diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/validation.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/validation.cpp | 338 |
1 files changed, 166 insertions, 172 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index 9301066c6a..ca6d2176b3 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ std::unique_ptr<CBlockTreeDB> pblocktree; // See definition for documentation static void FindFilesToPruneManual(std::set<int>& setFilesToPrune, int nManualPruneHeight); static void FindFilesToPrune(std::set<int>& setFilesToPrune, uint64_t nPruneAfterHeight); -bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, const CCoinsViewCache &inputs, unsigned int flags, bool cacheSigStore, bool cacheFullScriptStore, PrecomputedTransactionData& txdata, std::vector<CScriptCheck> *pvChecks = nullptr); +bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, TxValidationState &state, const CCoinsViewCache &inputs, unsigned int flags, bool cacheSigStore, bool cacheFullScriptStore, PrecomputedTransactionData& txdata, std::vector<CScriptCheck> *pvChecks = nullptr); static FILE* OpenUndoFile(const FlatFilePos &pos, bool fReadOnly = false); static FlatFileSeq BlockFileSeq(); static FlatFileSeq UndoFileSeq(); @@ -363,9 +363,9 @@ static void UpdateMempoolForReorg(DisconnectedBlockTransactions& disconnectpool, auto it = disconnectpool.queuedTx.get<insertion_order>().rbegin(); while (it != disconnectpool.queuedTx.get<insertion_order>().rend()) { // ignore validation errors in resurrected transactions - CValidationState stateDummy; + TxValidationState stateDummy; if (!fAddToMempool || (*it)->IsCoinBase() || - !AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, stateDummy, *it, nullptr /* pfMissingInputs */, + !AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, stateDummy, *it, nullptr /* plTxnReplaced */, true /* bypass_limits */, 0 /* nAbsurdFee */)) { // If the transaction doesn't make it in to the mempool, remove any // transactions that depend on it (which would now be orphans). @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void UpdateMempoolForReorg(DisconnectedBlockTransactions& disconnectpool, // Used to avoid mempool polluting consensus critical paths if CCoinsViewMempool // were somehow broken and returning the wrong scriptPubKeys -static bool CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState& state, const CCoinsViewCache& view, const CTxMemPool& pool, +static bool CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache(const CTransaction& tx, TxValidationState& state, const CCoinsViewCache& view, const CTxMemPool& pool, unsigned int flags, PrecomputedTransactionData& txdata) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) { AssertLockHeld(cs_main); @@ -441,8 +441,7 @@ public: // around easier. struct ATMPArgs { const CChainParams& m_chainparams; - CValidationState &m_state; - bool* m_missing_inputs; + TxValidationState &m_state; const int64_t m_accept_time; std::list<CTransactionRef>* m_replaced_transactions; const bool m_bypass_limits; @@ -502,15 +501,15 @@ private: bool Finalize(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main, m_pool.cs); // Compare a package's feerate against minimum allowed. - bool CheckFeeRate(size_t package_size, CAmount package_fee, CValidationState& state) + bool CheckFeeRate(size_t package_size, CAmount package_fee, TxValidationState& state) { CAmount mempoolRejectFee = m_pool.GetMinFee(gArgs.GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000).GetFee(package_size); if (mempoolRejectFee > 0 && package_fee < mempoolRejectFee) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "mempool min fee not met", strprintf("%d < %d", package_fee, mempoolRejectFee)); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "mempool min fee not met", strprintf("%d < %d", package_fee, mempoolRejectFee)); } if (package_fee < ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(package_size)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "min relay fee not met", strprintf("%d < %d", package_fee, ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(package_size))); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "min relay fee not met", strprintf("%d < %d", package_fee, ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(package_size))); } return true; } @@ -537,8 +536,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) const uint256& hash = ws.m_hash; // Copy/alias what we need out of args - CValidationState &state = args.m_state; - bool* pfMissingInputs = args.m_missing_inputs; + TxValidationState &state = args.m_state; const int64_t nAcceptTime = args.m_accept_time; const bool bypass_limits = args.m_bypass_limits; const CAmount& nAbsurdFee = args.m_absurd_fee; @@ -554,38 +552,34 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) CAmount& nConflictingFees = ws.m_conflicting_fees; size_t& nConflictingSize = ws.m_conflicting_size; - if (pfMissingInputs) { - *pfMissingInputs = false; - } - if (!CheckTransaction(tx, state)) return false; // state filled in by CheckTransaction // Coinbase is only valid in a block, not as a loose transaction if (tx.IsCoinBase()) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "coinbase"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_CONSENSUS, "coinbase"); // Rather not work on nonstandard transactions (unless -testnet/-regtest) std::string reason; if (fRequireStandard && !IsStandardTx(tx, reason)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, reason); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD, reason); // Do not work on transactions that are too small. // A transaction with 1 segwit input and 1 P2WPHK output has non-witness size of 82 bytes. // Transactions smaller than this are not relayed to mitigate CVE-2017-12842 by not relaying // 64-byte transactions. if (::GetSerializeSize(tx, PROTOCOL_VERSION | SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS) < MIN_STANDARD_TX_NONWITNESS_SIZE) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, "tx-size-small"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD, "tx-size-small"); // Only accept nLockTime-using transactions that can be mined in the next // block; we don't want our mempool filled up with transactions that can't // be mined yet. if (!CheckFinalTx(tx, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_PREMATURE_SPEND, false, "non-final"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_PREMATURE_SPEND, "non-final"); // is it already in the memory pool? if (m_pool.exists(hash)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_CONFLICT, false, "txn-already-in-mempool"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_CONFLICT, "txn-already-in-mempool"); } // Check for conflicts with in-memory transactions @@ -617,7 +611,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) } } if (fReplacementOptOut) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "txn-mempool-conflict"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "txn-mempool-conflict"); } setConflicts.insert(ptxConflicting->GetHash()); @@ -643,14 +637,11 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) for (size_t out = 0; out < tx.vout.size(); out++) { // Optimistically just do efficient check of cache for outputs if (coins_cache.HaveCoinInCache(COutPoint(hash, out))) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_CONFLICT, false, "txn-already-known"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_CONFLICT, "txn-already-known"); } } // Otherwise assume this might be an orphan tx for which we just haven't seen parents yet - if (pfMissingInputs) { - *pfMissingInputs = true; - } - return false; // fMissingInputs and !state.IsInvalid() is used to detect this condition, don't set state.Invalid() + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MISSING_INPUTS, "bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent"); } } @@ -668,7 +659,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // Must keep pool.cs for this unless we change CheckSequenceLocks to take a // CoinsViewCache instead of create its own if (!CheckSequenceLocks(m_pool, tx, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS, &lp)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_PREMATURE_SPEND, false, "non-BIP68-final"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_PREMATURE_SPEND, "non-BIP68-final"); CAmount nFees = 0; if (!Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, m_view, GetSpendHeight(m_view), nFees)) { @@ -677,11 +668,11 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // Check for non-standard pay-to-script-hash in inputs if (fRequireStandard && !AreInputsStandard(tx, m_view)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, "bad-txns-nonstandard-inputs"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD, "bad-txns-nonstandard-inputs"); // Check for non-standard witness in P2WSH if (tx.HasWitness() && fRequireStandard && !IsWitnessStandard(tx, m_view)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED, false, "bad-witness-nonstandard"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED, "bad-witness-nonstandard"); int64_t nSigOpsCost = GetTransactionSigOpCost(tx, m_view, STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS); @@ -705,7 +696,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) unsigned int nSize = entry->GetTxSize(); if (nSigOpsCost > MAX_STANDARD_TX_SIGOPS_COST) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, "bad-txns-too-many-sigops", + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD, "bad-txns-too-many-sigops", strprintf("%d", nSigOpsCost)); // No transactions are allowed below minRelayTxFee except from disconnected @@ -713,7 +704,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) if (!bypass_limits && !CheckFeeRate(nSize, nModifiedFees, state)) return false; if (nAbsurdFee && nFees > nAbsurdFee) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD, "absurdly-high-fee", strprintf("%d > %d", nFees, nAbsurdFee)); const CTxMemPool::setEntries setIterConflicting = m_pool.GetIterSet(setConflicts); @@ -771,7 +762,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // this, see https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html if (nSize > EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT || !m_pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(*entry, setAncestors, 2, m_limit_ancestor_size, m_limit_descendants + 1, m_limit_descendant_size + EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT, dummy_err_string)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "too-long-mempool-chain", errString); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "too-long-mempool-chain", errString); } } @@ -784,7 +775,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) const uint256 &hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash(); if (setConflicts.count(hashAncestor)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_CONSENSUS, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", strprintf("%s spends conflicting transaction %s", hash.ToString(), hashAncestor.ToString())); @@ -824,7 +815,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize()); if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "insufficient fee", + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee", strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s", hash.ToString(), newFeeRate.ToString(), @@ -852,7 +843,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize(); } } else { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "too many potential replacements", + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "too many potential replacements", strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n", hash.ToString(), nConflictingCount, @@ -876,7 +867,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // it's cheaper to just check if the new input refers to a // tx that's in the mempool. if (m_pool.exists(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", strprintf("replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d", hash.ToString(), j)); } @@ -888,7 +879,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // transactions would not be paid for. if (nModifiedFees < nConflictingFees) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "insufficient fee", + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee", strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s", hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nModifiedFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees))); } @@ -898,7 +889,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) CAmount nDeltaFees = nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees; if (nDeltaFees < ::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(nSize)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "insufficient fee", + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee", strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s", hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nDeltaFees), @@ -912,7 +903,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PolicyScriptChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws, Precompute { const CTransaction& tx = *ws.m_ptx; - CValidationState &state = args.m_state; + TxValidationState &state = args.m_state; constexpr unsigned int scriptVerifyFlags = STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS; @@ -922,14 +913,13 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PolicyScriptChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws, Precompute // SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK requires SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, so we // need to turn both off, and compare against just turning off CLEANSTACK // to see if the failure is specifically due to witness validation. - CValidationState stateDummy; // Want reported failures to be from first CheckInputs - if (!tx.HasWitness() && CheckInputs(tx, stateDummy, m_view, scriptVerifyFlags & ~(SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS | SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK), true, false, txdata) && - !CheckInputs(tx, stateDummy, m_view, scriptVerifyFlags & ~SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK, true, false, txdata)) { + TxValidationState state_dummy; // Want reported failures to be from first CheckInputs + if (!tx.HasWitness() && CheckInputs(tx, state_dummy, m_view, scriptVerifyFlags & ~(SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS | SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK), true, false, txdata) && + !CheckInputs(tx, state_dummy, m_view, scriptVerifyFlags & ~SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK, true, false, txdata)) { // Only the witness is missing, so the transaction itself may be fine. - state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED, false, + state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED, state.GetRejectReason(), state.GetDebugMessage()); } - assert(IsTransactionReason(state.GetReason())); return false; // state filled in by CheckInputs } @@ -941,7 +931,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::ConsensusScriptChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws, Precomp const CTransaction& tx = *ws.m_ptx; const uint256& hash = ws.m_hash; - CValidationState &state = args.m_state; + TxValidationState &state = args.m_state; const CChainParams& chainparams = args.m_chainparams; // Check again against the current block tip's script verification @@ -972,7 +962,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::Finalize(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) { const CTransaction& tx = *ws.m_ptx; const uint256& hash = ws.m_hash; - CValidationState &state = args.m_state; + TxValidationState &state = args.m_state; const bool bypass_limits = args.m_bypass_limits; CTxMemPool::setEntries& allConflicting = ws.m_all_conflicting; @@ -1010,7 +1000,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::Finalize(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) if (!bypass_limits) { LimitMempoolSize(m_pool, gArgs.GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000, std::chrono::hours{gArgs.GetArg("-mempoolexpiry", DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY)}); if (!m_pool.exists(hash)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, "mempool full"); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "mempool full"); } return true; } @@ -1047,12 +1037,12 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::AcceptSingleTransaction(const CTransactionRef& ptx, ATMPArgs } // anon namespace /** (try to) add transaction to memory pool with a specified acceptance time **/ -static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransactionRef &tx, - bool* pfMissingInputs, int64_t nAcceptTime, std::list<CTransactionRef>* plTxnReplaced, +static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool& pool, TxValidationState &state, const CTransactionRef &tx, + int64_t nAcceptTime, std::list<CTransactionRef>* plTxnReplaced, bool bypass_limits, const CAmount nAbsurdFee, bool test_accept) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) { std::vector<COutPoint> coins_to_uncache; - MemPoolAccept::ATMPArgs args { chainparams, state, pfMissingInputs, nAcceptTime, plTxnReplaced, bypass_limits, nAbsurdFee, coins_to_uncache, test_accept }; + MemPoolAccept::ATMPArgs args { chainparams, state, nAcceptTime, plTxnReplaced, bypass_limits, nAbsurdFee, coins_to_uncache, test_accept }; bool res = MemPoolAccept(pool).AcceptSingleTransaction(tx, args); if (!res) { // Remove coins that were not present in the coins cache before calling ATMPW; @@ -1064,17 +1054,17 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPo ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip().Uncache(hashTx); } // After we've (potentially) uncached entries, ensure our coins cache is still within its size limits - CValidationState stateDummy; - ::ChainstateActive().FlushStateToDisk(chainparams, stateDummy, FlushStateMode::PERIODIC); + BlockValidationState state_dummy; + ::ChainstateActive().FlushStateToDisk(chainparams, state_dummy, FlushStateMode::PERIODIC); return res; } -bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransactionRef &tx, - bool* pfMissingInputs, std::list<CTransactionRef>* plTxnReplaced, +bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, TxValidationState &state, const CTransactionRef &tx, + std::list<CTransactionRef>* plTxnReplaced, bool bypass_limits, const CAmount nAbsurdFee, bool test_accept) { const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); - return AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime(chainparams, pool, state, tx, pfMissingInputs, GetTime(), plTxnReplaced, bypass_limits, nAbsurdFee, test_accept); + return AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime(chainparams, pool, state, tx, GetTime(), plTxnReplaced, bypass_limits, nAbsurdFee, test_accept); } /** @@ -1419,8 +1409,8 @@ void static InvalidChainFound(CBlockIndex* pindexNew) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(c CheckForkWarningConditions(); } -void CChainState::InvalidBlockFound(CBlockIndex *pindex, const CValidationState &state) { - if (state.GetReason() != ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED) { +void CChainState::InvalidBlockFound(CBlockIndex *pindex, const BlockValidationState &state) { + if (state.GetResult() != BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED) { pindex->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_VALID; m_blockman.m_failed_blocks.insert(pindex); setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindex); @@ -1493,7 +1483,7 @@ void InitScriptExecutionCache() { * * Non-static (and re-declared) in src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp */ -bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, const CCoinsViewCache &inputs, unsigned int flags, bool cacheSigStore, bool cacheFullScriptStore, PrecomputedTransactionData& txdata, std::vector<CScriptCheck> *pvChecks) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) +bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, TxValidationState &state, const CCoinsViewCache &inputs, unsigned int flags, bool cacheSigStore, bool cacheFullScriptStore, PrecomputedTransactionData& txdata, std::vector<CScriptCheck> *pvChecks) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) { if (tx.IsCoinBase()) return true; @@ -1545,10 +1535,10 @@ bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, const CCoinsVi CScriptCheck check2(coin.out, tx, i, flags & ~STANDARD_NOT_MANDATORY_VERIFY_FLAGS, cacheSigStore, &txdata); if (check2()) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, strprintf("non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (%s)", ScriptErrorString(check.GetScriptError()))); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD, strprintf("non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (%s)", ScriptErrorString(check.GetScriptError()))); } // MANDATORY flag failures correspond to - // ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS. Because CONSENSUS + // TxValidationResult::TX_CONSENSUS. Because CONSENSUS // failures are the most serious case of validation // failures, we may need to consider using // RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE for any script failure that @@ -1556,7 +1546,7 @@ bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, const CCoinsVi // support, to avoid splitting the network (but this // depends on the details of how net_processing handles // such errors). - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, strprintf("mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (%s)", ScriptErrorString(check.GetScriptError()))); + return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_CONSENSUS, strprintf("mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (%s)", ScriptErrorString(check.GetScriptError()))); } } @@ -1641,7 +1631,7 @@ static bool AbortNode(const std::string& strMessage, const std::string& userMess return false; } -static bool AbortNode(CValidationState& state, const std::string& strMessage, const std::string& userMessage = "", unsigned int prefix = 0) +static bool AbortNode(BlockValidationState& state, const std::string& strMessage, const std::string& userMessage = "", unsigned int prefix = 0) { AbortNode(strMessage, userMessage, prefix); return state.Error(strMessage); @@ -1755,9 +1745,9 @@ void static FlushBlockFile(bool fFinalize = false) } } -static bool FindUndoPos(CValidationState &state, int nFile, FlatFilePos &pos, unsigned int nAddSize); +static bool FindUndoPos(BlockValidationState &state, int nFile, FlatFilePos &pos, unsigned int nAddSize); -static bool WriteUndoDataForBlock(const CBlockUndo& blockundo, CValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pindex, const CChainParams& chainparams) +static bool WriteUndoDataForBlock(const CBlockUndo& blockundo, BlockValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pindex, const CChainParams& chainparams) { // Write undo information to disk if (pindex->GetUndoPos().IsNull()) { @@ -1896,7 +1886,7 @@ static int64_t nBlocksTotal = 0; /** Apply the effects of this block (with given index) on the UTXO set represented by coins. * Validity checks that depend on the UTXO set are also done; ConnectBlock() * can fail if those validity checks fail (among other reasons). */ -bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pindex, +bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, BlockValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pindex, CCoinsViewCache& view, const CChainParams& chainparams, bool fJustCheck) { AssertLockHeld(cs_main); @@ -1918,7 +1908,7 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl // re-enforce that rule here (at least until we make it impossible for // GetAdjustedTime() to go backward). if (!CheckBlock(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus(), !fJustCheck, !fJustCheck)) { - if (state.GetReason() == ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED) { + if (state.GetResult() == BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED) { // We don't write down blocks to disk if they may have been // corrupted, so this should be impossible unless we're having hardware // problems. @@ -2058,8 +2048,8 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) { for (size_t o = 0; o < tx->vout.size(); o++) { if (view.HaveCoin(COutPoint(tx->GetHash(), o))) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("ConnectBlock(): tried to overwrite transaction"), - "bad-txns-BIP30"); + LogPrintf("ERROR: ConnectBlock(): tried to overwrite transaction\n"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-txns-BIP30"); } } } @@ -2097,21 +2087,17 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl if (!tx.IsCoinBase()) { CAmount txfee = 0; - if (!Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, view, pindex->nHeight, txfee)) { - if (!IsBlockReason(state.GetReason())) { - // CheckTxInputs may return MISSING_INPUTS or - // PREMATURE_SPEND but we can't return that, as it's not - // defined for a block, so we reset the reason flag to - // CONSENSUS here. - state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, - state.GetRejectReason(), state.GetDebugMessage()); - } + TxValidationState tx_state; + if (!Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, tx_state, view, pindex->nHeight, txfee)) { + // Any transaction validation failure in ConnectBlock is a block consensus failure + state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, + tx_state.GetRejectReason(), tx_state.GetDebugMessage()); return error("%s: Consensus::CheckTxInputs: %s, %s", __func__, tx.GetHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); } nFees += txfee; if (!MoneyRange(nFees)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("%s: accumulated fee in the block out of range.", __func__), - "bad-txns-accumulated-fee-outofrange"); + LogPrintf("ERROR: %s: accumulated fee in the block out of range.\n", __func__); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-txns-accumulated-fee-outofrange"); } // Check that transaction is BIP68 final @@ -2123,8 +2109,8 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl } if (!SequenceLocks(tx, nLockTimeFlags, &prevheights, *pindex)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("%s: contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__), - "bad-txns-nonfinal"); + LogPrintf("ERROR: %s: contains a non-BIP68-final transaction\n", __func__); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-txns-nonfinal"); } } @@ -2133,26 +2119,21 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl // * p2sh (when P2SH enabled in flags and excludes coinbase) // * witness (when witness enabled in flags and excludes coinbase) nSigOpsCost += GetTransactionSigOpCost(tx, view, flags); - if (nSigOpsCost > MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("ConnectBlock(): too many sigops"), - "bad-blk-sigops"); + if (nSigOpsCost > MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST) { + LogPrintf("ERROR: ConnectBlock(): too many sigops\n"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-blk-sigops"); + } txdata.emplace_back(tx); if (!tx.IsCoinBase()) { std::vector<CScriptCheck> vChecks; bool fCacheResults = fJustCheck; /* Don't cache results if we're actually connecting blocks (still consult the cache, though) */ - if (fScriptChecks && !CheckInputs(tx, state, view, flags, fCacheResults, fCacheResults, txdata[i], nScriptCheckThreads ? &vChecks : nullptr)) { - if (state.GetReason() == ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD) { - // CheckInputs may return NOT_STANDARD for extra flags we passed, - // but we can't return that, as it's not defined for a block, so - // we reset the reason flag to CONSENSUS here. - // In the event of a future soft-fork, we may need to - // consider whether rewriting to CONSENSUS or - // RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE would be more appropriate. - state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, - state.GetRejectReason(), state.GetDebugMessage()); - } + TxValidationState tx_state; + if (fScriptChecks && !CheckInputs(tx, tx_state, view, flags, fCacheResults, fCacheResults, txdata[i], nScriptCheckThreads ? &vChecks : nullptr)) { + // Any transaction validation failure in ConnectBlock is a block consensus failure + state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, + tx_state.GetRejectReason(), tx_state.GetDebugMessage()); return error("ConnectBlock(): CheckInputs on %s failed with %s", tx.GetHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); } @@ -2169,14 +2150,15 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl LogPrint(BCLog::BENCH, " - Connect %u transactions: %.2fms (%.3fms/tx, %.3fms/txin) [%.2fs (%.2fms/blk)]\n", (unsigned)block.vtx.size(), MILLI * (nTime3 - nTime2), MILLI * (nTime3 - nTime2) / block.vtx.size(), nInputs <= 1 ? 0 : MILLI * (nTime3 - nTime2) / (nInputs-1), nTimeConnect * MICRO, nTimeConnect * MILLI / nBlocksTotal); CAmount blockReward = nFees + GetBlockSubsidy(pindex->nHeight, chainparams.GetConsensus()); - if (block.vtx[0]->GetValueOut() > blockReward) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, - error("ConnectBlock(): coinbase pays too much (actual=%d vs limit=%d)", - block.vtx[0]->GetValueOut(), blockReward), - "bad-cb-amount"); - - if (!control.Wait()) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("%s: CheckQueue failed", __func__), "block-validation-failed"); + if (block.vtx[0]->GetValueOut() > blockReward) { + LogPrintf("ERROR: ConnectBlock(): coinbase pays too much (actual=%d vs limit=%d)\n", block.vtx[0]->GetValueOut(), blockReward); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cb-amount"); + } + + if (!control.Wait()) { + LogPrintf("ERROR: %s: CheckQueue failed\n", __func__); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "block-validation-failed"); + } int64_t nTime4 = GetTimeMicros(); nTimeVerify += nTime4 - nTime2; LogPrint(BCLog::BENCH, " - Verify %u txins: %.2fms (%.3fms/txin) [%.2fs (%.2fms/blk)]\n", nInputs - 1, MILLI * (nTime4 - nTime2), nInputs <= 1 ? 0 : MILLI * (nTime4 - nTime2) / (nInputs-1), nTimeVerify * MICRO, nTimeVerify * MILLI / nBlocksTotal); @@ -2206,7 +2188,7 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl bool CChainState::FlushStateToDisk( const CChainParams& chainparams, - CValidationState &state, + BlockValidationState &state, FlushStateMode mode, int nManualPruneHeight) { @@ -2317,7 +2299,7 @@ bool CChainState::FlushStateToDisk( } void CChainState::ForceFlushStateToDisk() { - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); if (!this->FlushStateToDisk(chainparams, state, FlushStateMode::ALWAYS)) { LogPrintf("%s: failed to flush state (%s)\n", __func__, FormatStateMessage(state)); @@ -2325,7 +2307,7 @@ void CChainState::ForceFlushStateToDisk() { } void CChainState::PruneAndFlush() { - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; fCheckForPruning = true; const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); @@ -2411,7 +2393,7 @@ void static UpdateTip(const CBlockIndex* pindexNew, const CChainParams& chainPar * disconnectpool (note that the caller is responsible for mempool consistency * in any case). */ -bool CChainState::DisconnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, DisconnectedBlockTransactions *disconnectpool) +bool CChainState::DisconnectTip(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, DisconnectedBlockTransactions *disconnectpool) { CBlockIndex *pindexDelete = m_chain.Tip(); assert(pindexDelete); @@ -2531,7 +2513,7 @@ public: * * The block is added to connectTrace if connection succeeds. */ -bool CChainState::ConnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexNew, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, ConnectTrace& connectTrace, DisconnectedBlockTransactions &disconnectpool) +bool CChainState::ConnectTip(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexNew, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, ConnectTrace& connectTrace, DisconnectedBlockTransactions &disconnectpool) { assert(pindexNew->pprev == m_chain.Tip()); // Read block from disk. @@ -2663,7 +2645,7 @@ void CChainState::PruneBlockIndexCandidates() { * * @returns true unless a system error occurred */ -bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexMostWork, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, bool& fInvalidFound, ConnectTrace& connectTrace) +bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexMostWork, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, bool& fInvalidFound, ConnectTrace& connectTrace) { AssertLockHeld(cs_main); @@ -2710,10 +2692,10 @@ bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainPar if (!ConnectTip(state, chainparams, pindexConnect, pindexConnect == pindexMostWork ? pblock : std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>(), connectTrace, disconnectpool)) { if (state.IsInvalid()) { // The block violates a consensus rule. - if (state.GetReason() != ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED) { + if (state.GetResult() != BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED) { InvalidChainFound(vpindexToConnect.front()); } - state = CValidationState(); + state = BlockValidationState(); fInvalidFound = true; fContinue = false; break; @@ -2781,7 +2763,7 @@ static void LimitValidationInterfaceQueue() LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) { } } -bool CChainState::ActivateBestChain(CValidationState &state, const CChainParams& chainparams, std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> pblock) { +bool CChainState::ActivateBestChain(BlockValidationState &state, const CChainParams& chainparams, std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> pblock) { // Note that while we're often called here from ProcessNewBlock, this is // far from a guarantee. Things in the P2P/RPC will often end up calling // us in the middle of ProcessNewBlock - do not assume pblock is set @@ -2881,11 +2863,11 @@ bool CChainState::ActivateBestChain(CValidationState &state, const CChainParams& return true; } -bool ActivateBestChain(CValidationState &state, const CChainParams& chainparams, std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> pblock) { +bool ActivateBestChain(BlockValidationState &state, const CChainParams& chainparams, std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> pblock) { return ::ChainstateActive().ActivateBestChain(state, chainparams, std::move(pblock)); } -bool CChainState::PreciousBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& params, CBlockIndex *pindex) +bool CChainState::PreciousBlock(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& params, CBlockIndex *pindex) { { LOCK(cs_main); @@ -2913,11 +2895,11 @@ bool CChainState::PreciousBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& par return ActivateBestChain(state, params, std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>()); } -bool PreciousBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& params, CBlockIndex *pindex) { +bool PreciousBlock(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& params, CBlockIndex *pindex) { return ::ChainstateActive().PreciousBlock(state, params, pindex); } -bool CChainState::InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex *pindex) +bool CChainState::InvalidateBlock(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex *pindex) { CBlockIndex* to_mark_failed = pindex; bool pindex_was_in_chain = false; @@ -3053,7 +3035,7 @@ bool CChainState::InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c return true; } -bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex *pindex) { +bool InvalidateBlock(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex *pindex) { return ::ChainstateActive().InvalidateBlock(state, chainparams, pindex); } @@ -3227,7 +3209,7 @@ static bool FindBlockPos(FlatFilePos &pos, unsigned int nAddSize, unsigned int n return true; } -static bool FindUndoPos(CValidationState &state, int nFile, FlatFilePos &pos, unsigned int nAddSize) +static bool FindUndoPos(BlockValidationState &state, int nFile, FlatFilePos &pos, unsigned int nAddSize) { pos.nFile = nFile; @@ -3249,16 +3231,16 @@ static bool FindUndoPos(CValidationState &state, int nFile, FlatFilePos &pos, un return true; } -static bool CheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, bool fCheckPOW = true) +static bool CheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValidationState& state, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, bool fCheckPOW = true) { // Check proof of work matches claimed amount if (fCheckPOW && !CheckProofOfWork(block.GetHash(), block.nBits, consensusParams)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, false, "high-hash", "proof of work failed"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, "high-hash", "proof of work failed"); return true; } -bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, bool fCheckPOW, bool fCheckMerkleRoot) +bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, BlockValidationState& state, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, bool fCheckPOW, bool fCheckMerkleRoot) { // These are checks that are independent of context. @@ -3275,13 +3257,13 @@ bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::P bool mutated; uint256 hashMerkleRoot2 = BlockMerkleRoot(block, &mutated); if (block.hashMerkleRoot != hashMerkleRoot2) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, "bad-txnmrklroot", "hashMerkleRoot mismatch"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED, "bad-txnmrklroot", "hashMerkleRoot mismatch"); // Check for merkle tree malleability (CVE-2012-2459): repeating sequences // of transactions in a block without affecting the merkle root of a block, // while still invalidating it. if (mutated) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, "bad-txns-duplicate", "duplicate transaction"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED, "bad-txns-duplicate", "duplicate transaction"); } // All potential-corruption validation must be done before we do any @@ -3292,28 +3274,34 @@ bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::P // Size limits if (block.vtx.empty() || block.vtx.size() * WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR > MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT || ::GetSerializeSize(block, PROTOCOL_VERSION | SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS) * WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR > MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "bad-blk-length", "size limits failed"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-blk-length", "size limits failed"); // First transaction must be coinbase, the rest must not be if (block.vtx.empty() || !block.vtx[0]->IsCoinBase()) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "bad-cb-missing", "first tx is not coinbase"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cb-missing", "first tx is not coinbase"); for (unsigned int i = 1; i < block.vtx.size(); i++) if (block.vtx[i]->IsCoinBase()) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "bad-cb-multiple", "more than one coinbase"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cb-multiple", "more than one coinbase"); // Check transactions - for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) - if (!CheckTransaction(*tx, state)) - return state.Invalid(state.GetReason(), false, state.GetRejectReason(), - strprintf("Transaction check failed (tx hash %s) %s", tx->GetHash().ToString(), state.GetDebugMessage())); - + // Must check for duplicate inputs (see CVE-2018-17144) + for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) { + TxValidationState tx_state; + if (!CheckTransaction(*tx, tx_state)) { + // CheckBlock() does context-free validation checks. The only + // possible failures are consensus failures. + assert(tx_state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_CONSENSUS); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, tx_state.GetRejectReason(), + strprintf("Transaction check failed (tx hash %s) %s", tx->GetHash().ToString(), tx_state.GetDebugMessage())); + } + } unsigned int nSigOps = 0; for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) { nSigOps += GetLegacySigOpCount(*tx); } if (nSigOps * WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR > MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "bad-blk-sigops", "out-of-bounds SigOpCount"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-blk-sigops", "out-of-bounds SigOpCount"); if (fCheckPOW && fCheckMerkleRoot) block.fChecked = true; @@ -3406,7 +3394,7 @@ static CBlockIndex* GetLastCheckpoint(const CCheckpointData& data) EXCLUSIVE_LOC * in ConnectBlock(). * Note that -reindex-chainstate skips the validation that happens here! */ -static bool ContextualCheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& params, const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, int64_t nAdjustedTime) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) +static bool ContextualCheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& params, const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, int64_t nAdjustedTime) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) { assert(pindexPrev != nullptr); const int nHeight = pindexPrev->nHeight + 1; @@ -3414,7 +3402,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationSta // Check proof of work const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = params.GetConsensus(); if (block.nBits != GetNextWorkRequired(pindexPrev, &block, consensusParams)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, false, "bad-diffbits", "incorrect proof of work"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, "bad-diffbits", "incorrect proof of work"); // Check against checkpoints if (fCheckpointsEnabled) { @@ -3422,24 +3410,26 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationSta // GetLastCheckpoint finds the last checkpoint in MapCheckpoints that's in our // g_blockman.m_block_index. CBlockIndex* pcheckpoint = GetLastCheckpoint(params.Checkpoints()); - if (pcheckpoint && nHeight < pcheckpoint->nHeight) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_CHECKPOINT, error("%s: forked chain older than last checkpoint (height %d)", __func__, nHeight), "bad-fork-prior-to-checkpoint"); + if (pcheckpoint && nHeight < pcheckpoint->nHeight) { + LogPrintf("ERROR: %s: forked chain older than last checkpoint (height %d)\n", __func__, nHeight); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CHECKPOINT, "bad-fork-prior-to-checkpoint"); + } } // Check timestamp against prev if (block.GetBlockTime() <= pindexPrev->GetMedianTimePast()) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, false, "time-too-old", "block's timestamp is too early"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, "time-too-old", "block's timestamp is too early"); // Check timestamp if (block.GetBlockTime() > nAdjustedTime + MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE, false, "time-too-new", "block timestamp too far in the future"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE, "time-too-new", "block timestamp too far in the future"); // Reject outdated version blocks when 95% (75% on testnet) of the network has upgraded: // check for version 2, 3 and 4 upgrades if((block.nVersion < 2 && nHeight >= consensusParams.BIP34Height) || (block.nVersion < 3 && nHeight >= consensusParams.BIP66Height) || (block.nVersion < 4 && nHeight >= consensusParams.BIP65Height)) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, false, strprintf("bad-version(0x%08x)", block.nVersion), + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, strprintf("bad-version(0x%08x)", block.nVersion), strprintf("rejected nVersion=0x%08x block", block.nVersion)); return true; @@ -3451,7 +3441,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationSta * in ConnectBlock(). * Note that -reindex-chainstate skips the validation that happens here! */ -static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev) +static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, BlockValidationState& state, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev) { const int nHeight = pindexPrev == nullptr ? 0 : pindexPrev->nHeight + 1; @@ -3469,7 +3459,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c // Check that all transactions are finalized for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) { if (!IsFinalTx(*tx, nHeight, nLockTimeCutoff)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "bad-txns-nonfinal", "non-final transaction"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-txns-nonfinal", "non-final transaction"); } } @@ -3479,7 +3469,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c CScript expect = CScript() << nHeight; if (block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptSig.size() < expect.size() || !std::equal(expect.begin(), expect.end(), block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptSig.begin())) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "bad-cb-height", "block height mismatch in coinbase"); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cb-height", "block height mismatch in coinbase"); } } @@ -3501,11 +3491,11 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c // already does not permit it, it is impossible to trigger in the // witness tree. if (block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptWitness.stack.size() != 1 || block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptWitness.stack[0].size() != 32) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, "bad-witness-nonce-size", strprintf("%s : invalid witness reserved value size", __func__)); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED, "bad-witness-nonce-size", strprintf("%s : invalid witness reserved value size", __func__)); } CHash256().Write(hashWitness.begin(), 32).Write(&block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptWitness.stack[0][0], 32).Finalize(hashWitness.begin()); if (memcmp(hashWitness.begin(), &block.vtx[0]->vout[commitpos].scriptPubKey[6], 32)) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, "bad-witness-merkle-match", strprintf("%s : witness merkle commitment mismatch", __func__)); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED, "bad-witness-merkle-match", strprintf("%s : witness merkle commitment mismatch", __func__)); } fHaveWitness = true; } @@ -3515,7 +3505,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c if (!fHaveWitness) { for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) { if (tx->HasWitness()) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, "unexpected-witness", strprintf("%s : unexpected witness data found", __func__)); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED, "unexpected-witness", strprintf("%s : unexpected witness data found", __func__)); } } } @@ -3527,13 +3517,13 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c // the block hash, so we couldn't mark the block as permanently // failed). if (GetBlockWeight(block) > MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT) { - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, "bad-blk-weight", strprintf("%s : weight limit failed", __func__)); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-blk-weight", strprintf("%s : weight limit failed", __func__)); } return true; } -bool BlockManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex** ppindex) +bool BlockManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex** ppindex) { AssertLockHeld(cs_main); // Check for duplicate @@ -3546,8 +3536,10 @@ bool BlockManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState pindex = miSelf->second; if (ppindex) *ppindex = pindex; - if (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CACHED_INVALID, error("%s: block %s is marked invalid", __func__, hash.ToString()), "duplicate"); + if (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) { + LogPrintf("ERROR: %s: block %s is marked invalid\n", __func__, hash.ToString()); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CACHED_INVALID, "duplicate"); + } return true; } @@ -3557,11 +3549,15 @@ bool BlockManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState // Get prev block index CBlockIndex* pindexPrev = nullptr; BlockMap::iterator mi = m_block_index.find(block.hashPrevBlock); - if (mi == m_block_index.end()) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MISSING_PREV, error("%s: prev block not found", __func__), "prev-blk-not-found"); + if (mi == m_block_index.end()) { + LogPrintf("ERROR: %s: prev block not found\n", __func__); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MISSING_PREV, "prev-blk-not-found"); + } pindexPrev = (*mi).second; - if (pindexPrev->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), "bad-prevblk"); + if (pindexPrev->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) { + LogPrintf("ERROR: %s: prev block invalid\n", __func__); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV, "bad-prevblk"); + } if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime())) return error("%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); @@ -3598,7 +3594,8 @@ bool BlockManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(invalid_walk); invalid_walk = invalid_walk->pprev; } - return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), "bad-prevblk"); + LogPrintf("ERROR: %s: prev block invalid\n", __func__); + return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV, "bad-prevblk"); } } } @@ -3613,9 +3610,8 @@ bool BlockManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState } // Exposed wrapper for AcceptBlockHeader -bool ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlockIndex** ppindex, CBlockHeader *first_invalid) +bool ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlockIndex** ppindex) { - if (first_invalid != nullptr) first_invalid->SetNull(); { LOCK(cs_main); for (const CBlockHeader& header : headers) { @@ -3624,7 +3620,6 @@ bool ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, CValidatio ::ChainstateActive().CheckBlockIndex(chainparams.GetConsensus()); if (!accepted) { - if (first_invalid) *first_invalid = header; return false; } if (ppindex) { @@ -3660,7 +3655,7 @@ static FlatFilePos SaveBlockToDisk(const CBlock& block, int nHeight, const CChai } /** Store block on disk. If dbp is non-nullptr, the file is known to already reside on disk */ -bool CChainState::AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex** ppindex, bool fRequested, const FlatFilePos* dbp, bool* fNewBlock) +bool CChainState::AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex** ppindex, bool fRequested, const FlatFilePos* dbp, bool* fNewBlock) { const CBlock& block = *pblock; @@ -3710,8 +3705,7 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, CVali if (!CheckBlock(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus()) || !ContextualCheckBlock(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus(), pindex->pprev)) { - assert(IsBlockReason(state.GetReason())); - if (state.IsInvalid() && state.GetReason() != ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED) { + if (state.IsInvalid() && state.GetResult() != BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED) { pindex->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_VALID; setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindex); } @@ -3750,7 +3744,7 @@ bool ProcessNewBlock(const CChainParams& chainparams, const std::shared_ptr<cons { CBlockIndex *pindex = nullptr; if (fNewBlock) *fNewBlock = false; - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; // CheckBlock() does not support multi-threaded block validation because CBlock::fChecked can cause data race. // Therefore, the following critical section must include the CheckBlock() call as well. @@ -3771,14 +3765,14 @@ bool ProcessNewBlock(const CChainParams& chainparams, const std::shared_ptr<cons NotifyHeaderTip(); - CValidationState state; // Only used to report errors, not invalidity - ignore it + BlockValidationState state; // Only used to report errors, not invalidity - ignore it if (!::ChainstateActive().ActivateBestChain(state, chainparams, pblock)) return error("%s: ActivateBestChain failed (%s)", __func__, FormatStateMessage(state)); return true; } -bool TestBlockValidity(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlock& block, CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, bool fCheckPOW, bool fCheckMerkleRoot) +bool TestBlockValidity(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlock& block, CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, bool fCheckPOW, bool fCheckMerkleRoot) { AssertLockHeld(cs_main); assert(pindexPrev && pindexPrev == ::ChainActive().Tip()); @@ -3889,7 +3883,7 @@ static void FindFilesToPruneManual(std::set<int>& setFilesToPrune, int nManualPr /* This function is called from the RPC code for pruneblockchain */ void PruneBlockFilesManual(int nManualPruneHeight) { - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); if (!::ChainstateActive().FlushStateToDisk( chainparams, state, FlushStateMode::NONE, nManualPruneHeight)) { @@ -4185,7 +4179,7 @@ bool CVerifyDB::VerifyDB(const CChainParams& chainparams, CCoinsView *coinsview, CBlockIndex* pindex; CBlockIndex* pindexFailure = nullptr; int nGoodTransactions = 0; - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; int reportDone = 0; LogPrintf("[0%%]..."); /* Continued */ for (pindex = ::ChainActive().Tip(); pindex && pindex->pprev; pindex = pindex->pprev) { @@ -4429,7 +4423,7 @@ bool CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(const CChainParams& params) } // nHeight is now the height of the first insufficiently-validated block, or tipheight + 1 - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; // Loop until the tip is below nHeight, or we reach a pruned block. while (!ShutdownRequested()) { { @@ -4497,7 +4491,7 @@ bool RewindBlockIndex(const CChainParams& params) { // FlushStateToDisk can possibly read ::ChainActive(). Be conservative // and skip it here, we're about to -reindex-chainstate anyway, so // it'll get called a bunch real soon. - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; if (!::ChainstateActive().FlushStateToDisk(params, state, FlushStateMode::ALWAYS)) { LogPrintf("RewindBlockIndex: unable to flush state to disk (%s)\n", FormatStateMessage(state)); return false; @@ -4649,7 +4643,7 @@ bool LoadExternalBlockFile(const CChainParams& chainparams, FILE* fileIn, FlatFi // process in case the block isn't known yet CBlockIndex* pindex = LookupBlockIndex(hash); if (!pindex || (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA) == 0) { - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; if (::ChainstateActive().AcceptBlock(pblock, state, chainparams, nullptr, true, dbp, nullptr)) { nLoaded++; } @@ -4663,7 +4657,7 @@ bool LoadExternalBlockFile(const CChainParams& chainparams, FILE* fileIn, FlatFi // Activate the genesis block so normal node progress can continue if (hash == chainparams.GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock) { - CValidationState state; + BlockValidationState state; if (!ActivateBestChain(state, chainparams)) { break; } @@ -4686,7 +4680,7 @@ bool LoadExternalBlockFile(const CChainParams& chainparams, FILE* fileIn, FlatFi LogPrint(BCLog::REINDEX, "%s: Processing out of order child %s of %s\n", __func__, pblockrecursive->GetHash().ToString(), head.ToString()); LOCK(cs_main); - CValidationState dummy; + BlockValidationState dummy; if (::ChainstateActive().AcceptBlock(pblockrecursive, dummy, chainparams, nullptr, true, &it->second, nullptr)) { nLoaded++; @@ -4963,10 +4957,10 @@ bool LoadMempool(CTxMemPool& pool) if (amountdelta) { pool.PrioritiseTransaction(tx->GetHash(), amountdelta); } - CValidationState state; + TxValidationState state; if (nTime + nExpiryTimeout > nNow) { LOCK(cs_main); - AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime(chainparams, pool, state, tx, nullptr /* pfMissingInputs */, nTime, + AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime(chainparams, pool, state, tx, nTime, nullptr /* plTxnReplaced */, false /* bypass_limits */, 0 /* nAbsurdFee */, false /* test_accept */); if (state.IsValid()) { |