diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp | 47 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp index ed6782ea34..6bfd315647 100644 --- a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp @@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) int blocknum = 0; // Loop through 200 blocks - // At a decay .998 and 4 fee transactions per block - // This makes the tx count about 1.33 per bucket, above the 1 threshold + // At a decay .9952 and 4 fee transactions per block + // This makes the tx count about 2.5 per bucket, well above the 0.1 threshold while (blocknum < 200) { for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++) { // For each fee for (int k = 0; k < 4; k++) { // add 4 fee txs @@ -75,20 +75,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) } mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); block.clear(); - if (blocknum == 30) { - // At this point we should need to combine 5 buckets to get enough data points - // So estimateFee(1,2,3) should fail and estimateFee(4) should return somewhere around - // 8*baserate. estimateFee(4) %'s are 100,100,100,100,90 = average 98% + // Check after just a few txs that combining buckets works as expected + if (blocknum == 3) { + // At this point we should need to combine 3 buckets to get enough data points + // So estimateFee(1) should fail and estimateFee(2) should return somewhere around + // 9*baserate. estimateFee(2) %'s are 100,100,90 = average 97% BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(2) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(3) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee); - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee); - int answerFound; - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(1, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(3, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(4, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(8, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(8) && answerFound == 8); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(2).GetFeePerK() < 9*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(2).GetFeePerK() > 9*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee); } } @@ -105,13 +99,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] <= origFeeEst[i-2]); } int mult = 11-i; - if (i > 1) { + if (i % 2 == 0) { //At scale 2, test logic is only correct for even targets BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] < mult*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee); BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] > mult*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee); } - else { - BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] == CFeeRate(0).GetFeePerK()); - } + } + // Fill out rest of the original estimates + for (int i = 10; i <= 48; i++) { + origFeeEst.push_back(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); } // Mine 50 more blocks with no transactions happening, estimates shouldn't change @@ -140,10 +135,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); } - int answerFound; for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) { BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, &answerFound, mpool).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[answerFound-1] - deltaFee); } // Mine all those transactions @@ -156,16 +149,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) txHashes[j].pop_back(); } } - mpool.removeForBlock(block, 265); + mpool.removeForBlock(block, 266); block.clear(); BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); for (int i = 2; i < 10;i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); } - // Mine 200 more blocks where everything is mined every block + // Mine 400 more blocks where everything is mined every block // Estimates should be below original estimates - while (blocknum < 465) { + while (blocknum < 665) { for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++) { // For each fee multiple for (int k = 0; k < 4; k++) { // add 4 fee txs tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 10000*blocknum+100*j+k; @@ -181,7 +174,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) block.clear(); } BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); - for (int i = 2; i < 10; i++) { + for (int i = 2; i < 9; i++) { // At 9, the original estimate was already at the bottom (b/c scale = 2) BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); } @@ -191,7 +184,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) mpool.TrimToSize(1); BOOST_CHECK(mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK() > feeV[5]); for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= feeEst.estimateRawFee(i, 0.85, FeeEstimateHorizon::MED_HALFLIFE).GetFeePerK()); BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK()); } } |