diff options
author | Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com> | 2017-10-06 14:32:07 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com> | 2017-10-19 20:38:22 -0400 |
commit | 08fd822771bf8dae1c21698811f57aa691b2f25d (patch) | |
tree | 91cbff957d0df76b7f8c6909bb2289f4e13c23c7 /test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py | |
parent | ce8cd7a7da9174ab151172fc0ce97b5164637cf3 (diff) |
qa: add test for minchainwork use in acceptblock
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py')
-rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py | 44 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py b/test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py index 6c7e6a22ec..27ae0c27e1 100755 --- a/test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py +++ b/test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py @@ -8,17 +8,22 @@ Since behavior differs when receiving unrequested blocks from whitelisted peers versus non-whitelisted peers, this tests the behavior of both (effectively two separate tests running in parallel). -Setup: two nodes, node0 and node1, not connected to each other. Node0 does not +Setup: three nodes, node0+node1+node2, not connected to each other. Node0 does not whitelist localhost, but node1 does. They will each be on their own chain for -this test. +this test. Node2 will have nMinimumChainWork set to 0x10, so it won't process +low-work unrequested blocks. -We have one NodeConn connection to each, test_node and white_node respectively. +We have one NodeConn connection to each, test_node, white_node, and min_work_node, +respectively. The test: 1. Generate one block on each node, to leave IBD. 2. Mine a new block on each tip, and deliver to each node from node's peer. - The tip should advance. + The tip should advance for node0 and node1, but node2 should skip processing + due to nMinimumChainWork. + +Node2 is unused in tests 3-7: 3. Mine a block that forks the previous block, and deliver to each node from corresponding peer. @@ -46,6 +51,10 @@ The test: 7. Send Node0 the missing block again. Node0 should process and the tip should advance. + +8. Test Node2 is able to sync when connected to node0 (which should have sufficient +work on its chain). + """ from test_framework.mininode import * @@ -62,52 +71,60 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): def set_test_params(self): self.setup_clean_chain = True - self.num_nodes = 2 - self.extra_args = [[], ["-whitelist=127.0.0.1"]] + self.num_nodes = 3 + self.extra_args = [[], ["-whitelist=127.0.0.1"], ["-minimumchainwork=0x10"]] def setup_network(self): # Node0 will be used to test behavior of processing unrequested blocks # from peers which are not whitelisted, while Node1 will be used for # the whitelisted case. + # Node2 will be used for non-whitelisted peers to test the interaction + # with nMinimumChainWork. self.setup_nodes() def run_test(self): # Setup the p2p connections and start up the network thread. test_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node0 (not whitelisted) white_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node1 (whitelisted) + min_work_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node2 (not whitelisted) connections = [] connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(0), self.nodes[0], test_node)) connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(1), self.nodes[1], white_node)) + connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(2), self.nodes[2], min_work_node)) test_node.add_connection(connections[0]) white_node.add_connection(connections[1]) + min_work_node.add_connection(connections[2]) NetworkThread().start() # Start up network handling in another thread # Test logic begins here test_node.wait_for_verack() white_node.wait_for_verack() + min_work_node.wait_for_verack() - # 1. Have both nodes mine a block (leave IBD) + # 1. Have nodes mine a block (nodes1/2 leave IBD) [ n.generate(1) for n in self.nodes ] tips = [ int("0x" + n.getbestblockhash(), 0) for n in self.nodes ] # 2. Send one block that builds on each tip. - # This should be accepted. + # This should be accepted by nodes 1/2 blocks_h2 = [] # the height 2 blocks on each node's chain block_time = int(time.time()) + 1 - for i in range(2): + for i in range(3): blocks_h2.append(create_block(tips[i], create_coinbase(2), block_time)) blocks_h2[i].solve() block_time += 1 test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[0])) white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[1])) + min_work_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[2])) - for x in [test_node, white_node]: + for x in [test_node, white_node, min_work_node]: x.sync_with_ping() assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 2) - self.log.info("First height 2 block accepted by both nodes") + assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getblockcount(), 1) + self.log.info("First height 2 block accepted by node0/node1; correctly rejected by node2") # 3. Send another block that builds on the original tip. blocks_h2f = [] # Blocks at height 2 that fork off the main chain @@ -220,6 +237,11 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 290) self.log.info("Successfully reorged to longer chain from non-whitelisted peer") + # 8. Connect node2 to node0 and ensure it is able to sync + connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2) + sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], self.nodes[2]]) + self.log.info("Successfully synced nodes 2 and 0") + [ c.disconnect_node() for c in connections ] if __name__ == '__main__': |