diff options
author | Sebastian Falbesoner <sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com> | 2021-11-17 23:26:28 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sebastian Falbesoner <sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com> | 2021-11-17 23:26:28 +0100 |
commit | 0d43525c61b09a283bc38b96f3827a95be976aba (patch) | |
tree | b0040be9a9e20410a83a428923887e3f0d5cde40 /test/functional/rpc_decodescript.py | |
parent | 2ef186a1400c1c7f498549dd97c227819456245e (diff) |
test: add logging to rpc_decodescript.py
Also remove the enumerations ("1)", "2)"...) from the test
cases as those potentially hinder maintainability; e.g. if a
new case in inserted in-between, all the remaining
enumerations would need to be adapted.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/rpc_decodescript.py')
-rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/rpc_decodescript.py | 45 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/rpc_decodescript.py b/test/functional/rpc_decodescript.py index 58432c3dae..e6e4033f43 100755 --- a/test/functional/rpc_decodescript.py +++ b/test/functional/rpc_decodescript.py @@ -27,29 +27,29 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): # below are test cases for all of the standard transaction types - # 1) P2PK scriptSig + self.log.info("- P2PK") # the scriptSig of a public key scriptPubKey simply pushes a signature onto the stack rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript(push_signature) assert_equal(signature, rpc_result['asm']) - # 2) P2PKH scriptSig + self.log.info("- P2PKH") rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript(push_signature + push_public_key) assert_equal(signature + ' ' + public_key, rpc_result['asm']) - # 3) multisig scriptSig + self.log.info("- multisig") # this also tests the leading portion of a P2SH multisig scriptSig # OP_0 <A sig> <B sig> rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript('00' + push_signature + push_signature) assert_equal('0 ' + signature + ' ' + signature, rpc_result['asm']) - # 4) P2SH scriptSig + self.log.info("- P2SH") # an empty P2SH redeemScript is valid and makes for a very simple test case. # thus, such a spending scriptSig would just need to pass the outer redeemScript # hash test and leave true on the top of the stack. rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript('5100') assert_equal('1 0', rpc_result['asm']) - # 5) null data scriptSig - no such thing because null data scripts can not be spent. + # null data scriptSig - no such thing because null data scripts can not be spent. # thus, no test case for that standard transaction type is here. def decodescript_script_pub_key(self): @@ -63,21 +63,21 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): # below are test cases for all of the standard transaction types - # 1) P2PK scriptPubKey + self.log.info("- P2PK") # <pubkey> OP_CHECKSIG rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript(push_public_key + 'ac') assert_equal(public_key + ' OP_CHECKSIG', rpc_result['asm']) # P2PK is translated to P2WPKH assert_equal('0 ' + public_key_hash, rpc_result['segwit']['asm']) - # 2) P2PKH scriptPubKey + self.log.info("- P2PKH") # OP_DUP OP_HASH160 <PubKeyHash> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript('76a9' + push_public_key_hash + '88ac') assert_equal('OP_DUP OP_HASH160 ' + public_key_hash + ' OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG', rpc_result['asm']) # P2PKH is translated to P2WPKH assert_equal('0 ' + public_key_hash, rpc_result['segwit']['asm']) - # 3) multisig scriptPubKey + self.log.info("- multisig") # <m> <A pubkey> <B pubkey> <C pubkey> <n> OP_CHECKMULTISIG # just imagine that the pub keys used below are different. # for our purposes here it does not matter that they are the same even though it is unrealistic. @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): multisig_script_hash = sha256(bytes.fromhex(multisig_script)).hex() assert_equal('0 ' + multisig_script_hash, rpc_result['segwit']['asm']) - # 4) P2SH scriptPubKey + self.log.info ("- P2SH") # OP_HASH160 <Hash160(redeemScript)> OP_EQUAL. # push_public_key_hash here should actually be the hash of a redeem script. # but this works the same for purposes of this test. @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): # P2SH does not work in segwit secripts. decodescript should not return a result for it. assert 'segwit' not in rpc_result - # 5) null data scriptPubKey + self.log.info("- null data") # use a signature look-alike here to make sure that we do not decode random data as a signature. # this matters if/when signature sighash decoding comes along. # would want to make sure that no such decoding takes place in this case. @@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript('6a' + signature_imposter) assert_equal('OP_RETURN ' + signature_imposter[2:], rpc_result['asm']) - # 6) a CLTV redeem script. redeem scripts are in-effect scriptPubKey scripts, so adding a test here. + self.log.info("- CLTV redeem script") + # redeem scripts are in-effect scriptPubKey scripts, so adding a test here. # OP_NOP2 is also known as OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. # just imagine that the pub keys used below are different. # for our purposes here it does not matter that they are the same even though it is unrealistic. @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): cltv_script_hash = sha256(bytes.fromhex(cltv_script)).hex() assert_equal('0 ' + cltv_script_hash, rpc_result['segwit']['asm']) - # 7) P2PK scriptPubKey + self.log.info("- P2PK with uncompressed pubkey") # <pubkey> OP_CHECKSIG rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript(push_uncompressed_public_key + 'ac') assert_equal(uncompressed_public_key + ' OP_CHECKSIG', rpc_result['asm']) @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): # decodescript should not return a P2WPKH equivalent. assert 'segwit' not in rpc_result - # 8) multisig scriptPubKey with an uncompressed pubkey + self.log.info("- multisig with uncompressed pubkey") # <m> <A pubkey> <B pubkey> <n> OP_CHECKMULTISIG # just imagine that the pub keys used below are different. # the purpose of this test is to check that a segwit script is not returned for bare multisig scripts @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): # decodescript should not return a P2WPKH equivalent. assert 'segwit' not in rpc_result - # 9) P2WPKH scriptpubkey + self.log.info("- P2WPKH") # 0 <PubKeyHash> rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decodescript('00' + push_public_key_hash) assert_equal('0 ' + public_key_hash, rpc_result['asm']) @@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): # a nested segwit script should not be returned in the results. assert 'segwit' not in rpc_result - # 10) P2WSH scriptpubkey + self.log.info("- P2WSH") # 0 <ScriptHash> # even though this hash is of a P2PK script which is better used as bare P2WPKH, it should not matter # for the purpose of this test. @@ -169,7 +170,8 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): This test is in with the "decodescript" tests because they are testing the same "asm" script decodes. """ - # this test case uses a random plain vanilla mainnet transaction with a single P2PKH input and output + self.log.info("- various mainnet txs") + # this test case uses a mainnet transaction that has a P2SH input and both P2PKH and P2SH outputs. tx = '0100000001696a20784a2c70143f634e95227dbdfdf0ecd51647052e70854512235f5986ca010000008a47304402207174775824bec6c2700023309a168231ec80b82c6069282f5133e6f11cbb04460220570edc55c7c5da2ca687ebd0372d3546ebc3f810516a002350cac72dfe192dfb014104d3f898e6487787910a690410b7a917ef198905c27fb9d3b0a42da12aceae0544fc7088d239d9a48f2828a15a09e84043001f27cc80d162cb95404e1210161536ffffffff0100e1f505000000001976a914eb6c6e0cdb2d256a32d97b8df1fc75d1920d9bca88ac00000000' rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(tx) assert_equal('304402207174775824bec6c2700023309a168231ec80b82c6069282f5133e6f11cbb04460220570edc55c7c5da2ca687ebd0372d3546ebc3f810516a002350cac72dfe192dfb[ALL] 04d3f898e6487787910a690410b7a917ef198905c27fb9d3b0a42da12aceae0544fc7088d239d9a48f2828a15a09e84043001f27cc80d162cb95404e1210161536', rpc_result['vin'][0]['scriptSig']['asm']) @@ -185,11 +187,13 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_equal('OP_HASH160 2a5edea39971049a540474c6a99edf0aa4074c58 OP_EQUAL', rpc_result['vout'][1]['scriptPubKey']['asm']) txSave = tx_from_hex(tx) + self.log.info("- tx not passing DER signature checks") # make sure that a specifically crafted op_return value will not pass all the IsDERSignature checks and then get decoded as a sighash type tx = '01000000015ded05872fdbda629c7d3d02b194763ce3b9b1535ea884e3c8e765d42e316724020000006b48304502204c10d4064885c42638cbff3585915b322de33762598321145ba033fc796971e2022100bb153ad3baa8b757e30a2175bd32852d2e1cb9080f84d7e32fcdfd667934ef1b012103163c0ff73511ea1743fb5b98384a2ff09dd06949488028fd819f4d83f56264efffffffff0200000000000000000b6a0930060201000201000180380100000000001976a9141cabd296e753837c086da7a45a6c2fe0d49d7b7b88ac00000000' rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(tx) assert_equal('OP_RETURN 300602010002010001', rpc_result['vout'][0]['scriptPubKey']['asm']) + self.log.info("- tx passing DER signature checks") # verify that we have not altered scriptPubKey processing even of a specially crafted P2PKH pubkeyhash and P2SH redeem script hash that is made to pass the der signature checks tx = '01000000018d1f5635abd06e2c7e2ddf58dc85b3de111e4ad6e0ab51bb0dcf5e84126d927300000000fdfe0000483045022100ae3b4e589dfc9d48cb82d41008dc5fa6a86f94d5c54f9935531924602730ab8002202f88cf464414c4ed9fa11b773c5ee944f66e9b05cc1e51d97abc22ce098937ea01483045022100b44883be035600e9328a01b66c7d8439b74db64187e76b99a68f7893b701d5380220225bf286493e4c4adcf928c40f785422572eb232f84a0b83b0dea823c3a19c75014c695221020743d44be989540d27b1b4bbbcfd17721c337cb6bc9af20eb8a32520b393532f2102c0120a1dda9e51a938d39ddd9fe0ebc45ea97e1d27a7cbd671d5431416d3dd87210213820eb3d5f509d7438c9eeecb4157b2f595105e7cd564b3cdbb9ead3da41eed53aeffffffff02611e0000000000001976a914301102070101010101010102060101010101010188acee2a02000000000017a91430110207010101010101010206010101010101018700000000' rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(tx) @@ -207,7 +211,7 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): push_signature_2 = '48' + signature_2 signature_2_sighash_decoded = der_signature + '[NONE|ANYONECANPAY]' - # 1) P2PK scriptSig + self.log.info("- P2PK scriptSig") txSave.vin[0].scriptSig = bytes.fromhex(push_signature) rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(txSave.serialize().hex()) assert_equal(signature_sighash_decoded, rpc_result['vin'][0]['scriptSig']['asm']) @@ -217,20 +221,23 @@ class DecodeScriptTest(BitcoinTestFramework): rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(txSave.serialize().hex()) assert_equal(signature_2_sighash_decoded, rpc_result['vin'][0]['scriptSig']['asm']) - # 2) multisig scriptSig + self.log.info("- multisig scriptSig") txSave.vin[0].scriptSig = bytes.fromhex('00' + push_signature + push_signature_2) rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(txSave.serialize().hex()) assert_equal('0 ' + signature_sighash_decoded + ' ' + signature_2_sighash_decoded, rpc_result['vin'][0]['scriptSig']['asm']) - # 3) test a scriptSig that contains more than push operations. + self.log.info("- scriptSig that contains more than push operations") # in fact, it contains an OP_RETURN with data specially crafted to cause improper decode if the code does not catch it. txSave.vin[0].scriptSig = bytes.fromhex('6a143011020701010101010101020601010101010101') rpc_result = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(txSave.serialize().hex()) assert_equal('OP_RETURN 3011020701010101010101020601010101010101', rpc_result['vin'][0]['scriptSig']['asm']) def run_test(self): + self.log.info("Test decoding of standard input scripts [scriptSig]") self.decodescript_script_sig() + self.log.info("Test decoding of standard output scripts [scriptPubKey]") self.decodescript_script_pub_key() + self.log.info("Test 'asm' script decoding of transactions") self.decoderawtransaction_asm_sighashtype() if __name__ == '__main__': |