aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.cpp52
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index f63abca847..ca701a7e5b 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -157,9 +157,6 @@ std::map<uint256, std::map<uint256, COrphanTx>::iterator> g_orphans_by_wtxid GUA
void EraseOrphansFor(NodeId peer);
-/** Increase a node's misbehavior score. */
-void Misbehaving(NodeId nodeid, int howmuch, const std::string& message="") EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
-
// Internal stuff
namespace {
/** Number of nodes with fSyncStarted. */
@@ -1062,23 +1059,22 @@ unsigned int LimitOrphanTxSize(unsigned int nMaxOrphans)
* Increment peer's misbehavior score. If the new value >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, mark the node
* to be discouraged, meaning the peer might be disconnected and added to the discouragement filter.
*/
-void Misbehaving(NodeId pnode, int howmuch, const std::string& message) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
+void Misbehaving(const NodeId pnode, const int howmuch, const std::string& message) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
{
- if (howmuch == 0)
- return;
+ assert(howmuch > 0);
- CNodeState *state = State(pnode);
- if (state == nullptr)
- return;
+ CNodeState* const state = State(pnode);
+ if (state == nullptr) return;
state->nMisbehavior += howmuch;
- std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message);
+ const std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message);
if (state->nMisbehavior >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD && state->nMisbehavior - howmuch < DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD)
{
- LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: %s peer=%d (%d -> %d) DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED%s\n", __func__, state->name, pnode, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
+ LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d) DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED%s\n", pnode, state->nMisbehavior - howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
state->m_should_discourage = true;
- } else
- LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: %s peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s\n", __func__, state->name, pnode, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
+ } else {
+ LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s\n", pnode, state->nMisbehavior - howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
+ }
}
/**
@@ -1799,7 +1795,7 @@ inline void static SendBlockTransactions(const CBlock& block, const BlockTransac
for (size_t i = 0; i < req.indexes.size(); i++) {
if (req.indexes[i] >= block.vtx.size()) {
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us a getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices", pfrom.GetId()));
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices");
return;
}
resp.txn[i] = block.vtx[req.indexes[i]];
@@ -1848,7 +1844,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom.GetId(), headers.back().GetHash());
if (nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders % MAX_UNCONNECTING_HEADERS == 0) {
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 20);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 20, strprintf("%d non-connecting headers", nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders));
}
return;
}
@@ -2307,7 +2303,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (pfrom.nVersion != 0)
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "redundant version message");
return;
}
@@ -2468,7 +2464,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (pfrom.nVersion == 0) {
// Must have a version message before anything else
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "non-version message before version handshake");
return;
}
@@ -2535,7 +2531,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (!pfrom.fSuccessfullyConnected) {
// Must have a verack message before anything else
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "non-verack message before version handshake");
return;
}
@@ -3203,7 +3199,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
ReadStatus status = partialBlock.InitData(cmpctblock, vExtraTxnForCompact);
if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) {
MarkBlockAsReceived(pindex->GetBlockHash()); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us invalid compact block\n", pfrom.GetId()));
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "invalid compact block");
return;
} else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) {
// Duplicate txindexes, the block is now in-flight, so just request it
@@ -3336,7 +3332,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
ReadStatus status = partialBlock.FillBlock(*pblock, resp.txn);
if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) {
MarkBlockAsReceived(resp.blockhash); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions\n", pfrom.GetId()));
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions");
return;
} else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) {
// Might have collided, fall back to getdata now :(
@@ -3605,7 +3601,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
{
// There is no excuse for sending a too-large filter
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "too-large bloom filter");
}
else if (pfrom.m_tx_relay != nullptr)
{
@@ -3639,7 +3635,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
}
if (bad) {
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "bad filteradd message");
}
return;
}
@@ -3723,32 +3719,32 @@ void ProcessMessage(
*/
bool PeerLogicValidation::MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode)
{
- NodeId peer_id{pnode.GetId()};
+ const NodeId peer_id{pnode.GetId()};
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- CNodeState &state = *State(peer_id);
+ CNodeState& state = *State(peer_id);
// There's nothing to do if the m_should_discourage flag isn't set
if (!state.m_should_discourage) return false;
- // Reset m_should_discourage
state.m_should_discourage = false;
} // cs_main
if (pnode.HasPermission(PF_NOBAN)) {
- // Peer has the NOBAN permission flag - log but don't disconnect
+ // We never disconnect or discourage peers for bad behavior if they have the NOBAN permission flag
LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing noban peer %d!\n", peer_id);
return false;
}
if (pnode.m_manual_connection) {
- // Peer is a manual connection - log but don't disconnect
+ // We never disconnect or discourage manual peers for bad behavior
LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing manually connected peer %d!\n", peer_id);
return false;
}
if (pnode.addr.IsLocal()) {
- // Peer is on a local address. Disconnect this peer, but don't discourage the local address
+ // We disconnect local peers for bad behavior but don't discourage (since that would discourage
+ // all peers on the same local address)
LogPrintf("Warning: disconnecting but not discouraging local peer %d!\n", peer_id);
pnode.fDisconnect = true;
return true;