diff options
author | Samuel Dobson <dobsonsa68@gmail.com> | 2020-07-12 14:31:46 +1200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Samuel Dobson <dobsonsa68@gmail.com> | 2020-07-12 14:42:35 +1200 |
commit | 4db44acf2d5d3b40943c94b3960f42838255b7ad (patch) | |
tree | 7bc20aa15a8878c2ad0ee82b8ec2e08c31098b7a /test/functional/wallet_basic.py | |
parent | 32302e5c88ef990b2eca0561bb6be38cdbc11ec3 (diff) | |
parent | 08fc6f6cfc3b06fd170452a766696d7b833113fa (diff) | |
download | bitcoin-4db44acf2d5d3b40943c94b3960f42838255b7ad.tar.xz |
Merge #18202: refactor: consolidate sendmany and sendtoaddress code
08fc6f6cfc3b06fd170452a766696d7b833113fa [rpc] refactor: consolidate sendmany and sendtoaddress code (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
I consolidated code between these two RPC calls, since `sendtoaddress` is essentially `sendmany` with 1 destination.
Unless I overlooked something, the only behaviour change is that some `sendtoaddress` error codes changed from `-4` to `-6`. The release note mentions this.
Salvaged from #18201.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 08fc6f6cfc3b06fd170452a766696d7b833113fa
jonatack:
ACK 08fc6f6cfc3b06fd170452a766696d7b833113fa
meshcollider:
Code review & functional test run ACK 08fc6f6cfc3b06fd170452a766696d7b833113fa
Tree-SHA512: 7b66c52fa0444a4d02fc3f81d9c2a386794d447616026a30111eda35fb46510475eea6506a9ceda00bb4e0230ebb758da5d236b3ac05c954c044fa68a1e3e909
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/wallet_basic.py')
-rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/wallet_basic.py | 7 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_basic.py b/test/functional/wallet_basic.py index 8962362276..81382d94ad 100755 --- a/test/functional/wallet_basic.py +++ b/test/functional/wallet_basic.py @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, expected locked output", self.nodes[2].lockunspent, True, [unspent_0]) self.nodes[2].lockunspent(False, [unspent_0]) assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, output already locked", self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False, [unspent_0]) - assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Insufficient funds", self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress, self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 20) + assert_raises_rpc_error(-6, "Insufficient funds", self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress, self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 20) assert_equal([unspent_0], self.nodes[2].listlockunspent()) self.nodes[2].lockunspent(True, [unspent_0]) assert_equal(len(self.nodes[2].listlockunspent()), 0) @@ -363,6 +363,9 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_equal(tx_obj['amount'], Decimal('-0.0001')) # General checks for errors from incorrect inputs + # This will raise an exception because the amount is negative + assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range", self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress, self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "-1") + # This will raise an exception because the amount type is wrong assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Invalid amount", self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress, self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "1f-4") @@ -590,7 +593,7 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework): node0_balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance() # With walletrejectlongchains we will not create the tx and store it in our wallet. - assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Transaction has too long of a mempool chain", self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress, sending_addr, node0_balance - Decimal('0.01')) + assert_raises_rpc_error(-6, "Transaction has too long of a mempool chain", self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress, sending_addr, node0_balance - Decimal('0.01')) # Verify nothing new in wallet assert_equal(total_txs, len(self.nodes[0].listtransactions("*", 99999))) |