aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorfanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>2021-05-26 19:32:38 +0800
committerfanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>2021-05-26 19:32:51 +0800
commitecddd1248258fb904ba88b5255ecbc624eec4f37 (patch)
tree7e58b83561de4b47a90bd3d36bcd2354f6f45d3d /test
parent3ec033ed32fcfcb1e2064f3296ad0b9c3aff55d1 (diff)
parente6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-ecddd1248258fb904ba88b5255ecbc624eec4f37.tar.xz
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#18418: wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100
e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729 rpc: Improve avoidpartialspends and avoid_reuse documentation (Fabian Jahr) 8f073076b102b77897e5a025ae555baae3d1f671 wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: Follow-up to #17824. This increases OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 which means that OutputGroups will now be up to 100 outputs large, up from previously 10. The main motivation for this change is that during the PR review club on #17824 [several participants signaled](https://bitcoincore.reviews/17824.html#l-339) that 100 might be a better value here. I think fees should be manageable for users but more importantly, users should know what they can expect when using the wallet with this configuration, so I also tried to clarify the documentation on `-avoidpartialspends` and `avoid_reuse` a bit. If there are other additional ways how or docs where users can be made aware of the potential consequences of using these parameters, please let me know. Another small upside is that [there seem to be a high number of batching transactions with 100 and 200 inputs](https://miro.medium.com/max/3628/1*sZ5eaBSbsJsHx-J9iztq2g.png)([source](https://medium.com/@hasufly/an-analysis-of-batching-in-bitcoin-9bdf81a394e0)) giving these transactions a bit of a larger anonymity set, although that is probably a very weak argument. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: ACK e6fe1c37d0 Xekyo: retACK e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729 rajarshimaitra: tACK `e6fe1c3` achow101: ACK e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729 glozow: code review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18418/commits/e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729 Tree-SHA512: 79685c58bafa64ed8303b0ecd616fce50fc9a2b758aa79833e4ad9f15760e09ab60c007bc16ab4cbc4222e644cfd154f1fa494b0f3a5d86faede7af33a6f2826
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/wallet_avoidreuse.py46
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_avoidreuse.py b/test/functional/wallet_avoidreuse.py
index 1d3736d9b1..c13d8de4b5 100755
--- a/test/functional/wallet_avoidreuse.py
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_avoidreuse.py
@@ -42,25 +42,25 @@ def count_unspent(node):
r["reused"]["supported"] = supports_reused
return r
-def assert_unspent(node, total_count=None, total_sum=None, reused_supported=None, reused_count=None, reused_sum=None):
+def assert_unspent(node, total_count=None, total_sum=None, reused_supported=None, reused_count=None, reused_sum=None, margin=0.001):
'''Make assertions about a node's unspent output statistics'''
stats = count_unspent(node)
if total_count is not None:
assert_equal(stats["total"]["count"], total_count)
if total_sum is not None:
- assert_approx(stats["total"]["sum"], total_sum, 0.001)
+ assert_approx(stats["total"]["sum"], total_sum, margin)
if reused_supported is not None:
assert_equal(stats["reused"]["supported"], reused_supported)
if reused_count is not None:
assert_equal(stats["reused"]["count"], reused_count)
if reused_sum is not None:
- assert_approx(stats["reused"]["sum"], reused_sum, 0.001)
+ assert_approx(stats["reused"]["sum"], reused_sum, margin)
-def assert_balances(node, mine):
+def assert_balances(node, mine, margin=0.001):
'''Make assertions about a node's getbalances output'''
got = node.getbalances()["mine"]
for k,v in mine.items():
- assert_approx(got[k], v, 0.001)
+ assert_approx(got[k], v, margin)
class AvoidReuseTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ class AvoidReuseTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
ret_addr = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
# send multiple transactions, reusing one address
- for _ in range(11):
+ for _ in range(101):
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(new_addr, 1)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
@@ -311,14 +311,14 @@ class AvoidReuseTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# getbalances and listunspent should show the remaining outputs
# in the reused address as used/reused
- assert_unspent(self.nodes[1], total_count=2, total_sum=6, reused_count=1, reused_sum=1)
- assert_balances(self.nodes[1], mine={"used": 1, "trusted": 5})
+ assert_unspent(self.nodes[1], total_count=2, total_sum=96, reused_count=1, reused_sum=1, margin=0.01)
+ assert_balances(self.nodes[1], mine={"used": 1, "trusted": 95}, margin=0.01)
def test_full_destination_group_is_preferred(self):
'''
- Test the case where [1] only has 11 outputs of 1 BTC in the same reused
+ Test the case where [1] only has 101 outputs of 1 BTC in the same reused
address and tries to send a small payment of 0.5 BTC. The wallet
- should use 10 outputs from the reused address as inputs and not a
+ should use 100 outputs from the reused address as inputs and not a
single 1 BTC input, in order to join several outputs from the reused
address.
'''
@@ -330,8 +330,8 @@ class AvoidReuseTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
new_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
ret_addr = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
- # Send 11 outputs of 1 BTC to the same, reused address in the wallet
- for _ in range(11):
+ # Send 101 outputs of 1 BTC to the same, reused address in the wallet
+ for _ in range(101):
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(new_addr, 1)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
@@ -342,14 +342,14 @@ class AvoidReuseTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
txid = self.nodes[1].sendtoaddress(address=ret_addr, amount=0.5)
inputs = self.nodes[1].getrawtransaction(txid, 1)["vin"]
- # The transaction should use 10 inputs exactly
- assert_equal(len(inputs), 10)
+ # The transaction should use 100 inputs exactly
+ assert_equal(len(inputs), 100)
def test_all_destination_groups_are_used(self):
'''
- Test the case where [1] only has 22 outputs of 1 BTC in the same reused
- address and tries to send a payment of 20.5 BTC. The wallet
- should use all 22 outputs from the reused address as inputs.
+ Test the case where [1] only has 202 outputs of 1 BTC in the same reused
+ address and tries to send a payment of 200.5 BTC. The wallet
+ should use all 202 outputs from the reused address as inputs.
'''
self.log.info("Test that all destination groups are used")
@@ -359,20 +359,20 @@ class AvoidReuseTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
new_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
ret_addr = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
- # Send 22 outputs of 1 BTC to the same, reused address in the wallet
- for _ in range(22):
+ # Send 202 outputs of 1 BTC to the same, reused address in the wallet
+ for _ in range(202):
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(new_addr, 1)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all()
# Sending a transaction that needs to use the full groups
- # of 10 inputs but also the incomplete group of 2 inputs.
- txid = self.nodes[1].sendtoaddress(address=ret_addr, amount=20.5)
+ # of 100 inputs but also the incomplete group of 2 inputs.
+ txid = self.nodes[1].sendtoaddress(address=ret_addr, amount=200.5)
inputs = self.nodes[1].getrawtransaction(txid, 1)["vin"]
- # The transaction should use 22 inputs exactly
- assert_equal(len(inputs), 22)
+ # The transaction should use 202 inputs exactly
+ assert_equal(len(inputs), 202)
if __name__ == '__main__':