diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp | 70 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp index 8cf614bc8d..e5d62a3ab2 100644 --- a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ // Unit tests for denial-of-service detection/prevention code +#include <banman.h> #include <chainparams.h> #include <keystore.h> #include <net.h> @@ -20,6 +21,23 @@ #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> +struct CConnmanTest : public CConnman { + using CConnman::CConnman; + void AddNode(CNode& node) + { + LOCK(cs_vNodes); + vNodes.push_back(&node); + } + void ClearNodes() + { + LOCK(cs_vNodes); + for (CNode* node : vNodes) { + delete node; + } + vNodes.clear(); + } +}; + // Tests these internal-to-net_processing.cpp methods: extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransactionRef& tx, NodeId peer); extern void EraseOrphansFor(NodeId peer); @@ -57,6 +75,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(denialofservice_tests, TestingSetup) // work. BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction) { + auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337); + auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, scheduler, false); // Mock an outbound peer CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); @@ -109,7 +129,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction) peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); } -static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic) +static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic, CConnmanTest* connman) { CAddress addr(ip(g_insecure_rand_ctx.randbits(32)), NODE_NONE); vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false)); @@ -120,11 +140,14 @@ static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidat node.nVersion = 1; node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - CConnmanTest::AddNode(node); + connman->AddNode(node); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) { + auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnmanTest>(0x1337, 0x1337); + auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, scheduler, false); + const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus(); constexpr int nMaxOutbound = 8; CConnman::Options options; @@ -137,7 +160,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) // Mock some outbound peers for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) { - AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic); + AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, connman.get()); } peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); @@ -162,7 +185,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) // If we add one more peer, something should get marked for eviction // on the next check (since we're mocking the time to be in the future, the // required time connected check should be satisfied). - AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic); + AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, connman.get()); peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) { @@ -189,13 +212,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) peerLogic->FinalizeNode(node->GetId(), dummy); } - CConnmanTest::ClearNodes(); + connman->ClearNodes(); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) { + auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME); + auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337); + auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler, false); - connman->ClearBanned(); + banman->ClearBanned(); CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", true); dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); @@ -210,8 +236,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); } - BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); - BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned + BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsBanned(addr1)); + BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned CAddress addr2(ip(0xa0b0c002), NODE_NONE); CNode dummyNode2(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, 1, 1, CAddress(), "", true); @@ -227,8 +253,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2)); } - BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr2)); // 2 not banned yet... - BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be + BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsBanned(addr2)); // 2 not banned yet... + BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsBanned(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be { LOCK(cs_main); Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); @@ -237,7 +263,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2)); } - BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr2)); + BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsBanned(addr2)); bool dummy; peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); @@ -246,8 +272,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) { + auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME); + auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337); + auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler, false); - connman->ClearBanned(); + banman->ClearBanned(); gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", "111"); // because 11 is my favorite number CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 3, 1, CAddress(), "", true); @@ -263,7 +292,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); } - BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1)); + BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsBanned(addr1)); { LOCK(cs_main); Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 10); @@ -272,7 +301,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); } - BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1)); + BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsBanned(addr1)); { LOCK(cs_main); Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 1); @@ -281,7 +310,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); } - BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); + BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsBanned(addr1)); gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", std::to_string(DEFAULT_BANSCORE_THRESHOLD)); bool dummy; @@ -290,8 +319,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) { + auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME); + auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337); + auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler, false); - connman->ClearBanned(); + banman->ClearBanned(); int64_t nStartTime = GetTime(); SetMockTime(nStartTime); // Overrides future calls to GetTime() @@ -310,13 +342,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode)); } - BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr)); + BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsBanned(addr)); SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60); - BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr)); + BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsBanned(addr)); SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60*24+1); - BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr)); + BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsBanned(addr)); bool dummy; peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode.GetId(), dummy); |