diff options
author | glozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com> | 2021-08-03 11:54:42 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | glozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com> | 2021-11-04 14:54:03 -0400 |
commit | 9e910d8152e08d26ecce6592870adbe5dabd159e (patch) | |
tree | 422b3596c98fa1041db0522c568e345da84d0608 /src | |
parent | fd92b0c3986b9eb41ce28eb602f56d405bdd3cd7 (diff) | |
download | bitcoin-9e910d8152e08d26ecce6592870adbe5dabd159e.tar.xz |
scripted-diff: clean up MemPoolAccept aliases
The aliases are leftover from a previous MOVEONLY refactor - they are
unnecessary and removing them reduces the diff for splitting out mempool
Checks from PreChecks, making RBF variables MemPoolAccept-wide, etc.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
unalias() { sed -i "s:\<$1\>:$2:g" src/validation.cpp; sed -i "/$2 = $2/d" src/validation.cpp; }
unalias nModifiedFees ws.m_modified_fees
unalias nConflictingFees ws.m_conflicting_fees
unalias nConflictingSize ws.m_conflicting_size
unalias setConflicts ws.m_conflicts
unalias allConflicting ws.m_all_conflicting
unalias setAncestors ws.m_ancestors
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/validation.cpp | 61 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index c444b65f27..138306a193 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -603,13 +603,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // Alias what we need out of ws TxValidationState& state = ws.m_state; - std::set<uint256>& setConflicts = ws.m_conflicts; - CTxMemPool::setEntries& allConflicting = ws.m_all_conflicting; - CTxMemPool::setEntries& setAncestors = ws.m_ancestors; std::unique_ptr<CTxMemPoolEntry>& entry = ws.m_entry; - CAmount& nModifiedFees = ws.m_modified_fees; - CAmount& nConflictingFees = ws.m_conflicting_fees; - size_t& nConflictingSize = ws.m_conflicting_size; if (!CheckTransaction(tx, state)) { return false; // state filled in by CheckTransaction @@ -655,7 +649,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // Transaction conflicts with a mempool tx, but we're not allowing replacements. return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "bip125-replacement-disallowed"); } - if (!setConflicts.count(ptxConflicting->GetHash())) + if (!ws.m_conflicts.count(ptxConflicting->GetHash())) { // Transactions that don't explicitly signal replaceability are // *not* replaceable with the current logic, even if one of their @@ -668,7 +662,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "txn-mempool-conflict"); } - setConflicts.insert(ptxConflicting->GetHash()); + ws.m_conflicts.insert(ptxConflicting->GetHash()); } } } @@ -732,9 +726,9 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) int64_t nSigOpsCost = GetTransactionSigOpCost(tx, m_view, STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS); - // nModifiedFees includes any fee deltas from PrioritiseTransaction - nModifiedFees = ws.m_base_fees; - m_pool.ApplyDelta(hash, nModifiedFees); + // ws.m_modified_fees includes any fee deltas from PrioritiseTransaction + ws.m_modified_fees = ws.m_base_fees; + m_pool.ApplyDelta(hash, ws.m_modified_fees); // Keep track of transactions that spend a coinbase, which we re-scan // during reorgs to ensure COINBASE_MATURITY is still met. @@ -757,11 +751,11 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // No transactions are allowed below minRelayTxFee except from disconnected // blocks - if (!bypass_limits && !CheckFeeRate(ws.m_vsize, nModifiedFees, state)) return false; + if (!bypass_limits && !CheckFeeRate(ws.m_vsize, ws.m_modified_fees, state)) return false; - ws.m_iters_conflicting = m_pool.GetIterSet(setConflicts); + ws.m_iters_conflicting = m_pool.GetIterSet(ws.m_conflicts); // Calculate in-mempool ancestors, up to a limit. - if (setConflicts.size() == 1) { + if (ws.m_conflicts.size() == 1) { // In general, when we receive an RBF transaction with mempool conflicts, we want to know whether we // would meet the chain limits after the conflicts have been removed. However, there isn't a practical // way to do this short of calculating the ancestor and descendant sets with an overlay cache of @@ -797,8 +791,8 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) } std::string errString; - if (!m_pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(*entry, setAncestors, m_limit_ancestors, m_limit_ancestor_size, m_limit_descendants, m_limit_descendant_size, errString)) { - setAncestors.clear(); + if (!m_pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(*entry, ws.m_ancestors, m_limit_ancestors, m_limit_ancestor_size, m_limit_descendants, m_limit_descendant_size, errString)) { + ws.m_ancestors.clear(); // If CalculateMemPoolAncestors fails second time, we want the original error string. std::string dummy_err_string; // Contracting/payment channels CPFP carve-out: @@ -813,24 +807,24 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // outputs - one for each counterparty. For more info on the uses for // this, see https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html if (ws.m_vsize > EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT || - !m_pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(*entry, setAncestors, 2, m_limit_ancestor_size, m_limit_descendants + 1, m_limit_descendant_size + EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT, dummy_err_string)) { + !m_pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(*entry, ws.m_ancestors, 2, m_limit_ancestor_size, m_limit_descendants + 1, m_limit_descendant_size + EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT, dummy_err_string)) { return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "too-long-mempool-chain", errString); } } // A transaction that spends outputs that would be replaced by it is invalid. Now // that we have the set of all ancestors we can detect this - // pathological case by making sure setConflicts and setAncestors don't + // pathological case by making sure ws.m_conflicts and ws.m_ancestors don't // intersect. - if (const auto err_string{EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(setAncestors, setConflicts, hash)}) { + if (const auto err_string{EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(ws.m_ancestors, ws.m_conflicts, hash)}) { // We classify this as a consensus error because a transaction depending on something it // conflicts with would be inconsistent. return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_CONSENSUS, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", *err_string); } - m_rbf = !setConflicts.empty(); + m_rbf = !ws.m_conflicts.empty(); if (m_rbf) { - CFeeRate newFeeRate(nModifiedFees, ws.m_vsize); + CFeeRate newFeeRate(ws.m_modified_fees, ws.m_vsize); // It's possible that the replacement pays more fees than its direct conflicts but not more // than all conflicts (i.e. the direct conflicts have high-fee descendants). However, if the // replacement doesn't pay more fees than its direct conflicts, then we can be sure it's not @@ -842,7 +836,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) } // Calculate all conflicting entries and enforce BIP125 Rule #5. - if (const auto err_string{GetEntriesForConflicts(tx, m_pool, ws.m_iters_conflicting, allConflicting)}) { + if (const auto err_string{GetEntriesForConflicts(tx, m_pool, ws.m_iters_conflicting, ws.m_all_conflicting)}) { return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "too many potential replacements", *err_string); } @@ -854,11 +848,11 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) // Check if it's economically rational to mine this transaction rather than the ones it // replaces and pays for its own relay fees. Enforce BIP125 Rules #3 and #4. - for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : allConflicting) { - nConflictingFees += it->GetModifiedFee(); - nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize(); + for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : ws.m_all_conflicting) { + ws.m_conflicting_fees += it->GetModifiedFee(); + ws.m_conflicting_size += it->GetTxSize(); } - if (const auto err_string{PaysForRBF(nConflictingFees, nModifiedFees, ws.m_vsize, + if (const auto err_string{PaysForRBF(ws.m_conflicting_fees, ws.m_modified_fees, ws.m_vsize, ::incrementalRelayFee, hash)}) { return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee", *err_string); } @@ -931,24 +925,19 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::Finalize(const ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) TxValidationState& state = ws.m_state; const bool bypass_limits = args.m_bypass_limits; - CTxMemPool::setEntries& allConflicting = ws.m_all_conflicting; - CTxMemPool::setEntries& setAncestors = ws.m_ancestors; - const CAmount& nModifiedFees = ws.m_modified_fees; - const CAmount& nConflictingFees = ws.m_conflicting_fees; - const size_t& nConflictingSize = ws.m_conflicting_size; std::unique_ptr<CTxMemPoolEntry>& entry = ws.m_entry; // Remove conflicting transactions from the mempool - for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : allConflicting) + for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : ws.m_all_conflicting) { LogPrint(BCLog::MEMPOOL, "replacing tx %s with %s for %s additional fees, %d delta bytes\n", it->GetTx().GetHash().ToString(), hash.ToString(), - FormatMoney(nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees), - (int)entry->GetTxSize() - (int)nConflictingSize); + FormatMoney(ws.m_modified_fees - ws.m_conflicting_fees), + (int)entry->GetTxSize() - (int)ws.m_conflicting_size); ws.m_replaced_transactions.push_back(it->GetSharedTx()); } - m_pool.RemoveStaged(allConflicting, false, MemPoolRemovalReason::REPLACED); + m_pool.RemoveStaged(ws.m_all_conflicting, false, MemPoolRemovalReason::REPLACED); // This transaction should only count for fee estimation if: // - it's not being re-added during a reorg which bypasses typical mempool fee limits @@ -957,7 +946,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::Finalize(const ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws) bool validForFeeEstimation = !bypass_limits && IsCurrentForFeeEstimation(m_active_chainstate) && m_pool.HasNoInputsOf(tx); // Store transaction in memory - m_pool.addUnchecked(*entry, setAncestors, validForFeeEstimation); + m_pool.addUnchecked(*entry, ws.m_ancestors, validForFeeEstimation); // trim mempool and check if tx was trimmed if (!bypass_limits) { |