diff options
author | Jon Atack <jon@atack.com> | 2021-09-30 15:09:08 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jon Atack <jon@atack.com> | 2021-10-02 15:27:40 +0200 |
commit | 502f50da12694dd0193744427f0f89238e612f54 (patch) | |
tree | 901a64952d65d8b77c762a5698f7a1af15c4d5d8 /test | |
parent | 1cf7fb9fd65820b298a0eb28f6e2c4c7409c78d1 (diff) | |
download | bitcoin-502f50da12694dd0193744427f0f89238e612f54.tar.xz |
Test transactions conflicted by double spend in listtransactions
Test the properties of transactions conflicted by a double
spend as returned by RPC listtransactions in the "abandoned",
"confirmations", "trusted" and "walletconflicts" fields.
These fields are also returned by RPCs listsinceblock and
gettransactions.
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
-rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py | 29 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py b/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py index 6365840041..70ca5a2fe4 100755 --- a/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py +++ b/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996")) balance = newbalance + self.log.info("Test transactions conflicted by a double spend") # Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output # Mine double spend from node 1 inputs = [] @@ -163,6 +164,34 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework): self.connect_nodes(0, 1) self.sync_blocks() + tx_list = self.nodes[0].listtransactions() + + conflicted = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["confirmations"] < 0] + assert_equal(4, len(conflicted)) + + wallet_conflicts = [tx for tx in conflicted if tx["walletconflicts"]] + assert_equal(2, len(wallet_conflicts)) + + double_spends = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["walletconflicts"] and tx["confirmations"] > 0] + assert_equal(1, len(double_spends)) + double_spend = double_spends[0] + + # Test the properties of the conflicted transactions, i.e. with confirmations < 0. + for tx in conflicted: + assert_equal(tx["abandoned"], False) + assert_equal(tx["confirmations"], -1) + assert_equal(tx["trusted"], False) + + # Test the properties of the double-spend transaction, i.e. having wallet conflicts and confirmations > 0. + assert_equal(double_spend["abandoned"], False) + assert_equal(double_spend["confirmations"], 1) + assert "trusted" not in double_spend.keys() # "trusted" only returned if tx has 0 or negative confirmations. + + # Test the walletconflicts field of each. + for tx in wallet_conflicts: + assert_equal(double_spend["walletconflicts"], [tx["txid"]]) + assert_equal(tx["walletconflicts"], [double_spend["txid"]]) + # Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance() assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20")) |