diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/DoS_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/DoS_tests.cpp | 228 |
1 files changed, 199 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp index ffbeeb7d91..6be176a1ad 100644 --- a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp @@ -4,17 +4,17 @@ // Unit tests for denial-of-service detection/prevention code -#include "chainparams.h" -#include "keystore.h" -#include "net.h" -#include "net_processing.h" -#include "pow.h" -#include "script/sign.h" -#include "serialize.h" -#include "util.h" -#include "validation.h" - -#include "test/test_bitcoin.h" +#include <chainparams.h> +#include <keystore.h> +#include <net.h> +#include <net_processing.h> +#include <pow.h> +#include <script/sign.h> +#include <serialize.h> +#include <util.h> +#include <validation.h> + +#include <test/test_bitcoin.h> #include <stdint.h> @@ -40,8 +40,141 @@ CService ip(uint32_t i) static NodeId id = 0; +void UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(NodeId node, int64_t time_in_seconds); + BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(DoS_tests, TestingSetup) +// Test eviction of an outbound peer whose chain never advances +// Mock a node connection, and use mocktime to simulate a peer +// which never sends any headers messages. PeerLogic should +// decide to evict that outbound peer, after the appropriate timeouts. +// Note that we protect 4 outbound nodes from being subject to +// this logic; this test takes advantage of that protection only +// being applied to nodes which send headers with sufficient +// work. +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction) +{ + std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false); + + // Mock an outbound peer + CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); + CNode dummyNode1(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false); + dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); + + peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1); + dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; + dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; + + // This test requires that we have a chain with non-zero work. + LOCK(cs_main); + BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip() != nullptr); + BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork > 0); + + // Test starts here + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_vSend); + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0); + dummyNode1.vSendMsg.clear(); + + int64_t nStartTime = GetTime(); + // Wait 21 minutes + SetMockTime(nStartTime+21*60); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0); + // Wait 3 more minutes + SetMockTime(nStartTime+24*60); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in disconnect + BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.fDisconnect == true); + SetMockTime(0); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); +} + +void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic) +{ + CAddress addr(ip(GetRandInt(0xffffffff)), NODE_NONE); + vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false)); + CNode &node = *vNodes.back(); + node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); + + peerLogic.InitializeNode(&node); + node.nVersion = 1; + node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; + + CConnmanTest::AddNode(node); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) +{ + const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus(); + constexpr int nMaxOutbound = 8; + CConnman::Options options; + options.nMaxConnections = 125; + options.nMaxOutbound = nMaxOutbound; + options.nMaxFeeler = 1; + + connman->Init(options); + std::vector<CNode *> vNodes; + + // Mock some outbound peers + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) { + AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic); + } + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + + // No nodes should be marked for disconnection while we have no extra peers + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false); + } + + SetMockTime(GetTime() + 3*consensusParams.nPowTargetSpacing + 1); + + // Now tip should definitely be stale, and we should look for an extra + // outbound peer + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + BOOST_CHECK(connman->GetTryNewOutboundPeer()); + + // Still no peers should be marked for disconnection + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false); + } + + // If we add one more peer, something should get marked for eviction + // on the next check (since we're mocking the time to be in the future, the + // required time connected check should be satisfied). + AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic); + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) { + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false); + } + // Last added node should get marked for eviction + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == true); + + vNodes.back()->fDisconnect = false; + + // Update the last announced block time for the last + // peer, and check that the next newest node gets evicted. + UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(vNodes.back()->GetId(), GetTime()); + + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound-1; ++i) { + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false); + } + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[nMaxOutbound-1]->fDisconnect == true); + BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == false); + + bool dummy; + for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(node->GetId(), dummy); + } + + CConnmanTest::ClearNodes(); +} + BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) { std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false); @@ -50,27 +183,42 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", true); dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); - GetNodeSignals().InitializeNode(&dummyNode1, *connman); + peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1); dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); // Should get banned - SendMessages(&dummyNode1, *connman, interruptDummy); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); // Should get banned + } + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned CAddress addr2(ip(0xa0b0c002), NODE_NONE); CNode dummyNode2(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, 1, 1, CAddress(), "", true); dummyNode2.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); - GetNodeSignals().InitializeNode(&dummyNode2, *connman); + peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode2); dummyNode2.nVersion = 1; dummyNode2.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); - SendMessages(&dummyNode2, *connman, interruptDummy); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); + } + LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr2)); // 2 not banned yet... BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be - Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); - SendMessages(&dummyNode2, *connman, interruptDummy); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); + } + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr2)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode2.GetId(), dummy); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) @@ -82,19 +230,32 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 3, 1, CAddress(), "", true); dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); - GetNodeSignals().InitializeNode(&dummyNode1, *connman); + peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1); dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); - SendMessages(&dummyNode1, *connman, interruptDummy); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); + } + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1)); - Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 10); - SendMessages(&dummyNode1, *connman, interruptDummy); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 10); + } + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1)); - Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 1); - SendMessages(&dummyNode1, *connman, interruptDummy); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 1); + } + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", std::to_string(DEFAULT_BANSCORE_THRESHOLD)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) @@ -108,12 +269,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) CAddress addr(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE); CNode dummyNode(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 4, 4, CAddress(), "", true); dummyNode.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION); - GetNodeSignals().InitializeNode(&dummyNode, *connman); + peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode); dummyNode.nVersion = 1; dummyNode.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), 100); - SendMessages(&dummyNode, *connman, interruptDummy); + { + LOCK(cs_main); + Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), 100); + } + LOCK(dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing); + peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode, interruptDummy); BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr)); SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60); @@ -121,11 +286,15 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60*24+1); BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr)); + + bool dummy; + peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode.GetId(), dummy); } CTransactionRef RandomOrphan() { std::map<uint256, COrphanTx>::iterator it; + LOCK(cs_main); it = mapOrphanTransactions.lower_bound(InsecureRand256()); if (it == mapOrphanTransactions.end()) it = mapOrphanTransactions.begin(); @@ -195,6 +364,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_mapOrphans) BOOST_CHECK(!AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i)); } + LOCK(cs_main); // Test EraseOrphansFor: for (NodeId i = 0; i < 3; i++) { |