aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--src/init.cpp10
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.cpp148
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.h70
-rw-r--r--src/node/context.h4
-rw-r--r--src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp23
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp7
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/process_messages.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/test/util/setup_common.cpp4
-rw-r--r--test/sanitizer_suppressions/tsan2
9 files changed, 147 insertions, 123 deletions
diff --git a/src/init.cpp b/src/init.cpp
index 633dd8cefc..7dceef7fff 100644
--- a/src/init.cpp
+++ b/src/init.cpp
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ void Shutdown(NodeContext& node)
// Because these depend on each-other, we make sure that neither can be
// using the other before destroying them.
- if (node.peer_logic) UnregisterValidationInterface(node.peer_logic.get());
+ if (node.peerman) UnregisterValidationInterface(node.peerman.get());
// Follow the lock order requirements:
// * CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers locks cs_main before indirectly calling GetExtraOutboundCount
// which locks cs_vNodes.
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ void Shutdown(NodeContext& node)
// After the threads that potentially access these pointers have been stopped,
// destruct and reset all to nullptr.
- node.peer_logic.reset();
+ node.peerman.reset();
node.connman.reset();
node.banman.reset();
@@ -1376,8 +1376,8 @@ bool AppInitMain(const util::Ref& context, NodeContext& node, interfaces::BlockA
node.chainman = &g_chainman;
ChainstateManager& chainman = *Assert(node.chainman);
- node.peer_logic.reset(new PeerLogicValidation(*node.connman, node.banman.get(), *node.scheduler, chainman, *node.mempool));
- RegisterValidationInterface(node.peer_logic.get());
+ node.peerman.reset(new PeerManager(chainparams, *node.connman, node.banman.get(), *node.scheduler, chainman, *node.mempool));
+ RegisterValidationInterface(node.peerman.get());
// sanitize comments per BIP-0014, format user agent and check total size
std::vector<std::string> uacomments;
@@ -1911,7 +1911,7 @@ bool AppInitMain(const util::Ref& context, NodeContext& node, interfaces::BlockA
connOptions.nBestHeight = chain_active_height;
connOptions.uiInterface = &uiInterface;
connOptions.m_banman = node.banman.get();
- connOptions.m_msgproc = node.peer_logic.get();
+ connOptions.m_msgproc = node.peerman.get();
connOptions.nSendBufferMaxSize = 1000 * args.GetArg("-maxsendbuffer", DEFAULT_MAXSENDBUFFER);
connOptions.nReceiveFloodSize = 1000 * args.GetArg("-maxreceivebuffer", DEFAULT_MAXRECEIVEBUFFER);
connOptions.m_added_nodes = args.GetArgs("-addnode");
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index 9176513dae..05f5188266 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ void UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(NodeId node, int64_t time_in_seconds)
if (state) state->m_last_block_announcement = time_in_seconds;
}
-void PeerLogicValidation::InitializeNode(CNode *pnode) {
+void PeerManager::InitializeNode(CNode *pnode) {
CAddress addr = pnode->addr;
std::string addrName = pnode->GetAddrName();
NodeId nodeid = pnode->GetId();
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::InitializeNode(CNode *pnode) {
}
}
-void PeerLogicValidation::ReattemptInitialBroadcast(CScheduler& scheduler) const
+void PeerManager::ReattemptInitialBroadcast(CScheduler& scheduler) const
{
std::map<uint256, uint256> unbroadcast_txids = m_mempool.GetUnbroadcastTxs();
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ReattemptInitialBroadcast(CScheduler& scheduler) const
scheduler.scheduleFromNow([&] { ReattemptInitialBroadcast(scheduler); }, delta);
}
-void PeerLogicValidation::FinalizeNode(NodeId nodeid, bool& fUpdateConnectionTime) {
+void PeerManager::FinalizeNode(NodeId nodeid, bool& fUpdateConnectionTime) {
fUpdateConnectionTime = false;
LOCK(cs_main);
int misbehavior{0};
@@ -1110,11 +1110,7 @@ unsigned int LimitOrphanTxSize(unsigned int nMaxOrphans)
return nEvicted;
}
-/**
- * Increment peer's misbehavior score. If the new value >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, mark the node
- * to be discouraged, meaning the peer might be disconnected and added to the discouragement filter.
- */
-void Misbehaving(const NodeId pnode, const int howmuch, const std::string& message)
+void PeerManager::Misbehaving(const NodeId pnode, const int howmuch, const std::string& message)
{
assert(howmuch > 0);
@@ -1132,17 +1128,9 @@ void Misbehaving(const NodeId pnode, const int howmuch, const std::string& messa
}
}
-/**
- * Potentially mark a node discouraged based on the contents of a BlockValidationState object
- *
- * @param[in] via_compact_block this bool is passed in because net_processing should
- * punish peers differently depending on whether the data was provided in a compact
- * block message or not. If the compact block had a valid header, but contained invalid
- * txs, the peer should not be punished. See BIP 152.
- *
- * @return Returns true if the peer was punished (probably disconnected)
- */
-static bool MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidationState& state, bool via_compact_block, const std::string& message = "") {
+bool PeerManager::MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidationState& state,
+ bool via_compact_block, const std::string& message)
+{
switch (state.GetResult()) {
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_RESULT_UNSET:
break;
@@ -1190,12 +1178,7 @@ static bool MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidationState& s
return false;
}
-/**
- * Potentially disconnect and discourage a node based on the contents of a TxValidationState object
- *
- * @return Returns true if the peer was punished (probably disconnected)
- */
-static bool MaybePunishNodeForTx(NodeId nodeid, const TxValidationState& state, const std::string& message = "")
+bool PeerManager::MaybePunishNodeForTx(NodeId nodeid, const TxValidationState& state, const std::string& message)
{
switch (state.GetResult()) {
case TxValidationResult::TX_RESULT_UNSET:
@@ -1241,8 +1224,10 @@ static bool BlockRequestAllowed(const CBlockIndex* pindex, const Consensus::Para
(GetBlockProofEquivalentTime(*pindexBestHeader, *pindex, *pindexBestHeader, consensusParams) < STALE_RELAY_AGE_LIMIT);
}
-PeerLogicValidation::PeerLogicValidation(CConnman& connman, BanMan* banman, CScheduler& scheduler, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& pool)
- : m_connman(connman),
+PeerManager::PeerManager(const CChainParams& chainparams, CConnman& connman, BanMan* banman,
+ CScheduler& scheduler, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& pool)
+ : m_chainparams(chainparams),
+ m_connman(connman),
m_banman(banman),
m_chainman(chainman),
m_mempool(pool),
@@ -1279,7 +1264,7 @@ PeerLogicValidation::PeerLogicValidation(CConnman& connman, BanMan* banman, CSch
* Evict orphan txn pool entries (EraseOrphanTx) based on a newly connected
* block. Also save the time of the last tip update.
*/
-void PeerLogicValidation::BlockConnected(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, const CBlockIndex* pindex)
+void PeerManager::BlockConnected(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, const CBlockIndex* pindex)
{
{
LOCK(g_cs_orphans);
@@ -1323,7 +1308,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::BlockConnected(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pb
}
}
-void PeerLogicValidation::BlockDisconnected(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> &block, const CBlockIndex* pindex)
+void PeerManager::BlockDisconnected(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> &block, const CBlockIndex* pindex)
{
// To avoid relay problems with transactions that were previously
// confirmed, clear our filter of recently confirmed transactions whenever
@@ -1348,7 +1333,7 @@ static bool fWitnessesPresentInMostRecentCompactBlock GUARDED_BY(cs_most_recent_
* Maintain state about the best-seen block and fast-announce a compact block
* to compatible peers.
*/
-void PeerLogicValidation::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock) {
+void PeerManager::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock) {
std::shared_ptr<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs> pcmpctblock = std::make_shared<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs> (*pblock, true);
const CNetMsgMaker msgMaker(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
@@ -1383,7 +1368,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std:
if (state.fPreferHeaderAndIDs && (!fWitnessEnabled || state.fWantsCmpctWitness) &&
!PeerHasHeader(&state, pindex) && PeerHasHeader(&state, pindex->pprev)) {
- LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s sending header-and-ids %s to peer=%d\n", "PeerLogicValidation::NewPoWValidBlock",
+ LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s sending header-and-ids %s to peer=%d\n", "PeerManager::NewPoWValidBlock",
hashBlock.ToString(), pnode->GetId());
m_connman.PushMessage(pnode, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *pcmpctblock));
state.pindexBestHeaderSent = pindex;
@@ -1395,7 +1380,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std:
* Update our best height and announce any block hashes which weren't previously
* in ::ChainActive() to our peers.
*/
-void PeerLogicValidation::UpdatedBlockTip(const CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CBlockIndex *pindexFork, bool fInitialDownload) {
+void PeerManager::UpdatedBlockTip(const CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CBlockIndex *pindexFork, bool fInitialDownload) {
const int nNewHeight = pindexNew->nHeight;
m_connman.SetBestHeight(nNewHeight);
@@ -1430,7 +1415,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::UpdatedBlockTip(const CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CB
* Handle invalid block rejection and consequent peer discouragement, maintain which
* peers announce compact blocks.
*/
-void PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked(const CBlock& block, const BlockValidationState& state) {
+void PeerManager::BlockChecked(const CBlock& block, const BlockValidationState& state) {
LOCK(cs_main);
const uint256 hash(block.GetHash());
@@ -1839,7 +1824,7 @@ static uint32_t GetFetchFlags(const CNode& pfrom) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_ma
return nFetchFlags;
}
-inline void static SendBlockTransactions(const CBlock& block, const BlockTransactionsRequest& req, CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman) {
+void PeerManager::SendBlockTransactions(CNode& pfrom, const CBlock& block, const BlockTransactionsRequest& req) {
BlockTransactions resp(req);
for (size_t i = 0; i < req.indexes.size(); i++) {
if (req.indexes[i] >= block.vtx.size()) {
@@ -1851,10 +1836,10 @@ inline void static SendBlockTransactions(const CBlock& block, const BlockTransac
LOCK(cs_main);
const CNetMsgMaker msgMaker(pfrom.GetSendVersion());
int nSendFlags = State(pfrom.GetId())->fWantsCmpctWitness ? 0 : SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS;
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::BLOCKTXN, resp));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::BLOCKTXN, resp));
}
-static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& mempool, const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, const CChainParams& chainparams, bool via_compact_block)
+void PeerManager::ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, bool via_compact_block)
{
const CNetMsgMaker msgMaker(pfrom.GetSendVersion());
size_t nCount = headers.size();
@@ -1880,7 +1865,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
// nUnconnectingHeaders gets reset back to 0.
if (!LookupBlockIndex(headers[0].hashPrevBlock) && nCount < MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE) {
nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders++;
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), uint256()));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), uint256()));
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "received header %s: missing prev block %s, sending getheaders (%d) to end (peer=%d, nUnconnectingHeaders=%d)\n",
headers[0].GetHash().ToString(),
headers[0].hashPrevBlock.ToString(),
@@ -1914,7 +1899,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
}
BlockValidationState state;
- if (!chainman.ProcessNewBlockHeaders(headers, state, chainparams, &pindexLast)) {
+ if (!m_chainman.ProcessNewBlockHeaders(headers, state, m_chainparams, &pindexLast)) {
if (state.IsInvalid()) {
MaybePunishNodeForBlock(pfrom.GetId(), state, via_compact_block, "invalid header received");
return;
@@ -1945,10 +1930,10 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
// TODO: optimize: if pindexLast is an ancestor of ::ChainActive().Tip or pindexBestHeader, continue
// from there instead.
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "more getheaders (%d) to end to peer=%d (startheight:%d)\n", pindexLast->nHeight, pfrom.GetId(), pfrom.nStartingHeight);
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexLast), uint256()));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexLast), uint256()));
}
- bool fCanDirectFetch = CanDirectFetch(chainparams.GetConsensus());
+ bool fCanDirectFetch = CanDirectFetch(m_chainparams.GetConsensus());
// If this set of headers is valid and ends in a block with at least as
// much work as our tip, download as much as possible.
if (fCanDirectFetch && pindexLast->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_TREE) && ::ChainActive().Tip()->nChainWork <= pindexLast->nChainWork) {
@@ -1958,7 +1943,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
while (pindexWalk && !::ChainActive().Contains(pindexWalk) && vToFetch.size() <= MAX_BLOCKS_IN_TRANSIT_PER_PEER) {
if (!(pindexWalk->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA) &&
!mapBlocksInFlight.count(pindexWalk->GetBlockHash()) &&
- (!IsWitnessEnabled(pindexWalk->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) || State(pfrom.GetId())->fHaveWitness)) {
+ (!IsWitnessEnabled(pindexWalk->pprev, m_chainparams.GetConsensus()) || State(pfrom.GetId())->fHaveWitness)) {
// We don't have this block, and it's not yet in flight.
vToFetch.push_back(pindexWalk);
}
@@ -1982,7 +1967,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
}
uint32_t nFetchFlags = GetFetchFlags(pfrom);
vGetData.push_back(CInv(MSG_BLOCK | nFetchFlags, pindex->GetBlockHash()));
- MarkBlockAsInFlight(mempool, pfrom.GetId(), pindex->GetBlockHash(), pindex);
+ MarkBlockAsInFlight(m_mempool, pfrom.GetId(), pindex->GetBlockHash(), pindex);
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Requesting block %s from peer=%d\n",
pindex->GetBlockHash().ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
}
@@ -1995,7 +1980,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
// In any case, we want to download using a compact block, not a regular one
vGetData[0] = CInv(MSG_CMPCT_BLOCK, vGetData[0].hash);
}
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vGetData));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vGetData));
}
}
}
@@ -2036,7 +2021,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
return;
}
-void static ProcessOrphanTx(CConnman& connman, CTxMemPool& mempool, std::set<uint256>& orphan_work_set, std::list<CTransactionRef>& removed_txn) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main, g_cs_orphans)
+void PeerManager::ProcessOrphanTx(std::set<uint256>& orphan_work_set, std::list<CTransactionRef>& removed_txn)
{
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
AssertLockHeld(g_cs_orphans);
@@ -2058,9 +2043,9 @@ void static ProcessOrphanTx(CConnman& connman, CTxMemPool& mempool, std::set<uin
TxValidationState orphan_state;
if (setMisbehaving.count(fromPeer)) continue;
- if (AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, orphan_state, porphanTx, &removed_txn, false /* bypass_limits */, 0 /* nAbsurdFee */)) {
+ if (AcceptToMemoryPool(m_mempool, orphan_state, porphanTx, &removed_txn, false /* bypass_limits */, 0 /* nAbsurdFee */)) {
LogPrint(BCLog::MEMPOOL, " accepted orphan tx %s\n", orphanHash.ToString());
- RelayTransaction(orphanHash, porphanTx->GetWitnessHash(), connman);
+ RelayTransaction(orphanHash, porphanTx->GetWitnessHash(), m_connman);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < orphanTx.vout.size(); i++) {
auto it_by_prev = mapOrphanTransactionsByPrev.find(COutPoint(orphanHash, i));
if (it_by_prev != mapOrphanTransactionsByPrev.end()) {
@@ -2118,7 +2103,7 @@ void static ProcessOrphanTx(CConnman& connman, CTxMemPool& mempool, std::set<uin
EraseOrphanTx(orphanHash);
done = true;
}
- mempool.check(&::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
+ m_mempool.check(&::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
}
}
@@ -2338,9 +2323,9 @@ static void ProcessGetCFCheckPt(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv, const CChainPar
connman.PushMessage(&peer, std::move(msg));
}
-void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDataStream& vRecv,
+void PeerManager::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDataStream& vRecv,
const std::chrono::microseconds time_received,
- const CChainParams& chainparams, const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc)
+ const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc)
{
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "received: %s (%u bytes) peer=%d\n", SanitizeString(msg_type), vRecv.size(), pfrom.GetId());
if (gArgs.IsArgSet("-dropmessagestest") && GetRand(gArgs.GetArg("-dropmessagestest", 0)) == 0)
@@ -2772,7 +2757,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
}
pfrom.vRecvGetData.insert(pfrom.vRecvGetData.end(), vInv.begin(), vInv.end());
- ProcessGetData(pfrom, chainparams, m_connman, m_mempool, interruptMsgProc);
+ ProcessGetData(pfrom, m_chainparams, m_connman, m_mempool, interruptMsgProc);
return;
}
@@ -2825,7 +2810,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
}
// If pruning, don't inv blocks unless we have on disk and are likely to still have
// for some reasonable time window (1 hour) that block relay might require.
- const int nPrunedBlocksLikelyToHave = MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP - 3600 / chainparams.GetConsensus().nPowTargetSpacing;
+ const int nPrunedBlocksLikelyToHave = MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP - 3600 / m_chainparams.GetConsensus().nPowTargetSpacing;
if (fPruneMode && (!(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA) || pindex->nHeight <= ::ChainActive().Tip()->nHeight - nPrunedBlocksLikelyToHave))
{
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, " getblocks stopping, pruned or too old block at %d %s\n", pindex->nHeight, pindex->GetBlockHash().ToString());
@@ -2856,7 +2841,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
// Unlock cs_most_recent_block to avoid cs_main lock inversion
}
if (recent_block) {
- SendBlockTransactions(*recent_block, req, pfrom, m_connman);
+ SendBlockTransactions(pfrom, *recent_block, req);
return;
}
@@ -2886,10 +2871,10 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
}
CBlock block;
- bool ret = ReadBlockFromDisk(block, pindex, chainparams.GetConsensus());
+ bool ret = ReadBlockFromDisk(block, pindex, m_chainparams.GetConsensus());
assert(ret);
- SendBlockTransactions(block, req, pfrom, m_connman);
+ SendBlockTransactions(pfrom, block, req);
return;
}
@@ -2920,7 +2905,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
return;
}
- if (!BlockRequestAllowed(pindex, chainparams.GetConsensus())) {
+ if (!BlockRequestAllowed(pindex, m_chainparams.GetConsensus())) {
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: ignoring request from peer=%i for old block header that isn't in the main chain\n", __func__, pfrom.GetId());
return;
}
@@ -3036,7 +3021,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
m_mempool.size(), m_mempool.DynamicMemoryUsage() / 1000);
// Recursively process any orphan transactions that depended on this one
- ProcessOrphanTx(m_connman, m_mempool, pfrom.orphan_work_set, lRemovedTxn);
+ ProcessOrphanTx(pfrom.orphan_work_set, lRemovedTxn);
}
else if (state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_MISSING_INPUTS)
{
@@ -3198,7 +3183,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
const CBlockIndex *pindex = nullptr;
BlockValidationState state;
- if (!m_chainman.ProcessNewBlockHeaders({cmpctblock.header}, state, chainparams, &pindex)) {
+ if (!m_chainman.ProcessNewBlockHeaders({cmpctblock.header}, state, m_chainparams, &pindex)) {
if (state.IsInvalid()) {
MaybePunishNodeForBlock(pfrom.GetId(), state, /*via_compact_block*/ true, "invalid header via cmpctblock");
return;
@@ -3254,10 +3239,10 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
}
// If we're not close to tip yet, give up and let parallel block fetch work its magic
- if (!fAlreadyInFlight && !CanDirectFetch(chainparams.GetConsensus()))
+ if (!fAlreadyInFlight && !CanDirectFetch(m_chainparams.GetConsensus()))
return;
- if (IsWitnessEnabled(pindex->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) && !nodestate->fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion) {
+ if (IsWitnessEnabled(pindex->pprev, m_chainparams.GetConsensus()) && !nodestate->fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion) {
// Don't bother trying to process compact blocks from v1 peers
// after segwit activates.
return;
@@ -3341,8 +3326,9 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
}
} // cs_main
- if (fProcessBLOCKTXN)
- return ProcessMessage(pfrom, NetMsgType::BLOCKTXN, blockTxnMsg, time_received, chainparams, interruptMsgProc);
+ if (fProcessBLOCKTXN) {
+ return ProcessMessage(pfrom, NetMsgType::BLOCKTXN, blockTxnMsg, time_received, interruptMsgProc);
+ }
if (fRevertToHeaderProcessing) {
// Headers received from HB compact block peers are permitted to be
@@ -3350,7 +3336,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
// the peer if the header turns out to be for an invalid block.
// Note that if a peer tries to build on an invalid chain, that
// will be detected and the peer will be disconnected/discouraged.
- return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, m_connman, m_chainman, m_mempool, {cmpctblock.header}, chainparams, /*via_compact_block=*/true);
+ return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, {cmpctblock.header}, /*via_compact_block=*/true);
}
if (fBlockReconstructed) {
@@ -3370,7 +3356,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
// we have a chain with at least nMinimumChainWork), and we ignore
// compact blocks with less work than our tip, it is safe to treat
// reconstructed compact blocks as having been requested.
- m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
+ m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(m_chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
if (fNewBlock) {
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
} else {
@@ -3460,7 +3446,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
// disk-space attacks), but this should be safe due to the
// protections in the compact block handler -- see related comment
// in compact block optimistic reconstruction handling.
- m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
+ m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(m_chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
if (fNewBlock) {
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
} else {
@@ -3493,7 +3479,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
ReadCompactSize(vRecv); // ignore tx count; assume it is 0.
}
- return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, m_connman, m_chainman, m_mempool, headers, chainparams, /*via_compact_block=*/false);
+ return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, headers, /*via_compact_block=*/false);
}
if (msg_type == NetMsgType::BLOCK)
@@ -3522,7 +3508,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
mapBlockSource.emplace(hash, std::make_pair(pfrom.GetId(), true));
}
bool fNewBlock = false;
- m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, forceProcessing, &fNewBlock);
+ m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(m_chainparams, pblock, forceProcessing, &fNewBlock);
if (fNewBlock) {
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
} else {
@@ -3751,17 +3737,17 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
}
if (msg_type == NetMsgType::GETCFILTERS) {
- ProcessGetCFilters(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, m_connman);
+ ProcessGetCFilters(pfrom, vRecv, m_chainparams, m_connman);
return;
}
if (msg_type == NetMsgType::GETCFHEADERS) {
- ProcessGetCFHeaders(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, m_connman);
+ ProcessGetCFHeaders(pfrom, vRecv, m_chainparams, m_connman);
return;
}
if (msg_type == NetMsgType::GETCFCHECKPT) {
- ProcessGetCFCheckPt(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, m_connman);
+ ProcessGetCFCheckPt(pfrom, vRecv, m_chainparams, m_connman);
return;
}
@@ -3795,12 +3781,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_ty
return;
}
-/** Maybe disconnect a peer and discourage future connections from its address.
- *
- * @param[in] pnode The node to check.
- * @return True if the peer was marked for disconnection in this function
- */
-bool PeerLogicValidation::MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode)
+bool PeerManager::MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode)
{
const NodeId peer_id{pnode.GetId()};
PeerRef peer = GetPeerRef(peer_id);
@@ -3842,9 +3823,8 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode)
return true;
}
-bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc)
+bool PeerManager::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc)
{
- const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
//
// Message format
// (4) message start
@@ -3856,12 +3836,12 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter
bool fMoreWork = false;
if (!pfrom->vRecvGetData.empty())
- ProcessGetData(*pfrom, chainparams, m_connman, m_mempool, interruptMsgProc);
+ ProcessGetData(*pfrom, m_chainparams, m_connman, m_mempool, interruptMsgProc);
if (!pfrom->orphan_work_set.empty()) {
std::list<CTransactionRef> removed_txn;
LOCK2(cs_main, g_cs_orphans);
- ProcessOrphanTx(m_connman, m_mempool, pfrom->orphan_work_set, removed_txn);
+ ProcessOrphanTx(pfrom->orphan_work_set, removed_txn);
for (const CTransactionRef& removedTx : removed_txn) {
AddToCompactExtraTransactions(removedTx);
}
@@ -3921,7 +3901,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter
}
try {
- ProcessMessage(*pfrom, msg_type, vRecv, msg.m_time, chainparams, interruptMsgProc);
+ ProcessMessage(*pfrom, msg_type, vRecv, msg.m_time, interruptMsgProc);
if (interruptMsgProc)
return false;
if (!pfrom->vRecvGetData.empty())
@@ -3935,7 +3915,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter
return fMoreWork;
}
-void PeerLogicValidation::ConsiderEviction(CNode& pto, int64_t time_in_seconds)
+void PeerManager::ConsiderEviction(CNode& pto, int64_t time_in_seconds)
{
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
@@ -3988,7 +3968,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ConsiderEviction(CNode& pto, int64_t time_in_seconds)
}
}
-void PeerLogicValidation::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds)
+void PeerManager::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds)
{
// Check whether we have too many outbound peers
int extra_peers = m_connman.GetExtraOutboundCount();
@@ -4047,7 +4027,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds)
}
}
-void PeerLogicValidation::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(const Consensus::Params &consensusParams)
+void PeerManager::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(const Consensus::Params &consensusParams)
{
LOCK(cs_main);
@@ -4089,7 +4069,7 @@ public:
};
}
-bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
+bool PeerManager::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
{
const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus();
diff --git a/src/net_processing.h b/src/net_processing.h
index 4f1c52fc17..520f7489e8 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.h
+++ b/src/net_processing.h
@@ -11,9 +11,13 @@
#include <sync.h>
#include <validationinterface.h>
+class BlockTransactionsRequest;
+class BlockValidationState;
+class CBlockHeader;
class CChainParams;
class CTxMemPool;
class ChainstateManager;
+class TxValidationState;
extern RecursiveMutex cs_main;
extern RecursiveMutex g_cs_orphans;
@@ -27,18 +31,10 @@ static const bool DEFAULT_PEERBLOCKFILTERS = false;
/** Threshold for marking a node to be discouraged, e.g. disconnected and added to the discouragement filter. */
static const int DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD{100};
-class PeerLogicValidation final : public CValidationInterface, public NetEventsInterface {
-private:
- CConnman& m_connman;
- /** Pointer to this node's banman. May be nullptr - check existence before dereferencing. */
- BanMan* const m_banman;
- ChainstateManager& m_chainman;
- CTxMemPool& m_mempool;
-
- bool MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode);
-
+class PeerManager final : public CValidationInterface, public NetEventsInterface {
public:
- PeerLogicValidation(CConnman& connman, BanMan* banman, CScheduler& scheduler, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& pool);
+ PeerManager(const CChainParams& chainparams, CConnman& connman, BanMan* banman,
+ CScheduler& scheduler, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& pool);
/**
* Overridden from CValidationInterface.
@@ -88,12 +84,58 @@ public:
/** Process a single message from a peer. Public for fuzz testing */
void ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDataStream& vRecv,
- const std::chrono::microseconds time_received, const CChainParams& chainparams,
- const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc);
+ const std::chrono::microseconds time_received, const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc);
+
+ /**
+ * Increment peer's misbehavior score. If the new value >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, mark the node
+ * to be discouraged, meaning the peer might be disconnected and added to the discouragement filter.
+ * Public for unit testing.
+ */
+ void Misbehaving(const NodeId pnode, const int howmuch, const std::string& message);
private:
- int64_t m_stale_tip_check_time; //!< Next time to check for stale tip
+ /**
+ * Potentially mark a node discouraged based on the contents of a BlockValidationState object
+ *
+ * @param[in] via_compact_block this bool is passed in because net_processing should
+ * punish peers differently depending on whether the data was provided in a compact
+ * block message or not. If the compact block had a valid header, but contained invalid
+ * txs, the peer should not be punished. See BIP 152.
+ *
+ * @return Returns true if the peer was punished (probably disconnected)
+ */
+ bool MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidationState& state,
+ bool via_compact_block, const std::string& message = "");
+ /**
+ * Potentially disconnect and discourage a node based on the contents of a TxValidationState object
+ *
+ * @return Returns true if the peer was punished (probably disconnected)
+ */
+ bool MaybePunishNodeForTx(NodeId nodeid, const TxValidationState& state, const std::string& message = "");
+
+ /** Maybe disconnect a peer and discourage future connections from its address.
+ *
+ * @param[in] pnode The node to check.
+ * @return True if the peer was marked for disconnection in this function
+ */
+ bool MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode);
+
+ void ProcessOrphanTx(std::set<uint256>& orphan_work_set, std::list<CTransactionRef>& removed_txn)
+ EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main, g_cs_orphans);
+ /** Process a single headers message from a peer. */
+ void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, bool via_compact_block);
+
+ void SendBlockTransactions(CNode& pfrom, const CBlock& block, const BlockTransactionsRequest& req);
+
+ const CChainParams& m_chainparams;
+ CConnman& m_connman;
+ /** Pointer to this node's banman. May be nullptr - check existence before dereferencing. */
+ BanMan* const m_banman;
+ ChainstateManager& m_chainman;
+ CTxMemPool& m_mempool;
+
+ int64_t m_stale_tip_check_time; //!< Next time to check for stale tip
};
struct CNodeStateStats {
diff --git a/src/node/context.h b/src/node/context.h
index d9d0750951..3228831ed1 100644
--- a/src/node/context.h
+++ b/src/node/context.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ class CConnman;
class CScheduler;
class CTxMemPool;
class ChainstateManager;
-class PeerLogicValidation;
+class PeerManager;
namespace interfaces {
class Chain;
class ChainClient;
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ class WalletClient;
struct NodeContext {
std::unique_ptr<CConnman> connman;
std::unique_ptr<CTxMemPool> mempool;
- std::unique_ptr<PeerLogicValidation> peer_logic;
+ std::unique_ptr<PeerManager> peerman;
ChainstateManager* chainman{nullptr}; // Currently a raw pointer because the memory is not managed by this struct
std::unique_ptr<BanMan> banman;
ArgsManager* args{nullptr}; // Currently a raw pointer because the memory is not managed by this struct
diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
index bf0659587c..f4d2204e1c 100644
--- a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ struct CConnmanTest : public CConnman {
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransactionRef& tx, NodeId peer);
extern void EraseOrphansFor(NodeId peer);
extern unsigned int LimitOrphanTxSize(unsigned int nMaxOrphans);
-extern void Misbehaving(NodeId nodeid, int howmuch, const std::string& message="");
struct COrphanTx {
CTransactionRef tx;
@@ -79,8 +78,9 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(denialofservice_tests, TestingSetup)
// work.
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
{
+ const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
- auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*connman, nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerManager>(chainparams, *connman, nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
// Mock an outbound peer
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
}
-static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic, CConnmanTest* connman)
+static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerManager &peerLogic, CConnmanTest* connman)
{
CAddress addr(ip(g_insecure_rand_ctx.randbits(32)), NODE_NONE);
vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK | NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", ConnectionType::OUTBOUND_FULL_RELAY));
@@ -149,8 +149,9 @@ static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidat
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
{
+ const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnmanTest>(0x1337, 0x1337);
- auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*connman, nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerManager>(chainparams, *connman, nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus();
constexpr int max_outbound_full_relay = MAX_OUTBOUND_FULL_RELAY_CONNECTIONS;
@@ -221,9 +222,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
{
+ const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
- auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*connman, banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerManager>(chainparams, *connman, banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
banman->ClearBanned();
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
@@ -232,7 +234,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); // Should be discouraged
+ peerLogic->Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /* message */ ""); // Should be discouraged
{
LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1));
@@ -246,14 +248,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode2);
dummyNode2.nVersion = 1;
dummyNode2.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1);
+ peerLogic->Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1, /* message */ "");
{
LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2));
}
BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(addr2)); // 2 not discouraged yet...
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be
- Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 1); // 2 reaches discouragement threshold
+ peerLogic->Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 1, /* message */ ""); // 2 reaches discouragement threshold
{
LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2));
@@ -268,9 +270,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
{
+ const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
- auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*connman, banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerManager>(chainparams, *connman, banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
banman->ClearBanned();
int64_t nStartTime = GetTime();
@@ -283,7 +286,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
dummyNode.nVersion = 1;
dummyNode.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD);
+ peerLogic->Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /* message */ "");
{
LOCK(dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode));
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
index 52efe5ddfa..3d6947ca92 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
@@ -73,11 +73,10 @@ void test_one_input(const std::vector<uint8_t>& buffer)
p2p_node.nVersion = PROTOCOL_VERSION;
p2p_node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
connman.AddTestNode(p2p_node);
- g_setup->m_node.peer_logic->InitializeNode(&p2p_node);
+ g_setup->m_node.peerman->InitializeNode(&p2p_node);
try {
- g_setup->m_node.peer_logic->ProcessMessage(p2p_node, random_message_type, random_bytes_data_stream,
- GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>(), Params(),
- std::atomic<bool>{false});
+ g_setup->m_node.peerman->ProcessMessage(p2p_node, random_message_type, random_bytes_data_stream,
+ GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>(), std::atomic<bool>{false});
} catch (const std::ios_base::failure&) {
}
SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue();
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/process_messages.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/process_messages.cpp
index 33385c06cf..c9433d325a 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/process_messages.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/process_messages.cpp
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void test_one_input(const std::vector<uint8_t>& buffer)
p2p_node.fPauseSend = false;
p2p_node.nVersion = PROTOCOL_VERSION;
p2p_node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
- g_setup->m_node.peer_logic->InitializeNode(&p2p_node);
+ g_setup->m_node.peerman->InitializeNode(&p2p_node);
connman.AddTestNode(p2p_node);
}
diff --git a/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp b/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
index 536a131313..08aff07448 100644
--- a/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
+++ b/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
@@ -169,10 +169,10 @@ TestingSetup::TestingSetup(const std::string& chainName, const std::vector<const
m_node.banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
m_node.connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337); // Deterministic randomness for tests.
- m_node.peer_logic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*m_node.connman, m_node.banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ m_node.peerman = MakeUnique<PeerManager>(chainparams, *m_node.connman, m_node.banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
{
CConnman::Options options;
- options.m_msgproc = m_node.peer_logic.get();
+ options.m_msgproc = m_node.peerman.get();
m_node.connman->Init(options);
}
}
diff --git a/test/sanitizer_suppressions/tsan b/test/sanitizer_suppressions/tsan
index 3ba2b2a103..625085c55b 100644
--- a/test/sanitizer_suppressions/tsan
+++ b/test/sanitizer_suppressions/tsan
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ mutex:CConnman::ThreadOpenConnections
mutex:CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections
mutex:CConnman::SocketHandler
mutex:UpdateTip
-mutex:PeerLogicValidation::UpdatedBlockTip
+mutex:PeerManager::UpdatedBlockTip
mutex:g_best_block_mutex
# race (TODO fix)
race:CConnman::WakeMessageHandler
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-07-20 03:01:57 +0000