aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp64
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
index cb64ee7c69..644c3da213 100644
--- a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(policyestimator_tests, BasicTestingSetup)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
{
CTxMemPool mpool(CFeeRate(1000));
+ TestMemPoolEntryHelper entry;
CAmount basefee(2000);
double basepri = 1e6;
CAmount deltaFee(100);
@@ -63,7 +64,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
for (int k = 0; k < 5; k++) { // add 4 fee txs for every priority tx
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 10000*blocknum+100*j+k; // make transaction unique
uint256 hash = tx.GetHash();
- mpool.addUnchecked(hash, CTxMemPoolEntry(tx, feeV[k/4][j], GetTime(), priV[k/4][j], blocknum, mpool.HasNoInputsOf(tx)));
+ mpool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(feeV[k/4][j]).Time(GetTime()).Priority(priV[k/4][j]).Height(blocknum).FromTx(tx, &mpool));
txHashes[j].push_back(hash);
}
}
@@ -83,11 +84,18 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
block.clear();
if (blocknum == 30) {
// At this point we should need to combine 5 buckets to get enough data points
- // So estimateFee(1) should fail and estimateFee(2) should return somewhere around
- // 8*baserate
+ // So estimateFee(1,2,3) should fail and estimateFee(4) should return somewhere around
+ // 8*baserate. estimateFee(4) %'s are 100,100,100,100,90 = average 98%
BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(2).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(2).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(2) == CFeeRate(0));
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(3) == CFeeRate(0));
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee);
+ int answerFound;
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(1, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(3, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(4, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(8, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(8) && answerFound == 8);
}
}
@@ -96,9 +104,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
// Highest feerate is 10*baseRate and gets in all blocks,
// second highest feerate is 9*baseRate and gets in 9/10 blocks = 90%,
// third highest feerate is 8*base rate, and gets in 8/10 blocks = 80%,
- // so estimateFee(1) should return 9*baseRate.
- // Third highest feerate has 90% chance of being included by 2 blocks,
- // so estimateFee(2) should return 8*baseRate etc...
+ // so estimateFee(1) should return 10*baseRate.
+ // Second highest feerate has 100% chance of being included by 2 blocks,
+ // so estimateFee(2) should return 9*baseRate etc...
for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) {
origFeeEst.push_back(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK());
origPriEst.push_back(mpool.estimatePriority(i));
@@ -106,10 +114,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] <= origFeeEst[i-2]);
BOOST_CHECK(origPriEst[i-1] <= origPriEst[i-2]);
}
- BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] < (10-i)*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee);
- BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] > (10-i)*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee);
- BOOST_CHECK(origPriEst[i-1] < pow(10,10-i) * basepri + deltaPri);
- BOOST_CHECK(origPriEst[i-1] > pow(10,10-i) * basepri - deltaPri);
+ int mult = 11-i;
+ BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] < mult*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] > mult*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(origPriEst[i-1] < pow(10,mult) * basepri + deltaPri);
+ BOOST_CHECK(origPriEst[i-1] > pow(10,mult) * basepri - deltaPri);
}
// Mine 50 more blocks with no transactions happening, estimates shouldn't change
@@ -132,16 +141,19 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
for (int k = 0; k < 5; k++) { // add 4 fee txs for every priority tx
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 10000*blocknum+100*j+k;
uint256 hash = tx.GetHash();
- mpool.addUnchecked(hash, CTxMemPoolEntry(tx, feeV[k/4][j], GetTime(), priV[k/4][j], blocknum, mpool.HasNoInputsOf(tx)));
+ mpool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(feeV[k/4][j]).Time(GetTime()).Priority(priV[k/4][j]).Height(blocknum).FromTx(tx, &mpool));
txHashes[j].push_back(hash);
}
}
mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted);
}
+ int answerFound;
for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) {
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimatePriority(i) > origPriEst[i-1] - deltaPri);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i, &answerFound).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[answerFound-1] - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimatePriority(i) == -1 || mpool.estimatePriority(i) > origPriEst[i-1] - deltaPri);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartPriority(i, &answerFound) > origPriEst[answerFound-1] - deltaPri);
}
// Mine all those transactions
@@ -161,14 +173,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimatePriority(i) > origPriEst[i-1] - deltaPri);
}
- // Mine 100 more blocks where everything is mined every block
- // Estimates should be below original estimates (not possible for last estimate)
- while (blocknum < 365) {
+ // Mine 200 more blocks where everything is mined every block
+ // Estimates should be below original estimates
+ while (blocknum < 465) {
for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++) { // For each fee/pri multiple
for (int k = 0; k < 5; k++) { // add 4 fee txs for every priority tx
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 10000*blocknum+100*j+k;
uint256 hash = tx.GetHash();
- mpool.addUnchecked(hash, CTxMemPoolEntry(tx, feeV[k/4][j], GetTime(), priV[k/4][j], blocknum, mpool.HasNoInputsOf(tx)));
+ mpool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(feeV[k/4][j]).Time(GetTime()).Priority(priV[k/4][j]).Height(blocknum).FromTx(tx, &mpool));
CTransaction btx;
if (mpool.lookup(hash, btx))
block.push_back(btx);
@@ -177,10 +189,22 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted);
block.clear();
}
- for (int i = 1; i < 9; i++) {
+ for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimatePriority(i) < origPriEst[i-1] - deltaPri);
}
+
+ // Test that if the mempool is limited, estimateSmartFee won't return a value below the mempool min fee
+ // and that estimateSmartPriority returns essentially an infinite value
+ mpool.addUnchecked(tx.GetHash(), entry.Fee(feeV[0][5]).Time(GetTime()).Priority(priV[1][5]).Height(blocknum).FromTx(tx, &mpool));
+ // evict that transaction which should set a mempool min fee of minRelayTxFee + feeV[0][5]
+ mpool.TrimToSize(1);
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK() > feeV[0][5]);
+ for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK());
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK());
+ BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartPriority(i) == INF_PRIORITY);
+ }
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()