aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
-rw-r--r--src/test/addrman_tests.cpp44
-rw-r--r--src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp26
-rw-r--r--src/test/coinstatsindex_tests.cpp8
-rw-r--r--src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp53
-rw-r--r--src/test/descriptor_tests.cpp8
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/addrman.cpp22
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/banman.cpp41
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/base_encode_decode.cpp7
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/coins_view.cpp8
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/crypto.cpp6
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp47
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/integer.cpp16
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/key_io.cpp11
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/load_external_block_file.cpp7
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/netaddress.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/node_eviction.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp12
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/script.cpp40
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/util.cpp39
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/util.h34
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp7
-rw-r--r--src/test/interfaces_tests.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/test/key_tests.cpp42
-rw-r--r--src/test/miner_tests.cpp93
-rw-r--r--src/test/net_peer_eviction_tests.cpp504
-rw-r--r--src/test/system_tests.cpp5
-rw-r--r--src/test/txindex_tests.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/test/txvalidation_tests.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp48
-rw-r--r--src/test/util/mining.cpp4
-rw-r--r--src/test/util/net.h12
-rw-r--r--src/test/util/setup_common.cpp25
-rw-r--r--src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp16
-rw-r--r--src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp9
-rw-r--r--src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp45
35 files changed, 818 insertions, 431 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
index 49b40924e0..1103292c1a 100644
--- a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ public:
// Simulates connection failure so that we can test eviction of offline nodes
void SimConnFail(const CService& addr)
{
- LOCK(cs);
int64_t nLastSuccess = 1;
- Good_(addr, true, nLastSuccess); // Set last good connection in the deep past.
+ // Set last good connection in the deep past.
+ Good(addr, true, nLastSuccess);
bool count_failure = false;
int64_t nLastTry = GetAdjustedTime()-61;
@@ -783,6 +783,46 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_serialization)
BOOST_CHECK(bucketAndEntry_asmap1_deser_addr1.second != bucketAndEntry_asmap1_deser_addr2.second);
}
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(remove_invalid)
+{
+ // Confirm that invalid addresses are ignored in unserialization.
+
+ CAddrManTest addrman;
+ CDataStream stream(SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+
+ const CAddress new1{ResolveService("5.5.5.5"), NODE_NONE};
+ const CAddress new2{ResolveService("6.6.6.6"), NODE_NONE};
+ const CAddress tried1{ResolveService("7.7.7.7"), NODE_NONE};
+ const CAddress tried2{ResolveService("8.8.8.8"), NODE_NONE};
+
+ addrman.Add({new1, tried1, new2, tried2}, CNetAddr{});
+ addrman.Good(tried1);
+ addrman.Good(tried2);
+ BOOST_REQUIRE_EQUAL(addrman.size(), 4);
+
+ stream << addrman;
+
+ const std::string str{stream.str()};
+ size_t pos;
+
+ const char new2_raw[]{6, 6, 6, 6};
+ const uint8_t new2_raw_replacement[]{0, 0, 0, 0}; // 0.0.0.0 is !IsValid()
+ pos = str.find(new2_raw, 0, sizeof(new2_raw));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(pos != std::string::npos);
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(pos + sizeof(new2_raw_replacement) <= stream.size());
+ memcpy(stream.data() + pos, new2_raw_replacement, sizeof(new2_raw_replacement));
+
+ const char tried2_raw[]{8, 8, 8, 8};
+ const uint8_t tried2_raw_replacement[]{255, 255, 255, 255}; // 255.255.255.255 is !IsValid()
+ pos = str.find(tried2_raw, 0, sizeof(tried2_raw));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(pos != std::string::npos);
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(pos + sizeof(tried2_raw_replacement) <= stream.size());
+ memcpy(stream.data() + pos, tried2_raw_replacement, sizeof(tried2_raw_replacement));
+
+ addrman.Clear();
+ stream >> addrman;
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(addrman.size(), 2);
+}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_selecttriedcollision)
{
diff --git a/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp b/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp
index 2f532ef598..2eb653e9ec 100644
--- a/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ CBlock BuildChainTestingSetup::CreateBlock(const CBlockIndex* prev,
const CScript& scriptPubKey)
{
const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
- std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate> pblocktemplate = BlockAssembler(::ChainstateActive(), *m_node.mempool, chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey);
+ std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate> pblocktemplate = BlockAssembler(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool, chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey);
CBlock& block = pblocktemplate->block;
block.hashPrevBlock = prev->GetBlockHash();
block.nTime = prev->nTime + 1;
@@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
std::vector<BlockFilter> filters;
std::vector<uint256> filter_hashes;
- for (const CBlockIndex* block_index = ::ChainActive().Genesis();
+ for (const CBlockIndex* block_index = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Genesis();
block_index != nullptr;
- block_index = ::ChainActive().Next(block_index)) {
+ block_index = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Next(block_index)) {
BOOST_CHECK(!filter_index.LookupFilter(block_index, filter));
BOOST_CHECK(!filter_index.LookupFilterHeader(block_index, filter_header));
BOOST_CHECK(!filter_index.LookupFilterRange(block_index->nHeight, block_index, filters));
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
// BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain should return false before index is started.
BOOST_CHECK(!filter_index.BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain());
- BOOST_REQUIRE(filter_index.Start(::ChainstateActive()));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(filter_index.Start(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate()));
// Allow filter index to catch up with the block index.
constexpr int64_t timeout_ms = 10 * 1000;
@@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
{
LOCK(cs_main);
const CBlockIndex* block_index;
- for (block_index = ::ChainActive().Genesis();
+ for (block_index = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Genesis();
block_index != nullptr;
- block_index = ::ChainActive().Next(block_index)) {
+ block_index = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Next(block_index)) {
CheckFilterLookups(filter_index, block_index, last_header);
}
}
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
const CBlockIndex* tip;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- tip = ::ChainActive().Tip();
+ tip = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
}
CKey coinbase_key_A, coinbase_key_B;
coinbase_key_A.MakeNewKey(true);
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
const CBlockIndex* block_index;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- block_index = g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(block->GetHash());
+ block_index = m_node.chainman->m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(block->GetHash());
}
BOOST_CHECK(filter_index.BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain());
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
const CBlockIndex* block_index;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- block_index = g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(block->GetHash());
+ block_index = m_node.chainman->m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(block->GetHash());
}
BOOST_CHECK(filter_index.BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain());
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
const CBlockIndex* block_index;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- block_index = g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(block->GetHash());
+ block_index = m_node.chainman->m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(block->GetHash());
}
BOOST_CHECK(filter_index.BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain());
@@ -231,14 +231,14 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- block_index = g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(chainA[i]->GetHash());
+ block_index = m_node.chainman->m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(chainA[i]->GetHash());
}
BOOST_CHECK(filter_index.BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain());
CheckFilterLookups(filter_index, block_index, chainA_last_header);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- block_index = g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(chainB[i]->GetHash());
+ block_index = m_node.chainman->m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(chainB[i]->GetHash());
}
BOOST_CHECK(filter_index.BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain());
CheckFilterLookups(filter_index, block_index, chainB_last_header);
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- tip = ::ChainActive().Tip();
+ tip = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
}
BOOST_CHECK(filter_index.LookupFilterRange(0, tip, filters));
BOOST_CHECK(filter_index.LookupFilterHashRange(0, tip, filter_hashes));
diff --git a/src/test/coinstatsindex_tests.cpp b/src/test/coinstatsindex_tests.cpp
index 106fcd2a33..597d7a7340 100644
--- a/src/test/coinstatsindex_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/coinstatsindex_tests.cpp
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(coinstatsindex_initial_sync, TestChain100Setup)
const CBlockIndex* block_index;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- block_index = ChainActive().Tip();
+ block_index = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
}
// CoinStatsIndex should not be found before it is started.
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(coinstatsindex_initial_sync, TestChain100Setup)
// is started.
BOOST_CHECK(!coin_stats_index.BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain());
- BOOST_REQUIRE(coin_stats_index.Start(::ChainstateActive()));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(coin_stats_index.Start(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate()));
// Allow the CoinStatsIndex to catch up with the block index that is syncing
// in a background thread.
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(coinstatsindex_initial_sync, TestChain100Setup)
const CBlockIndex* genesis_block_index;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- genesis_block_index = ChainActive().Genesis();
+ genesis_block_index = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Genesis();
}
BOOST_CHECK(coin_stats_index.LookUpStats(genesis_block_index, coin_stats));
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(coinstatsindex_initial_sync, TestChain100Setup)
const CBlockIndex* new_block_index;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- new_block_index = ChainActive().Tip();
+ new_block_index = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
}
coin_stats_index.LookUpStats(new_block_index, new_coin_stats);
diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
index a56ce51acb..5668ead1fb 100644
--- a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
@@ -14,36 +14,19 @@
#include <script/signingprovider.h>
#include <script/standard.h>
#include <serialize.h>
+#include <test/util/net.h>
+#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
#include <txorphanage.h>
#include <util/string.h>
#include <util/system.h>
#include <util/time.h>
#include <validation.h>
-#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
-
#include <array>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
-struct CConnmanTest : public CConnman {
- using CConnman::CConnman;
- void AddNode(CNode& node)
- {
- LOCK(cs_vNodes);
- vNodes.push_back(&node);
- }
- void ClearNodes()
- {
- LOCK(cs_vNodes);
- for (CNode* node : vNodes) {
- delete node;
- }
- vNodes.clear();
- }
-};
-
static CService ip(uint32_t i)
{
struct in_addr s;
@@ -83,8 +66,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
// This test requires that we have a chain with non-zero work.
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip() != nullptr);
- BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->nChainWork > 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip() != nullptr);
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nChainWork > 0);
}
// Test starts here
@@ -120,7 +103,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1);
}
-static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerManager &peerLogic, CConnmanTest* connman)
+static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode*>& vNodes, PeerManager& peerLogic, ConnmanTestMsg& connman)
{
CAddress addr(ip(g_insecure_rand_ctx.randbits(32)), NODE_NONE);
vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK | NODE_WITNESS), INVALID_SOCKET, addr, /* nKeyedNetGroupIn */ 0, /* nLocalHostNonceIn */ 0, CAddress(), /* pszDest */ "", ConnectionType::OUTBOUND_FULL_RELAY, /* inbound_onion */ false));
@@ -130,13 +113,13 @@ static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerManager &pee
peerLogic.InitializeNode(&node);
node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- connman->AddNode(node);
+ connman.AddTestNode(node);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
{
const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
- auto connman = std::make_unique<CConnmanTest>(0x1337, 0x1337, *m_node.addrman);
+ auto connman = std::make_unique<ConnmanTestMsg>(0x1337, 0x1337, *m_node.addrman);
auto peerLogic = PeerManager::make(chainparams, *connman, *m_node.addrman, nullptr,
*m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool, false);
@@ -150,8 +133,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
std::vector<CNode *> vNodes;
// Mock some outbound peers
- for (int i=0; i<max_outbound_full_relay; ++i) {
- AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, connman.get());
+ for (int i = 0; i < max_outbound_full_relay; ++i) {
+ AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, *connman);
}
peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers();
@@ -176,7 +159,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
// If we add one more peer, something should get marked for eviction
// on the next check (since we're mocking the time to be in the future, the
// required time connected check should be satisfied).
- AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, connman.get());
+ AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, *connman);
peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers();
for (int i = 0; i < max_outbound_full_relay; ++i) {
@@ -202,14 +185,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(*node);
}
- connman->ClearNodes();
+ connman->ClearTestNodes();
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
{
const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
- auto banman = std::make_unique<BanMan>(m_args.GetDataDirBase() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
- auto connman = std::make_unique<CConnmanTest>(0x1337, 0x1337, *m_node.addrman);
+ auto banman = std::make_unique<BanMan>(m_args.GetDataDirBase() / "banlist", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
+ auto connman = std::make_unique<ConnmanTestMsg>(0x1337, 0x1337, *m_node.addrman);
auto peerLogic = PeerManager::make(chainparams, *connman, *m_node.addrman, banman.get(),
*m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool, false);
@@ -233,7 +216,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
nodes[0]->SetCommonVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(nodes[0]);
nodes[0]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- connman->AddNode(*nodes[0]);
+ connman->AddTestNode(*nodes[0]);
peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[0]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /* message */ ""); // Should be discouraged
{
LOCK(nodes[0]->cs_sendProcessing);
@@ -249,7 +232,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
nodes[1]->SetCommonVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(nodes[1]);
nodes[1]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- connman->AddNode(*nodes[1]);
+ connman->AddTestNode(*nodes[1]);
peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1, /* message */ "");
{
LOCK(nodes[1]->cs_sendProcessing);
@@ -280,7 +263,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
nodes[2]->SetCommonVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(nodes[2]);
nodes[2]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- connman->AddNode(*nodes[2]);
+ connman->AddTestNode(*nodes[2]);
peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[2]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /* message */ "");
{
LOCK(nodes[2]->cs_sendProcessing);
@@ -296,13 +279,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
for (CNode* node : nodes) {
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(*node);
}
- connman->ClearNodes();
+ connman->ClearTestNodes();
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
{
const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
- auto banman = std::make_unique<BanMan>(m_args.GetDataDirBase() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
+ auto banman = std::make_unique<BanMan>(m_args.GetDataDirBase() / "banlist", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = std::make_unique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337, *m_node.addrman);
auto peerLogic = PeerManager::make(chainparams, *connman, *m_node.addrman, banman.get(),
*m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool, false);
diff --git a/src/test/descriptor_tests.cpp b/src/test/descriptor_tests.cpp
index 36e2dac3ff..8553f80a17 100644
--- a/src/test/descriptor_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/descriptor_tests.cpp
@@ -124,14 +124,10 @@ void DoCheck(const std::string& prv, const std::string& pub, const std::string&
// Check that private can produce the normalized descriptors
std::string norm1;
- BOOST_CHECK(parse_priv->ToNormalizedString(keys_priv, norm1, false));
+ BOOST_CHECK(parse_priv->ToNormalizedString(keys_priv, norm1));
BOOST_CHECK(EqualDescriptor(norm1, norm_pub));
- BOOST_CHECK(parse_pub->ToNormalizedString(keys_priv, norm1, false));
+ BOOST_CHECK(parse_pub->ToNormalizedString(keys_priv, norm1));
BOOST_CHECK(EqualDescriptor(norm1, norm_pub));
- BOOST_CHECK(parse_priv->ToNormalizedString(keys_priv, norm1, true));
- BOOST_CHECK(EqualDescriptor(norm1, norm_prv));
- BOOST_CHECK(parse_pub->ToNormalizedString(keys_priv, norm1, true));
- BOOST_CHECK(EqualDescriptor(norm1, norm_prv));
// Check whether IsRange on both returns the expected result
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(parse_pub->IsRange(), (flags & RANGE) != 0);
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/addrman.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/addrman.cpp
index 98ae32a8d0..db0b461873 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/addrman.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/addrman.cpp
@@ -57,15 +57,6 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(addrman, initialize_addrman)
(void)addr_man.SelectTriedCollision();
},
[&] {
- (void)addr_man.Select(fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool());
- },
- [&] {
- (void)addr_man.GetAddr(
- /* max_addresses */ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange<size_t>(0, 4096),
- /* max_pct */ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange<size_t>(0, 4096),
- /* network */ std::nullopt);
- },
- [&] {
const std::optional<CAddress> opt_address = ConsumeDeserializable<CAddress>(fuzzed_data_provider);
const std::optional<CNetAddr> opt_net_addr = ConsumeDeserializable<CNetAddr>(fuzzed_data_provider);
if (opt_address && opt_net_addr) {
@@ -109,12 +100,15 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(addrman, initialize_addrman)
if (opt_service) {
addr_man.SetServices(*opt_service, ConsumeWeakEnum(fuzzed_data_provider, ALL_SERVICE_FLAGS));
}
- },
- [&] {
- (void)addr_man.Check();
});
}
- (void)addr_man.size();
+ const CAddrMan& const_addr_man{addr_man};
+ (void)/*const_*/addr_man.GetAddr(
+ /* max_addresses */ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange<size_t>(0, 4096),
+ /* max_pct */ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange<size_t>(0, 4096),
+ /* network */ std::nullopt);
+ (void)/*const_*/addr_man.Select(fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool());
+ (void)const_addr_man.size();
CDataStream data_stream(SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
- data_stream << addr_man;
+ data_stream << const_addr_man;
}
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/banman.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/banman.cpp
index 759a70a857..182aabc79b 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/banman.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/banman.cpp
@@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
#include <test/fuzz/fuzz.h>
#include <test/fuzz/util.h>
#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
+#include <util/readwritefile.h>
#include <util/system.h>
+#include <cassert>
#include <cstdint>
#include <limits>
#include <string>
@@ -30,6 +32,13 @@ void initialize_banman()
static const auto testing_setup = MakeNoLogFileContext<>();
}
+static bool operator==(const CBanEntry& lhs, const CBanEntry& rhs)
+{
+ return lhs.nVersion == rhs.nVersion &&
+ lhs.nCreateTime == rhs.nCreateTime &&
+ lhs.nBanUntil == rhs.nBanUntil;
+}
+
FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(banman, initialize_banman)
{
// The complexity is O(N^2), where N is the input size, because each call
@@ -38,10 +47,23 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(banman, initialize_banman)
int limit_max_ops{300};
FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data_provider{buffer.data(), buffer.size()};
SetMockTime(ConsumeTime(fuzzed_data_provider));
- const fs::path banlist_file = gArgs.GetDataDirNet() / "fuzzed_banlist.dat";
- fs::remove(banlist_file);
+ fs::path banlist_file = gArgs.GetDataDirNet() / "fuzzed_banlist";
+
+ const bool start_with_corrupted_banlist{fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool()};
+ bool force_read_and_write_to_err{false};
+ if (start_with_corrupted_banlist) {
+ const std::string sfx{fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool() ? ".dat" : ".json"};
+ assert(WriteBinaryFile(banlist_file.string() + sfx,
+ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeRandomLengthString()));
+ } else {
+ force_read_and_write_to_err = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool();
+ if (force_read_and_write_to_err) {
+ banlist_file = fs::path{"path"} / "to" / "inaccessible" / "fuzzed_banlist";
+ }
+ }
+
{
- BanMan ban_man{banlist_file, nullptr, ConsumeBanTimeOffset(fuzzed_data_provider)};
+ BanMan ban_man{banlist_file, /* client_interface */ nullptr, /* default_ban_time */ ConsumeBanTimeOffset(fuzzed_data_provider)};
while (--limit_max_ops >= 0 && fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool()) {
CallOneOf(
fuzzed_data_provider,
@@ -79,6 +101,17 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(banman, initialize_banman)
ban_man.Discourage(ConsumeNetAddr(fuzzed_data_provider));
});
}
+ if (!force_read_and_write_to_err) {
+ ban_man.DumpBanlist();
+ SetMockTime(ConsumeTime(fuzzed_data_provider));
+ banmap_t banmap;
+ ban_man.GetBanned(banmap);
+ BanMan ban_man_read{banlist_file, /* client_interface */ nullptr, /* default_ban_time */ 0};
+ banmap_t banmap_read;
+ ban_man_read.GetBanned(banmap_read);
+ assert(banmap == banmap_read);
+ }
}
- fs::remove(banlist_file);
+ fs::remove(banlist_file.string() + ".dat");
+ fs::remove(banlist_file.string() + ".json");
}
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/base_encode_decode.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/base_encode_decode.cpp
index 4470e13a61..2b4f15115b 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/base_encode_decode.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/base_encode_decode.cpp
@@ -14,7 +14,12 @@
#include <string>
#include <vector>
-FUZZ_TARGET(base_encode_decode)
+void initialize_base_encode_decode()
+{
+ static const ECCVerifyHandle verify_handle;
+}
+
+FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(base_encode_decode, initialize_base_encode_decode)
{
const std::string random_encoded_string(buffer.begin(), buffer.end());
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/coins_view.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/coins_view.cpp
index b509ee0b26..f452696689 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/coins_view.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/coins_view.cpp
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <vector>
namespace {
+const TestingSetup* g_setup;
const Coin EMPTY_COIN{};
bool operator==(const Coin& a, const Coin& b)
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ bool operator==(const Coin& a, const Coin& b)
void initialize_coins_view()
{
static const auto testing_setup = MakeNoLogFileContext<const TestingSetup>();
+ g_setup = testing_setup.get();
}
FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(coins_view, initialize_coins_view)
@@ -181,8 +183,8 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(coins_view, initialize_coins_view)
}
{
- const CCoinsViewCursor* coins_view_cursor = backend_coins_view.Cursor();
- assert(coins_view_cursor == nullptr);
+ std::unique_ptr<CCoinsViewCursor> coins_view_cursor = backend_coins_view.Cursor();
+ assert(!coins_view_cursor);
(void)backend_coins_view.EstimateSize();
(void)backend_coins_view.GetBestBlock();
(void)backend_coins_view.GetHeadBlocks();
@@ -268,7 +270,7 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(coins_view, initialize_coins_view)
CCoinsStats stats{CoinStatsHashType::HASH_SERIALIZED};
bool expected_code_path = false;
try {
- (void)GetUTXOStats(&coins_view_cache, WITH_LOCK(::cs_main, return std::ref(g_chainman.m_blockman)), stats);
+ (void)GetUTXOStats(&coins_view_cache, WITH_LOCK(::cs_main, return std::ref(g_setup->m_node.chainman->m_blockman)), stats);
} catch (const std::logic_error&) {
expected_code_path = true;
}
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/crypto.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/crypto.cpp
index eeeac18968..f83747e424 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/crypto.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/crypto.cpp
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@
FUZZ_TARGET(crypto)
{
+ // Hashing is expensive with sanitizers enabled, so limit the number of
+ // calls
+ int limit_max_ops{30};
+
FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data_provider{buffer.data(), buffer.size()};
std::vector<uint8_t> data = ConsumeRandomLengthByteVector(fuzzed_data_provider);
if (data.empty()) {
@@ -36,7 +40,7 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(crypto)
SHA3_256 sha3;
CSipHasher sip_hasher{fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegral<uint64_t>(), fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegral<uint64_t>()};
- while (fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool()) {
+ while (--limit_max_ops >= 0 && fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool()) {
CallOneOf(
fuzzed_data_provider,
[&] {
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp
index 1290c78712..721e4360d0 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ struct invalid_fuzzing_input_exception : public std::exception {
};
template <typename T>
-CDataStream Serialize(const T& obj, const int version = INIT_PROTO_VERSION)
+CDataStream Serialize(const T& obj, const int version = INIT_PROTO_VERSION, const int ser_type = SER_NETWORK)
{
- CDataStream ds(SER_NETWORK, version);
+ CDataStream ds(ser_type, version);
ds << obj;
return ds;
}
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ T Deserialize(CDataStream ds)
}
template <typename T>
-void DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(FuzzBufferType buffer, T& obj, const std::optional<int> protocol_version = std::nullopt)
+void DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(FuzzBufferType buffer, T& obj, const std::optional<int> protocol_version = std::nullopt, const int ser_type = SER_NETWORK)
{
- CDataStream ds(buffer, SER_NETWORK, INIT_PROTO_VERSION);
+ CDataStream ds(buffer, ser_type, INIT_PROTO_VERSION);
if (protocol_version) {
ds.SetVersion(*protocol_version);
} else {
@@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ void DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(FuzzBufferType buffer, T& obj, const std::optio
}
template <typename T>
-void AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(const T& obj, const int version = INIT_PROTO_VERSION)
+void AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(const T& obj, const int version = INIT_PROTO_VERSION, const int ser_type = SER_NETWORK)
{
- assert(Deserialize<T>(Serialize(obj, version)) == obj);
+ assert(Deserialize<T>(Serialize(obj, version, ser_type)) == obj);
}
} // namespace
@@ -136,8 +136,7 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(partial_merkle_tree_deserialize, {
FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(pub_key_deserialize, {
CPubKey pub_key;
DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(buffer, pub_key);
- // TODO: The following equivalence should hold for CPubKey? Fix.
- // AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(pub_key);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(pub_key);
})
FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(script_deserialize, {
CScript script;
@@ -251,9 +250,37 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(messageheader_deserialize, {
DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(buffer, mh);
(void)mh.IsCommandValid();
})
-FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(address_deserialize, {
+FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(address_deserialize_v1_notime, {
CAddress a;
- DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(buffer, a);
+ DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(buffer, a, INIT_PROTO_VERSION);
+ // A CAddress without nTime (as is expected under INIT_PROTO_VERSION) will roundtrip
+ // in all 5 formats (with/without nTime, v1/v2, network/disk)
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, INIT_PROTO_VERSION);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, 0, SER_DISK);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, PROTOCOL_VERSION | ADDRV2_FORMAT);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, ADDRV2_FORMAT, SER_DISK);
+})
+FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(address_deserialize_v1_withtime, {
+ CAddress a;
+ DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(buffer, a, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+ // A CAddress in V1 mode will roundtrip in all 4 formats that have nTime.
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, 0, SER_DISK);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, PROTOCOL_VERSION | ADDRV2_FORMAT);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, ADDRV2_FORMAT, SER_DISK);
+})
+FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(address_deserialize_v2, {
+ CAddress a;
+ DeserializeFromFuzzingInput(buffer, a, PROTOCOL_VERSION | ADDRV2_FORMAT);
+ // A CAddress in V2 mode will roundtrip in both V2 formats, and also in the V1 formats
+ // with time if it's V1 compatible.
+ if (a.IsAddrV1Compatible()) {
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, 0, SER_DISK);
+ }
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, PROTOCOL_VERSION | ADDRV2_FORMAT);
+ AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(a, ADDRV2_FORMAT, SER_DISK);
})
FUZZ_TARGET_DESERIALIZE(inv_deserialize, {
CInv i;
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/integer.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/integer.cpp
index e9fa343896..e28e2feb0a 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/integer.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/integer.cpp
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@
#include <pow.h>
#include <protocol.h>
#include <pubkey.h>
-#include <rpc/util.h>
-#include <script/signingprovider.h>
#include <script/standard.h>
#include <serialize.h>
#include <streams.h>
@@ -158,20 +156,6 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(integer, initialize_integer)
const CKeyID key_id{u160};
const CScriptID script_id{u160};
- // CTxDestination = CNoDestination ∪ PKHash ∪ ScriptHash ∪ WitnessV0ScriptHash ∪ WitnessV0KeyHash ∪ WitnessUnknown
- const PKHash pk_hash{u160};
- const ScriptHash script_hash{u160};
- const WitnessV0KeyHash witness_v0_key_hash{u160};
- const WitnessV0ScriptHash witness_v0_script_hash{u256};
- const std::vector<CTxDestination> destinations{pk_hash, script_hash, witness_v0_key_hash, witness_v0_script_hash};
- const SigningProvider store;
- for (const CTxDestination& destination : destinations) {
- (void)DescribeAddress(destination);
- (void)EncodeDestination(destination);
- (void)GetKeyForDestination(store, destination);
- (void)GetScriptForDestination(destination);
- (void)IsValidDestination(destination);
- }
{
CDataStream stream(SER_NETWORK, INIT_PROTO_VERSION);
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/key_io.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/key_io.cpp
index 665ca01fa1..f58bf8b316 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/key_io.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/key_io.cpp
@@ -4,9 +4,6 @@
#include <chainparams.h>
#include <key_io.h>
-#include <rpc/util.h>
-#include <script/signingprovider.h>
-#include <script/standard.h>
#include <test/fuzz/fuzz.h>
#include <cassert>
@@ -39,12 +36,4 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(key_io, initialize_key_io)
if (ext_pub_key.pubkey.size() == CPubKey::COMPRESSED_SIZE) {
assert(ext_pub_key == DecodeExtPubKey(EncodeExtPubKey(ext_pub_key)));
}
-
- const CTxDestination tx_destination = DecodeDestination(random_string);
- (void)DescribeAddress(tx_destination);
- (void)GetKeyForDestination(/* store */ {}, tx_destination);
- (void)GetScriptForDestination(tx_destination);
- (void)IsValidDestination(tx_destination);
-
- (void)IsValidDestinationString(random_string);
}
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/load_external_block_file.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/load_external_block_file.cpp
index dbd0c76d42..bfa977520b 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/load_external_block_file.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/load_external_block_file.cpp
@@ -13,9 +13,14 @@
#include <cstdint>
#include <vector>
+namespace {
+const TestingSetup* g_setup;
+} // namespace
+
void initialize_load_external_block_file()
{
static const auto testing_setup = MakeNoLogFileContext<const TestingSetup>();
+ g_setup = testing_setup.get();
}
FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(load_external_block_file, initialize_load_external_block_file)
@@ -27,5 +32,5 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(load_external_block_file, initialize_load_external_block_file)
return;
}
FlatFilePos flat_file_pos;
- ::ChainstateActive().LoadExternalBlockFile(Params(), fuzzed_block_file, fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool() ? &flat_file_pos : nullptr);
+ g_setup->m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().LoadExternalBlockFile(fuzzed_block_file, fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool() ? &flat_file_pos : nullptr);
}
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/netaddress.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/netaddress.cpp
index f9d8129ca9..6cb81901cb 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/netaddress.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/netaddress.cpp
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(netaddress)
(void)net_addr.IsRFC3927();
(void)net_addr.IsRFC3964();
if (net_addr.IsRFC4193()) {
- assert(net_addr.GetNetwork() == Network::NET_ONION || net_addr.GetNetwork() == Network::NET_INTERNAL || net_addr.GetNetwork() == Network::NET_UNROUTABLE);
+ assert(net_addr.GetNetwork() == Network::NET_INTERNAL || net_addr.GetNetwork() == Network::NET_UNROUTABLE);
}
(void)net_addr.IsRFC4380();
(void)net_addr.IsRFC4843();
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/node_eviction.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/node_eviction.cpp
index 70ffc6bf37..a3f71426fa 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/node_eviction.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/node_eviction.cpp
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(node_eviction)
/* nKeyedNetGroup */ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegral<uint64_t>(),
/* prefer_evict */ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool(),
/* m_is_local */ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool(),
- /* m_is_onion */ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool(),
+ /* m_network */ fuzzed_data_provider.PickValueInArray(ALL_NETWORKS),
});
}
// Make a copy since eviction_candidates may be in some valid but otherwise
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
index 7b99193ad0..c4e4d4c785 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
@@ -58,7 +58,19 @@ void initialize_process_message()
static const auto testing_setup = MakeNoLogFileContext<const TestingSetup>();
g_setup = testing_setup.get();
+
+ // Temporary debug for https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35027
+ {
+ LOCK(::cs_main);
+ assert(CheckDiskSpace(gArgs.GetDataDirNet()));
+ assert(CheckDiskSpace(gArgs.GetDataDirNet(), 48 * 2 * 2 * g_setup->m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip().GetCacheSize()));
+ }
for (int i = 0; i < 2 * COINBASE_MATURITY; i++) {
+ {
+ LOCK(::cs_main);
+ assert(CheckDiskSpace(gArgs.GetDataDirNet()));
+ assert(CheckDiskSpace(gArgs.GetDataDirNet(), 48 * 2 * 2 * g_setup->m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip().GetCacheSize()));
+ }
MineBlock(g_setup->m_node, CScript() << OP_TRUE);
}
SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue();
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/script.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/script.cpp
index b87bcf2ef5..950ee45d1d 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/script.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/script.cpp
@@ -6,8 +6,10 @@
#include <compressor.h>
#include <core_io.h>
#include <core_memusage.h>
+#include <key_io.h>
#include <policy/policy.h>
#include <pubkey.h>
+#include <rpc/util.h>
#include <script/descriptor.h>
#include <script/interpreter.h>
#include <script/script.h>
@@ -184,26 +186,26 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(script, initialize_script)
}
{
- WitnessUnknown witness_unknown_1{};
- witness_unknown_1.version = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegral<uint32_t>();
- const std::vector<uint8_t> witness_unknown_program_1 = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBytes<uint8_t>(40);
- witness_unknown_1.length = witness_unknown_program_1.size();
- std::copy(witness_unknown_program_1.begin(), witness_unknown_program_1.end(), witness_unknown_1.program);
-
- WitnessUnknown witness_unknown_2{};
- witness_unknown_2.version = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegral<uint32_t>();
- const std::vector<uint8_t> witness_unknown_program_2 = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBytes<uint8_t>(40);
- witness_unknown_2.length = witness_unknown_program_2.size();
- std::copy(witness_unknown_program_2.begin(), witness_unknown_program_2.end(), witness_unknown_2.program);
-
- (void)(witness_unknown_1 == witness_unknown_2);
- (void)(witness_unknown_1 < witness_unknown_2);
- }
+ const CTxDestination tx_destination_1{
+ fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool() ?
+ DecodeDestination(fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeRandomLengthString()) :
+ ConsumeTxDestination(fuzzed_data_provider)};
+ const CTxDestination tx_destination_2{ConsumeTxDestination(fuzzed_data_provider)};
+ const std::string encoded_dest{EncodeDestination(tx_destination_1)};
+ const UniValue json_dest{DescribeAddress(tx_destination_1)};
+ Assert(tx_destination_1 == DecodeDestination(encoded_dest));
+ (void)GetKeyForDestination(/* store */ {}, tx_destination_1);
+ const CScript dest{GetScriptForDestination(tx_destination_1)};
+ const bool valid{IsValidDestination(tx_destination_1)};
+ Assert(dest.empty() != valid);
+
+ Assert(valid == IsValidDestinationString(encoded_dest));
- {
- const CTxDestination tx_destination_1 = ConsumeTxDestination(fuzzed_data_provider);
- const CTxDestination tx_destination_2 = ConsumeTxDestination(fuzzed_data_provider);
- (void)(tx_destination_1 == tx_destination_2);
(void)(tx_destination_1 < tx_destination_2);
+ if (tx_destination_1 == tx_destination_2) {
+ Assert(encoded_dest == EncodeDestination(tx_destination_2));
+ Assert(json_dest.write() == DescribeAddress(tx_destination_2).write());
+ Assert(dest == GetScriptForDestination(tx_destination_2));
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/util.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/util.cpp
index bcf0b0ce72..ece3214ed5 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/util.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/util.cpp
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
+#include <pubkey.h>
#include <test/fuzz/util.h>
#include <test/util/script.h>
#include <util/rbf.h>
@@ -304,3 +305,41 @@ uint32_t ConsumeSequence(FuzzedDataProvider& fuzzed_data_provider) noexcept
}) :
fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegral<uint32_t>();
}
+
+CTxDestination ConsumeTxDestination(FuzzedDataProvider& fuzzed_data_provider) noexcept
+{
+ CTxDestination tx_destination;
+ const size_t call_size{CallOneOf(
+ fuzzed_data_provider,
+ [&] {
+ tx_destination = CNoDestination{};
+ },
+ [&] {
+ tx_destination = PKHash{ConsumeUInt160(fuzzed_data_provider)};
+ },
+ [&] {
+ tx_destination = ScriptHash{ConsumeUInt160(fuzzed_data_provider)};
+ },
+ [&] {
+ tx_destination = WitnessV0ScriptHash{ConsumeUInt256(fuzzed_data_provider)};
+ },
+ [&] {
+ tx_destination = WitnessV0KeyHash{ConsumeUInt160(fuzzed_data_provider)};
+ },
+ [&] {
+ tx_destination = WitnessV1Taproot{XOnlyPubKey{ConsumeUInt256(fuzzed_data_provider)}};
+ },
+ [&] {
+ WitnessUnknown witness_unknown{};
+ witness_unknown.version = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange(2, 16);
+ std::vector<uint8_t> witness_unknown_program_1{fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBytes<uint8_t>(40)};
+ if (witness_unknown_program_1.size() < 2) {
+ witness_unknown_program_1 = {0, 0};
+ }
+ witness_unknown.length = witness_unknown_program_1.size();
+ std::copy(witness_unknown_program_1.begin(), witness_unknown_program_1.end(), witness_unknown.program);
+ tx_destination = witness_unknown;
+ })};
+ Assert(call_size == std::variant_size_v<CTxDestination>);
+ return tx_destination;
+}
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/util.h b/src/test/fuzz/util.h
index 023dcdb3e5..9f09395a9a 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/util.h
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/util.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
#include <vector>
template <typename... Callables>
-void CallOneOf(FuzzedDataProvider& fuzzed_data_provider, Callables... callables)
+size_t CallOneOf(FuzzedDataProvider& fuzzed_data_provider, Callables... callables)
{
constexpr size_t call_size{sizeof...(callables)};
static_assert(call_size >= 1);
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ void CallOneOf(FuzzedDataProvider& fuzzed_data_provider, Callables... callables)
size_t i{0};
((i++ == call_index ? callables() : void()), ...);
+ return call_size;
}
template <typename Collection>
@@ -178,36 +179,7 @@ template <typename WeakEnumType, size_t size>
return CTxMemPoolEntry{MakeTransactionRef(tx), fee, time, entry_height, spends_coinbase, sig_op_cost, {}};
}
-[[nodiscard]] inline CTxDestination ConsumeTxDestination(FuzzedDataProvider& fuzzed_data_provider) noexcept
-{
- CTxDestination tx_destination;
- CallOneOf(
- fuzzed_data_provider,
- [&] {
- tx_destination = CNoDestination{};
- },
- [&] {
- tx_destination = PKHash{ConsumeUInt160(fuzzed_data_provider)};
- },
- [&] {
- tx_destination = ScriptHash{ConsumeUInt160(fuzzed_data_provider)};
- },
- [&] {
- tx_destination = WitnessV0ScriptHash{ConsumeUInt256(fuzzed_data_provider)};
- },
- [&] {
- tx_destination = WitnessV0KeyHash{ConsumeUInt160(fuzzed_data_provider)};
- },
- [&] {
- WitnessUnknown witness_unknown{};
- witness_unknown.version = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegral<uint32_t>();
- const std::vector<uint8_t> witness_unknown_program_1 = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBytes<uint8_t>(40);
- witness_unknown.length = witness_unknown_program_1.size();
- std::copy(witness_unknown_program_1.begin(), witness_unknown_program_1.end(), witness_unknown.program);
- tx_destination = witness_unknown;
- });
- return tx_destination;
-}
+[[nodiscard]] CTxDestination ConsumeTxDestination(FuzzedDataProvider& fuzzed_data_provider) noexcept;
template <typename T>
[[nodiscard]] bool MultiplicationOverflow(const T i, const T j) noexcept
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp
index e1a21b6c53..c2aaf486c5 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp
@@ -14,9 +14,14 @@
#include <cstdint>
#include <vector>
+namespace {
+const TestingSetup* g_setup;
+} // namespace
+
void initialize_validation_load_mempool()
{
static const auto testing_setup = MakeNoLogFileContext<const TestingSetup>();
+ g_setup = testing_setup.get();
}
FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(validation_load_mempool, initialize_validation_load_mempool)
@@ -29,6 +34,6 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(validation_load_mempool, initialize_validation_load_mempool)
auto fuzzed_fopen = [&](const fs::path&, const char*) {
return fuzzed_file_provider.open();
};
- (void)LoadMempool(pool, ::ChainstateActive(), fuzzed_fopen);
+ (void)LoadMempool(pool, g_setup->m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), fuzzed_fopen);
(void)DumpMempool(pool, fuzzed_fopen, true);
}
diff --git a/src/test/interfaces_tests.cpp b/src/test/interfaces_tests.cpp
index 73463b071e..44779f7d7c 100644
--- a/src/test/interfaces_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/interfaces_tests.cpp
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(findCommonAncestor)
auto* orig_tip = active.Tip();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
BlockValidationState state;
- ChainstateActive().InvalidateBlock(state, Params(), active.Tip());
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().InvalidateBlock(state, active.Tip());
}
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(active.Height(), orig_tip->nHeight - 10);
coinbaseKey.MakeNewKey(true);
diff --git a/src/test/key_tests.cpp b/src/test/key_tests.cpp
index cb66d5164e..b915982d98 100644
--- a/src/test/key_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/key_tests.cpp
@@ -300,6 +300,48 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bip340_test_vectors)
auto sig = ParseHex(test.first[2]);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(XOnlyPubKey(pubkey).VerifySchnorr(uint256(msg), sig), test.second);
}
+
+ static const std::vector<std::array<std::string, 5>> SIGN_VECTORS = {
+ {{"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003", "F9308A019258C31049344F85F89D5229B531C845836F99B08601F113BCE036F9", "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "E907831F80848D1069A5371B402410364BDF1C5F8307B0084C55F1CE2DCA821525F66A4A85EA8B71E482A74F382D2CE5EBEEE8FDB2172F477DF4900D310536C0"}},
+ {{"B7E151628AED2A6ABF7158809CF4F3C762E7160F38B4DA56A784D9045190CFEF", "DFF1D77F2A671C5F36183726DB2341BE58FEAE1DA2DECED843240F7B502BA659", "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001", "243F6A8885A308D313198A2E03707344A4093822299F31D0082EFA98EC4E6C89", "6896BD60EEAE296DB48A229FF71DFE071BDE413E6D43F917DC8DCF8C78DE33418906D11AC976ABCCB20B091292BFF4EA897EFCB639EA871CFA95F6DE339E4B0A"}},
+ {{"C90FDAA22168C234C4C6628B80DC1CD129024E088A67CC74020BBEA63B14E5C9", "DD308AFEC5777E13121FA72B9CC1B7CC0139715309B086C960E18FD969774EB8", "C87AA53824B4D7AE2EB035A2B5BBBCCC080E76CDC6D1692C4B0B62D798E6D906", "7E2D58D8B3BCDF1ABADEC7829054F90DDA9805AAB56C77333024B9D0A508B75C", "5831AAEED7B44BB74E5EAB94BA9D4294C49BCF2A60728D8B4C200F50DD313C1BAB745879A5AD954A72C45A91C3A51D3C7ADEA98D82F8481E0E1E03674A6F3FB7"}},
+ {{"0B432B2677937381AEF05BB02A66ECD012773062CF3FA2549E44F58ED2401710", "25D1DFF95105F5253C4022F628A996AD3A0D95FBF21D468A1B33F8C160D8F517", "FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF", "FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF", "7EB0509757E246F19449885651611CB965ECC1A187DD51B64FDA1EDC9637D5EC97582B9CB13DB3933705B32BA982AF5AF25FD78881EBB32771FC5922EFC66EA3"}},
+ };
+
+ for (const auto& [sec_hex, pub_hex, aux_hex, msg_hex, sig_hex] : SIGN_VECTORS) {
+ auto sec = ParseHex(sec_hex);
+ auto pub = ParseHex(pub_hex);
+ uint256 aux256(ParseHex(aux_hex));
+ uint256 msg256(ParseHex(msg_hex));
+ auto sig = ParseHex(sig_hex);
+ unsigned char sig64[64];
+
+ // Run the untweaked test vectors above, comparing with exact expected signature.
+ CKey key;
+ key.Set(sec.begin(), sec.end(), true);
+ XOnlyPubKey pubkey(key.GetPubKey());
+ BOOST_CHECK(std::equal(pubkey.begin(), pubkey.end(), pub.begin(), pub.end()));
+ bool ok = key.SignSchnorr(msg256, sig64, nullptr, &aux256);
+ BOOST_CHECK(ok);
+ BOOST_CHECK(std::vector<unsigned char>(sig64, sig64 + 64) == sig);
+ // Verify those signatures for good measure.
+ BOOST_CHECK(pubkey.VerifySchnorr(msg256, sig64));
+
+ // Do 10 iterations where we sign with a random Merkle root to tweak,
+ // and compare against the resulting tweaked keys, with random aux.
+ // In iteration i=0 we tweak with empty Merkle tree.
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
+ uint256 merkle_root;
+ if (i) merkle_root = InsecureRand256();
+ auto tweaked = pubkey.CreateTapTweak(i ? &merkle_root : nullptr);
+ BOOST_CHECK(tweaked);
+ XOnlyPubKey tweaked_key = tweaked->first;
+ aux256 = InsecureRand256();
+ bool ok = key.SignSchnorr(msg256, sig64, &merkle_root, &aux256);
+ BOOST_CHECK(ok);
+ BOOST_CHECK(tweaked_key.VerifySchnorr(msg256, sig64));
+ }
+ }
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
diff --git a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
index c47d0eae1e..e20c5e4e8f 100644
--- a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ struct MinerTestingSetup : public TestingSetup {
void TestPackageSelection(const CChainParams& chainparams, const CScript& scriptPubKey, const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txFirst) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(::cs_main, m_node.mempool->cs);
bool TestSequenceLocks(const CTransaction& tx, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(::cs_main, m_node.mempool->cs)
{
- CCoinsViewMemPool viewMempool(&m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), *m_node.mempool);
- return CheckSequenceLocks(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip(), viewMempool, tx, flags);
+ CCoinsViewMemPool view_mempool(&m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), *m_node.mempool);
+ return CheckSequenceLocks(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip(), view_mempool, tx, flags);
}
BlockAssembler AssemblerForTest(const CChainParams& params);
};
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ BlockAssembler MinerTestingSetup::AssemblerForTest(const CChainParams& params)
options.nBlockMaxWeight = MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT;
options.blockMinFeeRate = blockMinFeeRate;
- return BlockAssembler(::ChainstateActive(), *m_node.mempool, params, options);
+ return BlockAssembler(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool, params, options);
}
constexpr static struct {
@@ -82,11 +82,11 @@ constexpr static struct {
{2, 0xbbbeb305}, {2, 0xfe1c810a},
};
-static CBlockIndex CreateBlockIndex(int nHeight) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
+static CBlockIndex CreateBlockIndex(int nHeight, CBlockIndex* active_chain_tip) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
{
CBlockIndex index;
index.nHeight = nHeight;
- index.pprev = ::ChainActive().Tip();
+ index.pprev = active_chain_tip;
return index;
}
@@ -228,17 +228,17 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
{
LOCK(cs_main);
pblock->nVersion = 1;
- pblock->nTime = ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1;
+ pblock->nTime = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1;
CMutableTransaction txCoinbase(*pblock->vtx[0]);
txCoinbase.nVersion = 1;
txCoinbase.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript();
txCoinbase.vin[0].scriptSig.push_back(bi.extranonce);
- txCoinbase.vin[0].scriptSig.push_back(::ChainActive().Height());
+ txCoinbase.vin[0].scriptSig.push_back(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Height());
txCoinbase.vout.resize(1); // Ignore the (optional) segwit commitment added by CreateNewBlock (as the hardcoded nonces don't account for this)
txCoinbase.vout[0].scriptPubKey = CScript();
pblock->vtx[0] = MakeTransactionRef(std::move(txCoinbase));
if (txFirst.size() == 0)
- baseheight = ::ChainActive().Height();
+ baseheight = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Height();
if (txFirst.size() < 4)
txFirst.push_back(pblock->vtx[0]);
pblock->hashMerkleRoot = BlockMerkleRoot(*pblock);
@@ -364,29 +364,29 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
m_node.mempool->clear();
// subsidy changing
- int nHeight = ::ChainActive().Height();
+ int nHeight = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Height();
// Create an actual 209999-long block chain (without valid blocks).
- while (::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight < 209999) {
- CBlockIndex* prev = ::ChainActive().Tip();
+ while (m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight < 209999) {
+ CBlockIndex* prev = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
CBlockIndex* next = new CBlockIndex();
next->phashBlock = new uint256(InsecureRand256());
- ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip().SetBestBlock(next->GetBlockHash());
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip().SetBestBlock(next->GetBlockHash());
next->pprev = prev;
next->nHeight = prev->nHeight + 1;
next->BuildSkip();
- ::ChainActive().SetTip(next);
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().SetTip(next);
}
BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
// Extend to a 210000-long block chain.
- while (::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight < 210000) {
- CBlockIndex* prev = ::ChainActive().Tip();
+ while (m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight < 210000) {
+ CBlockIndex* prev = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
CBlockIndex* next = new CBlockIndex();
next->phashBlock = new uint256(InsecureRand256());
- ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip().SetBestBlock(next->GetBlockHash());
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip().SetBestBlock(next->GetBlockHash());
next->pprev = prev;
next->nHeight = prev->nHeight + 1;
next->BuildSkip();
- ::ChainActive().SetTip(next);
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().SetTip(next);
}
BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
@@ -409,16 +409,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
m_node.mempool->clear();
// Delete the dummy blocks again.
- while (::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight > nHeight) {
- CBlockIndex* del = ::ChainActive().Tip();
- ::ChainActive().SetTip(del->pprev);
- ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip().SetBestBlock(del->pprev->GetBlockHash());
+ while (m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight > nHeight) {
+ CBlockIndex* del = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().SetTip(del->pprev);
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip().SetBestBlock(del->pprev->GetBlockHash());
delete del->phashBlock;
delete del;
}
// non-final txs in mempool
- SetMockTime(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1);
+ SetMockTime(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1);
int flags = LOCKTIME_VERIFY_SEQUENCE|LOCKTIME_MEDIAN_TIME_PAST;
// height map
std::vector<int> prevheights;
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash(); // only 1 transaction
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1;
- tx.vin[0].nSequence = ::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight + 1; // txFirst[0] is the 2nd block
+ tx.vin[0].nSequence = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight + 1; // txFirst[0] is the 2nd block
prevheights[0] = baseheight + 1;
tx.vout.resize(1);
tx.vout[0].nValue = BLOCKSUBSIDY-HIGHFEE;
@@ -438,53 +438,62 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
tx.nLockTime = 0;
hash = tx.GetHash();
m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(HIGHFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx));
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckFinalTx(::ChainActive().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime passes
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckFinalTx(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime passes
BOOST_CHECK(!TestSequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Sequence locks fail
- BOOST_CHECK(SequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags, prevheights, CreateBlockIndex(::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight + 2))); // Sequence locks pass on 2nd block
+
+ {
+ CBlockIndex* active_chain_tip = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
+ BOOST_CHECK(SequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags, prevheights, CreateBlockIndex(active_chain_tip->nHeight + 2, active_chain_tip))); // Sequence locks pass on 2nd block
+ }
// relative time locked
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[1]->GetHash();
- tx.vin[0].nSequence = CTxIn::SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_TYPE_FLAG | (((::ChainActive().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1-::ChainActive()[1]->GetMedianTimePast()) >> CTxIn::SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_GRANULARITY) + 1); // txFirst[1] is the 3rd block
+ tx.vin[0].nSequence = CTxIn::SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_TYPE_FLAG | (((m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1-m_node.chainman->ActiveChain()[1]->GetMedianTimePast()) >> CTxIn::SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_GRANULARITY) + 1); // txFirst[1] is the 3rd block
prevheights[0] = baseheight + 2;
hash = tx.GetHash();
m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Time(GetTime()).FromTx(tx));
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckFinalTx(::ChainActive().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime passes
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckFinalTx(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime passes
BOOST_CHECK(!TestSequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Sequence locks fail
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; i++)
- ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetAncestor(::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime += 512; //Trick the MedianTimePast
- BOOST_CHECK(SequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags, prevheights, CreateBlockIndex(::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight + 1))); // Sequence locks pass 512 seconds later
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime += 512; //Trick the MedianTimePast
+
+ {
+ CBlockIndex* active_chain_tip = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
+ BOOST_CHECK(SequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags, prevheights, CreateBlockIndex(active_chain_tip->nHeight + 1, active_chain_tip))); // Sequence locks pass 512 seconds later
+ }
+
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; i++)
- ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetAncestor(::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime -= 512; //undo tricked MTP
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime -= 512; //undo tricked MTP
// absolute height locked
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[2]->GetHash();
tx.vin[0].nSequence = CTxIn::SEQUENCE_FINAL - 1;
prevheights[0] = baseheight + 3;
- tx.nLockTime = ::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight + 1;
+ tx.nLockTime = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight + 1;
hash = tx.GetHash();
m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Time(GetTime()).FromTx(tx));
- BOOST_CHECK(!CheckFinalTx(::ChainActive().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime fails
+ BOOST_CHECK(!CheckFinalTx(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime fails
BOOST_CHECK(TestSequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Sequence locks pass
- BOOST_CHECK(IsFinalTx(CTransaction(tx), ::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight + 2, ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast())); // Locktime passes on 2nd block
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsFinalTx(CTransaction(tx), m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight + 2, m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast())); // Locktime passes on 2nd block
// absolute time locked
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[3]->GetHash();
- tx.nLockTime = ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast();
+ tx.nLockTime = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast();
prevheights.resize(1);
prevheights[0] = baseheight + 4;
hash = tx.GetHash();
m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Time(GetTime()).FromTx(tx));
- BOOST_CHECK(!CheckFinalTx(::ChainActive().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime fails
+ BOOST_CHECK(!CheckFinalTx(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime fails
BOOST_CHECK(TestSequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Sequence locks pass
- BOOST_CHECK(IsFinalTx(CTransaction(tx), ::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight + 2, ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast() + 1)); // Locktime passes 1 second later
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsFinalTx(CTransaction(tx), m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight + 2, m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast() + 1)); // Locktime passes 1 second later
// mempool-dependent transactions (not added)
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hash;
- prevheights[0] = ::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight + 1;
+ prevheights[0] = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight + 1;
tx.nLockTime = 0;
tx.vin[0].nSequence = 0;
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckFinalTx(::ChainActive().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime passes
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckFinalTx(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip(), CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Locktime passes
BOOST_CHECK(TestSequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Sequence locks pass
tx.vin[0].nSequence = 1;
BOOST_CHECK(!TestSequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags)); // Sequence locks fail
@@ -502,14 +511,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pblocktemplate->block.vtx.size(), 3U);
// However if we advance height by 1 and time by 512, all of them should be mined
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; i++)
- ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetAncestor(::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime += 512; //Trick the MedianTimePast
- ::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight++;
- SetMockTime(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast() + 1);
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime += 512; //Trick the MedianTimePast
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight++;
+ SetMockTime(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast() + 1);
BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pblocktemplate->block.vtx.size(), 5U);
- ::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight--;
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight--;
SetMockTime(0);
m_node.mempool->clear();
diff --git a/src/test/net_peer_eviction_tests.cpp b/src/test/net_peer_eviction_tests.cpp
index 31d391bf7d..4bfd487b86 100644
--- a/src/test/net_peer_eviction_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/net_peer_eviction_tests.cpp
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
+#include <netaddress.h>
#include <net.h>
+#include <test/util/net.h>
#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
@@ -15,11 +17,6 @@
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(net_peer_eviction_tests, BasicTestingSetup)
-namespace {
-constexpr int NODE_EVICTION_TEST_ROUNDS{10};
-constexpr int NODE_EVICTION_TEST_UP_TO_N_NODES{200};
-} // namespace
-
std::vector<NodeEvictionCandidate> GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates(const int n_candidates, FastRandomContext& random_context)
{
std::vector<NodeEvictionCandidate> candidates;
@@ -36,7 +33,7 @@ std::vector<NodeEvictionCandidate> GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates(const int n_c
/* nKeyedNetGroup */ random_context.randrange(100),
/* prefer_evict */ random_context.randbool(),
/* m_is_local */ random_context.randbool(),
- /* m_is_onion */ random_context.randbool(),
+ /* m_network */ ALL_NETWORKS[random_context.randrange(ALL_NETWORKS.size())],
});
}
return candidates;
@@ -94,7 +91,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_protection_test)
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = c.m_is_local = false;
+ c.m_is_local = false;
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV4;
},
/* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5},
/* unprotected_peer_ids */ {6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11},
@@ -104,129 +102,359 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_protection_test)
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [num_peers](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = num_peers - c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = c.m_is_local = false;
+ c.m_is_local = false;
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV6;
},
/* protected_peer_ids */ {6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11},
/* unprotected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5},
random_context));
- // Test protection of onion and localhost peers...
+ // Test protection of onion, localhost, and I2P peers...
// Expect 1/4 onion peers to be protected from eviction,
- // independently of other characteristics.
+ // if no localhost or I2P peers.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
- c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 3 || c.id == 8 || c.id == 9);
+ c.m_is_local = false;
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 3 || c.id == 8 || c.id == 9) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV4;
},
/* protected_peer_ids */ {3, 8, 9},
/* unprotected_peer_ids */ {},
random_context));
- // Expect 1/4 onion peers and 1/4 of the others to be protected
- // from eviction, sorted by longest uptime (lowest nTimeConnected).
+ // Expect 1/4 onion peers and 1/4 of the other peers to be protected,
+ // sorted by longest uptime (lowest nTimeConnected), if no localhost or I2P peers.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
c.m_is_local = false;
- c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 3 || c.id > 7);
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 3 || c.id > 7) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV6;
},
/* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 8, 9},
/* unprotected_peer_ids */ {4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11},
random_context));
// Expect 1/4 localhost peers to be protected from eviction,
- // if no onion peers.
+ // if no onion or I2P peers.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
- c.m_is_onion = false;
c.m_is_local = (c.id == 1 || c.id == 9 || c.id == 11);
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV4;
},
/* protected_peer_ids */ {1, 9, 11},
/* unprotected_peer_ids */ {},
random_context));
// Expect 1/4 localhost peers and 1/4 of the other peers to be protected,
- // sorted by longest uptime (lowest nTimeConnected), if no onion peers.
+ // sorted by longest uptime (lowest nTimeConnected), if no onion or I2P peers.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = false;
c.m_is_local = (c.id > 6);
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV6;
},
/* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 7, 8, 9},
/* unprotected_peer_ids */ {3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11},
random_context));
- // Combined test: expect 1/4 onion and 2 localhost peers to be protected
- // from eviction, sorted by longest uptime.
+ // Expect 1/4 I2P peers to be protected from eviction,
+ // if no onion or localhost peers.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.m_is_local = false;
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 2 || c.id == 7 || c.id == 10) ? NET_I2P : NET_IPV4;
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {2, 7, 10},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Expect 1/4 I2P peers and 1/4 of the other peers to be protected,
+ // sorted by longest uptime (lowest nTimeConnected), if no onion or localhost peers.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 0 || c.id == 5 || c.id == 10);
- c.m_is_local = (c.id == 1 || c.id == 9 || c.id == 11);
+ c.m_is_local = false;
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 4 || c.id > 8) ? NET_I2P : NET_IPV6;
},
- /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 5, 9, 10},
- /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11},
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 4, 9, 10},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11},
random_context));
- // Combined test: expect having only 1 onion to allow allocating the
- // remaining 2 of the 1/4 to localhost peers, sorted by longest uptime.
+ // Tests with 2 networks...
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost and 1 onion peer out of 4 to
+ // protect 1 localhost, 0 onion and 1 other peer, sorted by longest uptime;
+ // stable sort breaks tie with array order of localhost first.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
- num_peers + 4, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ 4, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 15);
- c.m_is_local = (c.id > 6 && c.id < 11);
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 4);
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 3) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV4;
},
- /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 15},
- /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14},
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 4},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {1, 2},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost and 1 onion peer out of 7 to
+ // protect 1 localhost, 0 onion, and 2 other peers (3 total), sorted by
+ // uptime; stable sort breaks tie with array order of localhost first.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 7, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 6);
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 5) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV4;
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 6},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 4, 5},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost and 1 onion peer out of 8 to
+ // protect protect 1 localhost, 1 onion and 2 other peers (4 total), sorted
+ // by uptime; stable sort breaks tie with array order of localhost first.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 8, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 6);
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 5) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV4;
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 5, 6},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 4, 7},
random_context));
- // Combined test: expect 2 onions (< 1/4) to allow allocating the minimum 2
- // localhost peers, sorted by longest uptime.
+ // Combined test: expect having 3 localhost and 3 onion peers out of 12 to
+ // protect 2 localhost and 1 onion, plus 3 other peers, sorted by longest
+ // uptime; stable sort breaks ties with the array order of localhost first.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 7 || c.id == 9);
- c.m_is_local = (c.id == 6 || c.id == 11);
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 6 || c.id == 9 || c.id == 11);
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 7 || c.id == 8 || c.id == 10) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV6;
},
- /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 6, 7, 9, 11},
- /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10},
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 6, 7, 9},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11},
random_context));
- // Combined test: when > 1/4, expect max 1/4 onion and 2 localhost peers
- // to be protected from eviction, sorted by longest uptime.
+ // Combined test: expect having 4 localhost and 1 onion peer out of 12 to
+ // protect 2 localhost and 1 onion, plus 3 other peers, sorted by longest uptime.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = (c.id > 3 && c.id < 8);
- c.m_is_local = (c.id > 7);
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id > 4 && c.id < 9);
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 10) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV4;
},
- /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9},
- /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11},
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 5, 6, 10},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11},
random_context));
- // Combined test: idem > 1/4 with only 8 peers: expect 2 onion and 2
- // localhost peers (1/4 + 2) to be protected, sorted by longest uptime.
+ // Combined test: expect having 4 localhost and 2 onion peers out of 16 to
+ // protect 2 localhost and 2 onions, plus 4 other peers, sorted by longest uptime.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
- 8, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ 16, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 6 || c.id == 9 || c.id == 11 || c.id == 12);
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 8 || c.id == 10) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV6;
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 5 localhost and 1 onion peer out of 16 to
+ // protect 3 localhost (recovering the unused onion slot), 1 onion, and 4
+ // others, sorted by longest uptime.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 16, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id > 10);
+ c.m_network = (c.id == 10) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV4;
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost and 4 onion peers out of 16 to
+ // protect 1 localhost and 3 onions (recovering the unused localhost slot),
+ // plus 4 others, sorted by longest uptime.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 16, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 15);
+ c.m_network = (c.id > 6 && c.id < 11) ? NET_ONION : NET_IPV6;
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 15},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 2 onion and 4 I2P out of 12 peers to protect
+ // 2 onion (prioritized for having fewer candidates) and 1 I2P, plus 3
+ // others, sorted by longest uptime.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = (c.id > 1 && c.id < 5);
- c.m_is_local = (c.id > 4);
+ c.m_is_local = false;
+ if (c.id == 8 || c.id == 10) {
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else if (c.id == 6 || c.id == 9 || c.id == 11 || c.id == 12) {
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV4;
+ }
},
- /* protected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 5, 6},
- /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 4, 7},
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 6, 8, 10},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11},
random_context));
- // Combined test: idem > 1/4 with only 6 peers: expect 1 onion peer and no
- // localhost peers (1/4 + 0) to be protected, sorted by longest uptime.
+ // Tests with 3 networks...
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost, 1 I2P and 1 onion peer out of 4
+ // to protect 1 I2P, 0 localhost, 0 onion and 1 other peer (2 total), sorted
+ // by longest uptime; stable sort breaks tie with array order of I2P first.
BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
- 6, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ 4, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
- c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 4 || c.id == 5);
c.m_is_local = (c.id == 3);
+ if (c.id == 4) {
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else if (c.id == 2) {
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV6;
+ }
},
- /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 4},
- /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 5},
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 4},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {1, 2},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost, 1 I2P and 1 onion peer out of 7
+ // to protect 1 I2P, 0 localhost, 0 onion and 2 other peers (3 total) sorted
+ // by longest uptime; stable sort breaks tie with array order of I2P first.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 7, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 4);
+ if (c.id == 6) {
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else if (c.id == 5) {
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV6;
+ }
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 6},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 4, 5},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost, 1 I2P and 1 onion peer out of 8
+ // to protect 1 I2P, 1 localhost, 0 onion and 2 other peers (4 total) sorted
+ // by uptime; stable sort breaks tie with array order of I2P then localhost.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 8, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 6);
+ if (c.id == 5) {
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else if (c.id == 4) {
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV6;
+ }
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 5, 6},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 4, 7},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 4 localhost, 2 I2P, and 2 onion peers out of
+ // 16 to protect 1 localhost, 2 I2P, and 1 onion (4/16 total), plus 4 others
+ // for 8 total, sorted by longest uptime.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 16, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 6 || c.id > 11);
+ if (c.id == 7 || c.id == 11) {
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else if (c.id == 9 || c.id == 10) {
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV4;
+ }
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost, 8 I2P and 1 onion peer out of
+ // 24 to protect 1, 4, and 1 (6 total), plus 6 others for 12/24 total,
+ // sorted by longest uptime.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 24, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 12);
+ if (c.id > 14 && c.id < 23) { // 4 protected instead of usual 2
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else if (c.id == 23) {
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV6;
+ }
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21, 22},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost, 3 I2P and 6 onion peers out of
+ // 24 to protect 1, 3, and 2 (6 total, I2P has fewer candidates and so gets the
+ // unused localhost slot), plus 6 others for 12/24 total, sorted by longest uptime.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 24, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 15);
+ if (c.id == 12 || c.id == 14 || c.id == 17) {
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else if (c.id > 17) { // 4 protected instead of usual 2
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV4;
+ }
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 1 localhost, 7 I2P and 4 onion peers out of
+ // 24 to protect 1 localhost, 2 I2P, and 3 onions (6 total), plus 6 others
+ // for 12/24 total, sorted by longest uptime.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 24, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id == 13);
+ if (c.id > 16) {
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else if (c.id == 12 || c.id == 14 || c.id == 15 || c.id == 16) {
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV6;
+ }
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23},
+ random_context));
+
+ // Combined test: expect having 8 localhost, 4 I2P, and 3 onion peers out of
+ // 24 to protect 2 of each (6 total), plus 6 others for 12/24 total, sorted
+ // by longest uptime.
+ BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
+ 24, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
+ c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
+ c.m_is_local = (c.id > 15);
+ if (c.id > 10 && c.id < 15) {
+ c.m_network = NET_I2P;
+ } else if (c.id > 6 && c.id < 10) {
+ c.m_network = NET_ONION;
+ } else {
+ c.m_network = NET_IPV4;
+ }
+ },
+ /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 16, 17},
+ /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23},
random_context));
}
@@ -257,91 +485,89 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_eviction_test)
{
FastRandomContext random_context{true};
- for (int i = 0; i < NODE_EVICTION_TEST_ROUNDS; ++i) {
- for (int number_of_nodes = 0; number_of_nodes < NODE_EVICTION_TEST_UP_TO_N_NODES; ++number_of_nodes) {
- // Four nodes with the highest keyed netgroup values should be
- // protected from eviction.
- BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
- number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
- candidate.nKeyedNetGroup = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
- },
- {0, 1, 2, 3}, random_context));
-
- // Eight nodes with the lowest minimum ping time should be protected
- // from eviction.
- BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
- number_of_nodes, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
- candidate.m_min_ping_time = std::chrono::microseconds{candidate.id};
- },
- {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}, random_context));
-
- // Four nodes that most recently sent us novel transactions accepted
- // into our mempool should be protected from eviction.
- BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
- number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
- candidate.nLastTXTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
- },
- {0, 1, 2, 3}, random_context));
-
- // Up to eight non-tx-relay peers that most recently sent us novel
- // blocks should be protected from eviction.
- BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
- number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
- candidate.nLastBlockTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
- if (candidate.id <= 7) {
- candidate.fRelayTxes = false;
- candidate.fRelevantServices = true;
- }
- },
- {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}, random_context));
-
- // Four peers that most recently sent us novel blocks should be
- // protected from eviction.
- BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
- number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
- candidate.nLastBlockTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
- },
- {0, 1, 2, 3}, random_context));
-
- // Combination of the previous two tests.
- BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
- number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
- candidate.nLastBlockTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
- if (candidate.id <= 7) {
- candidate.fRelayTxes = false;
- candidate.fRelevantServices = true;
- }
- },
- {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11}, random_context));
-
- // Combination of all tests above.
- BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
- number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
- candidate.nKeyedNetGroup = number_of_nodes - candidate.id; // 4 protected
- candidate.m_min_ping_time = std::chrono::microseconds{candidate.id}; // 8 protected
- candidate.nLastTXTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id; // 4 protected
- candidate.nLastBlockTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id; // 4 protected
- },
- {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19}, random_context));
-
- // An eviction is expected given >= 29 random eviction candidates. The eviction logic protects at most
- // four peers by net group, eight by lowest ping time, four by last time of novel tx, up to eight non-tx-relay
- // peers by last novel block time, and four more peers by last novel block time.
- if (number_of_nodes >= 29) {
- BOOST_CHECK(SelectNodeToEvict(GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates(number_of_nodes, random_context)));
- }
-
- // No eviction is expected given <= 20 random eviction candidates. The eviction logic protects at least
- // four peers by net group, eight by lowest ping time, four by last time of novel tx and four peers by last
- // novel block time.
- if (number_of_nodes <= 20) {
- BOOST_CHECK(!SelectNodeToEvict(GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates(number_of_nodes, random_context)));
- }
+ for (int number_of_nodes = 0; number_of_nodes < 200; ++number_of_nodes) {
+ // Four nodes with the highest keyed netgroup values should be
+ // protected from eviction.
+ BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
+ number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
+ candidate.nKeyedNetGroup = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
+ },
+ {0, 1, 2, 3}, random_context));
+
+ // Eight nodes with the lowest minimum ping time should be protected
+ // from eviction.
+ BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
+ number_of_nodes, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
+ candidate.m_min_ping_time = std::chrono::microseconds{candidate.id};
+ },
+ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}, random_context));
+
+ // Four nodes that most recently sent us novel transactions accepted
+ // into our mempool should be protected from eviction.
+ BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
+ number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
+ candidate.nLastTXTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
+ },
+ {0, 1, 2, 3}, random_context));
+
+ // Up to eight non-tx-relay peers that most recently sent us novel
+ // blocks should be protected from eviction.
+ BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
+ number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
+ candidate.nLastBlockTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
+ if (candidate.id <= 7) {
+ candidate.fRelayTxes = false;
+ candidate.fRelevantServices = true;
+ }
+ },
+ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}, random_context));
+
+ // Four peers that most recently sent us novel blocks should be
+ // protected from eviction.
+ BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
+ number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
+ candidate.nLastBlockTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
+ },
+ {0, 1, 2, 3}, random_context));
+
+ // Combination of the previous two tests.
+ BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
+ number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
+ candidate.nLastBlockTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id;
+ if (candidate.id <= 7) {
+ candidate.fRelayTxes = false;
+ candidate.fRelevantServices = true;
+ }
+ },
+ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11}, random_context));
+
+ // Combination of all tests above.
+ BOOST_CHECK(!IsEvicted(
+ number_of_nodes, [number_of_nodes](NodeEvictionCandidate& candidate) {
+ candidate.nKeyedNetGroup = number_of_nodes - candidate.id; // 4 protected
+ candidate.m_min_ping_time = std::chrono::microseconds{candidate.id}; // 8 protected
+ candidate.nLastTXTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id; // 4 protected
+ candidate.nLastBlockTime = number_of_nodes - candidate.id; // 4 protected
+ },
+ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19}, random_context));
+
+ // An eviction is expected given >= 29 random eviction candidates. The eviction logic protects at most
+ // four peers by net group, eight by lowest ping time, four by last time of novel tx, up to eight non-tx-relay
+ // peers by last novel block time, and four more peers by last novel block time.
+ if (number_of_nodes >= 29) {
+ BOOST_CHECK(SelectNodeToEvict(GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates(number_of_nodes, random_context)));
+ }
- // Cases left to test:
- // * "If any remaining peers are preferred for eviction consider only them. [...]"
- // * "Identify the network group with the most connections and youngest member. [...]"
+ // No eviction is expected given <= 20 random eviction candidates. The eviction logic protects at least
+ // four peers by net group, eight by lowest ping time, four by last time of novel tx and four peers by last
+ // novel block time.
+ if (number_of_nodes <= 20) {
+ BOOST_CHECK(!SelectNodeToEvict(GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates(number_of_nodes, random_context)));
}
+
+ // Cases left to test:
+ // * "If any remaining peers are preferred for eviction consider only them. [...]"
+ // * "Identify the network group with the most connections and youngest member. [...]"
}
}
diff --git a/src/test/system_tests.cpp b/src/test/system_tests.cpp
index 940145b84f..e97eab2c00 100644
--- a/src/test/system_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/system_tests.cpp
@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
#include <univalue.h>
#ifdef ENABLE_EXTERNAL_SIGNER
+#if defined(WIN32) && !defined(__kernel_entry)
+// A workaround for boost 1.71 incompatibility with mingw-w64 compiler.
+// For details see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22348.
+#define __kernel_entry
+#endif
#include <boost/process.hpp>
#endif // ENABLE_EXTERNAL_SIGNER
diff --git a/src/test/txindex_tests.cpp b/src/test/txindex_tests.cpp
index d47c54fd6e..3ce7ecb5f2 100644
--- a/src/test/txindex_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/txindex_tests.cpp
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(txindex_initial_sync, TestChain100Setup)
// BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain should return false before txindex is started.
BOOST_CHECK(!txindex.BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain());
- BOOST_REQUIRE(txindex.Start(::ChainstateActive()));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(txindex.Start(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate()));
// Allow tx index to catch up with the block index.
constexpr int64_t timeout_ms = 10 * 1000;
diff --git a/src/test/txvalidation_tests.cpp b/src/test/txvalidation_tests.cpp
index 95ad85d0f8..ade9e210f2 100644
--- a/src/test/txvalidation_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/txvalidation_tests.cpp
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_reject_coinbase, TestChain100Setup)
LOCK(cs_main);
unsigned int initialPoolSize = m_node.mempool->size();
- const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(::ChainstateActive(), *m_node.mempool, MakeTransactionRef(coinbaseTx),
+ const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool, MakeTransactionRef(coinbaseTx),
true /* bypass_limits */);
BOOST_CHECK(result.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::INVALID);
diff --git a/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp b/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp
index 3244b58082..23195c0a26 100644
--- a/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
const auto ToMemPool = [this](const CMutableTransaction& tx) {
LOCK(cs_main);
- const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(::ChainstateActive(), *m_node.mempool, MakeTransactionRef(tx),
+ const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool, MakeTransactionRef(tx),
true /* bypass_limits */);
return result.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::VALID;
};
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
// Test 2: ... and should be rejected if spend1 is in the memory pool
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
m_node.mempool->clear();
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
m_node.mempool->clear();
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(oneSpend, scriptPubKey);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
}
// spends[1] should have been removed from the mempool when the
// block with spends[0] is accepted:
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
// should fail.
// Capture this interaction with the upgraded_nop argument: set it when evaluating
// any script flag that is implemented as an upgraded NOP code.
-static void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(const CTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_flags, bool add_to_cache) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
+static void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(const CTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_flags, bool add_to_cache, CCoinsViewCache& active_coins_tip) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
{
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata;
// If we add many more flags, this loop can get too expensive, but we can
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(const CTransaction &tx, uint32_t fail
// WITNESS requires P2SH
test_flags |= SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH;
}
- bool ret = CheckInputScripts(tx, state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, nullptr);
+ bool ret = CheckInputScripts(tx, state, &active_coins_tip, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, nullptr);
// CheckInputScripts should succeed iff test_flags doesn't intersect with
// failing_flags
bool expected_return_value = !(test_flags & failing_flags);
@@ -136,13 +136,13 @@ static void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(const CTransaction &tx, uint32_t fail
if (ret && add_to_cache) {
// Check that we get a cache hit if the tx was valid
std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks;
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(tx, state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, &scriptchecks));
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(tx, state, &active_coins_tip, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, &scriptchecks));
BOOST_CHECK(scriptchecks.empty());
} else {
// Check that we get script executions to check, if the transaction
// was invalid, or we didn't add to cache.
std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks;
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(tx, state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, &scriptchecks));
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(tx, state, &active_coins_tip, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, &scriptchecks));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(scriptchecks.size(), tx.vin.size());
}
}
@@ -205,20 +205,20 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
TxValidationState state;
PrecomputedTransactionData ptd_spend_tx;
- BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(spend_tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, nullptr));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(spend_tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, nullptr));
// If we call again asking for scriptchecks (as happens in
// ConnectBlock), we should add a script check object for this -- we're
// not caching invalidity (if that changes, delete this test case).
std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks;
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(spend_tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, &scriptchecks));
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(spend_tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, &scriptchecks));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(scriptchecks.size(), 1U);
// Test that CheckInputScripts returns true iff DERSIG-enforcing flags are
// not present. Don't add these checks to the cache, so that we can
// test later that block validation works fine in the absence of cached
// successes.
- ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(spend_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG | SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S | SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC, false);
+ ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(spend_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG | SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S | SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC, false, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
}
// And if we produce a block with this tx, it should be valid (DERSIG not
@@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock({spend_tx}, p2pk_scriptPubKey);
LOCK(cs_main);
- BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
- BOOST_CHECK(::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip().GetBestBlock() == block.GetHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip().GetBestBlock() == block.GetHash());
// Test P2SH: construct a transaction that is valid without P2SH, and
// then test validity with P2SH.
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig2(p2pk_scriptPubKey.begin(), p2pk_scriptPubKey.end());
invalid_under_p2sh_tx.vin[0].scriptSig << vchSig2;
- ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_under_p2sh_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true);
+ ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_under_p2sh_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
}
// Test CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
@@ -267,13 +267,13 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
- ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_with_cltv_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true);
+ ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_with_cltv_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
// Make it valid, and check again
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100;
TxValidationState state;
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata;
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(invalid_with_cltv_tx), state, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(invalid_with_cltv_tx), state, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
}
// TEST CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY
@@ -295,13 +295,13 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
- ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_with_csv_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true);
+ ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_with_csv_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
// Make it valid, and check again
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100;
TxValidationState state;
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata;
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(invalid_with_csv_tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(invalid_with_csv_tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
}
// TODO: add tests for remaining script flags
@@ -324,11 +324,11 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
UpdateInput(valid_with_witness_tx.vin[0], sigdata);
// This should be valid under all script flags.
- ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx), 0, true);
+ ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx), 0, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
// Remove the witness, and check that it is now invalid.
valid_with_witness_tx.vin[0].scriptWitness.SetNull();
- ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true);
+ ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
}
{
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
}
// This should be valid under all script flags
- ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(tx), 0, true);
+ ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(tx), 0, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
// Check that if the second input is invalid, but the first input is
// valid, the transaction is not cached.
@@ -363,12 +363,12 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
TxValidationState state;
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata;
// This transaction is now invalid under segwit, because of the second input.
- BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks;
// Make sure this transaction was not cached (ie because the first
// input was valid)
- BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, &scriptchecks));
+ BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, &scriptchecks));
// Should get 2 script checks back -- caching is on a whole-transaction basis.
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(scriptchecks.size(), 2U);
}
diff --git a/src/test/util/mining.cpp b/src/test/util/mining.cpp
index 1204873828..f6a11bc02e 100644
--- a/src/test/util/mining.cpp
+++ b/src/test/util/mining.cpp
@@ -74,12 +74,12 @@ CTxIn MineBlock(const NodeContext& node, const CScript& coinbase_scriptPubKey)
std::shared_ptr<CBlock> PrepareBlock(const NodeContext& node, const CScript& coinbase_scriptPubKey)
{
auto block = std::make_shared<CBlock>(
- BlockAssembler{::ChainstateActive(), *Assert(node.mempool), Params()}
+ BlockAssembler{Assert(node.chainman)->ActiveChainstate(), *Assert(node.mempool), Params()}
.CreateNewBlock(coinbase_scriptPubKey)
->block);
LOCK(cs_main);
- block->nTime = ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast() + 1;
+ block->nTime = Assert(node.chainman)->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast() + 1;
block->hashMerkleRoot = BlockMerkleRoot(*block);
return block;
diff --git a/src/test/util/net.h b/src/test/util/net.h
index 71685d437a..1b49a671bd 100644
--- a/src/test/util/net.h
+++ b/src/test/util/net.h
@@ -6,9 +6,11 @@
#define BITCOIN_TEST_UTIL_NET_H
#include <compat.h>
+#include <netaddress.h>
#include <net.h>
#include <util/sock.h>
+#include <array>
#include <cassert>
#include <cstring>
#include <string>
@@ -67,6 +69,16 @@ constexpr ConnectionType ALL_CONNECTION_TYPES[]{
ConnectionType::ADDR_FETCH,
};
+constexpr auto ALL_NETWORKS = std::array{
+ Network::NET_UNROUTABLE,
+ Network::NET_IPV4,
+ Network::NET_IPV6,
+ Network::NET_ONION,
+ Network::NET_I2P,
+ Network::NET_CJDNS,
+ Network::NET_INTERNAL,
+};
+
/**
* A mocked Sock alternative that returns a statically contained data upon read and succeeds
* and ignores all writes. The data to be returned is given to the constructor and when it is
diff --git a/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp b/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
index 863c3ab565..748272bb1d 100644
--- a/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
+++ b/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ BasicTestingSetup::BasicTestingSetup(const std::string& chainName, const std::ve
: m_path_root{fs::temp_directory_path() / "test_common_" PACKAGE_NAME / g_insecure_rand_ctx_temp_path.rand256().ToString()},
m_args{}
{
+ m_node.args = &gArgs;
const std::vector<const char*> arguments = Cat(
{
"dummy",
@@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ BasicTestingSetup::BasicTestingSetup(const std::string& chainName, const std::ve
gArgs.ForceSetArg("-datadir", m_path_root.string());
gArgs.ClearPathCache();
{
- SetupServerArgs(m_node);
+ SetupServerArgs(*m_node.args);
std::string error;
const bool success{m_node.args->ParseParameters(arguments.size(), arguments.data(), error)};
assert(success);
@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ ChainTestingSetup::ChainTestingSetup(const std::string& chainName, const std::ve
m_node.fee_estimator = std::make_unique<CBlockPolicyEstimator>();
m_node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(m_node.fee_estimator.get(), 1);
- m_node.chainman = &::g_chainman;
+ m_node.chainman = std::make_unique<ChainstateManager>();
// Start script-checking threads. Set g_parallel_script_checks to true so they are used.
constexpr int script_check_threads = 2;
@@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ ChainTestingSetup::~ChainTestingSetup()
m_node.mempool.reset();
m_node.scheduler.reset();
m_node.chainman->Reset();
- m_node.chainman = nullptr;
+ m_node.chainman.reset();
pblocktree.reset();
}
@@ -180,22 +181,22 @@ TestingSetup::TestingSetup(const std::string& chainName, const std::vector<const
RegisterAllCoreRPCCommands(tableRPC);
m_node.chainman->InitializeChainstate(*m_node.mempool);
- ::ChainstateActive().InitCoinsDB(
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().InitCoinsDB(
/* cache_size_bytes */ 1 << 23, /* in_memory */ true, /* should_wipe */ false);
- assert(!::ChainstateActive().CanFlushToDisk());
- ::ChainstateActive().InitCoinsCache(1 << 23);
- assert(::ChainstateActive().CanFlushToDisk());
- if (!::ChainstateActive().LoadGenesisBlock(chainparams)) {
+ assert(!m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CanFlushToDisk());
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().InitCoinsCache(1 << 23);
+ assert(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CanFlushToDisk());
+ if (!m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().LoadGenesisBlock()) {
throw std::runtime_error("LoadGenesisBlock failed.");
}
BlockValidationState state;
- if (!::ChainstateActive().ActivateBestChain(state, chainparams)) {
+ if (!m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().ActivateBestChain(state)) {
throw std::runtime_error(strprintf("ActivateBestChain failed. (%s)", state.ToString()));
}
m_node.addrman = std::make_unique<CAddrMan>();
- m_node.banman = std::make_unique<BanMan>(m_args.GetDataDirBase() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
+ m_node.banman = std::make_unique<BanMan>(m_args.GetDataDirBase() / "banlist", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
m_node.connman = std::make_unique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337, *m_node.addrman); // Deterministic randomness for tests.
m_node.peerman = PeerManager::make(chainparams, *m_node.connman, *m_node.addrman,
m_node.banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman,
@@ -240,7 +241,7 @@ CBlock TestChain100Setup::CreateAndProcessBlock(const std::vector<CMutableTransa
{
const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
CTxMemPool empty_pool;
- CBlock block = BlockAssembler(::ChainstateActive(), empty_pool, chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey)->block;
+ CBlock block = BlockAssembler(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), empty_pool, chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey)->block;
Assert(block.vtx.size() == 1);
for (const CMutableTransaction& tx : txns) {
@@ -299,7 +300,7 @@ CMutableTransaction TestChain100Setup::CreateValidMempoolTransaction(CTransactio
// If submit=true, add transaction to the mempool.
if (submit) {
LOCK(cs_main);
- const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(::ChainstateActive(), *m_node.mempool.get(), MakeTransactionRef(mempool_txn), /* bypass_limits */ false);
+ const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool.get(), MakeTransactionRef(mempool_txn), /* bypass_limits */ false);
assert(result.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::VALID);
}
diff --git a/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp b/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp
index 552be0a2da..e0bc10d660 100644
--- a/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ std::shared_ptr<CBlock> MinerTestingSetup::Block(const uint256& prev_hash)
std::shared_ptr<CBlock> MinerTestingSetup::FinalizeBlock(std::shared_ptr<CBlock> pblock)
{
- LOCK(cs_main); // For g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex
- GenerateCoinbaseCommitment(*pblock, g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(pblock->hashPrevBlock), Params().GetConsensus());
+ LOCK(cs_main); // For m_node.chainman->m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex
+ GenerateCoinbaseCommitment(*pblock, m_node.chainman->m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(pblock->hashPrevBlock), Params().GetConsensus());
pblock->hashMerkleRoot = BlockMerkleRoot(*pblock);
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(processnewblock_signals_ordering)
const CBlockIndex* initial_tip = nullptr;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- initial_tip = ::ChainActive().Tip();
+ initial_tip = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
}
auto sub = std::make_shared<TestSubscriber>(initial_tip->GetBlockHash());
RegisterSharedValidationInterface(sub);
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(processnewblock_signals_ordering)
UnregisterSharedValidationInterface(sub);
LOCK(cs_main);
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(sub->m_expected_tip, ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(sub->m_expected_tip, m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash());
}
/**
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(mempool_locks_reorg)
// Run the test multiple times
for (int test_runs = 3; test_runs > 0; --test_runs) {
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(last_mined->GetHash(), ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(last_mined->GetHash(), m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash());
// Later on split from here
const uint256 split_hash{last_mined->hashPrevBlock};
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(mempool_locks_reorg)
{
LOCK(cs_main);
for (const auto& tx : txs) {
- const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(::ChainstateActive(), *m_node.mempool, tx, false /* bypass_limits */);
+ const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool, tx, false /* bypass_limits */);
BOOST_REQUIRE(result.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::VALID);
}
}
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(mempool_locks_reorg)
}
LOCK(cs_main);
// We are done with the reorg, so the tip must have changed
- assert(tip_init != ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash());
+ assert(tip_init != m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash());
}};
// Submit the reorg in this thread to invalidate and remove the txs from the tx pool
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(mempool_locks_reorg)
ProcessBlock(b);
}
// Check that the reorg was eventually successful
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(last_mined->GetHash(), ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(last_mined->GetHash(), m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash());
// We can join the other thread, which returns when the reorg was successful
rpc_thread.join();
diff --git a/src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp b/src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp
index 0b912acb08..7c1db9d4b9 100644
--- a/src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chainstatemanager)
CTxMemPool& mempool = *m_node.mempool;
std::vector<CChainState*> chainstates;
- const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
BOOST_CHECK(!manager.SnapshotBlockhash().has_value());
@@ -76,9 +75,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chainstatemanager)
/* cache_size_bytes */ 1 << 23, /* in_memory */ true, /* should_wipe */ false);
WITH_LOCK(::cs_main, c2.InitCoinsCache(1 << 23));
// Unlike c1, which doesn't have any blocks. Gets us different tip, height.
- c2.LoadGenesisBlock(chainparams);
+ c2.LoadGenesisBlock();
BlockValidationState _;
- BOOST_CHECK(c2.ActivateBestChain(_, chainparams, nullptr));
+ BOOST_CHECK(c2.ActivateBestChain(_, nullptr));
BOOST_CHECK(manager.IsSnapshotActive());
BOOST_CHECK(!manager.IsSnapshotValidated());
@@ -138,7 +137,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chainstatemanager_rebalance_caches)
{
LOCK(::cs_main);
c1.InitCoinsCache(1 << 23);
- BOOST_REQUIRE(c1.LoadGenesisBlock(Params()));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(c1.LoadGenesisBlock());
c1.CoinsTip().SetBestBlock(InsecureRand256());
manager.MaybeRebalanceCaches();
}
@@ -156,7 +155,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(chainstatemanager_rebalance_caches)
{
LOCK(::cs_main);
c2.InitCoinsCache(1 << 23);
- BOOST_REQUIRE(c2.LoadGenesisBlock(Params()));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(c2.LoadGenesisBlock());
c2.CoinsTip().SetBestBlock(InsecureRand256());
manager.MaybeRebalanceCaches();
}
diff --git a/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp b/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp
index 304cd8feb0..690031cdc1 100644
--- a/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <chain.h>
#include <chainparams.h>
#include <consensus/params.h>
+#include <deploymentstatus.h>
#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
#include <validation.h>
#include <versionbits.h>
@@ -258,8 +259,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(versionbits_test)
/** Check that ComputeBlockVersion will set the appropriate bit correctly */
static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus::DeploymentPos dep)
{
- // This implicitly uses versionbitscache, so clear it every time
- versionbitscache.Clear();
+ // This implicitly uses g_versionbitscache, so clear it every time
+ g_versionbitscache.Clear();
int64_t bit = params.vDeployments[dep].bit;
int64_t nStartTime = params.vDeployments[dep].nStartTime;
@@ -267,7 +268,7 @@ static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus
int min_activation_height = params.vDeployments[dep].min_activation_height;
// should not be any signalling for first block
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(nullptr, params), VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(nullptr, params), VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS);
// always/never active deployments shouldn't need to be tested further
if (nStartTime == Consensus::BIP9Deployment::ALWAYS_ACTIVE ||
@@ -287,7 +288,7 @@ static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus
// Check min_activation_height is on a retarget boundary
BOOST_REQUIRE_EQUAL(min_activation_height % params.nMinerConfirmationWindow, 0U);
- const uint32_t bitmask{VersionBitsMask(params, dep)};
+ const uint32_t bitmask{g_versionbitscache.Mask(params, dep)};
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(bitmask, uint32_t{1} << bit);
// In the first chain, test that the bit is set by CBV until it has failed.
@@ -306,9 +307,9 @@ static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus
// earlier time, so will transition from DEFINED to STARTED at the
// end of the first period by mining blocks at nTime == 0
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow - 1, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit), 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit), 0);
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
// then we'll keep mining at nStartTime...
} else {
// use a time 1s earlier than start time to check we stay DEFINED
@@ -316,28 +317,28 @@ static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus
// Start generating blocks before nStartTime
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit), 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit), 0);
// Mine more blocks (4 less than the adjustment period) at the old time, and check that CBV isn't setting the bit yet.
for (uint32_t i = 1; i < params.nMinerConfirmationWindow - 4; i++) {
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow + i, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit), 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit), 0);
}
// Now mine 5 more blocks at the start time -- MTP should not have passed yet, so
// CBV should still not yet set the bit.
nTime = nStartTime;
for (uint32_t i = params.nMinerConfirmationWindow - 4; i <= params.nMinerConfirmationWindow; i++) {
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow + i, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit), 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit), 0);
}
// Next we will advance to the next period and transition to STARTED,
}
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow * 3, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
// so ComputeBlockVersion should now set the bit,
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
// and should also be using the VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS.
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & VERSIONBITS_TOP_MASK, VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & VERSIONBITS_TOP_MASK, VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS);
// Check that ComputeBlockVersion will set the bit until nTimeout
nTime += 600;
@@ -346,8 +347,8 @@ static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus
// These blocks are all before nTimeout is reached.
while (nTime < nTimeout && blocksToMine > 0) {
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(nHeight+1, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit)) != 0);
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & VERSIONBITS_TOP_MASK, VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & VERSIONBITS_TOP_MASK, VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS);
blocksToMine--;
nTime += 600;
nHeight += 1;
@@ -361,7 +362,7 @@ static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus
// finish the last period before we start timing out
while (nHeight % params.nMinerConfirmationWindow != 0) {
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(nHeight+1, nTime - 1, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
nHeight += 1;
}
@@ -369,12 +370,12 @@ static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus
// the bit until the period transition.
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < params.nMinerConfirmationWindow - 1; i++) {
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(nHeight+1, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
nHeight += 1;
}
// The next block should trigger no longer setting the bit.
lastBlock = firstChain.Mine(nHeight+1, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit), 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit), 0);
}
// On a new chain:
@@ -385,30 +386,30 @@ static void check_computeblockversion(const Consensus::Params& params, Consensus
// Mine one period worth of blocks, and check that the bit will be on for the
// next period.
lastBlock = secondChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
// Mine another period worth of blocks, signaling the new bit.
lastBlock = secondChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow * 2, nTime, VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS | (1<<bit)).Tip();
// After one period of setting the bit on each block, it should have locked in.
// We keep setting the bit for one more period though, until activation.
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
// Now check that we keep mining the block until the end of this period, and
// then stop at the beginning of the next period.
lastBlock = secondChain.Mine((params.nMinerConfirmationWindow * 3) - 1, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
lastBlock = secondChain.Mine(params.nMinerConfirmationWindow * 3, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
if (lastBlock->nHeight + 1 < min_activation_height) {
// check signalling continues while min_activation_height is not reached
lastBlock = secondChain.Mine(min_activation_height - 1, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
- BOOST_CHECK((ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK((g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit)) != 0);
// then reach min_activation_height, which was already REQUIRE'd to start a new period
lastBlock = secondChain.Mine(min_activation_height, nTime, VERSIONBITS_LAST_OLD_BLOCK_VERSION).Tip();
}
// Check that we don't signal after activation
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1<<bit), 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(g_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(lastBlock, params) & (1 << bit), 0);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(versionbits_computeblockversion)
@@ -425,7 +426,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(versionbits_computeblockversion)
// not take precedence over STARTED/LOCKED_IN. So all softforks on
// the same bit might overlap, even when non-overlapping start-end
// times are picked.
- const uint32_t dep_mask{VersionBitsMask(chainParams->GetConsensus(), dep)};
+ const uint32_t dep_mask{g_versionbitscache.Mask(chainParams->GetConsensus(), dep)};
BOOST_CHECK(!(chain_all_vbits & dep_mask));
chain_all_vbits |= dep_mask;
check_computeblockversion(chainParams->GetConsensus(), dep);