aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--src/consensus/tx_check.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/script/interpreter.cpp4
-rw-r--r--src/test/data/script_tests.json7
-rw-r--r--src/validation.cpp3
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/feature_block.py2
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/mempool_accept.py1
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/p2p_invalid_block.py5
8 files changed, 16 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp b/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp
index 23ed3ecb53..00ebbbd1ab 100644
--- a/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp
+++ b/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ bool CheckTransaction(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, bool fChe
if (::GetSerializeSize(tx, PROTOCOL_VERSION | SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS) * WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR > MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT)
return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-oversize");
- // Check for negative or overflow output values
+ // Check for negative or overflow output values (see CVE-2010-5139)
CAmount nValueOut = 0;
for (const auto& txout : tx.vout)
{
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index a3b865a69e..5c66c4022a 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr
}
AddOrphanTx(ptx, pfrom->GetId());
- // DoS prevention: do not allow mapOrphanTransactions to grow unbounded
+ // DoS prevention: do not allow mapOrphanTransactions to grow unbounded (see CVE-2012-3789)
unsigned int nMaxOrphanTx = (unsigned int)std::max((int64_t)0, gArgs.GetArg("-maxorphantx", DEFAULT_MAX_ORPHAN_TRANSACTIONS));
unsigned int nEvicted = LimitOrphanTxSize(nMaxOrphanTx);
if (nEvicted > 0) {
diff --git a/src/script/interpreter.cpp b/src/script/interpreter.cpp
index 95b25b4911..a819a65d24 100644
--- a/src/script/interpreter.cpp
+++ b/src/script/interpreter.cpp
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ bool EvalScript(std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> >& stack, const CScript&
opcode == OP_MOD ||
opcode == OP_LSHIFT ||
opcode == OP_RSHIFT)
- return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_DISABLED_OPCODE); // Disabled opcodes.
+ return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_DISABLED_OPCODE); // Disabled opcodes (CVE-2010-5137).
// With SCRIPT_VERIFY_CONST_SCRIPTCODE, OP_CODESEPARATOR in non-segwit script is rejected even in an unexecuted branch
if (opcode == OP_CODESEPARATOR && sigversion == SigVersion::BASE && (flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_CONST_SCRIPTCODE))
@@ -1483,6 +1483,8 @@ bool VerifyScript(const CScript& scriptSig, const CScript& scriptPubKey, const C
return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY);
}
+ // scriptSig and scriptPubKey must be evaluated sequentially on the same stack
+ // rather than being simply concatenated (see CVE-2010-5141)
std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> > stack, stackCopy;
if (!EvalScript(stack, scriptSig, flags, checker, SigVersion::BASE, serror))
// serror is set
diff --git a/src/test/data/script_tests.json b/src/test/data/script_tests.json
index 9b320b6943..3241f32f56 100644
--- a/src/test/data/script_tests.json
+++ b/src/test/data/script_tests.json
@@ -829,15 +829,16 @@
["NOP", "2SWAP 1", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "INVALID_STACK_OPERATION"],
["1", "2 3 2SWAP 1", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "INVALID_STACK_OPERATION"],
+
+["NOP", "SIZE 1", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "INVALID_STACK_OPERATION"],
+
+["TEST DISABLED OP CODES (CVE-2010-5137)"],
["'a' 'b'", "CAT", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "CAT disabled"],
["'a' 'b' 0", "IF CAT ELSE 1 ENDIF", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "CAT disabled"],
["'abc' 1 1", "SUBSTR", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "SUBSTR disabled"],
["'abc' 1 1 0", "IF SUBSTR ELSE 1 ENDIF", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "SUBSTR disabled"],
["'abc' 2 0", "IF LEFT ELSE 1 ENDIF", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "LEFT disabled"],
["'abc' 2 0", "IF RIGHT ELSE 1 ENDIF", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "RIGHT disabled"],
-
-["NOP", "SIZE 1", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "INVALID_STACK_OPERATION"],
-
["'abc'", "IF INVERT ELSE 1 ENDIF", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "INVERT disabled"],
["1 2 0 IF AND ELSE 1 ENDIF", "NOP", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "AND disabled"],
["1 2 0 IF OR ELSE 1 ENDIF", "NOP", "P2SH,STRICTENC", "DISABLED_OPCODE", "OR disabled"],
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index 436c62261b..d0ce3f78fc 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl
// If such overwrites are allowed, coinbases and transactions depending upon those
// can be duplicated to remove the ability to spend the first instance -- even after
// being sent to another address.
- // See BIP30 and http://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html for more information.
+ // See BIP30, CVE-2012-1909, and http://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html for more information.
// This logic is not necessary for memory pool transactions, as AcceptToMemoryPool
// already refuses previously-known transaction ids entirely.
// This rule was originally applied to all blocks with a timestamp after March 15, 2012, 0:00 UTC.
@@ -3136,6 +3136,7 @@ bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::P
return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-cb-multiple", "more than one coinbase");
// Check transactions
+ // Must check for duplicate inputs (see CVE-2018-17144)
for (const auto& tx : block.vtx)
if (!CheckTransaction(*tx, state, true))
return state.Invalid(state.GetReason(), false, state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(),
diff --git a/test/functional/feature_block.py b/test/functional/feature_block.py
index 3ad83cd2b3..ce353b2272 100755
--- a/test/functional/feature_block.py
+++ b/test/functional/feature_block.py
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ class FullBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
#
# Blocks are not allowed to contain a transaction whose id matches that of an earlier,
# not-fully-spent transaction in the same chain. To test, make identical coinbases;
- # the second one should be rejected.
+ # the second one should be rejected. See also CVE-2012-1909.
#
self.log.info("Reject a block with a transaction with a duplicate hash of a previous transaction (BIP30)")
self.move_tip(60)
diff --git a/test/functional/mempool_accept.py b/test/functional/mempool_accept.py
index 2bb5d8ab7d..a94187ab90 100755
--- a/test/functional/mempool_accept.py
+++ b/test/functional/mempool_accept.py
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ class MempoolAcceptanceTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
rawtxs=[tx.serialize().hex()],
)
+ # The following two validations prevent overflow of the output amounts (see CVE-2010-5139).
self.log.info('A transaction with too large output value')
tx.deserialize(BytesIO(hex_str_to_bytes(raw_tx_reference)))
tx.vout[0].nValue = 21000000 * COIN + 1
diff --git a/test/functional/p2p_invalid_block.py b/test/functional/p2p_invalid_block.py
index 1e0b876593..8ba3cc7d72 100755
--- a/test/functional/p2p_invalid_block.py
+++ b/test/functional/p2p_invalid_block.py
@@ -53,10 +53,11 @@ class InvalidBlockRequestTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
block_time = best_block["time"] + 1
# Use merkle-root malleability to generate an invalid block with
- # same blockheader.
+ # same blockheader (CVE-2012-2459).
# Manufacture a block with 3 transactions (coinbase, spend of prior
# coinbase, spend of that spend). Duplicate the 3rd transaction to
# leave merkle root and blockheader unchanged but invalidate the block.
+ # For more information on merkle-root malleability see src/consensus/merkle.cpp.
self.log.info("Test merkle root malleability.")
block2 = create_block(tip, create_coinbase(height), block_time)
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ class InvalidBlockRequestTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
node.p2p.send_blocks_and_test([block2], node, success=False, reject_reason='bad-txns-duplicate')
- # Check transactions for duplicate inputs
+ # Check transactions for duplicate inputs (CVE-2018-17144)
self.log.info("Test duplicate input block.")
block2_orig.vtx[2].vin.append(block2_orig.vtx[2].vin[0])