aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2020-07-11 10:22:44 +0200
committerMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2020-07-11 10:23:09 +0200
commitca055885c631de8ac0ffe24be6b02835dbcc039d (patch)
treef7bd8fafc4473025ad17fc730fcee09884e14a50 /test/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py
parent505b4eda55a6f1592500ec9c2b9dad9e4adf92a2 (diff)
parentfab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f (diff)
downloadbitcoin-ca055885c631de8ac0ffe24be6b02835dbcc039d.tar.xz
Merge #19474: doc: Use precise permission flags where possible
fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f doc: Use precise permission flags where possible (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Instead of mentioning the all-encompassing `-whitelist*` settings, change the docs to mention the exact permission flag that will influence the behaviour. This is needed because in the future, the too-broad `-whitelist*` settings (they either include *all* permission flags or apply to *all* peers) might be deprecated to require the permission flags to be enumerated. Alternatively, in the future there could be an RPC to set the net permission flags on an existing connection, in which case the `-whitelist*` terminology is of no help. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: reACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f fjahr: Code review ACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f jonatack: ACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f Tree-SHA512: c7dea3e577d90103bb2b0ffab7b7c8640b388932a3a880f69e2b70747fc9213dc1f437085671fd54c902ec2a578458b8a2fae6dbe076642fb88efbf9fa9e679c
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py')
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py12
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py b/test/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py
index c323168848..71b0b0f63a 100755
--- a/test/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py
+++ b/test/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test processing of unrequested blocks.
-Setup: two nodes, node0+node1, not connected to each other. Node1 will have
+Setup: two nodes, node0 + node1, not connected to each other. Node1 will have
nMinimumChainWork set to 0x10, so it won't process low-work unrequested blocks.
We have one P2PInterface connection to node0 called test_node, and one to node1
@@ -71,18 +71,10 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.extra_args = [[], ["-minimumchainwork=0x10"]]
def setup_network(self):
- # Node0 will be used to test behavior of processing unrequested blocks
- # from peers which are not whitelisted, while Node1 will be used for
- # the whitelisted case.
- # Node2 will be used for non-whitelisted peers to test the interaction
- # with nMinimumChainWork.
self.setup_nodes()
def run_test(self):
- # Setup the p2p connections
- # test_node connects to node0 (not whitelisted)
test_node = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
- # min_work_node connects to node1 (whitelisted)
min_work_node = self.nodes[1].add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
# 1. Have nodes mine a block (leave IBD)
@@ -226,7 +218,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.nodes[0].getblock(all_blocks[286].hash)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), all_blocks[286].hash)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not found on disk", self.nodes[0].getblock, all_blocks[287].hash)
- self.log.info("Successfully reorged to longer chain from non-whitelisted peer")
+ self.log.info("Successfully reorged to longer chain")
# 8. Create a chain which is invalid at a height longer than the
# current chain, but which has more blocks on top of that