test: fix misleading fee unit in mempool_limit.py

The helper `send_large_txs` in its current interface has a fee_rate
parameter, implying that it would create a transaction with exactly that
rate. Unfortunately, this fee rate is only passed to MiniWallet's
`create_self_transfer` method, which can't know that we append several
tx outputs after, increasing the tx's vsize and decreasing it's fee rate
accordingly.

In our case, the fee rate is off by several orders of magnitude, as the
tx's vsize changes changes from 96 to 67552 vbytes (>700x), i.e. the
value passed to this function is neither really a fee rate nor an
absolute fee, but something in-between, which is very confusing.

Clarify the interface by passing an absolute fee that is deducted in the end
(and verified, via testmempoolaccept) and also describe how we come up with the
value passed.

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/test/functional/mempool_limit.py b/test/functional/mempool_limit.py
index c82dbb3f3d..79f6f9dc70 100755
--- a/test/functional/mempool_limit.py
+++ b/test/functional/mempool_limit.py
@@ -7,8 +7,14 @@
 from decimal import Decimal
 
 from test_framework.blocktools import COINBASE_MATURITY
+from test_framework.messages import COIN
 from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
-from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_greater_than, assert_raises_rpc_error, gen_return_txouts
+from test_framework.util import (
+    assert_equal,
+    assert_greater_than,
+    assert_raises_rpc_error,
+    gen_return_txouts,
+)
 from test_framework.wallet import MiniWallet
 
 
@@ -23,16 +29,19 @@ class MempoolLimitTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         ]]
         self.supports_cli = False
 
-    def send_large_txs(self, node, miniwallet, txouts, fee_rate, tx_batch_size):
+    def send_large_txs(self, node, miniwallet, txouts, fee, tx_batch_size):
         for _ in range(tx_batch_size):
-            tx = miniwallet.create_self_transfer(from_node=node, fee_rate=fee_rate)['tx']
+            tx = miniwallet.create_self_transfer(from_node=node, fee_rate=0, mempool_valid=False)['tx']
             for txout in txouts:
                 tx.vout.append(txout)
+            tx.vout[0].nValue -= int(fee * COIN)
+            res = node.testmempoolaccept([tx.serialize().hex()])[0]
+            assert_equal(res['fees']['base'], fee)
             miniwallet.sendrawtransaction(from_node=node, tx_hex=tx.serialize().hex())
 
     def run_test(self):
         txouts = gen_return_txouts()
-        node=self.nodes[0]
+        node = self.nodes[0]
         miniwallet = MiniWallet(node)
         relayfee = node.getnetworkinfo()['relayfee']
 
@@ -54,13 +63,15 @@ class MempoolLimitTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         self.log.info('Create a mempool tx that will be evicted')
         tx_to_be_evicted_id = miniwallet.send_self_transfer(from_node=node, fee_rate=relayfee)["txid"]
 
-        # Increase the tx fee rate massively to give the subsequent transactions a higher priority in the mempool
-        base_fee = relayfee * 1000
+        # Increase the tx fee rate to give the subsequent transactions a higher priority in the mempool
+        # The tx has an approx. vsize of 65k, i.e. multiplying the previous fee rate (in sats/kvB)
+        # by 130 should result in a fee that corresponds to 2x of that fee rate
+        base_fee = relayfee * 130
 
         self.log.info("Fill up the mempool with txs with higher fee rate")
         for batch_of_txid in range(num_of_batches):
-            fee_rate=(batch_of_txid + 1) * base_fee
-            self.send_large_txs(node, miniwallet, txouts, fee_rate, tx_batch_size)
+            fee = (batch_of_txid + 1) * base_fee
+            self.send_large_txs(node, miniwallet, txouts, fee, tx_batch_size)
 
         self.log.info('The tx should be evicted by now')
         # The number of transactions created should be greater than the ones present in the mempool