aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>2022-05-06 11:06:08 +0200
committerMacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>2022-05-06 11:06:13 +0200
commitb2e7811c6288c1a4184a02b98f9ba9a38acbbd12 (patch)
treee1df5b63c794e1bbe4aa7ef007e00dffa87c93ea /src
parent74d9f4bd950f5ff6d52090fd3a4338c83e565e5d (diff)
parente4303c337c8423f21c2c72ee1bcca3aaf46fa1cb (diff)
downloadbitcoin-b2e7811c6288c1a4184a02b98f9ba9a38acbbd12.tar.xz
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24538: miner: bug fix? update for ancestor inclusion using modified fees, not base
e4303c337c8423f21c2c72ee1bcca3aaf46fa1cb [unit test] prioritisation in mining (glozow) 7a8d60676bc0eec289687b2dfd5d2b00b83c0eaa [miner] bug fix: update for parent inclusion using modified fee (glozow) 0f9a44461c294cf21a335e8a8c13e498baac110f MOVEONLY: group miner tests into MinerTestingSetup functions (glozow) Pull request description: Came up while reviewing #24364, where some of us incorrectly assumed that we use the same fee deduction in `CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry::nModFeesWithAncestors` when first constructing an entry and in `update_for_parent_inclusion`. Actually, the behavior is this: when a mempool entry's ancestor is included in the block template, we create a `CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry` for it, subtracting the ancestor's modified fees from `nModFeesWithAncestors`. If another ancestor is included, we update it again, but use the ancestor's _base_ fees instead. I can't explain why we use `GetFee` in one place and `GetModifiedFee` in the other, but I'm quite certain we should be using the same one for both. And should it be base or modified fees? Modified, otherwise the child inherits the prioritisation of the parent, but only until the parent gets mined. If we want prioritisation to cascade down to current in-mempool descendants, we should probably document that in the `prioritsetransaction` helpstring and implement it in `CTxMemPool::mapDeltas`, not as a quirk in the mining code? Wrote a test in which a mempool entry has 2 ancestors, both prioritised, and both included in a block template individually. This test should fail without the s/GetFee/GetModifiedFee commit. ACKs for top commit: ccdle12: tested ACK e4303c3 MarcoFalke: ACK e4303c337c8423f21c2c72ee1bcca3aaf46fa1cb 🚗 Tree-SHA512: 4cd94106fbc9353e9f9b6d5af268ecda5aec7539245298c940ca220606dd0737264505bfaae1f83d94765cc2d9e1a6e913a765048fe6c19292482241761a6762
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/node/miner.h2
-rw-r--r--src/test/miner_tests.cpp185
2 files changed, 138 insertions, 49 deletions
diff --git a/src/node/miner.h b/src/node/miner.h
index c8093ec883..678df815c0 100644
--- a/src/node/miner.h
+++ b/src/node/miner.h
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct update_for_parent_inclusion
void operator() (CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry &e)
{
- e.nModFeesWithAncestors -= iter->GetFee();
+ e.nModFeesWithAncestors -= iter->GetModifiedFee();
e.nSizeWithAncestors -= iter->GetTxSize();
e.nSigOpCostWithAncestors -= iter->GetSigOpCost();
}
diff --git a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
index f6c1d1efad..7e26e732f5 100644
--- a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ using node::CBlockTemplate;
namespace miner_tests {
struct MinerTestingSetup : public TestingSetup {
void TestPackageSelection(const CChainParams& chainparams, const CScript& scriptPubKey, const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txFirst) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(::cs_main, m_node.mempool->cs);
+ void TestBasicMining(const CChainParams& chainparams, const CScript& scriptPubKey, const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txFirst, int baseheight) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(::cs_main, m_node.mempool->cs);
+ void TestPrioritisedMining(const CChainParams& chainparams, const CScript& scriptPubKey, const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txFirst) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(::cs_main, m_node.mempool->cs);
bool TestSequenceLocks(const CTransaction& tx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(::cs_main, m_node.mempool->cs)
{
CCoinsViewMemPool view_mempool(&m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), *m_node.mempool);
@@ -191,60 +193,17 @@ void MinerTestingSetup::TestPackageSelection(const CChainParams& chainparams, co
BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate->block.vtx[8]->GetHash() == hashLowFeeTx2);
}
-// NOTE: These tests rely on CreateNewBlock doing its own self-validation!
-BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
+void MinerTestingSetup::TestBasicMining(const CChainParams& chainparams, const CScript& scriptPubKey, const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txFirst, int baseheight)
{
- // Note that by default, these tests run with size accounting enabled.
- const auto chainParams = CreateChainParams(*m_node.args, CBaseChainParams::MAIN);
- const CChainParams& chainparams = *chainParams;
- CScript scriptPubKey = CScript() << ParseHex("04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f") << OP_CHECKSIG;
- std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate> pblocktemplate;
- CMutableTransaction tx;
- CScript script;
uint256 hash;
+ CMutableTransaction tx;
TestMemPoolEntryHelper entry;
entry.nFee = 11;
entry.nHeight = 11;
- fCheckpointsEnabled = false;
-
- // Simple block creation, nothing special yet:
- BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
-
- // We can't make transactions until we have inputs
- // Therefore, load 110 blocks :)
- static_assert(std::size(BLOCKINFO) == 110, "Should have 110 blocks to import");
- int baseheight = 0;
- std::vector<CTransactionRef> txFirst;
- for (const auto& bi : BLOCKINFO) {
- CBlock *pblock = &pblocktemplate->block; // pointer for convenience
- {
- LOCK(cs_main);
- pblock->nVersion = VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS;
- pblock->nTime = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1;
- CMutableTransaction txCoinbase(*pblock->vtx[0]);
- txCoinbase.nVersion = 1;
- txCoinbase.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript{} << (m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Height() + 1) << bi.extranonce;
- txCoinbase.vout.resize(1); // Ignore the (optional) segwit commitment added by CreateNewBlock (as the hardcoded nonces don't account for this)
- txCoinbase.vout[0].scriptPubKey = CScript();
- pblock->vtx[0] = MakeTransactionRef(std::move(txCoinbase));
- if (txFirst.size() == 0)
- baseheight = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Height();
- if (txFirst.size() < 4)
- txFirst.push_back(pblock->vtx[0]);
- pblock->hashMerkleRoot = BlockMerkleRoot(*pblock);
- pblock->nNonce = bi.nonce;
- }
- std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> shared_pblock = std::make_shared<const CBlock>(*pblock);
- BOOST_CHECK(Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, shared_pblock, true, nullptr));
- pblock->hashPrevBlock = pblock->GetHash();
- }
-
- LOCK(cs_main);
- LOCK(m_node.mempool->cs);
-
// Just to make sure we can still make simple blocks
- BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
+ auto pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey);
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate);
const CAmount BLOCKSUBSIDY = 50*COIN;
const CAmount LOWFEE = CENT;
@@ -386,7 +345,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1;
tx.vout[0].nValue = BLOCKSUBSIDY-LOWFEE;
- script = CScript() << OP_0;
+ CScript script = CScript() << OP_0;
tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(ScriptHash(script));
hash = tx.GetHash();
m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx));
@@ -508,6 +467,130 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pblocktemplate->block.vtx.size(), 5U);
+}
+
+void MinerTestingSetup::TestPrioritisedMining(const CChainParams& chainparams, const CScript& scriptPubKey, const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txFirst)
+{
+ TestMemPoolEntryHelper entry;
+
+ // Test that a tx below min fee but prioritised is included
+ CMutableTransaction tx;
+ tx.vin.resize(1);
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash();
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
+ tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1;
+ tx.vout.resize(1);
+ tx.vout[0].nValue = 5000000000LL; // 0 fee
+ uint256 hashFreePrioritisedTx = tx.GetHash();
+ m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(0).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx));
+ m_node.mempool->PrioritiseTransaction(hashFreePrioritisedTx, 5 * COIN);
+
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[1]->GetHash();
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
+ tx.vout[0].nValue = 5000000000LL - 1000;
+ // This tx has a low fee: 1000 satoshis
+ uint256 hashParentTx = tx.GetHash(); // save this txid for later use
+ m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(1000).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx));
+
+ // This tx has a medium fee: 10000 satoshis
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[2]->GetHash();
+ tx.vout[0].nValue = 5000000000LL - 10000;
+ uint256 hashMediumFeeTx = tx.GetHash();
+ m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(10000).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx));
+ m_node.mempool->PrioritiseTransaction(hashMediumFeeTx, -5 * COIN);
+
+ // This tx also has a low fee, but is prioritised
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hashParentTx;
+ tx.vout[0].nValue = 5000000000LL - 1000 - 1000; // 1000 satoshi fee
+ uint256 hashPrioritsedChild = tx.GetHash();
+ m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(1000).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx));
+ m_node.mempool->PrioritiseTransaction(hashPrioritsedChild, 2 * COIN);
+
+ // Test that transaction selection properly updates ancestor fee calculations as prioritised
+ // parents get included in a block. Create a transaction with two prioritised ancestors, each
+ // included by itself: FreeParent <- FreeChild <- FreeGrandchild.
+ // When FreeParent is added, a modified entry will be created for FreeChild + FreeGrandchild
+ // FreeParent's prioritisation should not be included in that entry.
+ // When FreeChild is included, FreeChild's prioritisation should also not be included.
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[3]->GetHash();
+ tx.vout[0].nValue = 5000000000LL; // 0 fee
+ uint256 hashFreeParent = tx.GetHash();
+ m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(0).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx));
+ m_node.mempool->PrioritiseTransaction(hashFreeParent, 10 * COIN);
+
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hashFreeParent;
+ tx.vout[0].nValue = 5000000000LL; // 0 fee
+ uint256 hashFreeChild = tx.GetHash();
+ m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(0).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx));
+ m_node.mempool->PrioritiseTransaction(hashFreeChild, 1 * COIN);
+
+ tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hashFreeChild;
+ tx.vout[0].nValue = 5000000000LL; // 0 fee
+ uint256 hashFreeGrandchild = tx.GetHash();
+ m_node.mempool->addUnchecked(entry.Fee(0).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx));
+
+ auto pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey);
+ BOOST_REQUIRE_EQUAL(pblocktemplate->block.vtx.size(), 6U);
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate->block.vtx[1]->GetHash() == hashFreeParent);
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate->block.vtx[2]->GetHash() == hashFreePrioritisedTx);
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate->block.vtx[3]->GetHash() == hashParentTx);
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate->block.vtx[4]->GetHash() == hashPrioritsedChild);
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate->block.vtx[5]->GetHash() == hashFreeChild);
+ for (size_t i=0; i<pblocktemplate->block.vtx.size(); ++i) {
+ // The FreeParent and FreeChild's prioritisations should not impact the child.
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate->block.vtx[i]->GetHash() != hashFreeGrandchild);
+ // De-prioritised transaction should not be included.
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate->block.vtx[i]->GetHash() != hashMediumFeeTx);
+ }
+}
+
+// NOTE: These tests rely on CreateNewBlock doing its own self-validation!
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
+{
+ // Note that by default, these tests run with size accounting enabled.
+ const auto chainParams = CreateChainParams(*m_node.args, CBaseChainParams::MAIN);
+ const CChainParams& chainparams = *chainParams;
+ CScript scriptPubKey = CScript() << ParseHex("04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f") << OP_CHECKSIG;
+ std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate> pblocktemplate;
+
+ fCheckpointsEnabled = false;
+
+ // Simple block creation, nothing special yet:
+ BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
+
+ // We can't make transactions until we have inputs
+ // Therefore, load 110 blocks :)
+ static_assert(std::size(BLOCKINFO) == 110, "Should have 110 blocks to import");
+ int baseheight = 0;
+ std::vector<CTransactionRef> txFirst;
+ for (const auto& bi : BLOCKINFO) {
+ CBlock *pblock = &pblocktemplate->block; // pointer for convenience
+ {
+ LOCK(cs_main);
+ pblock->nVersion = VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS;
+ pblock->nTime = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1;
+ CMutableTransaction txCoinbase(*pblock->vtx[0]);
+ txCoinbase.nVersion = 1;
+ txCoinbase.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript{} << (m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Height() + 1) << bi.extranonce;
+ txCoinbase.vout.resize(1); // Ignore the (optional) segwit commitment added by CreateNewBlock (as the hardcoded nonces don't account for this)
+ txCoinbase.vout[0].scriptPubKey = CScript();
+ pblock->vtx[0] = MakeTransactionRef(std::move(txCoinbase));
+ if (txFirst.size() == 0)
+ baseheight = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Height();
+ if (txFirst.size() < 4)
+ txFirst.push_back(pblock->vtx[0]);
+ pblock->hashMerkleRoot = BlockMerkleRoot(*pblock);
+ pblock->nNonce = bi.nonce;
+ }
+ std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> shared_pblock = std::make_shared<const CBlock>(*pblock);
+ BOOST_CHECK(Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, shared_pblock, true, nullptr));
+ pblock->hashPrevBlock = pblock->GetHash();
+ }
+
+ LOCK(cs_main);
+ LOCK(m_node.mempool->cs);
+
+ TestBasicMining(chainparams, scriptPubKey, txFirst, baseheight);
m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight--;
SetMockTime(0);
@@ -515,6 +598,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
TestPackageSelection(chainparams, scriptPubKey, txFirst);
+ m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight--;
+ SetMockTime(0);
+ m_node.mempool->clear();
+
+ TestPrioritisedMining(chainparams, scriptPubKey, txFirst);
+
fCheckpointsEnabled = true;
}