diff options
author | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2020-09-08 08:03:01 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2020-09-08 07:55:11 +0200 |
commit | fa7e407b504bc60c77341f02636ed9d6a4b53d79 (patch) | |
tree | decea0186288e79a84a57e967da16c28d9ee3d4a /src | |
parent | 147d50d63e07f600b414273a9f6b84f9f4ad9696 (diff) |
Do not pass chain params to CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers twice
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/net_processing.cpp | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/net_processing.h | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp | 15 |
3 files changed, 15 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp index 05f5188266..1d386b1ad8 100644 --- a/src/net_processing.cpp +++ b/src/net_processing.cpp @@ -1247,13 +1247,12 @@ PeerManager::PeerManager(const CChainParams& chainparams, CConnman& connman, Ban // same probability that we have in the reject filter). g_recent_confirmed_transactions.reset(new CRollingBloomFilter(48000, 0.000001)); - const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus(); // Stale tip checking and peer eviction are on two different timers, but we // don't want them to get out of sync due to drift in the scheduler, so we // combine them in one function and schedule at the quicker (peer-eviction) // timer. static_assert(EXTRA_PEER_CHECK_INTERVAL < STALE_CHECK_INTERVAL, "peer eviction timer should be less than stale tip check timer"); - scheduler.scheduleEvery([this, consensusParams] { this->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); }, std::chrono::seconds{EXTRA_PEER_CHECK_INTERVAL}); + scheduler.scheduleEvery([this] { this->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(); }, std::chrono::seconds{EXTRA_PEER_CHECK_INTERVAL}); // schedule next run for 10-15 minutes in the future const std::chrono::milliseconds delta = std::chrono::minutes{10} + GetRandMillis(std::chrono::minutes{5}); @@ -1344,7 +1343,7 @@ void PeerManager::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std::shared_ return; nHighestFastAnnounce = pindex->nHeight; - bool fWitnessEnabled = IsWitnessEnabled(pindex->pprev, Params().GetConsensus()); + bool fWitnessEnabled = IsWitnessEnabled(pindex->pprev, m_chainparams.GetConsensus()); uint256 hashBlock(pblock->GetHash()); { @@ -1572,7 +1571,7 @@ void static ProcessGetBlockData(CNode& pfrom, const CChainParams& chainparams, c } // release cs_main before calling ActivateBestChain if (need_activate_chain) { BlockValidationState state; - if (!ActivateBestChain(state, Params(), a_recent_block)) { + if (!ActivateBestChain(state, chainparams, a_recent_block)) { LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "failed to activate chain (%s)\n", state.ToString()); } } @@ -2786,7 +2785,7 @@ void PeerManager::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDat a_recent_block = most_recent_block; } BlockValidationState state; - if (!ActivateBestChain(state, Params(), a_recent_block)) { + if (!ActivateBestChain(state, m_chainparams, a_recent_block)) { LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "failed to activate chain (%s)\n", state.ToString()); } } @@ -4027,7 +4026,7 @@ void PeerManager::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds) } } -void PeerManager::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(const Consensus::Params &consensusParams) +void PeerManager::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers() { LOCK(cs_main); @@ -4038,7 +4037,7 @@ void PeerManager::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(const Consensus::Params &consens if (time_in_seconds > m_stale_tip_check_time) { // Check whether our tip is stale, and if so, allow using an extra // outbound peer - if (!fImporting && !fReindex && m_connman.GetNetworkActive() && m_connman.GetUseAddrmanOutgoing() && TipMayBeStale(consensusParams)) { + if (!fImporting && !fReindex && m_connman.GetNetworkActive() && m_connman.GetUseAddrmanOutgoing() && TipMayBeStale(m_chainparams.GetConsensus())) { LogPrintf("Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer (last tip update: %d seconds ago)\n", time_in_seconds - g_last_tip_update); m_connman.SetTryNewOutboundPeer(true); } else if (m_connman.GetTryNewOutboundPeer()) { @@ -4071,7 +4070,7 @@ public: bool PeerManager::SendMessages(CNode* pto) { - const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus(); + const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = m_chainparams.GetConsensus(); // We must call MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect first, to ensure that we'll // disconnect misbehaving peers even before the version handshake is complete. diff --git a/src/net_processing.h b/src/net_processing.h index 520f7489e8..3e748c0c5b 100644 --- a/src/net_processing.h +++ b/src/net_processing.h @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ public: /** Consider evicting an outbound peer based on the amount of time they've been behind our tip */ void ConsiderEviction(CNode& pto, int64_t time_in_seconds) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main); /** Evict extra outbound peers. If we think our tip may be stale, connect to an extra outbound */ - void CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(const Consensus::Params &consensusParams); + void CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(); /** If we have extra outbound peers, try to disconnect the one with the oldest block announcement */ void EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main); /** Retrieve unbroadcast transactions from the mempool and reattempt sending to peers */ diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp index f4d2204e1c..e4ee08db61 100644 --- a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp @@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnmanTest>(0x1337, 0x1337); auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerManager>(chainparams, *connman, nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool); - const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus(); constexpr int max_outbound_full_relay = MAX_OUTBOUND_FULL_RELAY_CONNECTIONS; CConnman::Options options; options.nMaxConnections = DEFAULT_MAX_PEER_CONNECTIONS; @@ -168,18 +167,18 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, connman.get()); } - peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(); // No nodes should be marked for disconnection while we have no extra peers for (const CNode *node : vNodes) { BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false); } - SetMockTime(GetTime() + 3*consensusParams.nPowTargetSpacing + 1); + SetMockTime(GetTime() + 3 * chainparams.GetConsensus().nPowTargetSpacing + 1); // Now tip should definitely be stale, and we should look for an extra // outbound peer - peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(); BOOST_CHECK(connman->GetTryNewOutboundPeer()); // Still no peers should be marked for disconnection @@ -192,8 +191,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) // required time connected check should be satisfied). AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, connman.get()); - peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); - for (int i=0; i<max_outbound_full_relay; ++i) { + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(); + for (int i = 0; i < max_outbound_full_relay; ++i) { BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false); } // Last added node should get marked for eviction @@ -205,8 +204,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management) // peer, and check that the next newest node gets evicted. UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(vNodes.back()->GetId(), GetTime()); - peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams); - for (int i=0; i<max_outbound_full_relay-1; ++i) { + peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(); + for (int i = 0; i < max_outbound_full_relay - 1; ++i) { BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false); } BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[max_outbound_full_relay-1]->fDisconnect == true); |