diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/DoS_tests.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/DoS_tests.cpp | 140 |
1 files changed, 140 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp index b88ad5ed1b..d1f9e63ecf 100644 --- a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp @@ -40,8 +40,138 @@ CService ip(uint32_t i) static NodeId id = 0; +void UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(NodeId node, int64_t time_in_seconds); + BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(DoS_tests, TestingSetup) +// Test eviction of an outbound peer whose chain never advances +// Mock a node connection, and use mocktime to simulate a peer +// which never sends any headers messages. PeerLogic should +// decide to evict that outbound peer, after the appropriate timeouts. +// Note that we protect 4 outbound nodes from being subject to +// this logic; this test takes advantage of that protection only +// being applied to nodes which send headers with sufficient +// work. +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction) +{ + std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false); + + // Mock an outbound peer + CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); + CNode dummyNode1(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false); + dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); + + peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1); + dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; + dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; + + // This test requires that we have a chain with non-zero work. + BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip() != nullptr); + BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork > 0); + + // Test starts here + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0); + dummyNode1.vSendMsg.clear(); + + int64_t nStartTime = GetTime(); + // Wait 21 minutes + SetMockTime(nStartTime+21*60); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0); + // Wait 3 more minutes + SetMockTime(nStartTime+24*60); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in disconnect + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.fDisconnect == true); + SetMockTime(0); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); +} + +void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic) +{ + CAddress addr(ip(GetRandInt(0xffffffff)), NODE_NONE); + vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false)); + CNode &node = *vNodes.back(); + node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); + + peerLogic.InitializeNode(&node); + node.nVersion = 1; + node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; + + CConnmanTest::AddNode(node); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) +{ + const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus(); + constexpr int nMaxOutbound = 8; + CConnman::Options options; + options.nMaxConnections = 125; + options.nMaxOutbound = nMaxOutbound; + options.nMaxFeeler = 1; + + connman->Init(options); + std::vector<CNode *> vNodes; + + // Mock some outbound peers + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) { + AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic); + } + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + + // No nodes should be marked for disconnection while we have no extra peers + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false); + } + + SetMockTime(GetTime() + 3*consensusParams.nPowTargetSpacing + 1); + + // Now tip should definitely be stale, and we should look for an extra + // outbound peer + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + BOOST_CHECK(connman->GetTryNewOutboundPeer()); + + // Still no peers should be marked for disconnection + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false); + } + + // If we add one more peer, something should get marked for eviction + // on the next check (since we're mocking the time to be in the future, the + // required time connected check should be satisfied). + AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic); + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) { + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false); + } + // Last added node should get marked for eviction + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == true); + + vNodes.back()->fDisconnect = false; + + // Update the last announced block time for the last + // peer, and check that the next newest node gets evicted. + UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(vNodes.back()->GetId(), GetTime()); + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound-1; ++i) { + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false); + } + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[nMaxOutbound-1]->fDisconnect == true); + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == false); + + bool dummy; + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(node->GetId(), dummy); + } + + CConnmanTest::ClearNodes(); +} + BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) { std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false); @@ -71,6 +201,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr2)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode2.GetId(), dummy); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) @@ -95,6 +229,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", std::to_string(DEFAULT_BANSCORE_THRESHOLD)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) @@ -121,6 +258,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60*24+1); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode.GetId(), dummy); } CTransactionRef RandomOrphan() |