diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/validation.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/validation.cpp | 131 |
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 57 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index 0951b3cf97..5f6d578c2b 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -579,28 +579,28 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool // Coinbase is only valid in a block, not as a loose transaction if (tx.IsCoinBase()) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "coinbase"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "coinbase"); // Rather not work on nonstandard transactions (unless -testnet/-regtest) std::string reason; if (fRequireStandard && !IsStandardTx(tx, reason)) - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, reason); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, reason); // Do not work on transactions that are too small. // A transaction with 1 segwit input and 1 P2WPHK output has non-witness size of 82 bytes. // Transactions smaller than this are not relayed to reduce unnecessary malloc overhead. if (::GetSerializeSize(tx, PROTOCOL_VERSION | SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS) < MIN_STANDARD_TX_NONWITNESS_SIZE) - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "tx-size-small"); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "tx-size-small"); // Only accept nLockTime-using transactions that can be mined in the next // block; we don't want our mempool filled up with transactions that can't // be mined yet. if (!CheckFinalTx(tx, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS)) - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "non-final"); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "non-final"); // is it already in the memory pool? if (pool.exists(hash)) { - return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_DUPLICATE, "txn-already-in-mempool"); + return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_CONFLICT, false, REJECT_DUPLICATE, "txn-already-in-mempool"); } // Check for conflicts with in-memory transactions @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool } } if (fReplacementOptOut) { - return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_DUPLICATE, "txn-mempool-conflict"); + return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_DUPLICATE, "txn-mempool-conflict"); } setConflicts.insert(ptxConflicting->GetHash()); @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool for (size_t out = 0; out < tx.vout.size(); out++) { // Optimistically just do efficient check of cache for outputs if (pcoinsTip->HaveCoinInCache(COutPoint(hash, out))) { - return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_DUPLICATE, "txn-already-known"); + return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_CONFLICT, false, REJECT_DUPLICATE, "txn-already-known"); } } // Otherwise assume this might be an orphan tx for which we just haven't seen parents yet @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool // Must keep pool.cs for this unless we change CheckSequenceLocks to take a // CoinsViewCache instead of create its own if (!CheckSequenceLocks(pool, tx, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS, &lp)) - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "non-BIP68-final"); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "non-BIP68-final"); CAmount nFees = 0; if (!Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, view, GetSpendHeight(view), nFees)) { @@ -694,11 +694,11 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool // Check for non-standard pay-to-script-hash in inputs if (fRequireStandard && !AreInputsStandard(tx, view)) - return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "bad-txns-nonstandard-inputs"); + return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "bad-txns-nonstandard-inputs"); // Check for non-standard witness in P2WSH if (tx.HasWitness() && fRequireStandard && !IsWitnessStandard(tx, view)) - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "bad-witness-nonstandard", true); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "bad-witness-nonstandard", true); int64_t nSigOpsCost = GetTransactionSigOpCost(tx, view, STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS); @@ -722,21 +722,21 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool unsigned int nSize = entry.GetTxSize(); if (nSigOpsCost > MAX_STANDARD_TX_SIGOPS_COST) - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "bad-txns-too-many-sigops", false, + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "bad-txns-too-many-sigops", false, strprintf("%d", nSigOpsCost)); CAmount mempoolRejectFee = pool.GetMinFee(gArgs.GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000).GetFee(nSize); if (!bypass_limits && mempoolRejectFee > 0 && nModifiedFees < mempoolRejectFee) { - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "mempool min fee not met", false, strprintf("%d < %d", nModifiedFees, mempoolRejectFee)); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "mempool min fee not met", false, strprintf("%d < %d", nModifiedFees, mempoolRejectFee)); } // No transactions are allowed below minRelayTxFee except from disconnected blocks if (!bypass_limits && nModifiedFees < ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize)) { - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "min relay fee not met", false, strprintf("%d < %d", nModifiedFees, ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "min relay fee not met", false, strprintf("%d < %d", nModifiedFees, ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))); } if (nAbsurdFee && nFees > nAbsurdFee) - return state.Invalid(false, + return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, REJECT_HIGHFEE, "absurdly-high-fee", strprintf("%d > %d", nFees, nAbsurdFee)); @@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool size_t nLimitDescendantSize = gArgs.GetArg("-limitdescendantsize", DEFAULT_DESCENDANT_SIZE_LIMIT)*1000; std::string errString; if (!pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, setAncestors, nLimitAncestors, nLimitAncestorSize, nLimitDescendants, nLimitDescendantSize, errString)) { - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too-long-mempool-chain", false, errString); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too-long-mempool-chain", false, errString); } // A transaction that spends outputs that would be replaced by it is invalid. Now @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool const uint256 &hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash(); if (setConflicts.count(hashAncestor)) { - return state.DoS(100, false, + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", false, strprintf("%s spends conflicting transaction %s", hash.ToString(), @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize()); if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate) { - return state.DoS(0, false, + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false, strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s", hash.ToString(), @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize(); } } else { - return state.DoS(0, false, + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false, strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n", hash.ToString(), @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool // it's cheaper to just check if the new input refers to a // tx that's in the mempool. if (pool.exists(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash)) { - return state.DoS(0, false, + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", false, strprintf("replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d", hash.ToString(), j)); @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool // transactions would not be paid for. if (nModifiedFees < nConflictingFees) { - return state.DoS(0, false, + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false, strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s", hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nModifiedFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees))); @@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool CAmount nDeltaFees = nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees; if (nDeltaFees < ::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(nSize)) { - return state.DoS(0, false, + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false, strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s", hash.ToString(), @@ -898,7 +898,8 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool if (!tx.HasWitness() && CheckInputs(tx, stateDummy, view, true, scriptVerifyFlags & ~(SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS | SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK), true, false, txdata) && !CheckInputs(tx, stateDummy, view, true, scriptVerifyFlags & ~SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK, true, false, txdata)) { // Only the witness is missing, so the transaction itself may be fine. - state.SetCorruptionPossible(); + state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED, false, + state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), true, state.GetDebugMessage()); } return false; // state filled in by CheckInputs } @@ -956,7 +957,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool if (!bypass_limits) { LimitMempoolSize(pool, gArgs.GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000, gArgs.GetArg("-mempoolexpiry", DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY) * 60 * 60); if (!pool.exists(hash)) - return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "mempool full"); + return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "mempool full"); } } @@ -1357,6 +1358,9 @@ void InitScriptExecutionCache() { * which are matched. This is useful for checking blocks where we will likely never need the cache * entry again. * + * Note that we may set state.reason to NOT_STANDARD for extra soft-fork flags in flags, block-checking + * callers should probably reset it to CONSENSUS in such cases. + * * Non-static (and re-declared) in src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp */ bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, const CCoinsViewCache &inputs, bool fScriptChecks, unsigned int flags, bool cacheSigStore, bool cacheFullScriptStore, PrecomputedTransactionData& txdata, std::vector<CScriptCheck> *pvChecks) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) @@ -1418,7 +1422,7 @@ bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, const CCoinsVi CScriptCheck check2(coin.out, tx, i, flags & ~STANDARD_NOT_MANDATORY_VERIFY_FLAGS, cacheSigStore, &txdata); if (check2()) - return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, strprintf("non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (%s)", ScriptErrorString(check.GetScriptError()))); + return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, strprintf("non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (%s)", ScriptErrorString(check.GetScriptError()))); } // Failures of other flags indicate a transaction that is // invalid in new blocks, e.g. an invalid P2SH. We DoS ban @@ -1427,7 +1431,7 @@ bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, const CCoinsVi // as to the correct behavior - we may want to continue // peering with non-upgraded nodes even after soft-fork // super-majority signaling has occurred. - return state.DoS(100,false, REJECT_INVALID, strprintf("mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (%s)", ScriptErrorString(check.GetScriptError()))); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, strprintf("mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (%s)", ScriptErrorString(check.GetScriptError()))); } } @@ -1922,7 +1926,7 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) { for (size_t o = 0; o < tx->vout.size(); o++) { if (view.HaveCoin(COutPoint(tx->GetHash(), o))) { - return state.DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock(): tried to overwrite transaction"), + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("ConnectBlock(): tried to overwrite transaction"), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-BIP30"); } } @@ -1962,11 +1966,17 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl { CAmount txfee = 0; if (!Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, view, pindex->nHeight, txfee)) { + if (state.GetReason() == ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MISSING_INPUTS) { + // CheckTxInputs may return MISSING_INPUTS but we can't return that, as + // it's not defined for a block, so we reset the reason flag to CONSENSUS here. + state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, + state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), state.CorruptionPossible(), state.GetDebugMessage()); + } return error("%s: Consensus::CheckTxInputs: %s, %s", __func__, tx.GetHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); } nFees += txfee; if (!MoneyRange(nFees)) { - return state.DoS(100, error("%s: accumulated fee in the block out of range.", __func__), + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("%s: accumulated fee in the block out of range.", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-accumulated-fee-outofrange"); } @@ -1979,7 +1989,7 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl } if (!SequenceLocks(tx, nLockTimeFlags, &prevheights, *pindex)) { - return state.DoS(100, error("%s: contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__), + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("%s: contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-nonfinal"); } } @@ -1990,7 +2000,7 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl // * witness (when witness enabled in flags and excludes coinbase) nSigOpsCost += GetTransactionSigOpCost(tx, view, flags); if (nSigOpsCost > MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST) - return state.DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock(): too many sigops"), + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("ConnectBlock(): too many sigops"), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-blk-sigops"); txdata.emplace_back(tx); @@ -1999,9 +2009,16 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl std::vector<CScriptCheck> vChecks; bool fCacheResults = fJustCheck; /* Don't cache results if we're actually connecting blocks (still consult the cache, though) */ if (!CheckInputs(tx, state, view, fScriptChecks, flags, fCacheResults, fCacheResults, txdata[i], nScriptCheckThreads ? &vChecks : nullptr)) { - // With parallel script checks, we always set DoS to 100; do - // that here as well for simplicity (for now). - state.DoS(100, false, state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), state.CorruptionPossible(), state.GetDebugMessage()); + if (state.GetReason() == ValidationInvalidReason::TX_NOT_STANDARD) { + // CheckInputs may return NOT_STANDARD for extra flags we passed, + // but we can't return that, as it's not defined for a block, so + // we reset the reason flag to CONSENSUS here. + // In the event of a future soft-fork, we may need to + // consider whether rewriting to CONSENSUS or + // RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE would be more appropriate. + state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, + state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), state.CorruptionPossible(), state.GetDebugMessage()); + } return error("ConnectBlock(): CheckInputs on %s failed with %s", tx.GetHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); } @@ -2019,13 +2036,13 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl CAmount blockReward = nFees + GetBlockSubsidy(pindex->nHeight, chainparams.GetConsensus()); if (block.vtx[0]->GetValueOut() > blockReward) - return state.DoS(100, + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("ConnectBlock(): coinbase pays too much (actual=%d vs limit=%d)", block.vtx[0]->GetValueOut(), blockReward), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-cb-amount"); if (!control.Wait()) - return state.DoS(100, error("%s: CheckQueue failed", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "block-validation-failed"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, error("%s: CheckQueue failed", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "block-validation-failed"); int64_t nTime4 = GetTimeMicros(); nTimeVerify += nTime4 - nTime2; LogPrint(BCLog::BENCH, " - Verify %u txins: %.2fms (%.3fms/txin) [%.2fs (%.2fms/blk)]\n", nInputs - 1, MILLI * (nTime4 - nTime2), nInputs <= 1 ? 0 : MILLI * (nTime4 - nTime2) / (nInputs-1), nTimeVerify * MICRO, nTimeVerify * MILLI / nBlocksTotal); @@ -3051,7 +3068,7 @@ static bool CheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state, { // Check proof of work matches claimed amount if (fCheckPOW && !CheckProofOfWork(block.GetHash(), block.nBits, consensusParams)) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "high-hash", false, "proof of work failed"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, false, REJECT_INVALID, "high-hash", false, "proof of work failed"); return true; } @@ -3073,13 +3090,13 @@ bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::P bool mutated; uint256 hashMerkleRoot2 = BlockMerkleRoot(block, &mutated); if (block.hashMerkleRoot != hashMerkleRoot2) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txnmrklroot", true, "hashMerkleRoot mismatch"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txnmrklroot", true, "hashMerkleRoot mismatch"); // Check for merkle tree malleability (CVE-2012-2459): repeating sequences // of transactions in a block without affecting the merkle root of a block, // while still invalidating it. if (mutated) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-duplicate", true, "duplicate transaction"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-duplicate", true, "duplicate transaction"); } // All potential-corruption validation must be done before we do any @@ -3090,19 +3107,19 @@ bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::P // Size limits if (block.vtx.empty() || block.vtx.size() * WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR > MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT || ::GetSerializeSize(block, PROTOCOL_VERSION | SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS) * WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR > MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-blk-length", false, "size limits failed"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-blk-length", false, "size limits failed"); // First transaction must be coinbase, the rest must not be if (block.vtx.empty() || !block.vtx[0]->IsCoinBase()) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-cb-missing", false, "first tx is not coinbase"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-cb-missing", false, "first tx is not coinbase"); for (unsigned int i = 1; i < block.vtx.size(); i++) if (block.vtx[i]->IsCoinBase()) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-cb-multiple", false, "more than one coinbase"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-cb-multiple", false, "more than one coinbase"); // Check transactions for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) if (!CheckTransaction(*tx, state, true)) - return state.Invalid(false, state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), + return state.Invalid(state.GetReason(), false, state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), strprintf("Transaction check failed (tx hash %s) %s", tx->GetHash().ToString(), state.GetDebugMessage())); unsigned int nSigOps = 0; @@ -3111,7 +3128,7 @@ bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::P nSigOps += GetLegacySigOpCount(*tx); } if (nSigOps * WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR > MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-blk-sigops", false, "out-of-bounds SigOpCount"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-blk-sigops", false, "out-of-bounds SigOpCount"); if (fCheckPOW && fCheckMerkleRoot) block.fChecked = true; @@ -3204,7 +3221,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationSta // Check proof of work const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = params.GetConsensus(); if (block.nBits != GetNextWorkRequired(pindexPrev, &block, consensusParams)) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-diffbits", false, "incorrect proof of work"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-diffbits", false, "incorrect proof of work"); // Check against checkpoints if (fCheckpointsEnabled) { @@ -3213,23 +3230,23 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationSta // MapBlockIndex. CBlockIndex* pcheckpoint = Checkpoints::GetLastCheckpoint(params.Checkpoints()); if (pcheckpoint && nHeight < pcheckpoint->nHeight) - return state.DoS(100, error("%s: forked chain older than last checkpoint (height %d)", __func__, nHeight), REJECT_CHECKPOINT, "bad-fork-prior-to-checkpoint"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_CHECKPOINT, error("%s: forked chain older than last checkpoint (height %d)", __func__, nHeight), REJECT_CHECKPOINT, "bad-fork-prior-to-checkpoint"); } // Check timestamp against prev if (block.GetBlockTime() <= pindexPrev->GetMedianTimePast()) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "time-too-old", false, "block's timestamp is too early"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, false, REJECT_INVALID, "time-too-old", false, "block's timestamp is too early"); // Check timestamp if (block.GetBlockTime() > nAdjustedTime + MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME) - return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_INVALID, "time-too-new", "block timestamp too far in the future"); + return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE, false, REJECT_INVALID, "time-too-new", "block timestamp too far in the future"); // Reject outdated version blocks when 95% (75% on testnet) of the network has upgraded: // check for version 2, 3 and 4 upgrades if((block.nVersion < 2 && nHeight >= consensusParams.BIP34Height) || (block.nVersion < 3 && nHeight >= consensusParams.BIP66Height) || (block.nVersion < 4 && nHeight >= consensusParams.BIP65Height)) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_OBSOLETE, strprintf("bad-version(0x%08x)", block.nVersion), false, + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER, false, REJECT_OBSOLETE, strprintf("bad-version(0x%08x)", block.nVersion), false, strprintf("rejected nVersion=0x%08x block", block.nVersion)); return true; @@ -3259,7 +3276,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c // Check that all transactions are finalized for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) { if (!IsFinalTx(*tx, nHeight, nLockTimeCutoff)) { - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-nonfinal", false, "non-final transaction"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-nonfinal", false, "non-final transaction"); } } @@ -3269,7 +3286,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c CScript expect = CScript() << nHeight; if (block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptSig.size() < expect.size() || !std::equal(expect.begin(), expect.end(), block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptSig.begin())) { - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-cb-height", false, "block height mismatch in coinbase"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-cb-height", false, "block height mismatch in coinbase"); } } @@ -3291,11 +3308,11 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c // already does not permit it, it is impossible to trigger in the // witness tree. if (block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptWitness.stack.size() != 1 || block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptWitness.stack[0].size() != 32) { - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-witness-nonce-size", true, strprintf("%s : invalid witness reserved value size", __func__)); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-witness-nonce-size", true, strprintf("%s : invalid witness reserved value size", __func__)); } CHash256().Write(hashWitness.begin(), 32).Write(&block.vtx[0]->vin[0].scriptWitness.stack[0][0], 32).Finalize(hashWitness.begin()); if (memcmp(hashWitness.begin(), &block.vtx[0]->vout[commitpos].scriptPubKey[6], 32)) { - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-witness-merkle-match", true, strprintf("%s : witness merkle commitment mismatch", __func__)); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-witness-merkle-match", true, strprintf("%s : witness merkle commitment mismatch", __func__)); } fHaveWitness = true; } @@ -3305,7 +3322,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c if (!fHaveWitness) { for (const auto& tx : block.vtx) { if (tx->HasWitness()) { - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "unexpected-witness", true, strprintf("%s : unexpected witness data found", __func__)); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MUTATED, false, REJECT_INVALID, "unexpected-witness", true, strprintf("%s : unexpected witness data found", __func__)); } } } @@ -3317,7 +3334,7 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, c // the block hash, so we couldn't mark the block as permanently // failed). if (GetBlockWeight(block) > MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT) { - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-blk-weight", false, strprintf("%s : weight limit failed", __func__)); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-blk-weight", false, strprintf("%s : weight limit failed", __func__)); } return true; @@ -3337,7 +3354,7 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& if (ppindex) *ppindex = pindex; if (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) - return state.Invalid(error("%s: block %s is marked invalid", __func__, hash.ToString()), 0, "duplicate"); + return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CACHED_INVALID, error("%s: block %s is marked invalid", __func__, hash.ToString()), 0, "duplicate"); return true; } @@ -3348,10 +3365,10 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& CBlockIndex* pindexPrev = nullptr; BlockMap::iterator mi = mapBlockIndex.find(block.hashPrevBlock); if (mi == mapBlockIndex.end()) - return state.DoS(10, error("%s: prev block not found", __func__), 0, "prev-blk-not-found"); + return state.DoS(10, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_MISSING_PREV, error("%s: prev block not found", __func__), 0, "prev-blk-not-found"); pindexPrev = (*mi).second; if (pindexPrev->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) - return state.DoS(100, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-prevblk"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-prevblk"); if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime())) return error("%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); @@ -3388,7 +3405,7 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(invalid_walk); invalid_walk = invalid_walk->pprev; } - return state.DoS(100, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-prevblk"); + return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-prevblk"); } } } |