aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/validation.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/validation.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/validation.cpp141
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index 486dc9cc1f..c5d73187b7 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -156,6 +156,26 @@ namespace {
/** chainwork for the last block that preciousblock has been applied to. */
arith_uint256 nLastPreciousChainwork = 0;
+ /** In order to efficiently track invalidity of headers, we keep the set of
+ * blocks which we tried to connect and found to be invalid here (ie which
+ * were set to BLOCK_FAILED_VALID since the last restart). We can then
+ * walk this set and check if a new header is a descendant of something in
+ * this set, preventing us from having to walk mapBlockIndex when we try
+ * to connect a bad block and fail.
+ *
+ * While this is more complicated than marking everything which descends
+ * from an invalid block as invalid at the time we discover it to be
+ * invalid, doing so would require walking all of mapBlockIndex to find all
+ * descendants. Since this case should be very rare, keeping track of all
+ * BLOCK_FAILED_VALID blocks in a set should be just fine and work just as
+ * well.
+ *
+ * Because we already walk mapBlockIndex in height-order at startup, we go
+ * ahead and mark descendants of invalid blocks as FAILED_CHILD at that time,
+ * instead of putting things in this set.
+ */
+ std::set<CBlockIndex*> g_failed_blocks;
+
/** Dirty block index entries. */
std::set<CBlockIndex*> setDirtyBlockIndex;
@@ -181,9 +201,9 @@ CBlockIndex* FindForkInGlobalIndex(const CChain& chain, const CBlockLocator& loc
return chain.Genesis();
}
-CCoinsViewDB *pcoinsdbview = nullptr;
-CCoinsViewCache *pcoinsTip = nullptr;
-CBlockTreeDB *pblocktree = nullptr;
+std::unique_ptr<CCoinsViewDB> pcoinsdbview;
+std::unique_ptr<CCoinsViewCache> pcoinsTip;
+std::unique_ptr<CBlockTreeDB> pblocktree;
enum FlushStateMode {
FLUSH_STATE_NONE,
@@ -275,7 +295,7 @@ bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags, LockPoints* lp, bool
}
else {
// pcoinsTip contains the UTXO set for chainActive.Tip()
- CCoinsViewMemPool viewMemPool(pcoinsTip, mempool);
+ CCoinsViewMemPool viewMemPool(pcoinsTip.get(), mempool);
std::vector<int> prevheights;
prevheights.resize(tx.vin.size());
for (size_t txinIndex = 0; txinIndex < tx.vin.size(); txinIndex++) {
@@ -404,7 +424,7 @@ void UpdateMempoolForReorg(DisconnectedBlockTransactions &disconnectpool, bool f
mempool.UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(vHashUpdate);
// We also need to remove any now-immature transactions
- mempool.removeForReorg(pcoinsTip, chainActive.Tip()->nHeight + 1, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS);
+ mempool.removeForReorg(pcoinsTip.get(), chainActive.Tip()->nHeight + 1, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS);
// Re-limit mempool size, in case we added any transactions
LimitMempoolSize(mempool, gArgs.GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000, gArgs.GetArg("-mempoolexpiry", DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY) * 60 * 60);
}
@@ -537,7 +557,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
LockPoints lp;
{
LOCK(pool.cs);
- CCoinsViewMemPool viewMemPool(pcoinsTip, pool);
+ CCoinsViewMemPool viewMemPool(pcoinsTip.get(), pool);
view.SetBackend(viewMemPool);
// do all inputs exist?
@@ -939,6 +959,9 @@ bool GetTransaction(const uint256 &hash, CTransactionRef &txOut, const Consensus
return error("%s: txid mismatch", __func__);
return true;
}
+
+ // transaction not found in index, nothing more can be done
+ return false;
}
if (fAllowSlow) { // use coin database to locate block that contains transaction, and scan it
@@ -1177,6 +1200,7 @@ void static InvalidChainFound(CBlockIndex* pindexNew)
void static InvalidBlockFound(CBlockIndex *pindex, const CValidationState &state) {
if (!state.CorruptionPossible()) {
pindex->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_VALID;
+ g_failed_blocks.insert(pindex);
setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindex);
setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(pindex);
InvalidChainFound(pindex);
@@ -1587,11 +1611,12 @@ static ThresholdConditionCache warningcache[VERSIONBITS_NUM_BITS];
static unsigned int GetBlockScriptFlags(const CBlockIndex* pindex, const Consensus::Params& consensusparams) {
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
- // BIP16 didn't become active until Apr 1 2012
- int64_t nBIP16SwitchTime = 1333238400;
- bool fStrictPayToScriptHash = (pindex->GetBlockTime() >= nBIP16SwitchTime);
+ unsigned int flags = SCRIPT_VERIFY_NONE;
- unsigned int flags = fStrictPayToScriptHash ? SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH : SCRIPT_VERIFY_NONE;
+ // Start enforcing P2SH (BIP16)
+ if (pindex->nHeight >= consensusparams.BIP16Height) {
+ flags |= SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH;
+ }
// Start enforcing the DERSIG (BIP66) rule
if (pindex->nHeight >= consensusparams.BIP66Height) {
@@ -2080,7 +2105,7 @@ bool static DisconnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainpara
// Apply the block atomically to the chain state.
int64_t nStart = GetTimeMicros();
{
- CCoinsViewCache view(pcoinsTip);
+ CCoinsViewCache view(pcoinsTip.get());
assert(view.GetBestBlock() == pindexDelete->GetBlockHash());
if (DisconnectBlock(block, pindexDelete, view) != DISCONNECT_OK)
return error("DisconnectTip(): DisconnectBlock %s failed", pindexDelete->GetBlockHash().ToString());
@@ -2210,7 +2235,7 @@ bool static ConnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams,
int64_t nTime3;
LogPrint(BCLog::BENCH, " - Load block from disk: %.2fms [%.2fs]\n", (nTime2 - nTime1) * MILLI, nTimeReadFromDisk * MICRO);
{
- CCoinsViewCache view(pcoinsTip);
+ CCoinsViewCache view(pcoinsTip.get());
bool rv = ConnectBlock(blockConnecting, state, pindexNew, view, chainparams);
GetMainSignals().BlockChecked(blockConnecting, state);
if (!rv) {
@@ -2388,7 +2413,7 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c
// any disconnected transactions back to the mempool.
UpdateMempoolForReorg(disconnectpool, true);
}
- mempool.check(pcoinsTip);
+ mempool.check(pcoinsTip.get());
// Callbacks/notifications for a new best chain.
if (fInvalidFound)
@@ -2530,17 +2555,18 @@ bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C
{
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
- // Mark the block itself as invalid.
- pindex->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_VALID;
- setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindex);
- setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(pindex);
+ // We first disconnect backwards and then mark the blocks as invalid.
+ // This prevents a case where pruned nodes may fail to invalidateblock
+ // and be left unable to start as they have no tip candidates (as there
+ // are no blocks that meet the "have data and are not invalid per
+ // nStatus" criteria for inclusion in setBlockIndexCandidates).
+
+ bool pindex_was_in_chain = false;
+ CBlockIndex *invalid_walk_tip = chainActive.Tip();
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool;
while (chainActive.Contains(pindex)) {
- CBlockIndex *pindexWalk = chainActive.Tip();
- pindexWalk->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD;
- setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindexWalk);
- setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(pindexWalk);
+ pindex_was_in_chain = true;
// ActivateBestChain considers blocks already in chainActive
// unconditionally valid already, so force disconnect away from it.
if (!DisconnectTip(state, chainparams, &disconnectpool)) {
@@ -2551,6 +2577,21 @@ bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C
}
}
+ // Now mark the blocks we just disconnected as descendants invalid
+ // (note this may not be all descendants).
+ while (pindex_was_in_chain && invalid_walk_tip != pindex) {
+ invalid_walk_tip->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD;
+ setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(invalid_walk_tip);
+ setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(invalid_walk_tip);
+ invalid_walk_tip = invalid_walk_tip->pprev;
+ }
+
+ // Mark the block itself as invalid.
+ pindex->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_VALID;
+ setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindex);
+ setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(pindex);
+ g_failed_blocks.insert(pindex);
+
// DisconnectTip will add transactions to disconnectpool; try to add these
// back to the mempool.
UpdateMempoolForReorg(disconnectpool, true);
@@ -2588,6 +2629,7 @@ bool ResetBlockFailureFlags(CBlockIndex *pindex) {
// Reset invalid block marker if it was pointing to one of those.
pindexBestInvalid = nullptr;
}
+ g_failed_blocks.erase(it->second);
}
it++;
}
@@ -3063,6 +3105,21 @@ static bool AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state
return state.DoS(100, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-prevblk");
if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime()))
return error("%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
+
+ if (!pindexPrev->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS)) {
+ for (const CBlockIndex* failedit : g_failed_blocks) {
+ if (pindexPrev->GetAncestor(failedit->nHeight) == failedit) {
+ assert(failedit->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_VALID);
+ CBlockIndex* invalid_walk = pindexPrev;
+ while (invalid_walk != failedit) {
+ invalid_walk->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD;
+ setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(invalid_walk);
+ invalid_walk = invalid_walk->pprev;
+ }
+ return state.DoS(100, error("%s: prev block invalid", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-prevblk");
+ }
+ }
+ }
}
if (pindex == nullptr)
pindex = AddToBlockIndex(block);
@@ -3076,13 +3133,15 @@ static bool AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state
}
// Exposed wrapper for AcceptBlockHeader
-bool ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlockIndex** ppindex)
+bool ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlockIndex** ppindex, CBlockHeader *first_invalid)
{
+ if (first_invalid != nullptr) first_invalid->SetNull();
{
LOCK(cs_main);
for (const CBlockHeader& header : headers) {
CBlockIndex *pindex = nullptr; // Use a temp pindex instead of ppindex to avoid a const_cast
if (!AcceptBlockHeader(header, state, chainparams, &pindex)) {
+ if (first_invalid) *first_invalid = header;
return false;
}
if (ppindex) {
@@ -3112,7 +3171,7 @@ static bool AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, CValidation
// process an unrequested block if it's new and has enough work to
// advance our tip, and isn't too many blocks ahead.
bool fAlreadyHave = pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA;
- bool fHasMoreWork = (chainActive.Tip() ? pindex->nChainWork > chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork : true);
+ bool fHasMoreOrSameWork = (chainActive.Tip() ? pindex->nChainWork >= chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork : true);
// Blocks that are too out-of-order needlessly limit the effectiveness of
// pruning, because pruning will not delete block files that contain any
// blocks which are too close in height to the tip. Apply this test
@@ -3129,9 +3188,15 @@ static bool AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, CValidation
// and unrequested blocks.
if (fAlreadyHave) return true;
if (!fRequested) { // If we didn't ask for it:
- if (pindex->nTx != 0) return true; // This is a previously-processed block that was pruned
- if (!fHasMoreWork) return true; // Don't process less-work chains
- if (fTooFarAhead) return true; // Block height is too high
+ if (pindex->nTx != 0) return true; // This is a previously-processed block that was pruned
+ if (!fHasMoreOrSameWork) return true; // Don't process less-work chains
+ if (fTooFarAhead) return true; // Block height is too high
+
+ // Protect against DoS attacks from low-work chains.
+ // If our tip is behind, a peer could try to send us
+ // low-work blocks on a fake chain that we would never
+ // request; don't process these.
+ if (pindex->nChainWork < nMinimumChainWork) return true;
}
if (fNewBlock) *fNewBlock = true;
@@ -3210,7 +3275,7 @@ bool TestBlockValidity(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams,
{
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
assert(pindexPrev && pindexPrev == chainActive.Tip());
- CCoinsViewCache viewNew(pcoinsTip);
+ CCoinsViewCache viewNew(pcoinsTip.get());
CBlockIndex indexDummy(block);
indexDummy.pprev = pindexPrev;
indexDummy.nHeight = pindexPrev->nHeight + 1;
@@ -3483,6 +3548,10 @@ bool static LoadBlockIndexDB(const CChainParams& chainparams)
pindex->nChainTx = pindex->nTx;
}
}
+ if (!(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) && pindex->pprev && (pindex->pprev->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK)) {
+ pindex->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD;
+ setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindex);
+ }
if (pindex->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS) && (pindex->nChainTx || pindex->pprev == nullptr))
setBlockIndexCandidates.insert(pindex);
if (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK && (!pindexBestInvalid || pindex->nChainWork > pindexBestInvalid->nChainWork))
@@ -3873,6 +3942,7 @@ void UnloadBlockIndex()
nLastBlockFile = 0;
nBlockSequenceId = 1;
setDirtyBlockIndex.clear();
+ g_failed_blocks.clear();
setDirtyFileInfo.clear();
versionbitscache.Clear();
for (int b = 0; b < VERSIONBITS_NUM_BITS; b++) {
@@ -4287,8 +4357,9 @@ bool LoadMempool(void)
}
int64_t count = 0;
- int64_t skipped = 0;
+ int64_t expired = 0;
int64_t failed = 0;
+ int64_t already_there = 0;
int64_t nNow = GetTime();
try {
@@ -4319,10 +4390,18 @@ bool LoadMempool(void)
if (state.IsValid()) {
++count;
} else {
- ++failed;
+ // mempool may contain the transaction already, e.g. from
+ // wallet(s) having loaded it while we were processing
+ // mempool transactions; consider these as valid, instead of
+ // failed, but mark them as 'already there'
+ if (mempool.exists(tx->GetHash())) {
+ ++already_there;
+ } else {
+ ++failed;
+ }
}
} else {
- ++skipped;
+ ++expired;
}
if (ShutdownRequested())
return false;
@@ -4338,7 +4417,7 @@ bool LoadMempool(void)
return false;
}
- LogPrintf("Imported mempool transactions from disk: %i successes, %i failed, %i expired\n", count, failed, skipped);
+ LogPrintf("Imported mempool transactions from disk: %i succeeded, %i failed, %i expired, %i already there\n", count, failed, expired, already_there);
return true;
}