diff options
author | fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com> | 2023-05-04 12:07:26 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com> | 2023-06-16 10:38:19 +0100 |
commit | 32e2ffc39374f61bb2435da507f285459985df9e (patch) | |
tree | 44103a701bd14b0c77163db5d557215d40842210 /test/functional/rpc_signer.py | |
parent | b3db18a0126bc4181d2a0880c27f45d203d06179 (diff) |
Remove the syscall sandbox
After initially being merged in #20487, it's no-longer clear that an
internal syscall sandboxing mechanism is something that Bitcoin Core
should have/maintain, especially when compared to better
maintained/supported alterantives, i.e firejail.
Note that given where it's used, the sandbox also gets dragged into the
kernel.
There is some related discussion in #24771.
This should not require any sort of deprecation, as this was only ever
an opt-in, experimental feature.
Closes #24771.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/rpc_signer.py')
-rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/rpc_signer.py | 3 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/rpc_signer.py b/test/functional/rpc_signer.py index 4300190387..5ba0d35835 100755 --- a/test/functional/rpc_signer.py +++ b/test/functional/rpc_signer.py @@ -27,9 +27,6 @@ class RPCSignerTest(BitcoinTestFramework): def set_test_params(self): self.num_nodes = 4 - # The experimental syscall sandbox feature (-sandbox) is not compatible with -signer (which - # invokes execve). - self.disable_syscall_sandbox = True self.extra_args = [ [], |