wallet);
+ LOCK(testWallet.cs_wallet);
// test multiple times to allow for differences in the shuffle order
for (int i = 0; i < RUN_TESTS; i++)
@@ -78,24 +84,24 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
empty_wallet();
// with an empty wallet we can't even pay one cent
- BOOST_CHECK(!wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 1 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 1 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
add_coin(1*CENT, 4); // add a new 1 cent coin
// with a new 1 cent coin, we still can't find a mature 1 cent
- BOOST_CHECK(!wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 1 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 1 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
// but we can find a new 1 cent
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 1 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 1 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * CENT);
add_coin(2*CENT); // add a mature 2 cent coin
// we can't make 3 cents of mature coins
- BOOST_CHECK(!wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 3 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 3 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
// we can make 3 cents of new coins
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 3 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 3 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 3 * CENT);
add_coin(5*CENT); // add a mature 5 cent coin,
@@ -105,33 +111,33 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
// now we have new: 1+10=11 (of which 10 was self-sent), and mature: 2+5+20=27. total = 38
// we can't make 38 cents only if we disallow new coins:
- BOOST_CHECK(!wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(38 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(38 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
// we can't even make 37 cents if we don't allow new coins even if they're from us
- BOOST_CHECK(!wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(38 * CENT, 6, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(38 * CENT, 6, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
// but we can make 37 cents if we accept new coins from ourself
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(37 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(37 * CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 37 * CENT);
// and we can make 38 cents if we accept all new coins
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(38 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(38 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 38 * CENT);
// try making 34 cents from 1,2,5,10,20 - we can't do it exactly
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(34 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(34 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 35 * CENT); // but 35 cents is closest
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 3U); // the best should be 20+10+5. it's incredibly unlikely the 1 or 2 got included (but possible)
// when we try making 7 cents, the smaller coins (1,2,5) are enough. We should see just 2+5
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 7 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 7 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 7 * CENT);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 2U);
// when we try making 8 cents, the smaller coins (1,2,5) are exactly enough.
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 8 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 8 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK(nValueRet == 8 * CENT);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 3U);
// when we try making 9 cents, no subset of smaller coins is enough, and we get the next bigger coin (10)
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 9 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 9 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 10 * CENT);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1U);
@@ -145,30 +151,30 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
add_coin(30*CENT); // now we have 6+7+8+20+30 = 71 cents total
// check that we have 71 and not 72
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(71 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
- BOOST_CHECK(!wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(72 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(71 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(72 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
// now try making 16 cents. the best smaller coins can do is 6+7+8 = 21; not as good at the next biggest coin, 20
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(16 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(16 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 20 * CENT); // we should get 20 in one coin
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1U);
add_coin( 5*CENT); // now we have 5+6+7+8+20+30 = 75 cents total
// now if we try making 16 cents again, the smaller coins can make 5+6+7 = 18 cents, better than the next biggest coin, 20
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(16 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(16 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 18 * CENT); // we should get 18 in 3 coins
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 3U);
add_coin( 18*CENT); // now we have 5+6+7+8+18+20+30
// and now if we try making 16 cents again, the smaller coins can make 5+6+7 = 18 cents, the same as the next biggest coin, 18
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(16 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(16 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 18 * CENT); // we should get 18 in 1 coin
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1U); // because in the event of a tie, the biggest coin wins
// now try making 11 cents. we should get 5+6
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(11 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(11 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 11 * CENT);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 2U);
@@ -177,11 +183,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
add_coin( 2*COIN);
add_coin( 3*COIN);
add_coin( 4*COIN); // now we have 5+6+7+8+18+20+30+100+200+300+400 = 1094 cents
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(95 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(95 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * COIN); // we should get 1 BTC in 1 coin
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1U);
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(195 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(195 * CENT, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 2 * COIN); // we should get 2 BTC in 1 coin
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1U);
@@ -196,14 +202,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
// try making 1 * MIN_CHANGE from the 1.5 * MIN_CHANGE
// we'll get change smaller than MIN_CHANGE whatever happens, so can expect MIN_CHANGE exactly
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, MIN_CHANGE);
// but if we add a bigger coin, small change is avoided
add_coin(1111*MIN_CHANGE);
// try making 1 from 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.3 + 0.4 + 0.5 + 1111 = 1112.5
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * MIN_CHANGE); // we should get the exact amount
// if we add more small coins:
@@ -211,7 +217,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
add_coin(MIN_CHANGE * 7 / 10);
// and try again to make 1.0 * MIN_CHANGE
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * MIN_CHANGE); // we should get the exact amount
// run the 'mtgox' test (see http://blockexplorer.com/tx/29a3efd3ef04f9153d47a990bd7b048a4b2d213daaa5fb8ed670fb85f13bdbcf)
@@ -220,7 +226,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
for (int j = 0; j < 20; j++)
add_coin(50000 * COIN);
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(500000 * COIN, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(500000 * COIN, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 500000 * COIN); // we should get the exact amount
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 10U); // in ten coins
@@ -233,7 +239,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
add_coin(MIN_CHANGE * 6 / 10);
add_coin(MIN_CHANGE * 7 / 10);
add_coin(1111 * MIN_CHANGE);
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1111 * MIN_CHANGE); // we get the bigger coin
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1U);
@@ -243,7 +249,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
add_coin(MIN_CHANGE * 6 / 10);
add_coin(MIN_CHANGE * 8 / 10);
add_coin(1111 * MIN_CHANGE);
- BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK( testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(MIN_CHANGE, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, MIN_CHANGE); // we should get the exact amount
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 2U); // in two coins 0.4+0.6
@@ -254,12 +260,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
add_coin(MIN_CHANGE * 100);
// trying to make 100.01 from these three coins
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(MIN_CHANGE * 10001 / 100, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(MIN_CHANGE * 10001 / 100, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, MIN_CHANGE * 10105 / 100); // we should get all coins
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 3U);
// but if we try to make 99.9, we should take the bigger of the two small coins to avoid small change
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(MIN_CHANGE * 9990 / 100, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(MIN_CHANGE * 9990 / 100, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 101 * MIN_CHANGE);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 2U);
@@ -269,7 +275,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
// Create 676 inputs (= (old MAX_STANDARD_TX_SIZE == 100000) / 148 bytes per input)
for (uint16_t j = 0; j < 676; j++)
add_coin(amt);
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(2000, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(2000, 1, 1, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
if (amt - 2000 < MIN_CHANGE) {
// needs more than one input:
uint16_t returnSize = std::ceil((2000.0 + MIN_CHANGE)/amt);
@@ -291,8 +297,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
// picking 50 from 100 coins doesn't depend on the shuffle,
// but does depend on randomness in the stochastic approximation code
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(50 * COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet , nValueRet));
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(50 * COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet2, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(50 * COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet , nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(50 * COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet2, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK(!equal_sets(setCoinsRet, setCoinsRet2));
int fails = 0;
@@ -300,8 +306,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
{
// selecting 1 from 100 identical coins depends on the shuffle; this test will fail 1% of the time
// run the test RANDOM_REPEATS times and only complain if all of them fail
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet , nValueRet));
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet2, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet , nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet2, nValueRet));
if (equal_sets(setCoinsRet, setCoinsRet2))
fails++;
}
@@ -321,8 +327,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
{
// selecting 1 from 100 identical coins depends on the shuffle; this test will fail 1% of the time
// run the test RANDOM_REPEATS times and only complain if all of them fail
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(90*CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet , nValueRet));
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(90*CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet2, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(90*CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet , nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(90*CENT, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet2, nValueRet));
if (equal_sets(setCoinsRet, setCoinsRet2))
fails++;
}
@@ -337,7 +343,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ApproximateBestSubset)
CoinSet setCoinsRet;
CAmount nValueRet;
- LOCK(wallet.cs_wallet);
+ LOCK(testWallet.cs_wallet);
empty_wallet();
@@ -346,9 +352,156 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ApproximateBestSubset)
add_coin(1000 * COIN);
add_coin(3 * COIN);
- BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1003 * COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
+ BOOST_CHECK(testWallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1003 * COIN, 1, 6, 0, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1003 * COIN);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 2U);
+
+ empty_wallet();
+}
+
+BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(rescan, TestChain100Setup)
+{
+ LOCK(cs_main);
+
+ // Cap last block file size, and mine new block in a new block file.
+ CBlockIndex* oldTip = chainActive.Tip();
+ GetBlockFileInfo(oldTip->GetBlockPos().nFile)->nSize = MAX_BLOCKFILE_SIZE;
+ CreateAndProcessBlock({}, GetScriptForRawPubKey(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()));
+ CBlockIndex* newTip = chainActive.Tip();
+
+ // Verify ScanForWalletTransactions picks up transactions in both the old
+ // and new block files.
+ {
+ CWallet wallet;
+ LOCK(wallet.cs_wallet);
+ wallet.AddKeyPubKey(coinbaseKey, coinbaseKey.GetPubKey());
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(oldTip, wallet.ScanForWalletTransactions(oldTip));
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(wallet.GetImmatureBalance(), 100 * COIN);
+ }
+
+ // Prune the older block file.
+ PruneOneBlockFile(oldTip->GetBlockPos().nFile);
+ UnlinkPrunedFiles({oldTip->GetBlockPos().nFile});
+
+ // Verify ScanForWalletTransactions only picks transactions in the new block
+ // file.
+ {
+ CWallet wallet;
+ LOCK(wallet.cs_wallet);
+ wallet.AddKeyPubKey(coinbaseKey, coinbaseKey.GetPubKey());
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(newTip, wallet.ScanForWalletTransactions(oldTip));
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(wallet.GetImmatureBalance(), 50 * COIN);
+ }
+
+ // Verify importmulti RPC returns failure for a key whose creation time is
+ // before the missing block, and success for a key whose creation time is
+ // after.
+ {
+ CWallet wallet;
+ CWallet *backup = ::pwalletMain;
+ ::pwalletMain = &wallet;
+ UniValue keys;
+ keys.setArray();
+ UniValue key;
+ key.setObject();
+ key.pushKV("scriptPubKey", HexStr(GetScriptForRawPubKey(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey())));
+ key.pushKV("timestamp", 0);
+ key.pushKV("internal", UniValue(true));
+ keys.push_back(key);
+ key.clear();
+ key.setObject();
+ CKey futureKey;
+ futureKey.MakeNewKey(true);
+ key.pushKV("scriptPubKey", HexStr(GetScriptForRawPubKey(futureKey.GetPubKey())));
+ key.pushKV("timestamp", newTip->GetBlockTimeMax() + TIMESTAMP_WINDOW);
+ key.pushKV("internal", UniValue(true));
+ keys.push_back(key);
+ JSONRPCRequest request;
+ request.params.setArray();
+ request.params.push_back(keys);
+
+ UniValue response = importmulti(request);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(response.write(), strprintf("[{\"success\":false,\"error\":{\"code\":-1,\"message\":\"Failed to rescan before time %d, transactions may be missing.\"}},{\"success\":true}]", newTip->GetBlockTimeMax()));
+ ::pwalletMain = backup;
+ }
+}
+
+// Check that GetImmatureCredit() returns a newly calculated value instead of
+// the cached value after a MarkDirty() call.
+//
+// This is a regression test written to verify a bugfix for the immature credit
+// function. Similar tests probably should be written for the other credit and
+// debit functions.
+BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(coin_mark_dirty_immature_credit, TestChain100Setup)
+{
+ CWallet wallet;
+ CWalletTx wtx(&wallet, MakeTransactionRef(coinbaseTxns.back()));
+ LOCK2(cs_main, wallet.cs_wallet);
+ wtx.hashBlock = chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash();
+ wtx.nIndex = 0;
+
+ // Call GetImmatureCredit() once before adding the key to the wallet to
+ // cache the current immature credit amount, which is 0.
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(wtx.GetImmatureCredit(), 0);
+
+ // Invalidate the cached value, add the key, and make sure a new immature
+ // credit amount is calculated.
+ wtx.MarkDirty();
+ wallet.AddKeyPubKey(coinbaseKey, coinbaseKey.GetPubKey());
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(wtx.GetImmatureCredit(), 50*COIN);
+}
+
+static int64_t AddTx(CWallet& wallet, uint32_t lockTime, int64_t mockTime, int64_t blockTime)
+{
+ CMutableTransaction tx;
+ tx.nLockTime = lockTime;
+ SetMockTime(mockTime);
+ CBlockIndex* block = nullptr;
+ if (blockTime > 0) {
+ auto inserted = mapBlockIndex.emplace(GetRandHash(), new CBlockIndex);
+ assert(inserted.second);
+ const uint256& hash = inserted.first->first;
+ block = inserted.first->second;
+ block->nTime = blockTime;
+ block->phashBlock = &hash;
+ }
+
+ CWalletTx wtx(&wallet, MakeTransactionRef(tx));
+ if (block) {
+ wtx.SetMerkleBranch(block, 0);
+ }
+ wallet.AddToWallet(wtx);
+ return wallet.mapWallet.at(wtx.GetHash()).nTimeSmart;
+}
+
+// Simple test to verify assignment of CWalletTx::nSmartTime value. Could be
+// expanded to cover more corner cases of smart time logic.
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ComputeTimeSmart)
+{
+ CWallet wallet;
+
+ // New transaction should use clock time if lower than block time.
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(AddTx(wallet, 1, 100, 120), 100);
+
+ // Test that updating existing transaction does not change smart time.
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(AddTx(wallet, 1, 200, 220), 100);
+
+ // New transaction should use clock time if there's no block time.
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(AddTx(wallet, 2, 300, 0), 300);
+
+ // New transaction should use block time if lower than clock time.
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(AddTx(wallet, 3, 420, 400), 400);
+
+ // New transaction should use latest entry time if higher than
+ // min(block time, clock time).
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(AddTx(wallet, 4, 500, 390), 400);
+
+ // If there are future entries, new transaction should use time of the
+ // newest entry that is no more than 300 seconds ahead of the clock time.
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(AddTx(wallet, 5, 50, 600), 300);
+
+ // Reset mock time for other tests.
+ SetMockTime(0);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-19 18:31:18 +0000