aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/secp256k1/sage/group_prover.sage
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/secp256k1/sage/group_prover.sage')
-rw-r--r--src/secp256k1/sage/group_prover.sage23
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/secp256k1/sage/group_prover.sage b/src/secp256k1/sage/group_prover.sage
index 8521f07999..b200bfeae3 100644
--- a/src/secp256k1/sage/group_prover.sage
+++ b/src/secp256k1/sage/group_prover.sage
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
# as we assume that all constraints in it are complementary with each other.
#
# Based on the sage verification scripts used in the Explicit-Formulas Database
-# by Tanja Lange and others, see http://hyperelliptic.org/EFD
+# by Tanja Lange and others, see https://hyperelliptic.org/EFD
class fastfrac:
"""Fractions over rings."""
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ class fastfrac:
return self.top in I and self.bot not in I
def reduce(self,assumeZero):
- zero = self.R.ideal(map(numerator, assumeZero))
+ zero = self.R.ideal(list(map(numerator, assumeZero)))
return fastfrac(self.R, zero.reduce(self.top)) / fastfrac(self.R, zero.reduce(self.bot))
def __add__(self,other):
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ class fastfrac:
"""Multiply something else with a fraction."""
return self.__mul__(other)
- def __div__(self,other):
+ def __truediv__(self,other):
"""Divide two fractions."""
if parent(other) == ZZ:
return fastfrac(self.R,self.top,self.bot * other)
@@ -108,6 +108,11 @@ class fastfrac:
return fastfrac(self.R,self.top * other.bot,self.bot * other.top)
return NotImplemented
+ # Compatibility wrapper for Sage versions based on Python 2
+ def __div__(self,other):
+ """Divide two fractions."""
+ return self.__truediv__(other)
+
def __pow__(self,other):
"""Compute a power of a fraction."""
if parent(other) == ZZ:
@@ -175,7 +180,7 @@ class constraints:
def conflicts(R, con):
"""Check whether any of the passed non-zero assumptions is implied by the zero assumptions"""
- zero = R.ideal(map(numerator, con.zero))
+ zero = R.ideal(list(map(numerator, con.zero)))
if 1 in zero:
return True
# First a cheap check whether any of the individual nonzero terms conflict on
@@ -195,7 +200,7 @@ def conflicts(R, con):
def get_nonzero_set(R, assume):
"""Calculate a simple set of nonzero expressions"""
- zero = R.ideal(map(numerator, assume.zero))
+ zero = R.ideal(list(map(numerator, assume.zero)))
nonzero = set()
for nz in map(numerator, assume.nonzero):
for (f,n) in nz.factor():
@@ -208,7 +213,7 @@ def get_nonzero_set(R, assume):
def prove_nonzero(R, exprs, assume):
"""Check whether an expression is provably nonzero, given assumptions"""
- zero = R.ideal(map(numerator, assume.zero))
+ zero = R.ideal(list(map(numerator, assume.zero)))
nonzero = get_nonzero_set(R, assume)
expl = set()
ok = True
@@ -250,7 +255,7 @@ def prove_zero(R, exprs, assume):
r, e = prove_nonzero(R, dict(map(lambda x: (fastfrac(R, x.bot, 1), exprs[x]), exprs)), assume)
if not r:
return (False, map(lambda x: "Possibly zero denominator: %s" % x, e))
- zero = R.ideal(map(numerator, assume.zero))
+ zero = R.ideal(list(map(numerator, assume.zero)))
nonzero = prod(x for x in assume.nonzero)
expl = []
for expr in exprs:
@@ -265,8 +270,8 @@ def describe_extra(R, assume, assumeExtra):
"""Describe what assumptions are added, given existing assumptions"""
zerox = assume.zero.copy()
zerox.update(assumeExtra.zero)
- zero = R.ideal(map(numerator, assume.zero))
- zeroextra = R.ideal(map(numerator, zerox))
+ zero = R.ideal(list(map(numerator, assume.zero)))
+ zeroextra = R.ideal(list(map(numerator, zerox)))
nonzero = get_nonzero_set(R, assume)
ret = set()
# Iterate over the extra zero expressions