diff options
-rw-r--r-- | src/net_processing.cpp | 52 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp index f63abca847..ca701a7e5b 100644 --- a/src/net_processing.cpp +++ b/src/net_processing.cpp @@ -157,9 +157,6 @@ std::map<uint256, std::map<uint256, COrphanTx>::iterator> g_orphans_by_wtxid GUA void EraseOrphansFor(NodeId peer); -/** Increase a node's misbehavior score. */ -void Misbehaving(NodeId nodeid, int howmuch, const std::string& message="") EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main); - // Internal stuff namespace { /** Number of nodes with fSyncStarted. */ @@ -1062,23 +1059,22 @@ unsigned int LimitOrphanTxSize(unsigned int nMaxOrphans) * Increment peer's misbehavior score. If the new value >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, mark the node * to be discouraged, meaning the peer might be disconnected and added to the discouragement filter. */ -void Misbehaving(NodeId pnode, int howmuch, const std::string& message) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) +void Misbehaving(const NodeId pnode, const int howmuch, const std::string& message) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main) { - if (howmuch == 0) - return; + assert(howmuch > 0); - CNodeState *state = State(pnode); - if (state == nullptr) - return; + CNodeState* const state = State(pnode); + if (state == nullptr) return; state->nMisbehavior += howmuch; - std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message); + const std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message); if (state->nMisbehavior >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD && state->nMisbehavior - howmuch < DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD) { - LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: %s peer=%d (%d -> %d) DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED%s\n", __func__, state->name, pnode, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed); + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d) DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED%s\n", pnode, state->nMisbehavior - howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed); state->m_should_discourage = true; - } else - LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: %s peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s\n", __func__, state->name, pnode, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed); + } else { + LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s\n", pnode, state->nMisbehavior - howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed); + } } /** @@ -1799,7 +1795,7 @@ inline void static SendBlockTransactions(const CBlock& block, const BlockTransac for (size_t i = 0; i < req.indexes.size(); i++) { if (req.indexes[i] >= block.vtx.size()) { LOCK(cs_main); - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us a getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices", pfrom.GetId())); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices"); return; } resp.txn[i] = block.vtx[req.indexes[i]]; @@ -1848,7 +1844,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom.GetId(), headers.back().GetHash()); if (nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders % MAX_UNCONNECTING_HEADERS == 0) { - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 20); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 20, strprintf("%d non-connecting headers", nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders)); } return; } @@ -2307,7 +2303,7 @@ void ProcessMessage( if (pfrom.nVersion != 0) { LOCK(cs_main); - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "redundant version message"); return; } @@ -2468,7 +2464,7 @@ void ProcessMessage( if (pfrom.nVersion == 0) { // Must have a version message before anything else LOCK(cs_main); - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "non-version message before version handshake"); return; } @@ -2535,7 +2531,7 @@ void ProcessMessage( if (!pfrom.fSuccessfullyConnected) { // Must have a verack message before anything else LOCK(cs_main); - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "non-verack message before version handshake"); return; } @@ -3203,7 +3199,7 @@ void ProcessMessage( ReadStatus status = partialBlock.InitData(cmpctblock, vExtraTxnForCompact); if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) { MarkBlockAsReceived(pindex->GetBlockHash()); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us invalid compact block\n", pfrom.GetId())); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "invalid compact block"); return; } else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) { // Duplicate txindexes, the block is now in-flight, so just request it @@ -3336,7 +3332,7 @@ void ProcessMessage( ReadStatus status = partialBlock.FillBlock(*pblock, resp.txn); if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) { MarkBlockAsReceived(resp.blockhash); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions\n", pfrom.GetId())); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions"); return; } else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) { // Might have collided, fall back to getdata now :( @@ -3605,7 +3601,7 @@ void ProcessMessage( { // There is no excuse for sending a too-large filter LOCK(cs_main); - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "too-large bloom filter"); } else if (pfrom.m_tx_relay != nullptr) { @@ -3639,7 +3635,7 @@ void ProcessMessage( } if (bad) { LOCK(cs_main); - Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100); + Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "bad filteradd message"); } return; } @@ -3723,32 +3719,32 @@ void ProcessMessage( */ bool PeerLogicValidation::MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode) { - NodeId peer_id{pnode.GetId()}; + const NodeId peer_id{pnode.GetId()}; { LOCK(cs_main); - CNodeState &state = *State(peer_id); + CNodeState& state = *State(peer_id); // There's nothing to do if the m_should_discourage flag isn't set if (!state.m_should_discourage) return false; - // Reset m_should_discourage state.m_should_discourage = false; } // cs_main if (pnode.HasPermission(PF_NOBAN)) { - // Peer has the NOBAN permission flag - log but don't disconnect + // We never disconnect or discourage peers for bad behavior if they have the NOBAN permission flag LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing noban peer %d!\n", peer_id); return false; } if (pnode.m_manual_connection) { - // Peer is a manual connection - log but don't disconnect + // We never disconnect or discourage manual peers for bad behavior LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing manually connected peer %d!\n", peer_id); return false; } if (pnode.addr.IsLocal()) { - // Peer is on a local address. Disconnect this peer, but don't discourage the local address + // We disconnect local peers for bad behavior but don't discourage (since that would discourage + // all peers on the same local address) LogPrintf("Warning: disconnecting but not discouraging local peer %d!\n", peer_id); pnode.fDisconnect = true; return true; |