diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp | 3 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py | 22 |
2 files changed, 24 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp b/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp index 9d334063c4..a74d6058be 100644 --- a/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp +++ b/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp @@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ static UniValue listsinceblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request) {RPCResult::Type::ARR, "removed", "<structure is the same as \"transactions\" above, only present if include_removed=true>\n" "Note: transactions that were re-added in the active chain will appear as-is in this array, and may thus have a positive confirmation count." , {{RPCResult::Type::ELISION, "", ""},}}, - {RPCResult::Type::STR_HEX, "lastblock", "The hash of the block (target_confirmations-1) from the best block on the main chain. This is typically used to feed back into listsinceblock the next time you call it. So you would generally use a target_confirmations of say 6, so you will be continually re-notified of transactions until they've reached 6 confirmations plus any new ones"}, + {RPCResult::Type::STR_HEX, "lastblock", "The hash of the block (target_confirmations-1) from the best block on the main chain, or the genesis hash if the referenced block does not exist yet. This is typically used to feed back into listsinceblock the next time you call it. So you would generally use a target_confirmations of say 6, so you will be continually re-notified of transactions until they've reached 6 confirmations plus any new ones"}, } }, RPCExamples{ @@ -1567,6 +1567,7 @@ static UniValue listsinceblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request) } uint256 lastblock; + target_confirms = std::min(target_confirms, wallet.GetLastBlockHeight() + 1); CHECK_NONFATAL(wallet.chain().findAncestorByHeight(wallet.GetLastBlockHash(), wallet.GetLastBlockHeight() + 1 - target_confirms, FoundBlock().hash(lastblock))); UniValue ret(UniValue::VOBJ); diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py b/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py index 6d51ca6c93..d4131deabf 100755 --- a/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py +++ b/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): self.test_double_spend() self.test_double_send() self.double_spends_filtered() + self.test_targetconfirmations() def test_no_blockhash(self): self.log.info("Test no blockhash") @@ -74,6 +75,27 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be hexadecimal string (not 'Z000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock, "Z000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000") + def test_targetconfirmations(self): + ''' + This tests when the value of target_confirmations exceeds the number of + blocks in the main chain. In this case, the genesis block hash should be + given for the `lastblock` property. If target_confirmations is < 1, then + a -8 invalid parameter error is thrown. + ''' + self.log.info("Test target_confirmations") + blockhash, = self.nodes[2].generate(1) + blockheight = self.nodes[2].getblockheader(blockhash)['height'] + self.sync_all() + + assert_equal( + self.nodes[0].getblockhash(0), + self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blockhash, blockheight + 1)['lastblock']) + assert_equal( + self.nodes[0].getblockhash(0), + self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blockhash, blockheight + 1000)['lastblock']) + assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter", + self.nodes[0].listsinceblock, blockhash, 0) + def test_reorg(self): ''' `listsinceblock` did not behave correctly when handed a block that was |