diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/DoS_tests.cpp | 184 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/mempool_tests.cpp | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/miner_tests.cpp | 35 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp | 34 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/test_bitcoin.h | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/test_bitcoin_fuzzy.cpp | 23 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp | 24 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp | 15 |
10 files changed, 288 insertions, 49 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp index b88ad5ed1b..bf6f2533df 100644 --- a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp @@ -40,8 +40,141 @@ CService ip(uint32_t i) static NodeId id = 0; +void UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(NodeId node, int64_t time_in_seconds); + BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(DoS_tests, TestingSetup) +// Test eviction of an outbound peer whose chain never advances +// Mock a node connection, and use mocktime to simulate a peer +// which never sends any headers messages. PeerLogic should +// decide to evict that outbound peer, after the appropriate timeouts. +// Note that we protect 4 outbound nodes from being subject to +// this logic; this test takes advantage of that protection only +// being applied to nodes which send headers with sufficient +// work. +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction) +{ + std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false); + + // Mock an outbound peer + CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); + CNode dummyNode1(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false); + dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); + + peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1); + dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; + dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; + + // This test requires that we have a chain with non-zero work. + LOCK(cs_main); + BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip() != nullptr); + BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork > 0); + + // Test starts here + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_vSend); + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0); + dummyNode1.vSendMsg.clear(); + + int64_t nStartTime = GetTime(); + // Wait 21 minutes + SetMockTime(nStartTime+21*60); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0); + // Wait 3 more minutes + SetMockTime(nStartTime+24*60); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in disconnect + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.fDisconnect == true); + SetMockTime(0); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); +} + +void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic) +{ + CAddress addr(ip(GetRandInt(0xffffffff)), NODE_NONE); + vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false)); + CNode &node = *vNodes.back(); + node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); + + peerLogic.InitializeNode(&node); + node.nVersion = 1; + node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; + + CConnmanTest::AddNode(node); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) +{ + const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus(); + constexpr int nMaxOutbound = 8; + CConnman::Options options; + options.nMaxConnections = 125; + options.nMaxOutbound = nMaxOutbound; + options.nMaxFeeler = 1; + + connman->Init(options); + std::vector<CNode *> vNodes; + + // Mock some outbound peers + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) { + AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic); + } + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + + // No nodes should be marked for disconnection while we have no extra peers + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false); + } + + SetMockTime(GetTime() + 3*consensusParams.nPowTargetSpacing + 1); + + // Now tip should definitely be stale, and we should look for an extra + // outbound peer + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + BOOST_CHECK(connman->GetTryNewOutboundPeer()); + + // Still no peers should be marked for disconnection + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false); + } + + // If we add one more peer, something should get marked for eviction + // on the next check (since we're mocking the time to be in the future, the + // required time connected check should be satisfied). + AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic); + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) { + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false); + } + // Last added node should get marked for eviction + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == true); + + vNodes.back()->fDisconnect = false; + + // Update the last announced block time for the last + // peer, and check that the next newest node gets evicted. + UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(vNodes.back()->GetId(), GetTime()); + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound-1; ++i) { + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false); + } + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[nMaxOutbound-1]->fDisconnect == true); + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == false); + + bool dummy; + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(node->GetId(), dummy); + } + + CConnmanTest::ClearNodes(); +} + BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) { std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false); @@ -53,7 +186,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1); dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); // Should get banned + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); // Should get banned + } + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned @@ -64,13 +201,24 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode2); dummyNode2.nVersion = 1; dummyNode2.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); + } + LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing); peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr2)); // 2 not banned yet... BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be - Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); + } peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr2)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode2.GetId(), dummy); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) @@ -85,16 +233,29 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1); dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); + } + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1)); - Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 10); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 10); + } peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1)); - Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 1); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 1); + } peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", std::to_string(DEFAULT_BANSCORE_THRESHOLD)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) @@ -112,7 +273,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) dummyNode.nVersion = 1; dummyNode.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), 100); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), 100); + } + LOCK(dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing); peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr)); @@ -121,11 +286,15 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60*24+1); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode.GetId(), dummy); } CTransactionRef RandomOrphan() { std::map<uint256, COrphanTx>::iterator it; + LOCK(cs_main); it = mapOrphanTransactions.lower_bound(InsecureRand256()); if (it == mapOrphanTransactions.end()) it = mapOrphanTransactions.begin(); @@ -195,6 +364,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_mapOrphans) BOOST_CHECK(!AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i)); } + LOCK(cs_main); // Test EraseOrphansFor: for (NodeId i = 0; i < 3; i++) { diff --git a/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp b/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp index f2d5b385d0..71baf286e9 100644 --- a/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(SimpleRoundTripTest) CBlock block(BuildBlockTestCase()); pool.addUnchecked(block.vtx[2]->GetHash(), entry.FromTx(*block.vtx[2])); + LOCK(pool.cs); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.mapTx.find(block.vtx[2]->GetHash())->GetSharedTx().use_count(), SHARED_TX_OFFSET + 0); // Do a simple ShortTxIDs RT @@ -161,6 +162,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(NonCoinbasePreforwardRTTest) CBlock block(BuildBlockTestCase()); pool.addUnchecked(block.vtx[2]->GetHash(), entry.FromTx(*block.vtx[2])); + LOCK(pool.cs); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.mapTx.find(block.vtx[2]->GetHash())->GetSharedTx().use_count(), SHARED_TX_OFFSET + 0); uint256 txhash; @@ -227,6 +229,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(SufficientPreforwardRTTest) CBlock block(BuildBlockTestCase()); pool.addUnchecked(block.vtx[1]->GetHash(), entry.FromTx(*block.vtx[1])); + LOCK(pool.cs); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.mapTx.find(block.vtx[1]->GetHash())->GetSharedTx().use_count(), SHARED_TX_OFFSET + 0); uint256 txhash; diff --git a/src/test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp b/src/test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp index efddafe17e..c1625cf476 100644 --- a/src/test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(existing_data_no_obfuscate) create_directories(ph); // Set up a non-obfuscated wrapper to write some initial data. - CDBWrapper* dbw = new CDBWrapper(ph, (1 << 10), false, false, false); + std::unique_ptr<CDBWrapper> dbw = MakeUnique<CDBWrapper>(ph, (1 << 10), false, false, false); char key = 'k'; uint256 in = InsecureRand256(); uint256 res; @@ -135,8 +135,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(existing_data_no_obfuscate) BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res.ToString(), in.ToString()); // Call the destructor to free leveldb LOCK - delete dbw; - dbw = nullptr; + dbw.reset(); // Now, set up another wrapper that wants to obfuscate the same directory CDBWrapper odbw(ph, (1 << 10), false, false, true); @@ -167,7 +166,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(existing_data_reindex) create_directories(ph); // Set up a non-obfuscated wrapper to write some initial data. - CDBWrapper* dbw = new CDBWrapper(ph, (1 << 10), false, false, false); + std::unique_ptr<CDBWrapper> dbw = MakeUnique<CDBWrapper>(ph, (1 << 10), false, false, false); char key = 'k'; uint256 in = InsecureRand256(); uint256 res; @@ -177,8 +176,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(existing_data_reindex) BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res.ToString(), in.ToString()); // Call the destructor to free leveldb LOCK - delete dbw; - dbw = nullptr; + dbw.reset(); // Simulate a -reindex by wiping the existing data store CDBWrapper odbw(ph, (1 << 10), false, true, true); diff --git a/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp b/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp index 116210a297..c7abad8026 100644 --- a/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolIndexingTest) sortedOrder[2] = tx1.GetHash().ToString(); // 10000 sortedOrder[3] = tx4.GetHash().ToString(); // 15000 sortedOrder[4] = tx2.GetHash().ToString(); // 20000 + LOCK(pool.cs); CheckSort<descendant_score>(pool, sortedOrder); /* low fee but with high fee child */ @@ -375,6 +376,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolAncestorIndexingTest) } sortedOrder[4] = tx3.GetHash().ToString(); // 0 + LOCK(pool.cs); CheckSort<ancestor_score>(pool, sortedOrder); /* low fee parent with high fee child */ diff --git a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp index 41e0626eb9..2851808cf4 100644 --- a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp @@ -335,23 +335,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity) BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error); mempool.clear(); - // invalid (pre-p2sh) txn in mempool, template creation fails - tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash(); - tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0; - tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1; - tx.vout[0].nValue = BLOCKSUBSIDY-LOWFEE; - script = CScript() << OP_0; - tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(CScriptID(script)); - hash = tx.GetHash(); - mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx)); - tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hash; - tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << std::vector<unsigned char>(script.begin(), script.end()); - tx.vout[0].nValue -= LOWFEE; - hash = tx.GetHash(); - mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx)); - BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error); - mempool.clear(); - // double spend txn pair in mempool, template creation fails tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash(); tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1; @@ -391,6 +374,24 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity) chainActive.SetTip(next); } BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey)); + + // invalid p2sh txn in mempool, template creation fails + tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash(); + tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0; + tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1; + tx.vout[0].nValue = BLOCKSUBSIDY-LOWFEE; + script = CScript() << OP_0; + tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(CScriptID(script)); + hash = tx.GetHash(); + mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx)); + tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hash; + tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << std::vector<unsigned char>(script.begin(), script.end()); + tx.vout[0].nValue -= LOWFEE; + hash = tx.GetHash(); + mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx)); + BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error); + mempool.clear(); + // Delete the dummy blocks again. while (chainActive.Tip()->nHeight > nHeight) { CBlockIndex* del = chainActive.Tip(); diff --git a/src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp b/src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp index 79bc48a118..fbe9e217ec 100644 --- a/src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp +++ b/src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp @@ -25,6 +25,18 @@ #include <memory> +void CConnmanTest::AddNode(CNode& node) +{ + LOCK(g_connman->cs_vNodes); + g_connman->vNodes.push_back(&node); +} + +void CConnmanTest::ClearNodes() +{ + LOCK(g_connman->cs_vNodes); + g_connman->vNodes.clear(); +} + uint256 insecure_rand_seed = GetRandHash(); FastRandomContext insecure_rand_ctx(insecure_rand_seed); @@ -69,9 +81,9 @@ TestingSetup::TestingSetup(const std::string& chainName) : BasicTestingSetup(cha GetMainSignals().RegisterBackgroundSignalScheduler(scheduler); mempool.setSanityCheck(1.0); - pblocktree = new CBlockTreeDB(1 << 20, true); - pcoinsdbview = new CCoinsViewDB(1 << 23, true); - pcoinsTip = new CCoinsViewCache(pcoinsdbview); + pblocktree.reset(new CBlockTreeDB(1 << 20, true)); + pcoinsdbview.reset(new CCoinsViewDB(1 << 23, true)); + pcoinsTip.reset(new CCoinsViewCache(pcoinsdbview.get())); if (!LoadGenesisBlock(chainparams)) { throw std::runtime_error("LoadGenesisBlock failed."); } @@ -86,7 +98,7 @@ TestingSetup::TestingSetup(const std::string& chainName) : BasicTestingSetup(cha threadGroup.create_thread(&ThreadScriptCheck); g_connman = std::unique_ptr<CConnman>(new CConnman(0x1337, 0x1337)); // Deterministic randomness for tests. connman = g_connman.get(); - peerLogic.reset(new PeerLogicValidation(connman)); + peerLogic.reset(new PeerLogicValidation(connman, scheduler)); } TestingSetup::~TestingSetup() @@ -98,14 +110,17 @@ TestingSetup::~TestingSetup() g_connman.reset(); peerLogic.reset(); UnloadBlockIndex(); - delete pcoinsTip; - delete pcoinsdbview; - delete pblocktree; + pcoinsTip.reset(); + pcoinsdbview.reset(); + pblocktree.reset(); fs::remove_all(pathTemp); } TestChain100Setup::TestChain100Setup() : TestingSetup(CBaseChainParams::REGTEST) { + // CreateAndProcessBlock() does not support building SegWit blocks, so don't activate in these tests. + // TODO: fix the code to support SegWit blocks. + UpdateVersionBitsParameters(Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT, 0, Consensus::BIP9Deployment::NO_TIMEOUT); // Generate a 100-block chain: coinbaseKey.MakeNewKey(true); CScript scriptPubKey = CScript() << ToByteVector(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()) << OP_CHECKSIG; @@ -134,7 +149,10 @@ TestChain100Setup::CreateAndProcessBlock(const std::vector<CMutableTransaction>& block.vtx.push_back(MakeTransactionRef(tx)); // IncrementExtraNonce creates a valid coinbase and merkleRoot unsigned int extraNonce = 0; - IncrementExtraNonce(&block, chainActive.Tip(), extraNonce); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + IncrementExtraNonce(&block, chainActive.Tip(), extraNonce); + } while (!CheckProofOfWork(block.GetHash(), block.nBits, chainparams.GetConsensus())) ++block.nNonce; diff --git a/src/test/test_bitcoin.h b/src/test/test_bitcoin.h index 2390aca342..6398386d42 100644 --- a/src/test/test_bitcoin.h +++ b/src/test/test_bitcoin.h @@ -49,9 +49,14 @@ struct BasicTestingSetup { * Included are data directory, coins database, script check threads setup. */ class CConnman; +class CNode; +struct CConnmanTest { + static void AddNode(CNode& node); + static void ClearNodes(); +}; + class PeerLogicValidation; struct TestingSetup: public BasicTestingSetup { - CCoinsViewDB *pcoinsdbview; fs::path pathTemp; boost::thread_group threadGroup; CConnman* connman; diff --git a/src/test/test_bitcoin_fuzzy.cpp b/src/test/test_bitcoin_fuzzy.cpp index 581ad2ffa0..6694c5caa8 100644 --- a/src/test/test_bitcoin_fuzzy.cpp +++ b/src/test/test_bitcoin_fuzzy.cpp @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include "undo.h" #include "version.h" #include "pubkey.h" +#include "blockencodings.h" #include <stdint.h> #include <unistd.h> @@ -45,6 +46,8 @@ enum TEST_ID { CBLOOMFILTER_DESERIALIZE, CDISKBLOCKINDEX_DESERIALIZE, CTXOUTCOMPRESSOR_DESERIALIZE, + BLOCKTRANSACTIONS_DESERIALIZE, + BLOCKTRANSACTIONSREQUEST_DESERIALIZE, TEST_ID_END }; @@ -245,6 +248,26 @@ int test_one_input(std::vector<uint8_t> buffer) { break; } + case BLOCKTRANSACTIONS_DESERIALIZE: + { + try + { + BlockTransactions bt; + ds >> bt; + } catch (const std::ios_base::failure& e) {return 0;} + + break; + } + case BLOCKTRANSACTIONSREQUEST_DESERIALIZE: + { + try + { + BlockTransactionsRequest btr; + ds >> btr; + } catch (const std::ios_base::failure& e) {return 0;} + + break; + } default: return 0; } diff --git a/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp b/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp index 82ca93e7da..ce3060a5f3 100644 --- a/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup) // Test 1: block with both of those transactions should be rejected. block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey); + LOCK(cs_main); BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash()); // Test 2: ... and should be rejected if spend1 is in the memory pool @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CMutableTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_fl // WITNESS requires P2SH test_flags |= SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH; } - bool ret = CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, nullptr); + bool ret = CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, nullptr); // CheckInputs should succeed iff test_flags doesn't intersect with // failing_flags bool expected_return_value = !(test_flags & failing_flags); @@ -135,13 +136,13 @@ void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CMutableTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_fl if (ret && add_to_cache) { // Check that we get a cache hit if the tx was valid std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks; - BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, &scriptchecks)); + BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, &scriptchecks)); BOOST_CHECK(scriptchecks.empty()); } else { // Check that we get script executions to check, if the transaction // was invalid, or we didn't add to cache. std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks; - BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, &scriptchecks)); + BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, test_flags, true, add_to_cache, txdata, &scriptchecks)); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(scriptchecks.size(), tx.vin.size()); } } @@ -151,7 +152,10 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup) { // Test that passing CheckInputs with one set of script flags doesn't imply // that we would pass again with a different set of flags. - InitScriptExecutionCache(); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + InitScriptExecutionCache(); + } CScript p2pk_scriptPubKey = CScript() << ToByteVector(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()) << OP_CHECKSIG; CScript p2sh_scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(CScriptID(p2pk_scriptPubKey)); @@ -201,13 +205,13 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup) CValidationState state; PrecomputedTransactionData ptd_spend_tx(spend_tx); - BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputs(spend_tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, nullptr)); + BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputs(spend_tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, nullptr)); // If we call again asking for scriptchecks (as happens in // ConnectBlock), we should add a script check object for this -- we're // not caching invalidity (if that changes, delete this test case). std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks; - BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(spend_tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, &scriptchecks)); + BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(spend_tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, &scriptchecks)); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(scriptchecks.size(), 1); // Test that CheckInputs returns true iff DERSIG-enforcing flags are @@ -268,7 +272,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup) invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100; CValidationState state; PrecomputedTransactionData txdata(invalid_with_cltv_tx); - BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(invalid_with_cltv_tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr)); + BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(invalid_with_cltv_tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr)); } // TEST CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY @@ -296,7 +300,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup) invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100; CValidationState state; PrecomputedTransactionData txdata(invalid_with_csv_tx); - BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(invalid_with_csv_tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr)); + BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(invalid_with_csv_tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr)); } // TODO: add tests for remaining script flags @@ -358,12 +362,12 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup) CValidationState state; PrecomputedTransactionData txdata(tx); // This transaction is now invalid under segwit, because of the second input. - BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, nullptr)); + BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, nullptr)); std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks; // Make sure this transaction was not cached (ie because the first // input was valid) - BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip, true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, &scriptchecks)); + BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputs(tx, state, pcoinsTip.get(), true, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, &scriptchecks)); // Should get 2 script checks back -- caching is on a whole-transaction basis. BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(scriptchecks.size(), 2); } diff --git a/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp b/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp index 882afb2e20..db537d3932 100644 --- a/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ public: int GetStateSinceHeightFor(const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev) const { return AbstractThresholdConditionChecker::GetStateSinceHeightFor(pindexPrev, paramsDummy, cache); } }; +class TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker : public TestConditionChecker +{ +public: + int64_t BeginTime(const Consensus::Params& params) const override { return Consensus::BIP9Deployment::ALWAYS_ACTIVE; } +}; + #define CHECKERS 6 class VersionBitsTester @@ -43,6 +49,8 @@ class VersionBitsTester // The first one performs all checks, the second only 50%, the third only 25%, etc... // This is to test whether lack of cached information leads to the same results. TestConditionChecker checker[CHECKERS]; + // Another 6 that assume always active activation + TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker checker_always[CHECKERS]; // Test counter (to identify failures) int num; @@ -56,6 +64,7 @@ public: } for (unsigned int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { checker[i] = TestConditionChecker(); + checker_always[i] = TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker(); } vpblock.clear(); return *this; @@ -82,6 +91,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateSinceHeightFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == height, strprintf("Test %i for StateSinceHeight", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateSinceHeightFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == 0, strprintf("Test %i for StateSinceHeight (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -92,6 +102,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_DEFINED, strprintf("Test %i for DEFINED", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -102,6 +113,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_STARTED, strprintf("Test %i for STARTED", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -112,6 +124,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_LOCKED_IN, strprintf("Test %i for LOCKED_IN", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -122,6 +135,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -132,6 +146,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_FAILED, strprintf("Test %i for FAILED", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; |