aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorfurszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>2022-11-23 10:22:50 -0300
committerfanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>2022-12-05 17:43:46 +0000
commit8b726bf556e05edf02946d4b1c3356df17fd0d57 (patch)
tree92603993b79dc84f3846935e5b4554dd46d534bc /src
parent9d73176d00a013e1383ae18cb5c0f8cbdd186cba (diff)
test: Coin Selection, duplicated preset inputs selection
This exercises the bug inside CoinsResult::Erase that ends up on (1) a wallet crash or (2) a created and broadcasted tx that contains a reduced recipient's amount. This is covered by making the wallet selects the preset inputs twice during the coin selection process. Making the wallet think that the selection process result covers the entire tx target when it does not. It's actually creating a tx that sends more coins than what inputs are covering for. Which, combined with the SFFO option, makes the wallet incorrectly reduce the recipient's amount by the difference between the original target and the wrongly counted inputs. Which means, a created and relayed tx sending less coins to the destination than what the user inputted. Github-Pull: #26560 Rebased-From: cf793846978a8783c23b66ba6b4f3f30e83ff3eb
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/wallet/test/spend_tests.cpp45
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/wallet/test/spend_tests.cpp b/src/wallet/test/spend_tests.cpp
index a75b014870..81a8883f85 100644
--- a/src/wallet/test/spend_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/test/spend_tests.cpp
@@ -112,5 +112,50 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(FillInputToWeightTest, BasicTestingSetup)
// Note: We don't test the next boundary because of memory allocation constraints.
}
+BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(wallet_duplicated_preset_inputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
+{
+ // Verify that the wallet's Coin Selection process does not include pre-selected inputs twice in a transaction.
+
+ // Add 4 spendable UTXO, 50 BTC each, to the wallet (total balance 200 BTC)
+ for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) CreateAndProcessBlock({}, GetScriptForRawPubKey(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()));
+ auto wallet = CreateSyncedWallet(*m_node.chain, WITH_LOCK(Assert(m_node.chainman)->GetMutex(), return m_node.chainman->ActiveChain()), m_args, coinbaseKey);
+
+ LOCK(wallet->cs_wallet);
+ auto available_coins = AvailableCoins(*wallet);
+ std::vector<COutput> coins = available_coins.All();
+ // Preselect the first 3 UTXO (150 BTC total)
+ std::set<COutPoint> preset_inputs = {coins[0].outpoint, coins[1].outpoint, coins[2].outpoint};
+
+ // Try to create a tx that spends more than what preset inputs + wallet selected inputs are covering for.
+ // The wallet can cover up to 200 BTC, and the tx target is 299 BTC.
+ std::vector<CRecipient> recipients = {{GetScriptForDestination(*Assert(wallet->GetNewDestination(OutputType::BECH32, "dummy"))),
+ /*nAmount=*/299 * COIN, /*fSubtractFeeFromAmount=*/true}};
+ CCoinControl coin_control;
+ coin_control.m_allow_other_inputs = true;
+ for (const auto& outpoint : preset_inputs) {
+ coin_control.Select(outpoint);
+ }
+
+ // Attempt to send 299 BTC from a wallet that only has 200 BTC. The wallet should exclude
+ // the preset inputs from the pool of available coins, realize that there is not enough
+ // money to fund the 299 BTC payment, and fail with "Insufficient funds".
+ //
+ // Even with SFFO, the wallet can only afford to send 200 BTC.
+ // If the wallet does not properly exclude preset inputs from the pool of available coins
+ // prior to coin selection, it may create a transaction that does not fund the full payment
+ // amount or, through SFFO, incorrectly reduce the recipient's amount by the difference
+ // between the original target and the wrongly counted inputs (in this case 99 BTC)
+ // so that the recipient's amount is no longer equal to the user's selected target of 299 BTC.
+
+ // First case, use 'subtract_fee_from_outputs=true'
+ util::Result<CreatedTransactionResult> res_tx = CreateTransaction(*wallet, recipients, /*change_pos*/-1, coin_control);
+ BOOST_CHECK(!res_tx.has_value());
+
+ // Second case, don't use 'subtract_fee_from_outputs'.
+ recipients[0].fSubtractFeeFromAmount = false;
+ res_tx = CreateTransaction(*wallet, recipients, /*change_pos*/-1, coin_control);
+ BOOST_CHECK(!res_tx.has_value());
+}
+
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
} // namespace wallet