diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/net_processing.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/net_processing.cpp | 748 |
1 files changed, 542 insertions, 206 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp index 6c26cd4cee..99b96a988a 100644 --- a/src/net_processing.cpp +++ b/src/net_processing.cpp @@ -3,33 +3,34 @@ // Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying // file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. -#include "net_processing.h" - -#include "addrman.h" -#include "arith_uint256.h" -#include "blockencodings.h" -#include "chainparams.h" -#include "consensus/validation.h" -#include "hash.h" -#include "init.h" -#include "validation.h" -#include "merkleblock.h" -#include "net.h" -#include "netmessagemaker.h" -#include "netbase.h" -#include "policy/fees.h" -#include "policy/policy.h" -#include "primitives/block.h" -#include "primitives/transaction.h" -#include "random.h" -#include "reverse_iterator.h" -#include "tinyformat.h" -#include "txmempool.h" -#include "ui_interface.h" -#include "util.h" -#include "utilmoneystr.h" -#include "utilstrencodings.h" -#include "validationinterface.h" +#include <net_processing.h> + +#include <addrman.h> +#include <arith_uint256.h> +#include <blockencodings.h> +#include <chainparams.h> +#include <consensus/validation.h> +#include <hash.h> +#include <init.h> +#include <validation.h> +#include <merkleblock.h> +#include <net.h> +#include <netmessagemaker.h> +#include <netbase.h> +#include <policy/fees.h> +#include <policy/policy.h> +#include <primitives/block.h> +#include <primitives/transaction.h> +#include <random.h> +#include <reverse_iterator.h> +#include <scheduler.h> +#include <tinyformat.h> +#include <txmempool.h> +#include <ui_interface.h> +#include <util.h> +#include <utilmoneystr.h> +#include <utilstrencodings.h> +#include <validationinterface.h> #if defined(NDEBUG) # error "Bitcoin cannot be compiled without assertions." @@ -124,6 +125,12 @@ namespace { /** Number of peers from which we're downloading blocks. */ int nPeersWithValidatedDownloads = 0; + /** Number of outbound peers with m_chain_sync.m_protect. */ + int g_outbound_peers_with_protect_from_disconnect = 0; + + /** When our tip was last updated. */ + int64_t g_last_tip_update = 0; + /** Relay map, protected by cs_main. */ typedef std::map<uint256, CTransactionRef> MapRelay; MapRelay mapRelay; @@ -201,6 +208,36 @@ struct CNodeState { */ bool fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion; + /** State used to enforce CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT + * Only in effect for outbound, non-manual connections, with + * m_protect == false + * Algorithm: if a peer's best known block has less work than our tip, + * set a timeout CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT seconds in the future: + * - If at timeout their best known block now has more work than our tip + * when the timeout was set, then either reset the timeout or clear it + * (after comparing against our current tip's work) + * - If at timeout their best known block still has less work than our + * tip did when the timeout was set, then send a getheaders message, + * and set a shorter timeout, HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME seconds in future. + * If their best known block is still behind when that new timeout is + * reached, disconnect. + */ + struct ChainSyncTimeoutState { + //! A timeout used for checking whether our peer has sufficiently synced + int64_t m_timeout; + //! A header with the work we require on our peer's chain + const CBlockIndex * m_work_header; + //! After timeout is reached, set to true after sending getheaders + bool m_sent_getheaders; + //! Whether this peer is protected from disconnection due to a bad/slow chain + bool m_protect; + }; + + ChainSyncTimeoutState m_chain_sync; + + //! Time of last new block announcement + int64_t m_last_block_announcement; + CNodeState(CAddress addrIn, std::string addrNameIn) : address(addrIn), name(addrNameIn) { fCurrentlyConnected = false; nMisbehavior = 0; @@ -223,6 +260,8 @@ struct CNodeState { fHaveWitness = false; fWantsCmpctWitness = false; fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion = false; + m_chain_sync = { 0, nullptr, false, false }; + m_last_block_announcement = 0; } }; @@ -396,6 +435,15 @@ void MaybeSetPeerAsAnnouncingHeaderAndIDs(NodeId nodeid, CConnman* connman) { } } +bool TipMayBeStale(const Consensus::Params &consensusParams) +{ + AssertLockHeld(cs_main); + if (g_last_tip_update == 0) { + g_last_tip_update = GetTime(); + } + return g_last_tip_update < GetTime() - consensusParams.nPowTargetSpacing * 3 && mapBlocksInFlight.empty(); +} + // Requires cs_main bool CanDirectFetch(const Consensus::Params &consensusParams) { @@ -502,6 +550,22 @@ void FindNextBlocksToDownload(NodeId nodeid, unsigned int count, std::vector<con } // namespace +// This function is used for testing the stale tip eviction logic, see +// DoS_tests.cpp +void UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(NodeId node, int64_t time_in_seconds) +{ + LOCK(cs_main); + CNodeState *state = State(node); + if (state) state->m_last_block_announcement = time_in_seconds; +} + +// Returns true for outbound peers, excluding manual connections, feelers, and +// one-shots +bool IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate(const CNode *node) +{ + return !(node->fInbound || node->m_manual_connection || node->fFeeler || node->fOneShot); +} + void PeerLogicValidation::InitializeNode(CNode *pnode) { CAddress addr = pnode->addr; std::string addrName = pnode->GetAddrName(); @@ -534,6 +598,8 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::FinalizeNode(NodeId nodeid, bool& fUpdateConnectionTim nPreferredDownload -= state->fPreferredDownload; nPeersWithValidatedDownloads -= (state->nBlocksInFlightValidHeaders != 0); assert(nPeersWithValidatedDownloads >= 0); + g_outbound_peers_with_protect_from_disconnect -= state->m_chain_sync.m_protect; + assert(g_outbound_peers_with_protect_from_disconnect >= 0); mapNodeState.erase(nodeid); @@ -542,6 +608,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::FinalizeNode(NodeId nodeid, bool& fUpdateConnectionTim assert(mapBlocksInFlight.empty()); assert(nPreferredDownload == 0); assert(nPeersWithValidatedDownloads == 0); + assert(g_outbound_peers_with_protect_from_disconnect == 0); } LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Cleared nodestate for peer=%d\n", nodeid); } @@ -566,7 +633,7 @@ bool GetNodeStateStats(NodeId nodeid, CNodeStateStats &stats) { // mapOrphanTransactions // -void AddToCompactExtraTransactions(const CTransactionRef& tx) +void AddToCompactExtraTransactions(const CTransactionRef& tx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) { size_t max_extra_txn = gArgs.GetArg("-blockreconstructionextratxn", DEFAULT_BLOCK_RECONSTRUCTION_EXTRA_TXN); if (max_extra_txn <= 0) @@ -714,18 +781,28 @@ void Misbehaving(NodeId pnode, int howmuch) // To prevent fingerprinting attacks, only send blocks/headers outside of the // active chain if they are no more than a month older (both in time, and in -// best equivalent proof of work) than the best header chain we know about. -static bool StaleBlockRequestAllowed(const CBlockIndex* pindex, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams) +// best equivalent proof of work) than the best header chain we know about and +// we fully-validated them at some point. +static bool BlockRequestAllowed(const CBlockIndex* pindex, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams) { AssertLockHeld(cs_main); - return (pindexBestHeader != nullptr) && + if (chainActive.Contains(pindex)) return true; + return pindex->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS) && (pindexBestHeader != nullptr) && (pindexBestHeader->GetBlockTime() - pindex->GetBlockTime() < STALE_RELAY_AGE_LIMIT) && (GetBlockProofEquivalentTime(*pindexBestHeader, *pindex, *pindexBestHeader, consensusParams) < STALE_RELAY_AGE_LIMIT); } -PeerLogicValidation::PeerLogicValidation(CConnman* connmanIn) : connman(connmanIn) { +PeerLogicValidation::PeerLogicValidation(CConnman* connmanIn, CScheduler &scheduler) : connman(connmanIn), m_stale_tip_check_time(0) { // Initialize global variables that cannot be constructed at startup. recentRejects.reset(new CRollingBloomFilter(120000, 0.000001)); + + const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus(); + // Stale tip checking and peer eviction are on two different timers, but we + // don't want them to get out of sync due to drift in the scheduler, so we + // combine them in one function and schedule at the quicker (peer-eviction) + // timer. + static_assert(EXTRA_PEER_CHECK_INTERVAL < STALE_CHECK_INTERVAL, "peer eviction timer should be less than stale tip check timer"); + scheduler.scheduleEvery(std::bind(&PeerLogicValidation::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers, this, consensusParams), EXTRA_PEER_CHECK_INTERVAL * 1000); } void PeerLogicValidation::BlockConnected(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, const CBlockIndex* pindex, const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtxConflicted) { @@ -756,6 +833,8 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::BlockConnected(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pb } LogPrint(BCLog::MEMPOOL, "Erased %d orphan tx included or conflicted by block\n", nErased); } + + g_last_tip_update = GetTime(); } // All of the following cache a recent block, and are protected by cs_most_recent_block @@ -997,14 +1076,9 @@ void static ProcessGetData(CNode* pfrom, const Consensus::Params& consensusParam CValidationState dummy; ActivateBestChain(dummy, Params(), a_recent_block); } - if (chainActive.Contains(mi->second)) { - send = true; - } else { - send = mi->second->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS) && - StaleBlockRequestAllowed(mi->second, consensusParams); - if (!send) { - LogPrintf("%s: ignoring request from peer=%i for old block that isn't in the main chain\n", __func__, pfrom->GetId()); - } + send = BlockRequestAllowed(mi->second, consensusParams); + if (!send) { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: ignoring request from peer=%i for old block that isn't in the main chain\n", __func__, pfrom->GetId()); } } // disconnect node in case we have reached the outbound limit for serving historical blocks @@ -1017,6 +1091,16 @@ void static ProcessGetData(CNode* pfrom, const Consensus::Params& consensusParam pfrom->fDisconnect = true; send = false; } + // Avoid leaking prune-height by never sending blocks below the NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED threshold + if (send && !pfrom->fWhitelisted && ( + (((pfrom->GetLocalServices() & NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED) == NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED) && ((pfrom->GetLocalServices() & NODE_NETWORK) != NODE_NETWORK) && (chainActive.Tip()->nHeight - mi->second->nHeight > (int)NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED_MIN_BLOCKS + 2 /* add two blocks buffer extension for possible races */) ) + )) { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Ignore block request below NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED threshold from peer=%d\n", pfrom->GetId()); + + //disconnect node and prevent it from stalling (would otherwise wait for the missing block) + pfrom->fDisconnect = true; + send = false; + } // Pruned nodes may have deleted the block, so check whether // it's available before trying to send. if (send && (mi->second->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA)) @@ -1164,6 +1248,225 @@ inline void static SendBlockTransactions(const CBlock& block, const BlockTransac connman->PushMessage(pfrom, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::BLOCKTXN, resp)); } +bool static ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode *pfrom, CConnman *connman, const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, const CChainParams& chainparams, bool punish_duplicate_invalid) +{ + const CNetMsgMaker msgMaker(pfrom->GetSendVersion()); + size_t nCount = headers.size(); + + if (nCount == 0) { + // Nothing interesting. Stop asking this peers for more headers. + return true; + } + + bool received_new_header = false; + const CBlockIndex *pindexLast = nullptr; + { + LOCK(cs_main); + CNodeState *nodestate = State(pfrom->GetId()); + + // If this looks like it could be a block announcement (nCount < + // MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE), use special logic for handling headers that + // don't connect: + // - Send a getheaders message in response to try to connect the chain. + // - The peer can send up to MAX_UNCONNECTING_HEADERS in a row that + // don't connect before giving DoS points + // - Once a headers message is received that is valid and does connect, + // nUnconnectingHeaders gets reset back to 0. + if (mapBlockIndex.find(headers[0].hashPrevBlock) == mapBlockIndex.end() && nCount < MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE) { + nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders++; + connman->PushMessage(pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), uint256())); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "received header %s: missing prev block %s, sending getheaders (%d) to end (peer=%d, nUnconnectingHeaders=%d)\n", + headers[0].GetHash().ToString(), + headers[0].hashPrevBlock.ToString(), + pindexBestHeader->nHeight, + pfrom->GetId(), nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders); + // Set hashLastUnknownBlock for this peer, so that if we + // eventually get the headers - even from a different peer - + // we can use this peer to download. + UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom->GetId(), headers.back().GetHash()); + + if (nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders % MAX_UNCONNECTING_HEADERS == 0) { + Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 20); + } + return true; + } + + uint256 hashLastBlock; + for (const CBlockHeader& header : headers) { + if (!hashLastBlock.IsNull() && header.hashPrevBlock != hashLastBlock) { + Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 20); + return error("non-continuous headers sequence"); + } + hashLastBlock = header.GetHash(); + } + + // If we don't have the last header, then they'll have given us + // something new (if these headers are valid). + if (mapBlockIndex.find(hashLastBlock) == mapBlockIndex.end()) { + received_new_header = true; + } + } + + CValidationState state; + CBlockHeader first_invalid_header; + if (!ProcessNewBlockHeaders(headers, state, chainparams, &pindexLast, &first_invalid_header)) { + int nDoS; + if (state.IsInvalid(nDoS)) { + LOCK(cs_main); + if (nDoS > 0) { + Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), nDoS); + } + if (punish_duplicate_invalid && mapBlockIndex.find(first_invalid_header.GetHash()) != mapBlockIndex.end()) { + // Goal: don't allow outbound peers to use up our outbound + // connection slots if they are on incompatible chains. + // + // We ask the caller to set punish_invalid appropriately based + // on the peer and the method of header delivery (compact + // blocks are allowed to be invalid in some circumstances, + // under BIP 152). + // Here, we try to detect the narrow situation that we have a + // valid block header (ie it was valid at the time the header + // was received, and hence stored in mapBlockIndex) but know the + // block is invalid, and that a peer has announced that same + // block as being on its active chain. + // Disconnect the peer in such a situation. + // + // Note: if the header that is invalid was not accepted to our + // mapBlockIndex at all, that may also be grounds for + // disconnecting the peer, as the chain they are on is likely + // to be incompatible. However, there is a circumstance where + // that does not hold: if the header's timestamp is more than + // 2 hours ahead of our current time. In that case, the header + // may become valid in the future, and we don't want to + // disconnect a peer merely for serving us one too-far-ahead + // block header, to prevent an attacker from splitting the + // network by mining a block right at the 2 hour boundary. + // + // TODO: update the DoS logic (or, rather, rewrite the + // DoS-interface between validation and net_processing) so that + // the interface is cleaner, and so that we disconnect on all the + // reasons that a peer's headers chain is incompatible + // with ours (eg block->nVersion softforks, MTP violations, + // etc), and not just the duplicate-invalid case. + pfrom->fDisconnect = true; + } + return error("invalid header received"); + } + } + + { + LOCK(cs_main); + CNodeState *nodestate = State(pfrom->GetId()); + if (nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders > 0) { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "peer=%d: resetting nUnconnectingHeaders (%d -> 0)\n", pfrom->GetId(), nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders); + } + nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders = 0; + + assert(pindexLast); + UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom->GetId(), pindexLast->GetBlockHash()); + + // From here, pindexBestKnownBlock should be guaranteed to be non-null, + // because it is set in UpdateBlockAvailability. Some nullptr checks + // are still present, however, as belt-and-suspenders. + + if (received_new_header && pindexLast->nChainWork > chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork) { + nodestate->m_last_block_announcement = GetTime(); + } + + if (nCount == MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS) { + // Headers message had its maximum size; the peer may have more headers. + // TODO: optimize: if pindexLast is an ancestor of chainActive.Tip or pindexBestHeader, continue + // from there instead. + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "more getheaders (%d) to end to peer=%d (startheight:%d)\n", pindexLast->nHeight, pfrom->GetId(), pfrom->nStartingHeight); + connman->PushMessage(pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(pindexLast), uint256())); + } + + bool fCanDirectFetch = CanDirectFetch(chainparams.GetConsensus()); + // If this set of headers is valid and ends in a block with at least as + // much work as our tip, download as much as possible. + if (fCanDirectFetch && pindexLast->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_TREE) && chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork <= pindexLast->nChainWork) { + std::vector<const CBlockIndex*> vToFetch; + const CBlockIndex *pindexWalk = pindexLast; + // Calculate all the blocks we'd need to switch to pindexLast, up to a limit. + while (pindexWalk && !chainActive.Contains(pindexWalk) && vToFetch.size() <= MAX_BLOCKS_IN_TRANSIT_PER_PEER) { + if (!(pindexWalk->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA) && + !mapBlocksInFlight.count(pindexWalk->GetBlockHash()) && + (!IsWitnessEnabled(pindexWalk->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) || State(pfrom->GetId())->fHaveWitness)) { + // We don't have this block, and it's not yet in flight. + vToFetch.push_back(pindexWalk); + } + pindexWalk = pindexWalk->pprev; + } + // If pindexWalk still isn't on our main chain, we're looking at a + // very large reorg at a time we think we're close to caught up to + // the main chain -- this shouldn't really happen. Bail out on the + // direct fetch and rely on parallel download instead. + if (!chainActive.Contains(pindexWalk)) { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Large reorg, won't direct fetch to %s (%d)\n", + pindexLast->GetBlockHash().ToString(), + pindexLast->nHeight); + } else { + std::vector<CInv> vGetData; + // Download as much as possible, from earliest to latest. + for (const CBlockIndex *pindex : reverse_iterate(vToFetch)) { + if (nodestate->nBlocksInFlight >= MAX_BLOCKS_IN_TRANSIT_PER_PEER) { + // Can't download any more from this peer + break; + } + uint32_t nFetchFlags = GetFetchFlags(pfrom); + vGetData.push_back(CInv(MSG_BLOCK | nFetchFlags, pindex->GetBlockHash())); + MarkBlockAsInFlight(pfrom->GetId(), pindex->GetBlockHash(), pindex); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Requesting block %s from peer=%d\n", + pindex->GetBlockHash().ToString(), pfrom->GetId()); + } + if (vGetData.size() > 1) { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Downloading blocks toward %s (%d) via headers direct fetch\n", + pindexLast->GetBlockHash().ToString(), pindexLast->nHeight); + } + if (vGetData.size() > 0) { + if (nodestate->fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion && vGetData.size() == 1 && mapBlocksInFlight.size() == 1 && pindexLast->pprev->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_CHAIN)) { + // In any case, we want to download using a compact block, not a regular one + vGetData[0] = CInv(MSG_CMPCT_BLOCK, vGetData[0].hash); + } + connman->PushMessage(pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vGetData)); + } + } + } + // If we're in IBD, we want outbound peers that will serve us a useful + // chain. Disconnect peers that are on chains with insufficient work. + if (IsInitialBlockDownload() && nCount != MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS) { + // When nCount < MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS, we know we have no more + // headers to fetch from this peer. + if (nodestate->pindexBestKnownBlock && nodestate->pindexBestKnownBlock->nChainWork < nMinimumChainWork) { + // This peer has too little work on their headers chain to help + // us sync -- disconnect if using an outbound slot (unless + // whitelisted or addnode). + // Note: We compare their tip to nMinimumChainWork (rather than + // chainActive.Tip()) because we won't start block download + // until we have a headers chain that has at least + // nMinimumChainWork, even if a peer has a chain past our tip, + // as an anti-DoS measure. + if (IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate(pfrom)) { + LogPrintf("Disconnecting outbound peer %d -- headers chain has insufficient work\n", pfrom->GetId()); + pfrom->fDisconnect = true; + } + } + } + + if (!pfrom->fDisconnect && IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate(pfrom) && nodestate->pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr) { + // If this is an outbound peer, check to see if we should protect + // it from the bad/lagging chain logic. + if (g_outbound_peers_with_protect_from_disconnect < MAX_OUTBOUND_PEERS_TO_PROTECT_FROM_DISCONNECT && nodestate->pindexBestKnownBlock->nChainWork >= chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork && !nodestate->m_chain_sync.m_protect) { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Protecting outbound peer=%d from eviction\n", pfrom->GetId()); + nodestate->m_chain_sync.m_protect = true; + ++g_outbound_peers_with_protect_from_disconnect; + } + } + } + + return true; +} + bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv, int64_t nTimeReceived, const CChainParams& chainparams, CConnman* connman, const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc) { LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "received: %s (%u bytes) peer=%d\n", SanitizeString(strCommand), vRecv.size(), pfrom->GetId()); @@ -1266,7 +1569,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr if (nVersion < MIN_PEER_PROTO_VERSION) { // disconnect from peers older than this proto version - LogPrintf("peer=%d using obsolete version %i; disconnecting\n", pfrom->GetId(), nVersion); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "peer=%d using obsolete version %i; disconnecting\n", pfrom->GetId(), nVersion); connman->PushMessage(pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(INIT_PROTO_VERSION).Make(NetMsgType::REJECT, strCommand, REJECT_OBSOLETE, strprintf("Version must be %d or greater", MIN_PEER_PROTO_VERSION))); pfrom->fDisconnect = true; @@ -1366,7 +1669,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr if (fLogIPs) remoteAddr = ", peeraddr=" + pfrom->addr.ToString(); - LogPrintf("receive version message: %s: version %d, blocks=%d, us=%s, peer=%d%s\n", + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "receive version message: %s: version %d, blocks=%d, us=%s, peer=%d%s\n", cleanSubVer, pfrom->nVersion, pfrom->nStartingHeight, addrMe.ToString(), pfrom->GetId(), remoteAddr); @@ -1409,6 +1712,9 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr // Mark this node as currently connected, so we update its timestamp later. LOCK(cs_main); State(pfrom->GetId())->fCurrentlyConnected = true; + LogPrintf("New outbound peer connected: version: %d, blocks=%d, peer=%d%s\n", + pfrom->nVersion.load(), pfrom->nStartingHeight, pfrom->GetId(), + (fLogIPs ? strprintf(", peeraddr=%s", pfrom->addr.ToString()) : "")); } if (pfrom->nVersion >= SENDHEADERS_VERSION) { @@ -1687,7 +1993,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr BlockMap::iterator it = mapBlockIndex.find(req.blockhash); if (it == mapBlockIndex.end() || !(it->second->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA)) { - LogPrintf("Peer %d sent us a getblocktxn for a block we don't have", pfrom->GetId()); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Peer %d sent us a getblocktxn for a block we don't have", pfrom->GetId()); return true; } @@ -1738,9 +2044,8 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr return true; pindex = (*mi).second; - if (!chainActive.Contains(pindex) && - !StaleBlockRequestAllowed(pindex, chainparams.GetConsensus())) { - LogPrintf("%s: ignoring request from peer=%i for old block header that isn't in the main chain\n", __func__, pfrom->GetId()); + if (!BlockRequestAllowed(pindex, chainparams.GetConsensus())) { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: ignoring request from peer=%i for old block header that isn't in the main chain\n", __func__, pfrom->GetId()); return true; } } @@ -1810,7 +2115,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr if (!AlreadyHave(inv) && AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, state, ptx, &fMissingInputs, &lRemovedTxn, false /* bypass_limits */, 0 /* nAbsurdFee */)) { - mempool.check(pcoinsTip); + mempool.check(pcoinsTip.get()); RelayTransaction(tx, connman); for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vout.size(); i++) { vWorkQueue.emplace_back(inv.hash, i); @@ -1877,7 +2182,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr recentRejects->insert(orphanHash); } } - mempool.check(pcoinsTip); + mempool.check(pcoinsTip.get()); } } @@ -1971,6 +2276,8 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock; vRecv >> cmpctblock; + bool received_new_header = false; + { LOCK(cs_main); @@ -1980,6 +2287,10 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr connman->PushMessage(pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), uint256())); return true; } + + if (mapBlockIndex.find(cmpctblock.header.GetHash()) == mapBlockIndex.end()) { + received_new_header = true; + } } const CBlockIndex *pindex = nullptr; @@ -1988,10 +2299,12 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr int nDoS; if (state.IsInvalid(nDoS)) { if (nDoS > 0) { + LogPrintf("Peer %d sent us invalid header via cmpctblock\n", pfrom->GetId()); LOCK(cs_main); Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), nDoS); + } else { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Peer %d sent us invalid header via cmpctblock\n", pfrom->GetId()); } - LogPrintf("Peer %d sent us invalid header via cmpctblock\n", pfrom->GetId()); return true; } } @@ -2006,7 +2319,6 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr // If we end up treating this as a plain headers message, call that as well // without cs_main. bool fRevertToHeaderProcessing = false; - CDataStream vHeadersMsg(SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION); // Keep a CBlock for "optimistic" compactblock reconstructions (see // below) @@ -2019,6 +2331,14 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr assert(pindex); UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom->GetId(), pindex->GetBlockHash()); + CNodeState *nodestate = State(pfrom->GetId()); + + // If this was a new header with more work than our tip, update the + // peer's last block announcement time + if (received_new_header && pindex->nChainWork > chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork) { + nodestate->m_last_block_announcement = GetTime(); + } + std::map<uint256, std::pair<NodeId, std::list<QueuedBlock>::iterator> >::iterator blockInFlightIt = mapBlocksInFlight.find(pindex->GetBlockHash()); bool fAlreadyInFlight = blockInFlightIt != mapBlocksInFlight.end(); @@ -2041,8 +2361,6 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr if (!fAlreadyInFlight && !CanDirectFetch(chainparams.GetConsensus())) return true; - CNodeState *nodestate = State(pfrom->GetId()); - if (IsWitnessEnabled(pindex->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) && !nodestate->fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion) { // Don't bother trying to process compact blocks from v1 peers // after segwit activates. @@ -2123,10 +2441,6 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr return true; } else { // If this was an announce-cmpctblock, we want the same treatment as a header message - // Dirty hack to process as if it were just a headers message (TODO: move message handling into their own functions) - std::vector<CBlock> headers; - headers.push_back(cmpctblock.header); - vHeadersMsg << headers; fRevertToHeaderProcessing = true; } } @@ -2135,8 +2449,14 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr if (fProcessBLOCKTXN) return ProcessMessage(pfrom, NetMsgType::BLOCKTXN, blockTxnMsg, nTimeReceived, chainparams, connman, interruptMsgProc); - if (fRevertToHeaderProcessing) - return ProcessMessage(pfrom, NetMsgType::HEADERS, vHeadersMsg, nTimeReceived, chainparams, connman, interruptMsgProc); + if (fRevertToHeaderProcessing) { + // Headers received from HB compact block peers are permitted to be + // relayed before full validation (see BIP 152), so we don't want to disconnect + // the peer if the header turns out to be for an invalid block. + // Note that if a peer tries to build on an invalid chain, that + // will be detected and the peer will be banned. + return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, connman, {cmpctblock.header}, chainparams, /*punish_duplicate_invalid=*/false); + } if (fBlockReconstructed) { // If we got here, we were able to optimistically reconstruct a @@ -2146,7 +2466,16 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr mapBlockSource.emplace(pblock->GetHash(), std::make_pair(pfrom->GetId(), false)); } bool fNewBlock = false; - ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, true, &fNewBlock); + // Setting fForceProcessing to true means that we bypass some of + // our anti-DoS protections in AcceptBlock, which filters + // unrequested blocks that might be trying to waste our resources + // (eg disk space). Because we only try to reconstruct blocks when + // we're close to caught up (via the CanDirectFetch() requirement + // above, combined with the behavior of not requesting blocks until + // we have a chain with at least nMinimumChainWork), and we ignore + // compact blocks with less work than our tip, it is safe to treat + // reconstructed compact blocks as having been requested. + ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock); if (fNewBlock) { pfrom->nLastBlockTime = GetTime(); } else { @@ -2226,7 +2555,11 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr bool fNewBlock = false; // Since we requested this block (it was in mapBlocksInFlight), force it to be processed, // even if it would not be a candidate for new tip (missing previous block, chain not long enough, etc) - ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, true, &fNewBlock); + // This bypasses some anti-DoS logic in AcceptBlock (eg to prevent + // disk-space attacks), but this should be safe due to the + // protections in the compact block handler -- see related comment + // in compact block optimistic reconstruction handling. + ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock); if (fNewBlock) { pfrom->nLastBlockTime = GetTime(); } else { @@ -2254,136 +2587,12 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr ReadCompactSize(vRecv); // ignore tx count; assume it is 0. } - if (nCount == 0) { - // Nothing interesting. Stop asking this peers for more headers. - return true; - } - - const CBlockIndex *pindexLast = nullptr; - { - LOCK(cs_main); - CNodeState *nodestate = State(pfrom->GetId()); - - // If this looks like it could be a block announcement (nCount < - // MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE), use special logic for handling headers that - // don't connect: - // - Send a getheaders message in response to try to connect the chain. - // - The peer can send up to MAX_UNCONNECTING_HEADERS in a row that - // don't connect before giving DoS points - // - Once a headers message is received that is valid and does connect, - // nUnconnectingHeaders gets reset back to 0. - if (mapBlockIndex.find(headers[0].hashPrevBlock) == mapBlockIndex.end() && nCount < MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE) { - nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders++; - connman->PushMessage(pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), uint256())); - LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "received header %s: missing prev block %s, sending getheaders (%d) to end (peer=%d, nUnconnectingHeaders=%d)\n", - headers[0].GetHash().ToString(), - headers[0].hashPrevBlock.ToString(), - pindexBestHeader->nHeight, - pfrom->GetId(), nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders); - // Set hashLastUnknownBlock for this peer, so that if we - // eventually get the headers - even from a different peer - - // we can use this peer to download. - UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom->GetId(), headers.back().GetHash()); - - if (nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders % MAX_UNCONNECTING_HEADERS == 0) { - Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 20); - } - return true; - } - - uint256 hashLastBlock; - for (const CBlockHeader& header : headers) { - if (!hashLastBlock.IsNull() && header.hashPrevBlock != hashLastBlock) { - Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 20); - return error("non-continuous headers sequence"); - } - hashLastBlock = header.GetHash(); - } - } - - CValidationState state; - if (!ProcessNewBlockHeaders(headers, state, chainparams, &pindexLast)) { - int nDoS; - if (state.IsInvalid(nDoS)) { - if (nDoS > 0) { - LOCK(cs_main); - Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), nDoS); - } - return error("invalid header received"); - } - } - - { - LOCK(cs_main); - CNodeState *nodestate = State(pfrom->GetId()); - if (nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders > 0) { - LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "peer=%d: resetting nUnconnectingHeaders (%d -> 0)\n", pfrom->GetId(), nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders); - } - nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders = 0; - - assert(pindexLast); - UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom->GetId(), pindexLast->GetBlockHash()); - - if (nCount == MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS) { - // Headers message had its maximum size; the peer may have more headers. - // TODO: optimize: if pindexLast is an ancestor of chainActive.Tip or pindexBestHeader, continue - // from there instead. - LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "more getheaders (%d) to end to peer=%d (startheight:%d)\n", pindexLast->nHeight, pfrom->GetId(), pfrom->nStartingHeight); - connman->PushMessage(pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(pindexLast), uint256())); - } - - bool fCanDirectFetch = CanDirectFetch(chainparams.GetConsensus()); - // If this set of headers is valid and ends in a block with at least as - // much work as our tip, download as much as possible. - if (fCanDirectFetch && pindexLast->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_TREE) && chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork <= pindexLast->nChainWork) { - std::vector<const CBlockIndex*> vToFetch; - const CBlockIndex *pindexWalk = pindexLast; - // Calculate all the blocks we'd need to switch to pindexLast, up to a limit. - while (pindexWalk && !chainActive.Contains(pindexWalk) && vToFetch.size() <= MAX_BLOCKS_IN_TRANSIT_PER_PEER) { - if (!(pindexWalk->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA) && - !mapBlocksInFlight.count(pindexWalk->GetBlockHash()) && - (!IsWitnessEnabled(pindexWalk->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) || State(pfrom->GetId())->fHaveWitness)) { - // We don't have this block, and it's not yet in flight. - vToFetch.push_back(pindexWalk); - } - pindexWalk = pindexWalk->pprev; - } - // If pindexWalk still isn't on our main chain, we're looking at a - // very large reorg at a time we think we're close to caught up to - // the main chain -- this shouldn't really happen. Bail out on the - // direct fetch and rely on parallel download instead. - if (!chainActive.Contains(pindexWalk)) { - LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Large reorg, won't direct fetch to %s (%d)\n", - pindexLast->GetBlockHash().ToString(), - pindexLast->nHeight); - } else { - std::vector<CInv> vGetData; - // Download as much as possible, from earliest to latest. - for (const CBlockIndex *pindex : reverse_iterate(vToFetch)) { - if (nodestate->nBlocksInFlight >= MAX_BLOCKS_IN_TRANSIT_PER_PEER) { - // Can't download any more from this peer - break; - } - uint32_t nFetchFlags = GetFetchFlags(pfrom); - vGetData.push_back(CInv(MSG_BLOCK | nFetchFlags, pindex->GetBlockHash())); - MarkBlockAsInFlight(pfrom->GetId(), pindex->GetBlockHash(), pindex); - LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Requesting block %s from peer=%d\n", - pindex->GetBlockHash().ToString(), pfrom->GetId()); - } - if (vGetData.size() > 1) { - LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Downloading blocks toward %s (%d) via headers direct fetch\n", - pindexLast->GetBlockHash().ToString(), pindexLast->nHeight); - } - if (vGetData.size() > 0) { - if (nodestate->fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion && vGetData.size() == 1 && mapBlocksInFlight.size() == 1 && pindexLast->pprev->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_CHAIN)) { - // In any case, we want to download using a compact block, not a regular one - vGetData[0] = CInv(MSG_CMPCT_BLOCK, vGetData[0].hash); - } - connman->PushMessage(pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vGetData)); - } - } - } - } + // Headers received via a HEADERS message should be valid, and reflect + // the chain the peer is on. If we receive a known-invalid header, + // disconnect the peer if it is using one of our outbound connection + // slots. + bool should_punish = !pfrom->fInbound && !pfrom->m_manual_connection; + return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, connman, headers, chainparams, should_punish); } else if (strCommand == NetMsgType::BLOCK && !fImporting && !fReindex) // Ignore blocks received while importing @@ -2393,11 +2602,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "received block %s peer=%d\n", pblock->GetHash().ToString(), pfrom->GetId()); - // Process all blocks from whitelisted peers, even if not requested, - // unless we're still syncing with the network. - // Such an unrequested block may still be processed, subject to the - // conditions in AcceptBlock(). - bool forceProcessing = pfrom->fWhitelisted && !IsInitialBlockDownload(); + bool forceProcessing = false; const uint256 hash(pblock->GetHash()); { LOCK(cs_main); @@ -2561,8 +2766,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr else { LOCK(pfrom->cs_filter); - delete pfrom->pfilter; - pfrom->pfilter = new CBloomFilter(filter); + pfrom->pfilter.reset(new CBloomFilter(filter)); pfrom->pfilter->UpdateEmptyFull(); pfrom->fRelayTxes = true; } @@ -2598,8 +2802,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr { LOCK(pfrom->cs_filter); if (pfrom->GetLocalServices() & NODE_BLOOM) { - delete pfrom->pfilter; - pfrom->pfilter = new CBloomFilter(); + pfrom->pfilter.reset(new CBloomFilter()); } pfrom->fRelayTxes = true; } @@ -2703,7 +2906,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter msg.SetVersion(pfrom->GetRecvVersion()); // Scan for message start if (memcmp(msg.hdr.pchMessageStart, chainparams.MessageStart(), CMessageHeader::MESSAGE_START_SIZE) != 0) { - LogPrintf("PROCESSMESSAGE: INVALID MESSAGESTART %s peer=%d\n", SanitizeString(msg.hdr.GetCommand()), pfrom->GetId()); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "PROCESSMESSAGE: INVALID MESSAGESTART %s peer=%d\n", SanitizeString(msg.hdr.GetCommand()), pfrom->GetId()); pfrom->fDisconnect = true; return false; } @@ -2712,7 +2915,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter CMessageHeader& hdr = msg.hdr; if (!hdr.IsValid(chainparams.MessageStart())) { - LogPrintf("PROCESSMESSAGE: ERRORS IN HEADER %s peer=%d\n", SanitizeString(hdr.GetCommand()), pfrom->GetId()); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "PROCESSMESSAGE: ERRORS IN HEADER %s peer=%d\n", SanitizeString(hdr.GetCommand()), pfrom->GetId()); return fMoreWork; } std::string strCommand = hdr.GetCommand(); @@ -2725,7 +2928,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter const uint256& hash = msg.GetMessageHash(); if (memcmp(hash.begin(), hdr.pchChecksum, CMessageHeader::CHECKSUM_SIZE) != 0) { - LogPrintf("%s(%s, %u bytes): CHECKSUM ERROR expected %s was %s\n", __func__, + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s(%s, %u bytes): CHECKSUM ERROR expected %s was %s\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, HexStr(hash.begin(), hash.begin()+CMessageHeader::CHECKSUM_SIZE), HexStr(hdr.pchChecksum, hdr.pchChecksum+CMessageHeader::CHECKSUM_SIZE)); @@ -2748,17 +2951,17 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter if (strstr(e.what(), "end of data")) { // Allow exceptions from under-length message on vRecv - LogPrintf("%s(%s, %u bytes): Exception '%s' caught, normally caused by a message being shorter than its stated length\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, e.what()); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s(%s, %u bytes): Exception '%s' caught, normally caused by a message being shorter than its stated length\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, e.what()); } else if (strstr(e.what(), "size too large")) { // Allow exceptions from over-long size - LogPrintf("%s(%s, %u bytes): Exception '%s' caught\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, e.what()); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s(%s, %u bytes): Exception '%s' caught\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, e.what()); } else if (strstr(e.what(), "non-canonical ReadCompactSize()")) { // Allow exceptions from non-canonical encoding - LogPrintf("%s(%s, %u bytes): Exception '%s' caught\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, e.what()); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s(%s, %u bytes): Exception '%s' caught\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, e.what()); } else { @@ -2772,7 +2975,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter } if (!fRet) { - LogPrintf("%s(%s, %u bytes) FAILED peer=%d\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, pfrom->GetId()); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s(%s, %u bytes) FAILED peer=%d\n", __func__, SanitizeString(strCommand), nMessageSize, pfrom->GetId()); } LOCK(cs_main); @@ -2781,6 +2984,136 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter return fMoreWork; } +void PeerLogicValidation::ConsiderEviction(CNode *pto, int64_t time_in_seconds) +{ + AssertLockHeld(cs_main); + + CNodeState &state = *State(pto->GetId()); + const CNetMsgMaker msgMaker(pto->GetSendVersion()); + + if (!state.m_chain_sync.m_protect && IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate(pto) && state.fSyncStarted) { + // This is an outbound peer subject to disconnection if they don't + // announce a block with as much work as the current tip within + // CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT + HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME seconds (note: if + // their chain has more work than ours, we should sync to it, + // unless it's invalid, in which case we should find that out and + // disconnect from them elsewhere). + if (state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr && state.pindexBestKnownBlock->nChainWork >= chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork) { + if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout != 0) { + state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout = 0; + state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header = nullptr; + state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = false; + } + } else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout == 0 || (state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr && state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr && state.pindexBestKnownBlock->nChainWork >= state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->nChainWork)) { + // Our best block known by this peer is behind our tip, and we're either noticing + // that for the first time, OR this peer was able to catch up to some earlier point + // where we checked against our tip. + // Either way, set a new timeout based on current tip. + state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout = time_in_seconds + CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT; + state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header = chainActive.Tip(); + state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = false; + } else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout > 0 && time_in_seconds > state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout) { + // No evidence yet that our peer has synced to a chain with work equal to that + // of our tip, when we first detected it was behind. Send a single getheaders + // message to give the peer a chance to update us. + if (state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders) { + // They've run out of time to catch up! + LogPrintf("Disconnecting outbound peer %d for old chain, best known block = %s\n", pto->GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>"); + pto->fDisconnect = true; + } else { + assert(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sending getheaders to outbound peer=%d to verify chain work (current best known block:%s, benchmark blockhash: %s)\n", pto->GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>", state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString()); + connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->pprev), uint256())); + state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = true; + constexpr int64_t HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME = 120; // 2 minutes + // Bump the timeout to allow a response, which could clear the timeout + // (if the response shows the peer has synced), reset the timeout (if + // the peer syncs to the required work but not to our tip), or result + // in disconnect (if we advance to the timeout and pindexBestKnownBlock + // has not sufficiently progressed) + state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout = time_in_seconds + HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME; + } + } + } +} + +void PeerLogicValidation::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds) +{ + // Check whether we have too many outbound peers + int extra_peers = connman->GetExtraOutboundCount(); + if (extra_peers > 0) { + // If we have more outbound peers than we target, disconnect one. + // Pick the outbound peer that least recently announced + // us a new block, with ties broken by choosing the more recent + // connection (higher node id) + NodeId worst_peer = -1; + int64_t oldest_block_announcement = std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max(); + + LOCK(cs_main); + + connman->ForEachNode([&](CNode* pnode) { + // Ignore non-outbound peers, or nodes marked for disconnect already + if (!IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate(pnode) || pnode->fDisconnect) return; + CNodeState *state = State(pnode->GetId()); + if (state == nullptr) return; // shouldn't be possible, but just in case + // Don't evict our protected peers + if (state->m_chain_sync.m_protect) return; + if (state->m_last_block_announcement < oldest_block_announcement || (state->m_last_block_announcement == oldest_block_announcement && pnode->GetId() > worst_peer)) { + worst_peer = pnode->GetId(); + oldest_block_announcement = state->m_last_block_announcement; + } + }); + if (worst_peer != -1) { + bool disconnected = connman->ForNode(worst_peer, [&](CNode *pnode) { + // Only disconnect a peer that has been connected to us for + // some reasonable fraction of our check-frequency, to give + // it time for new information to have arrived. + // Also don't disconnect any peer we're trying to download a + // block from. + CNodeState &state = *State(pnode->GetId()); + if (time_in_seconds - pnode->nTimeConnected > MINIMUM_CONNECT_TIME && state.nBlocksInFlight == 0) { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "disconnecting extra outbound peer=%d (last block announcement received at time %d)\n", pnode->GetId(), oldest_block_announcement); + pnode->fDisconnect = true; + return true; + } else { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "keeping outbound peer=%d chosen for eviction (connect time: %d, blocks_in_flight: %d)\n", pnode->GetId(), pnode->nTimeConnected, state.nBlocksInFlight); + return false; + } + }); + if (disconnected) { + // If we disconnected an extra peer, that means we successfully + // connected to at least one peer after the last time we + // detected a stale tip. Don't try any more extra peers until + // we next detect a stale tip, to limit the load we put on the + // network from these extra connections. + connman->SetTryNewOutboundPeer(false); + } + } + } +} + +void PeerLogicValidation::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(const Consensus::Params &consensusParams) +{ + if (connman == nullptr) return; + + int64_t time_in_seconds = GetTime(); + + EvictExtraOutboundPeers(time_in_seconds); + + if (time_in_seconds > m_stale_tip_check_time) { + LOCK(cs_main); + // Check whether our tip is stale, and if so, allow using an extra + // outbound peer + if (TipMayBeStale(consensusParams)) { + LogPrintf("Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer (last tip update: %d seconds ago)\n", time_in_seconds - g_last_tip_update); + connman->SetTryNewOutboundPeer(true); + } else if (connman->GetTryNewOutboundPeer()) { + connman->SetTryNewOutboundPeer(false); + } + m_stale_tip_check_time = time_in_seconds + STALE_CHECK_INTERVAL; + } +} + class CompareInvMempoolOrder { CTxMemPool *mp; @@ -3247,6 +3580,9 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto, std::atomic<bool>& interruptM } } + // Check that outbound peers have reasonable chains + // GetTime() is used by this anti-DoS logic so we can test this using mocktime + ConsiderEviction(pto, GetTime()); // // Message: getdata (blocks) |