diff options
author | Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com> | 2017-04-23 15:41:59 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com> | 2017-05-01 11:13:34 -0700 |
commit | dadfee38e8fdf2b384d0991253865ebf9fbdb07f (patch) | |
tree | 2e8527130f66f8e1ded077ff150dbc71b1542933 /test/functional | |
parent | e2b99b13131b5d0fd6fae6d55892c2ebb327d438 (diff) |
[test] Add test for listaddressgroupings
Test added as part of wallet-accounts.py.
Make file a little more flake8 compliant
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional')
-rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/wallet-accounts.py | 60 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet-accounts.py b/test/functional/wallet-accounts.py index ea12d4ec22..ec3be63121 100755 --- a/test/functional/wallet-accounts.py +++ b/test/functional/wallet-accounts.py @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ RPCs tested are: - getaccountaddress - getaddressesbyaccount + - listaddressgroupings - setaccount - sendfrom (with account arguments) - move (with account arguments) @@ -30,16 +31,57 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): self.nodes = start_nodes(self.num_nodes, self.options.tmpdir, self.node_args) self.is_network_split = False - def run_test (self): + def run_test(self): node = self.nodes[0] # Check that there's no UTXO on any of the nodes assert_equal(len(node.listunspent()), 0) - + + # Note each time we call generate, all generated coins go into + # the same address, so we call twice to get two addresses w/50 each + node.generate(1) node.generate(101) - - assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 50) - - accounts = ["a","b","c","d","e"] + assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 100) + + # there should be 2 address groups + # each with 1 address with a balance of 50 Bitcoins + address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings() + assert_equal(len(address_groups), 2) + # the addresses aren't linked now, but will be after we send to the + # common address + linked_addresses = set() + for address_group in address_groups: + assert_equal(len(address_group), 1) + assert_equal(len(address_group[0]), 2) + assert_equal(address_group[0][1], 50) + linked_addresses.add(address_group[0][0]) + + # send 50 from each address to a third address not in this wallet + # There's some fee that will come back to us when the miner reward + # matures. + common_address = "msf4WtN1YQKXvNtvdFYt9JBnUD2FB41kjr" + txid = node.sendmany( + fromaccount="", + amounts={common_address: 100}, + subtractfeefrom=[common_address], + minconf=1, + ) + tx_details = node.gettransaction(txid) + fee = -tx_details['details'][0]['fee'] + # there should be 1 address group, with the previously + # unlinked addresses now linked (they both have 0 balance) + address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings() + assert_equal(len(address_groups), 1) + assert_equal(len(address_groups[0]), 2) + assert_equal(set([a[0] for a in address_groups[0]]), linked_addresses) + assert_equal([a[1] for a in address_groups[0]], [0, 0]) + + node.generate(1) + + # we want to reset so that the "" account has what's expected. + # otherwise we're off by exactly the fee amount as that's mined + # and matures in the next 100 blocks + node.sendfrom("", common_address, fee) + accounts = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"] amount_to_send = 1.0 account_addresses = dict() for account in accounts: @@ -56,7 +98,7 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): for i in range(len(accounts)): from_account = accounts[i] - to_account = accounts[(i+1)%len(accounts)] + to_account = accounts[(i+1) % len(accounts)] to_address = account_addresses[to_account] node.sendfrom(from_account, to_address, amount_to_send) @@ -67,7 +109,7 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert(address != account_addresses[account]) assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account), 2) node.move(account, "", node.getbalance(account)) - + node.generate(101) expected_account_balances = {"": 5200} @@ -97,4 +139,4 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_equal(node.getbalance(account), 50) if __name__ == '__main__': - WalletAccountsTest().main () + WalletAccountsTest().main() |