aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/policy/rbf.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/policy/rbf.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/policy/rbf.cpp147
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/src/policy/rbf.cpp b/src/policy/rbf.cpp
index 43624c7993..7e6b0cf245 100644
--- a/src/policy/rbf.cpp
+++ b/src/policy/rbf.cpp
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ RBFTransactionState IsRBFOptIn(const CTransaction& tx, const CTxMemPool& pool)
{
AssertLockHeld(pool.cs);
- CTxMemPool::setEntries setAncestors;
+ CTxMemPool::setEntries ancestors;
// First check the transaction itself.
if (SignalsOptInRBF(tx)) {
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ RBFTransactionState IsRBFOptIn(const CTransaction& tx, const CTxMemPool& pool)
// If this transaction is not in our mempool, then we can't be sure
// we will know about all its inputs.
- if (!pool.exists(tx.GetHash())) {
+ if (!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx.GetHash()))) {
return RBFTransactionState::UNKNOWN;
}
@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ RBFTransactionState IsRBFOptIn(const CTransaction& tx, const CTxMemPool& pool)
uint64_t noLimit = std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max();
std::string dummy;
CTxMemPoolEntry entry = *pool.mapTx.find(tx.GetHash());
- pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, setAncestors, noLimit, noLimit, noLimit, noLimit, dummy, false);
+ pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, ancestors, noLimit, noLimit, noLimit, noLimit, dummy, false);
- for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : setAncestors) {
+ for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : ancestors) {
if (SignalsOptInRBF(it->GetTx())) {
return RBFTransactionState::REPLACEABLE_BIP125;
}
@@ -47,33 +47,130 @@ RBFTransactionState IsRBFOptInEmptyMempool(const CTransaction& tx)
return SignalsOptInRBF(tx) ? RBFTransactionState::REPLACEABLE_BIP125 : RBFTransactionState::UNKNOWN;
}
-bool GetEntriesForConflicts(const CTransaction& tx,
- CTxMemPool& m_pool,
- const CTxMemPool::setEntries& setIterConflicting,
- CTxMemPool::setEntries& allConflicting,
- std::string& err_string)
+std::optional<std::string> GetEntriesForConflicts(const CTransaction& tx,
+ CTxMemPool& pool,
+ const CTxMemPool::setEntries& iters_conflicting,
+ CTxMemPool::setEntries& all_conflicts)
{
- AssertLockHeld(m_pool.cs);
- const uint256 hash = tx.GetHash();
+ AssertLockHeld(pool.cs);
+ const uint256 txid = tx.GetHash();
uint64_t nConflictingCount = 0;
- for (const auto& mi : setIterConflicting) {
+ for (const auto& mi : iters_conflicting) {
nConflictingCount += mi->GetCountWithDescendants();
- // This potentially overestimates the number of actual descendants
- // but we just want to be conservative to avoid doing too much
- // work.
+ // BIP125 Rule #5: don't consider replacing more than MAX_BIP125_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES
+ // entries from the mempool. This potentially overestimates the number of actual
+ // descendants (i.e. if multiple conflicts share a descendant, it will be counted multiple
+ // times), but we just want to be conservative to avoid doing too much work.
if (nConflictingCount > MAX_BIP125_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES) {
- err_string = strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
- hash.ToString(),
- nConflictingCount,
- MAX_BIP125_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES);
- return false;
+ return strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
+ txid.ToString(),
+ nConflictingCount,
+ MAX_BIP125_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES);
}
}
- // If not too many to replace, then calculate the set of
- // transactions that would have to be evicted
- for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : setIterConflicting) {
- m_pool.CalculateDescendants(it, allConflicting);
+ // Calculate the set of all transactions that would have to be evicted.
+ for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : iters_conflicting) {
+ pool.CalculateDescendants(it, all_conflicts);
}
- return true;
+ return std::nullopt;
}
+std::optional<std::string> HasNoNewUnconfirmed(const CTransaction& tx,
+ const CTxMemPool& pool,
+ const CTxMemPool::setEntries& iters_conflicting)
+{
+ AssertLockHeld(pool.cs);
+ std::set<uint256> parents_of_conflicts;
+ for (const auto& mi : iters_conflicting) {
+ for (const CTxIn& txin : mi->GetTx().vin) {
+ parents_of_conflicts.insert(txin.prevout.hash);
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (unsigned int j = 0; j < tx.vin.size(); j++) {
+ // BIP125 Rule #2: We don't want to accept replacements that require low feerate junk to be
+ // mined first. Ideally we'd keep track of the ancestor feerates and make the decision
+ // based on that, but for now requiring all new inputs to be confirmed works.
+ //
+ // Note that if you relax this to make RBF a little more useful, this may break the
+ // CalculateMempoolAncestors RBF relaxation which subtracts the conflict count/size from the
+ // descendant limit.
+ if (!parents_of_conflicts.count(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash)) {
+ // Rather than check the UTXO set - potentially expensive - it's cheaper to just check
+ // if the new input refers to a tx that's in the mempool.
+ if (pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash))) {
+ return strprintf("replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d",
+ tx.GetHash().ToString(), j);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return std::nullopt;
+}
+
+std::optional<std::string> EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(const CTxMemPool::setEntries& ancestors,
+ const std::set<uint256>& direct_conflicts,
+ const uint256& txid)
+{
+ for (CTxMemPool::txiter ancestorIt : ancestors) {
+ const uint256& hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash();
+ if (direct_conflicts.count(hashAncestor)) {
+ return strprintf("%s spends conflicting transaction %s",
+ txid.ToString(),
+ hashAncestor.ToString());
+ }
+ }
+ return std::nullopt;
+}
+
+std::optional<std::string> PaysMoreThanConflicts(const CTxMemPool::setEntries& iters_conflicting,
+ CFeeRate replacement_feerate,
+ const uint256& txid)
+{
+ for (const auto& mi : iters_conflicting) {
+ // Don't allow the replacement to reduce the feerate of the mempool.
+ //
+ // We usually don't want to accept replacements with lower feerates than what they replaced
+ // as that would lower the feerate of the next block. Requiring that the feerate always be
+ // increased is also an easy-to-reason about way to prevent DoS attacks via replacements.
+ //
+ // We only consider the feerates of transactions being directly replaced, not their indirect
+ // descendants. While that does mean high feerate children are ignored when deciding whether
+ // or not to replace, we do require the replacement to pay more overall fees too, mitigating
+ // most cases.
+ CFeeRate original_feerate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize());
+ if (replacement_feerate <= original_feerate) {
+ return strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
+ txid.ToString(),
+ replacement_feerate.ToString(),
+ original_feerate.ToString());
+ }
+ }
+ return std::nullopt;
+}
+
+std::optional<std::string> PaysForRBF(CAmount original_fees,
+ CAmount replacement_fees,
+ size_t replacement_vsize,
+ CFeeRate relay_fee,
+ const uint256& txid)
+{
+ // BIP125 Rule #3: The replacement fees must be greater than or equal to fees of the
+ // transactions it replaces, otherwise the bandwidth used by those conflicting transactions
+ // would not be paid for.
+ if (replacement_fees < original_fees) {
+ return strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s",
+ txid.ToString(), FormatMoney(replacement_fees), FormatMoney(original_fees));
+ }
+
+ // BIP125 Rule #4: The new transaction must pay for its own bandwidth. Otherwise, we have a DoS
+ // vector where attackers can cause a transaction to be replaced (and relayed) repeatedly by
+ // increasing the fee by tiny amounts.
+ CAmount additional_fees = replacement_fees - original_fees;
+ if (additional_fees < relay_fee.GetFee(replacement_vsize)) {
+ return strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
+ txid.ToString(),
+ FormatMoney(additional_fees),
+ FormatMoney(relay_fee.GetFee(replacement_vsize)));
+ }
+ return std::nullopt;
+}