aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
-rw-r--r--src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/test/mempool_tests.cpp27
-rw-r--r--src/test/miner_tests.cpp3
-rw-r--r--src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp11
4 files changed, 19 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp b/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp
index 7530b013bd..f3f1befbc0 100644
--- a/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(SimpleRoundTripTest)
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.mapTx.find(block.vtx[2].GetHash())->GetSharedTx().use_count(), SHARED_TX_OFFSET + 1);
std::list<CTransaction> removed;
- pool.removeRecursive(block.vtx[2], removed);
+ pool.removeRecursive(block.vtx[2], &removed);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 1);
CBlock block2;
diff --git a/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp b/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp
index 033a50f94f..003daa203f 100644
--- a/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp
@@ -58,12 +58,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolRemoveTest)
std::list<CTransaction> removed;
// Nothing in pool, remove should do nothing:
- testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, removed);
+ testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, &removed);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 0);
// Just the parent:
testPool.addUnchecked(txParent.GetHash(), entry.FromTx(txParent));
- testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, removed);
+ testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, &removed);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 1);
removed.clear();
@@ -75,16 +75,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolRemoveTest)
testPool.addUnchecked(txGrandChild[i].GetHash(), entry.FromTx(txGrandChild[i]));
}
// Remove Child[0], GrandChild[0] should be removed:
- testPool.removeRecursive(txChild[0], removed);
+ testPool.removeRecursive(txChild[0], &removed);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 2);
removed.clear();
// ... make sure grandchild and child are gone:
- testPool.removeRecursive(txGrandChild[0], removed);
+ testPool.removeRecursive(txGrandChild[0], &removed);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 0);
- testPool.removeRecursive(txChild[0], removed);
+ testPool.removeRecursive(txChild[0], &removed);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 0);
// Remove parent, all children/grandchildren should go:
- testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, removed);
+ testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, &removed);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 5);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(testPool.size(), 0);
removed.clear();
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolRemoveTest)
}
// Now remove the parent, as might happen if a block-re-org occurs but the parent cannot be
// put into the mempool (maybe because it is non-standard):
- testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, removed);
+ testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, &removed);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 6);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(testPool.size(), 0);
removed.clear();
@@ -281,12 +281,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolIndexingTest)
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.size(), 10);
// Now try removing tx10 and verify the sort order returns to normal
- std::list<CTransaction> removed;
- pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx10.GetHash())->GetTx(), removed);
+ pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx10.GetHash())->GetTx());
CheckSort<descendant_score>(pool, snapshotOrder);
- pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx9.GetHash())->GetTx(), removed);
- pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx8.GetHash())->GetTx(), removed);
+ pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx9.GetHash())->GetTx());
+ pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx8.GetHash())->GetTx());
/* Now check the sort on the mining score index.
* Final order should be:
*
@@ -413,8 +412,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolAncestorIndexingTest)
/* after tx6 is mined, tx7 should move up in the sort */
std::vector<CTransaction> vtx;
vtx.push_back(tx6);
- std::list<CTransaction> dummy;
- pool.removeForBlock(vtx, 1, dummy, false);
+ pool.removeForBlock(vtx, 1, NULL, false);
sortedOrder.erase(sortedOrder.begin()+1);
sortedOrder.pop_back();
@@ -549,12 +547,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolSizeLimitTest)
pool.addUnchecked(tx7.GetHash(), entry.Fee(9000LL).FromTx(tx7, &pool));
std::vector<CTransaction> vtx;
- std::list<CTransaction> conflicts;
SetMockTime(42);
SetMockTime(42 + CTxMemPool::ROLLING_FEE_HALFLIFE);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK(), maxFeeRateRemoved.GetFeePerK() + 1000);
// ... we should keep the same min fee until we get a block
- pool.removeForBlock(vtx, 1, conflicts);
+ pool.removeForBlock(vtx, 1);
SetMockTime(42 + 2*CTxMemPool::ROLLING_FEE_HALFLIFE);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK(), (maxFeeRateRemoved.GetFeePerK() + 1000)/2);
// ... then feerate should drop 1/2 each halflife
diff --git a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
index d6d7b5716e..a94979fd77 100644
--- a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
@@ -137,8 +137,7 @@ void TestPackageSelection(const CChainParams& chainparams, CScript scriptPubKey,
// Test that packages above the min relay fee do get included, even if one
// of the transactions is below the min relay fee
// Remove the low fee transaction and replace with a higher fee transaction
- std::list<CTransaction> dummy;
- mempool.removeRecursive(tx, dummy);
+ mempool.removeRecursive(tx);
tx.vout[0].nValue -= 2; // Now we should be just over the min relay fee
hashLowFeeTx = tx.GetHash();
mempool.addUnchecked(hashLowFeeTx, entry.Fee(feeToUse+2).FromTx(tx));
diff --git a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
index 5c902387f1..f57c24270c 100644
--- a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 128; i++)
garbage.push_back('X');
CMutableTransaction tx;
- std::list<CTransaction> dummyConflicted;
tx.vin.resize(1);
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = garbage;
tx.vout.resize(1);
@@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
txHashes[9-h].pop_back();
}
}
- mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted);
+ mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum);
block.clear();
if (blocknum == 30) {
// At this point we should need to combine 5 buckets to get enough data points
@@ -125,7 +124,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
// Mine 50 more blocks with no transactions happening, estimates shouldn't change
// We haven't decayed the moving average enough so we still have enough data points in every bucket
while (blocknum < 250)
- mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted);
+ mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum);
for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) {
BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] + deltaFee);
@@ -146,7 +145,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
txHashes[j].push_back(hash);
}
}
- mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted);
+ mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum);
}
int answerFound;
@@ -167,7 +166,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
txHashes[j].pop_back();
}
}
- mpool.removeForBlock(block, 265, dummyConflicted);
+ mpool.removeForBlock(block, 265);
block.clear();
for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) {
BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
@@ -187,7 +186,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
block.push_back(*ptx);
}
}
- mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted);
+ mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum);
block.clear();
}
for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) {