aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorfanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>2020-08-24 21:28:02 +0800
committerfanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>2020-08-24 21:50:37 +0800
commit4fefd80f08880abd7c2d77a170152a9ef4394e4a (patch)
tree44702f65d41a7efd17c740529490f01b7e216069 /src
parent7ce7f2b2518cfa3bd4102c5b443278379bbf24eb (diff)
parentdaed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33 (diff)
Merge #19704: Net processing: move ProcessMessage() to PeerLogicValidation
daed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33 [net_processing] Move ProcessMessage to PeerLogicValidation (John Newbery) c556770b5ef4306f10e980daff772bee87daaa30 [net_processing] Change PeerLogicValidation to hold a connman reference (John Newbery) Pull request description: Rather than ProcessMessage() being a static function in net_processing.cpp, make it a private member function of PeerLogicValidation. This is the start of moving static functions and global variables into PeerLogicValidation to make it better encapsulated. ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK daed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33 code review and debug tested promag: Code review ACK daed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33. MarcoFalke: re-ACK daed542a12, only change is removing second commit 🎴 theStack: Code Review ACK daed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33 Tree-SHA512: ddebf410d114d9ad5a9e536950018ff333a347c035d74fcc101fb4a3f20a281782c7eac2b7d1bd1c8f6bc7e59f5b5630fb52c2e1b4c32df454fa584673bd021e
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/init.cpp2
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.cpp204
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.h11
-rw-r--r--src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp8
-rw-r--r--src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp19
-rw-r--r--src/test/util/setup_common.cpp2
6 files changed, 115 insertions, 131 deletions
diff --git a/src/init.cpp b/src/init.cpp
index f5aef08211..ebea6037d6 100644
--- a/src/init.cpp
+++ b/src/init.cpp
@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ bool AppInitMain(const util::Ref& context, NodeContext& node, interfaces::BlockA
node.chainman = &g_chainman;
ChainstateManager& chainman = *Assert(node.chainman);
- node.peer_logic.reset(new PeerLogicValidation(node.connman.get(), node.banman.get(), *node.scheduler, chainman, *node.mempool));
+ node.peer_logic.reset(new PeerLogicValidation(*node.connman, node.banman.get(), *node.scheduler, chainman, *node.mempool));
RegisterValidationInterface(node.peer_logic.get());
// sanitize comments per BIP-0014, format user agent and check total size
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index 7b83583e41..60bdfbe9f5 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::InitializeNode(CNode *pnode) {
mapNodeState.emplace_hint(mapNodeState.end(), std::piecewise_construct, std::forward_as_tuple(nodeid), std::forward_as_tuple(addr, std::move(addrName), pnode->IsInboundConn(), pnode->IsManualConn()));
}
if(!pnode->IsInboundConn())
- PushNodeVersion(*pnode, *connman, GetTime());
+ PushNodeVersion(*pnode, m_connman, GetTime());
}
void PeerLogicValidation::ReattemptInitialBroadcast(CScheduler& scheduler) const
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ReattemptInitialBroadcast(CScheduler& scheduler) const
// Sanity check: all unbroadcast txns should exist in the mempool
if (m_mempool.exists(elem.first)) {
LOCK(cs_main);
- RelayTransaction(elem.first, elem.second, *connman);
+ RelayTransaction(elem.first, elem.second, m_connman);
} else {
m_mempool.RemoveUnbroadcastTx(elem.first, true);
}
@@ -1197,8 +1197,8 @@ static bool BlockRequestAllowed(const CBlockIndex* pindex, const Consensus::Para
(GetBlockProofEquivalentTime(*pindexBestHeader, *pindex, *pindexBestHeader, consensusParams) < STALE_RELAY_AGE_LIMIT);
}
-PeerLogicValidation::PeerLogicValidation(CConnman* connmanIn, BanMan* banman, CScheduler& scheduler, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& pool)
- : connman(connmanIn),
+PeerLogicValidation::PeerLogicValidation(CConnman& connman, BanMan* banman, CScheduler& scheduler, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& pool)
+ : m_connman(connman),
m_banman(banman),
m_chainman(chainman),
m_mempool(pool),
@@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std:
fWitnessesPresentInMostRecentCompactBlock = fWitnessEnabled;
}
- connman->ForEachNode([this, &pcmpctblock, pindex, &msgMaker, fWitnessEnabled, &hashBlock](CNode* pnode) {
+ m_connman.ForEachNode([this, &pcmpctblock, pindex, &msgMaker, fWitnessEnabled, &hashBlock](CNode* pnode) {
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
// TODO: Avoid the repeated-serialization here
@@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std:
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s sending header-and-ids %s to peer=%d\n", "PeerLogicValidation::NewPoWValidBlock",
hashBlock.ToString(), pnode->GetId());
- connman->PushMessage(pnode, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *pcmpctblock));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pnode, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *pcmpctblock));
state.pindexBestHeaderSent = pindex;
}
});
@@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std:
*/
void PeerLogicValidation::UpdatedBlockTip(const CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CBlockIndex *pindexFork, bool fInitialDownload) {
const int nNewHeight = pindexNew->nHeight;
- connman->SetBestHeight(nNewHeight);
+ m_connman.SetBestHeight(nNewHeight);
SetServiceFlagsIBDCache(!fInitialDownload);
if (!fInitialDownload) {
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::UpdatedBlockTip(const CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CB
}
}
// Relay inventory, but don't relay old inventory during initial block download.
- connman->ForEachNode([nNewHeight, &vHashes](CNode* pnode) {
+ m_connman.ForEachNode([nNewHeight, &vHashes](CNode* pnode) {
LOCK(pnode->cs_inventory);
if (nNewHeight > (pnode->nStartingHeight != -1 ? pnode->nStartingHeight - 2000 : 0)) {
for (const uint256& hash : reverse_iterate(vHashes)) {
@@ -1378,7 +1378,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::UpdatedBlockTip(const CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CB
}
}
});
- connman->WakeMessageHandler();
+ m_connman.WakeMessageHandler();
}
}
@@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked(const CBlock& block, const BlockValidatio
!::ChainstateActive().IsInitialBlockDownload() &&
mapBlocksInFlight.count(hash) == mapBlocksInFlight.size()) {
if (it != mapBlockSource.end()) {
- MaybeSetPeerAsAnnouncingHeaderAndIDs(it->second.first, *connman);
+ MaybeSetPeerAsAnnouncingHeaderAndIDs(it->second.first, m_connman);
}
}
if (it != mapBlockSource.end())
@@ -2302,17 +2302,9 @@ static void ProcessGetCFCheckPt(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv, const CChainPar
connman.PushMessage(&peer, std::move(msg));
}
-void ProcessMessage(
- CNode& pfrom,
- const std::string& msg_type,
- CDataStream& vRecv,
- const std::chrono::microseconds time_received,
- const CChainParams& chainparams,
- ChainstateManager& chainman,
- CTxMemPool& mempool,
- CConnman& connman,
- BanMan* banman,
- const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc)
+void PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDataStream& vRecv,
+ const std::chrono::microseconds time_received,
+ const CChainParams& chainparams, const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc)
{
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "received: %s (%u bytes) peer=%d\n", SanitizeString(msg_type), vRecv.size(), pfrom.GetId());
if (gArgs.IsArgSet("-dropmessagestest") && GetRand(gArgs.GetArg("-dropmessagestest", 0)) == 0)
@@ -2348,7 +2340,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
nServices = ServiceFlags(nServiceInt);
if (!pfrom.IsInboundConn())
{
- connman.SetServices(pfrom.addr, nServices);
+ m_connman.SetServices(pfrom.addr, nServices);
}
if (pfrom.ExpectServicesFromConn() && !HasAllDesirableServiceFlags(nServices))
{
@@ -2377,7 +2369,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (!vRecv.empty())
vRecv >> fRelay;
// Disconnect if we connected to ourself
- if (pfrom.IsInboundConn() && !connman.CheckIncomingNonce(nNonce))
+ if (pfrom.IsInboundConn() && !m_connman.CheckIncomingNonce(nNonce))
{
LogPrintf("connected to self at %s, disconnecting\n", pfrom.addr.ToString());
pfrom.fDisconnect = true;
@@ -2391,13 +2383,13 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// Be shy and don't send version until we hear
if (pfrom.IsInboundConn())
- PushNodeVersion(pfrom, connman, GetAdjustedTime());
+ PushNodeVersion(pfrom, m_connman, GetAdjustedTime());
if (nVersion >= WTXID_RELAY_VERSION) {
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(INIT_PROTO_VERSION).Make(NetMsgType::WTXIDRELAY));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(INIT_PROTO_VERSION).Make(NetMsgType::WTXIDRELAY));
}
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(INIT_PROTO_VERSION).Make(NetMsgType::VERACK));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(INIT_PROTO_VERSION).Make(NetMsgType::VERACK));
pfrom.nServices = nServices;
pfrom.SetAddrLocal(addrMe);
@@ -2453,9 +2445,9 @@ void ProcessMessage(
}
// Get recent addresses
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(nSendVersion).Make(NetMsgType::GETADDR));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(nSendVersion).Make(NetMsgType::GETADDR));
pfrom.fGetAddr = true;
- connman.MarkAddressGood(pfrom.addr);
+ m_connman.MarkAddressGood(pfrom.addr);
}
std::string remoteAddr;
@@ -2474,7 +2466,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// If the peer is old enough to have the old alert system, send it the final alert.
if (pfrom.nVersion <= 70012) {
CDataStream finalAlert(ParseHex("60010000000000000000000000ffffff7f00000000ffffff7ffeffff7f01ffffff7f00000000ffffff7f00ffffff7f002f555247454e543a20416c657274206b657920636f6d70726f6d697365642c2075706772616465207265717569726564004630440220653febd6410f470f6bae11cad19c48413becb1ac2c17f908fd0fd53bdc3abd5202206d0e9c96fe88d4a0f01ed9dedae2b6f9e00da94cad0fecaae66ecf689bf71b50"), SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(nSendVersion).Make("alert", finalAlert));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, CNetMsgMaker(nSendVersion).Make("alert", finalAlert));
}
// Feeler connections exist only to verify if address is online.
@@ -2513,7 +2505,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// We send this to non-NODE NETWORK peers as well, because even
// non-NODE NETWORK peers can announce blocks (such as pruning
// nodes)
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::SENDHEADERS));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::SENDHEADERS));
}
if (pfrom.nVersion >= SHORT_IDS_BLOCKS_VERSION) {
// Tell our peer we are willing to provide version 1 or 2 cmpctblocks
@@ -2524,9 +2516,9 @@ void ProcessMessage(
bool fAnnounceUsingCMPCTBLOCK = false;
uint64_t nCMPCTBLOCKVersion = 2;
if (pfrom.GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS)
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::SENDCMPCT, fAnnounceUsingCMPCTBLOCK, nCMPCTBLOCKVersion));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::SENDCMPCT, fAnnounceUsingCMPCTBLOCK, nCMPCTBLOCKVersion));
nCMPCTBLOCKVersion = 1;
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::SENDCMPCT, fAnnounceUsingCMPCTBLOCK, nCMPCTBLOCKVersion));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::SENDCMPCT, fAnnounceUsingCMPCTBLOCK, nCMPCTBLOCKVersion));
}
pfrom.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
return;
@@ -2590,7 +2582,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (addr.nTime <= 100000000 || addr.nTime > nNow + 10 * 60)
addr.nTime = nNow - 5 * 24 * 60 * 60;
pfrom.AddAddressKnown(addr);
- if (banman && (banman->IsDiscouraged(addr) || banman->IsBanned(addr))) {
+ if (m_banman && (m_banman->IsDiscouraged(addr) || m_banman->IsBanned(addr))) {
// Do not process banned/discouraged addresses beyond remembering we received them
continue;
}
@@ -2598,13 +2590,13 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (addr.nTime > nSince && !pfrom.fGetAddr && vAddr.size() <= 10 && addr.IsRoutable())
{
// Relay to a limited number of other nodes
- RelayAddress(addr, fReachable, connman);
+ RelayAddress(addr, fReachable, m_connman);
}
// Do not store addresses outside our network
if (fReachable)
vAddrOk.push_back(addr);
}
- connman.AddNewAddresses(vAddrOk, pfrom.addr, 2 * 60 * 60);
+ m_connman.AddNewAddresses(vAddrOk, pfrom.addr, 2 * 60 * 60);
if (vAddr.size() < 1000)
pfrom.fGetAddr = false;
if (pfrom.IsAddrFetchConn())
@@ -2680,7 +2672,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (inv.IsMsgWtx()) continue;
}
- bool fAlreadyHave = AlreadyHave(inv, mempool);
+ bool fAlreadyHave = AlreadyHave(inv, m_mempool);
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "got inv: %s %s peer=%d\n", inv.ToString(), fAlreadyHave ? "have" : "new", pfrom.GetId());
if (inv.IsMsgTx()) {
@@ -2703,14 +2695,14 @@ void ProcessMessage(
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "transaction (%s) inv sent in violation of protocol, disconnecting peer=%d\n", inv.hash.ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
pfrom.fDisconnect = true;
return;
- } else if (!fAlreadyHave && !chainman.ActiveChainstate().IsInitialBlockDownload()) {
+ } else if (!fAlreadyHave && !m_chainman.ActiveChainstate().IsInitialBlockDownload()) {
RequestTx(State(pfrom.GetId()), ToGenTxid(inv), current_time);
}
}
}
if (best_block != nullptr) {
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), *best_block));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), *best_block));
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "getheaders (%d) %s to peer=%d\n", pindexBestHeader->nHeight, best_block->ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
}
@@ -2734,7 +2726,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
}
pfrom.vRecvGetData.insert(pfrom.vRecvGetData.end(), vInv.begin(), vInv.end());
- ProcessGetData(pfrom, chainparams, connman, mempool, interruptMsgProc);
+ ProcessGetData(pfrom, chainparams, m_connman, m_mempool, interruptMsgProc);
return;
}
@@ -2818,7 +2810,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// Unlock cs_most_recent_block to avoid cs_main lock inversion
}
if (recent_block) {
- SendBlockTransactions(*recent_block, req, pfrom, connman);
+ SendBlockTransactions(*recent_block, req, pfrom, m_connman);
return;
}
@@ -2851,7 +2843,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
bool ret = ReadBlockFromDisk(block, pindex, chainparams.GetConsensus());
assert(ret);
- SendBlockTransactions(block, req, pfrom, connman);
+ SendBlockTransactions(block, req, pfrom, m_connman);
return;
}
@@ -2918,7 +2910,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// will re-announce the new block via headers (or compact blocks again)
// in the SendMessages logic.
nodestate->pindexBestHeaderSent = pindex ? pindex : ::ChainActive().Tip();
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::HEADERS, vHeaders));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::HEADERS, vHeaders));
return;
}
@@ -2977,10 +2969,10 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// already; and an adversary can already relay us old transactions
// (older than our recency filter) if trying to DoS us, without any need
// for witness malleation.
- if (!AlreadyHave(CInv(MSG_WTX, wtxid), mempool) &&
- AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, state, ptx, &lRemovedTxn, false /* bypass_limits */, 0 /* nAbsurdFee */)) {
- mempool.check(&::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
- RelayTransaction(tx.GetHash(), tx.GetWitnessHash(), connman);
+ if (!AlreadyHave(CInv(MSG_WTX, wtxid), m_mempool) &&
+ AcceptToMemoryPool(m_mempool, state, ptx, &lRemovedTxn, false /* bypass_limits */, 0 /* nAbsurdFee */)) {
+ m_mempool.check(&::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
+ RelayTransaction(tx.GetHash(), tx.GetWitnessHash(), m_connman);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vout.size(); i++) {
auto it_by_prev = mapOrphanTransactionsByPrev.find(COutPoint(txid, i));
if (it_by_prev != mapOrphanTransactionsByPrev.end()) {
@@ -2995,10 +2987,10 @@ void ProcessMessage(
LogPrint(BCLog::MEMPOOL, "AcceptToMemoryPool: peer=%d: accepted %s (poolsz %u txn, %u kB)\n",
pfrom.GetId(),
tx.GetHash().ToString(),
- mempool.size(), mempool.DynamicMemoryUsage() / 1000);
+ m_mempool.size(), m_mempool.DynamicMemoryUsage() / 1000);
// Recursively process any orphan transactions that depended on this one
- ProcessOrphanTx(connman, mempool, pfrom.orphan_work_set, lRemovedTxn);
+ ProcessOrphanTx(m_connman, m_mempool, pfrom.orphan_work_set, lRemovedTxn);
}
else if (state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_MISSING_INPUTS)
{
@@ -3032,7 +3024,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// protocol for getting all unconfirmed parents.
CInv _inv(MSG_TX | nFetchFlags, parent_txid);
pfrom.AddKnownTx(parent_txid);
- if (!AlreadyHave(_inv, mempool)) RequestTx(State(pfrom.GetId()), ToGenTxid(_inv), current_time);
+ if (!AlreadyHave(_inv, m_mempool)) RequestTx(State(pfrom.GetId()), ToGenTxid(_inv), current_time);
}
AddOrphanTx(ptx, pfrom.GetId());
@@ -3093,11 +3085,11 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// if they were already in the mempool,
// allowing the node to function as a gateway for
// nodes hidden behind it.
- if (!mempool.exists(tx.GetHash())) {
+ if (!m_mempool.exists(tx.GetHash())) {
LogPrintf("Not relaying non-mempool transaction %s from forcerelay peer=%d\n", tx.GetHash().ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
} else {
LogPrintf("Force relaying tx %s from peer=%d\n", tx.GetHash().ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
- RelayTransaction(tx.GetHash(), tx.GetWitnessHash(), connman);
+ RelayTransaction(tx.GetHash(), tx.GetWitnessHash(), m_connman);
}
}
}
@@ -3150,7 +3142,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (!LookupBlockIndex(cmpctblock.header.hashPrevBlock)) {
// Doesn't connect (or is genesis), instead of DoSing in AcceptBlockHeader, request deeper headers
if (!::ChainstateActive().IsInitialBlockDownload())
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), uint256()));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), uint256()));
return;
}
@@ -3161,7 +3153,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
const CBlockIndex *pindex = nullptr;
BlockValidationState state;
- if (!chainman.ProcessNewBlockHeaders({cmpctblock.header}, state, chainparams, &pindex)) {
+ if (!m_chainman.ProcessNewBlockHeaders({cmpctblock.header}, state, chainparams, &pindex)) {
if (state.IsInvalid()) {
MaybePunishNodeForBlock(pfrom.GetId(), state, /*via_compact_block*/ true, "invalid header via cmpctblock");
return;
@@ -3211,7 +3203,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// so we just grab the block via normal getdata
std::vector<CInv> vInv(1);
vInv[0] = CInv(MSG_BLOCK | GetFetchFlags(pfrom), cmpctblock.header.GetHash());
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vInv));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vInv));
}
return;
}
@@ -3232,9 +3224,9 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if ((!fAlreadyInFlight && nodestate->nBlocksInFlight < MAX_BLOCKS_IN_TRANSIT_PER_PEER) ||
(fAlreadyInFlight && blockInFlightIt->second.first == pfrom.GetId())) {
std::list<QueuedBlock>::iterator* queuedBlockIt = nullptr;
- if (!MarkBlockAsInFlight(mempool, pfrom.GetId(), pindex->GetBlockHash(), pindex, &queuedBlockIt)) {
+ if (!MarkBlockAsInFlight(m_mempool, pfrom.GetId(), pindex->GetBlockHash(), pindex, &queuedBlockIt)) {
if (!(*queuedBlockIt)->partialBlock)
- (*queuedBlockIt)->partialBlock.reset(new PartiallyDownloadedBlock(&mempool));
+ (*queuedBlockIt)->partialBlock.reset(new PartiallyDownloadedBlock(&m_mempool));
else {
// The block was already in flight using compact blocks from the same peer
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Peer sent us compact block we were already syncing!\n");
@@ -3252,7 +3244,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// Duplicate txindexes, the block is now in-flight, so just request it
std::vector<CInv> vInv(1);
vInv[0] = CInv(MSG_BLOCK | GetFetchFlags(pfrom), cmpctblock.header.GetHash());
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vInv));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vInv));
return;
}
@@ -3269,7 +3261,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
fProcessBLOCKTXN = true;
} else {
req.blockhash = pindex->GetBlockHash();
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETBLOCKTXN, req));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETBLOCKTXN, req));
}
} else {
// This block is either already in flight from a different
@@ -3277,7 +3269,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// download from.
// Optimistically try to reconstruct anyway since we might be
// able to without any round trips.
- PartiallyDownloadedBlock tempBlock(&mempool);
+ PartiallyDownloadedBlock tempBlock(&m_mempool);
ReadStatus status = tempBlock.InitData(cmpctblock, vExtraTxnForCompact);
if (status != READ_STATUS_OK) {
// TODO: don't ignore failures
@@ -3295,7 +3287,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// mempool will probably be useless - request the block normally
std::vector<CInv> vInv(1);
vInv[0] = CInv(MSG_BLOCK | GetFetchFlags(pfrom), cmpctblock.header.GetHash());
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vInv));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vInv));
return;
} else {
// If this was an announce-cmpctblock, we want the same treatment as a header message
@@ -3305,7 +3297,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
} // cs_main
if (fProcessBLOCKTXN)
- return ProcessMessage(pfrom, NetMsgType::BLOCKTXN, blockTxnMsg, time_received, chainparams, chainman, mempool, connman, banman, interruptMsgProc);
+ return ProcessMessage(pfrom, NetMsgType::BLOCKTXN, blockTxnMsg, time_received, chainparams, interruptMsgProc);
if (fRevertToHeaderProcessing) {
// Headers received from HB compact block peers are permitted to be
@@ -3313,7 +3305,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// the peer if the header turns out to be for an invalid block.
// Note that if a peer tries to build on an invalid chain, that
// will be detected and the peer will be disconnected/discouraged.
- return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, connman, chainman, mempool, {cmpctblock.header}, chainparams, /*via_compact_block=*/true);
+ return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, m_connman, m_chainman, m_mempool, {cmpctblock.header}, chainparams, /*via_compact_block=*/true);
}
if (fBlockReconstructed) {
@@ -3333,7 +3325,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// we have a chain with at least nMinimumChainWork), and we ignore
// compact blocks with less work than our tip, it is safe to treat
// reconstructed compact blocks as having been requested.
- chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
+ m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
if (fNewBlock) {
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
} else {
@@ -3385,7 +3377,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// Might have collided, fall back to getdata now :(
std::vector<CInv> invs;
invs.push_back(CInv(MSG_BLOCK | GetFetchFlags(pfrom), resp.blockhash));
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, invs));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, invs));
} else {
// Block is either okay, or possibly we received
// READ_STATUS_CHECKBLOCK_FAILED.
@@ -3423,7 +3415,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// disk-space attacks), but this should be safe due to the
// protections in the compact block handler -- see related comment
// in compact block optimistic reconstruction handling.
- chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
+ m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
if (fNewBlock) {
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
} else {
@@ -3457,7 +3449,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
ReadCompactSize(vRecv); // ignore tx count; assume it is 0.
}
- return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, connman, chainman, mempool, headers, chainparams, /*via_compact_block=*/false);
+ return ProcessHeadersMessage(pfrom, m_connman, m_chainman, m_mempool, headers, chainparams, /*via_compact_block=*/false);
}
if (msg_type == NetMsgType::BLOCK)
@@ -3486,7 +3478,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
mapBlockSource.emplace(hash, std::make_pair(pfrom.GetId(), true));
}
bool fNewBlock = false;
- chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, forceProcessing, &fNewBlock);
+ m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, pblock, forceProcessing, &fNewBlock);
if (fNewBlock) {
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
} else {
@@ -3522,9 +3514,9 @@ void ProcessMessage(
pfrom.vAddrToSend.clear();
std::vector<CAddress> vAddr;
if (pfrom.HasPermission(PF_ADDR)) {
- vAddr = connman.GetAddresses(MAX_ADDR_TO_SEND, MAX_PCT_ADDR_TO_SEND);
+ vAddr = m_connman.GetAddresses(MAX_ADDR_TO_SEND, MAX_PCT_ADDR_TO_SEND);
} else {
- vAddr = connman.GetAddresses(pfrom.addr.GetNetwork(), MAX_ADDR_TO_SEND, MAX_PCT_ADDR_TO_SEND);
+ vAddr = m_connman.GetAddresses(pfrom.addr.GetNetwork(), MAX_ADDR_TO_SEND, MAX_PCT_ADDR_TO_SEND);
}
FastRandomContext insecure_rand;
for (const CAddress &addr : vAddr) {
@@ -3544,7 +3536,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
return;
}
- if (connman.OutboundTargetReached(false) && !pfrom.HasPermission(PF_MEMPOOL))
+ if (m_connman.OutboundTargetReached(false) && !pfrom.HasPermission(PF_MEMPOOL))
{
if (!pfrom.HasPermission(PF_NOBAN))
{
@@ -3577,7 +3569,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
// it, if the remote node sends a ping once per second and this node takes 5
// seconds to respond to each, the 5th ping the remote sends would appear to
// return very quickly.
- connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PONG, nonce));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PONG, nonce));
}
return;
}
@@ -3717,17 +3709,17 @@ void ProcessMessage(
}
if (msg_type == NetMsgType::GETCFILTERS) {
- ProcessGetCFilters(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, connman);
+ ProcessGetCFilters(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, m_connman);
return;
}
if (msg_type == NetMsgType::GETCFHEADERS) {
- ProcessGetCFHeaders(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, connman);
+ ProcessGetCFHeaders(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, m_connman);
return;
}
if (msg_type == NetMsgType::GETCFCHECKPT) {
- ProcessGetCFCheckPt(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, connman);
+ ProcessGetCFCheckPt(pfrom, vRecv, chainparams, m_connman);
return;
}
@@ -3802,7 +3794,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode)
// Normal case: Disconnect the peer and discourage all nodes sharing the address
LogPrintf("Disconnecting and discouraging peer %d!\n", peer_id);
if (m_banman) m_banman->Discourage(pnode.addr);
- connman->DisconnectNode(pnode.addr);
+ m_connman.DisconnectNode(pnode.addr);
return true;
}
@@ -3820,12 +3812,12 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter
bool fMoreWork = false;
if (!pfrom->vRecvGetData.empty())
- ProcessGetData(*pfrom, chainparams, *connman, m_mempool, interruptMsgProc);
+ ProcessGetData(*pfrom, chainparams, m_connman, m_mempool, interruptMsgProc);
if (!pfrom->orphan_work_set.empty()) {
std::list<CTransactionRef> removed_txn;
LOCK2(cs_main, g_cs_orphans);
- ProcessOrphanTx(*connman, m_mempool, pfrom->orphan_work_set, removed_txn);
+ ProcessOrphanTx(m_connman, m_mempool, pfrom->orphan_work_set, removed_txn);
for (const CTransactionRef& removedTx : removed_txn) {
AddToCompactExtraTransactions(removedTx);
}
@@ -3851,7 +3843,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter
// Just take one message
msgs.splice(msgs.begin(), pfrom->vProcessMsg, pfrom->vProcessMsg.begin());
pfrom->nProcessQueueSize -= msgs.front().m_raw_message_size;
- pfrom->fPauseRecv = pfrom->nProcessQueueSize > connman->GetReceiveFloodSize();
+ pfrom->fPauseRecv = pfrom->nProcessQueueSize > m_connman.GetReceiveFloodSize();
fMoreWork = !pfrom->vProcessMsg.empty();
}
CNetMessage& msg(msgs.front());
@@ -3885,7 +3877,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter
}
try {
- ProcessMessage(*pfrom, msg_type, vRecv, msg.m_time, chainparams, m_chainman, m_mempool, *connman, m_banman, interruptMsgProc);
+ ProcessMessage(*pfrom, msg_type, vRecv, msg.m_time, chainparams, interruptMsgProc);
if (interruptMsgProc)
return false;
if (!pfrom->vRecvGetData.empty())
@@ -3938,7 +3930,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ConsiderEviction(CNode& pto, int64_t time_in_seconds)
} else {
assert(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header);
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sending getheaders to outbound peer=%d to verify chain work (current best known block:%s, benchmark blockhash: %s)\n", pto.GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>", state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString());
- connman->PushMessage(&pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->pprev), uint256()));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(&pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->pprev), uint256()));
state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = true;
constexpr int64_t HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME = 120; // 2 minutes
// Bump the timeout to allow a response, which could clear the timeout
@@ -3955,7 +3947,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::ConsiderEviction(CNode& pto, int64_t time_in_seconds)
void PeerLogicValidation::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds)
{
// Check whether we have too many outbound peers
- int extra_peers = connman->GetExtraOutboundCount();
+ int extra_peers = m_connman.GetExtraOutboundCount();
if (extra_peers > 0) {
// If we have more outbound peers than we target, disconnect one.
// Pick the outbound peer that least recently announced
@@ -3964,7 +3956,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds)
NodeId worst_peer = -1;
int64_t oldest_block_announcement = std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max();
- connman->ForEachNode([&](CNode* pnode) {
+ m_connman.ForEachNode([&](CNode* pnode) {
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
// Ignore non-outbound peers, or nodes marked for disconnect already
@@ -3981,7 +3973,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds)
}
});
if (worst_peer != -1) {
- bool disconnected = connman->ForNode(worst_peer, [&](CNode *pnode) {
+ bool disconnected = m_connman.ForNode(worst_peer, [&](CNode *pnode) {
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
// Only disconnect a peer that has been connected to us for
@@ -4005,7 +3997,7 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds)
// detected a stale tip. Don't try any more extra peers until
// we next detect a stale tip, to limit the load we put on the
// network from these extra connections.
- connman->SetTryNewOutboundPeer(false);
+ m_connman.SetTryNewOutboundPeer(false);
}
}
}
@@ -4015,8 +4007,6 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(const Consensus::Params
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- if (connman == nullptr) return;
-
int64_t time_in_seconds = GetTime();
EvictExtraOutboundPeers(time_in_seconds);
@@ -4024,11 +4014,11 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(const Consensus::Params
if (time_in_seconds > m_stale_tip_check_time) {
// Check whether our tip is stale, and if so, allow using an extra
// outbound peer
- if (!fImporting && !fReindex && connman->GetNetworkActive() && connman->GetUseAddrmanOutgoing() && TipMayBeStale(consensusParams)) {
+ if (!fImporting && !fReindex && m_connman.GetNetworkActive() && m_connman.GetUseAddrmanOutgoing() && TipMayBeStale(consensusParams)) {
LogPrintf("Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer (last tip update: %d seconds ago)\n", time_in_seconds - g_last_tip_update);
- connman->SetTryNewOutboundPeer(true);
- } else if (connman->GetTryNewOutboundPeer()) {
- connman->SetTryNewOutboundPeer(false);
+ m_connman.SetTryNewOutboundPeer(true);
+ } else if (m_connman.GetTryNewOutboundPeer()) {
+ m_connman.SetTryNewOutboundPeer(false);
}
m_stale_tip_check_time = time_in_seconds + STALE_CHECK_INTERVAL;
}
@@ -4091,11 +4081,11 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
pto->m_ping_start = GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>();
if (pto->nVersion > BIP0031_VERSION) {
pto->nPingNonceSent = nonce;
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PING, nonce));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PING, nonce));
} else {
// Peer is too old to support ping command with nonce, pong will never arrive.
pto->nPingNonceSent = 0;
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PING));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PING));
}
}
@@ -4130,14 +4120,14 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
// receiver rejects addr messages larger than MAX_ADDR_TO_SEND
if (vAddr.size() >= MAX_ADDR_TO_SEND)
{
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::ADDR, vAddr));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::ADDR, vAddr));
vAddr.clear();
}
}
}
pto->vAddrToSend.clear();
if (!vAddr.empty())
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::ADDR, vAddr));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::ADDR, vAddr));
// we only send the big addr message once
if (pto->vAddrToSend.capacity() > 40)
pto->vAddrToSend.shrink_to_fit();
@@ -4164,7 +4154,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
if (pindexStart->pprev)
pindexStart = pindexStart->pprev;
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "initial getheaders (%d) to peer=%d (startheight:%d)\n", pindexStart->nHeight, pto->GetId(), pto->nStartingHeight);
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexStart), uint256()));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, ::ChainActive().GetLocator(pindexStart), uint256()));
}
}
@@ -4248,10 +4238,10 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
LOCK(cs_most_recent_block);
if (most_recent_block_hash == pBestIndex->GetBlockHash()) {
if (state.fWantsCmpctWitness || !fWitnessesPresentInMostRecentCompactBlock)
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *most_recent_compact_block));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *most_recent_compact_block));
else {
CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock(*most_recent_block, state.fWantsCmpctWitness);
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, cmpctblock));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, cmpctblock));
}
fGotBlockFromCache = true;
}
@@ -4261,7 +4251,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
bool ret = ReadBlockFromDisk(block, pBestIndex, consensusParams);
assert(ret);
CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock(block, state.fWantsCmpctWitness);
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, cmpctblock));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(nSendFlags, NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, cmpctblock));
}
state.pindexBestHeaderSent = pBestIndex;
} else if (state.fPreferHeaders) {
@@ -4274,7 +4264,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: sending header %s to peer=%d\n", __func__,
vHeaders.front().GetHash().ToString(), pto->GetId());
}
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::HEADERS, vHeaders));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::HEADERS, vHeaders));
state.pindexBestHeaderSent = pBestIndex;
} else
fRevertToInv = true;
@@ -4319,7 +4309,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
for (const uint256& hash : pto->vInventoryBlockToSend) {
vInv.push_back(CInv(MSG_BLOCK, hash));
if (vInv.size() == MAX_INV_SZ) {
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::INV, vInv));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::INV, vInv));
vInv.clear();
}
}
@@ -4332,7 +4322,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
if (pto->m_tx_relay->nNextInvSend < current_time) {
fSendTrickle = true;
if (pto->IsInboundConn()) {
- pto->m_tx_relay->nNextInvSend = std::chrono::microseconds{connman->PoissonNextSendInbound(nNow, INVENTORY_BROADCAST_INTERVAL)};
+ pto->m_tx_relay->nNextInvSend = std::chrono::microseconds{m_connman.PoissonNextSendInbound(nNow, INVENTORY_BROADCAST_INTERVAL)};
} else {
// Use half the delay for outbound peers, as there is less privacy concern for them.
pto->m_tx_relay->nNextInvSend = PoissonNextSend(current_time, std::chrono::seconds{INVENTORY_BROADCAST_INTERVAL >> 1});
@@ -4372,7 +4362,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
// Responses to MEMPOOL requests bypass the m_recently_announced_invs filter.
vInv.push_back(inv);
if (vInv.size() == MAX_INV_SZ) {
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::INV, vInv));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::INV, vInv));
vInv.clear();
}
}
@@ -4448,7 +4438,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
}
}
if (vInv.size() == MAX_INV_SZ) {
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::INV, vInv));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::INV, vInv));
vInv.clear();
}
pto->m_tx_relay->filterInventoryKnown.insert(hash);
@@ -4465,7 +4455,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
}
}
if (!vInv.empty())
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::INV, vInv));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::INV, vInv));
// Detect whether we're stalling
current_time = GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>();
@@ -4593,7 +4583,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Requesting %s peer=%d\n", inv.ToString(), pto->GetId());
vGetData.push_back(inv);
if (vGetData.size() >= MAX_GETDATA_SZ) {
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vGetData));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vGetData));
vGetData.clear();
}
UpdateTxRequestTime(gtxid, current_time);
@@ -4623,7 +4613,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
if (!vGetData.empty())
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vGetData));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETDATA, vGetData));
//
// Message: feefilter
@@ -4651,7 +4641,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
// We always have a fee filter of at least minRelayTxFee
filterToSend = std::max(filterToSend, ::minRelayTxFee.GetFeePerK());
if (filterToSend != pto->m_tx_relay->lastSentFeeFilter) {
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::FEEFILTER, filterToSend));
+ m_connman.PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::FEEFILTER, filterToSend));
pto->m_tx_relay->lastSentFeeFilter = filterToSend;
}
pto->m_tx_relay->nextSendTimeFeeFilter = PoissonNextSend(timeNow, AVG_FEEFILTER_BROADCAST_INTERVAL);
diff --git a/src/net_processing.h b/src/net_processing.h
index 2d98714122..74d6603747 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.h
+++ b/src/net_processing.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <sync.h>
#include <validationinterface.h>
+class CChainParams;
class CTxMemPool;
class ChainstateManager;
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ static const int DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD{100};
class PeerLogicValidation final : public CValidationInterface, public NetEventsInterface {
private:
- CConnman* const connman;
+ CConnman& m_connman;
/** Pointer to this node's banman. May be nullptr - check existence before dereferencing. */
BanMan* const m_banman;
ChainstateManager& m_chainman;
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ private:
bool MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode);
public:
- PeerLogicValidation(CConnman* connman, BanMan* banman, CScheduler& scheduler, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& pool);
+ PeerLogicValidation(CConnman& connman, BanMan* banman, CScheduler& scheduler, ChainstateManager& chainman, CTxMemPool& pool);
/**
* Overridden from CValidationInterface.
@@ -85,8 +86,14 @@ public:
/** Retrieve unbroadcast transactions from the mempool and reattempt sending to peers */
void ReattemptInitialBroadcast(CScheduler& scheduler) const;
+ /** Process a single message from a peer. Public for fuzz testing */
+ void ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDataStream& vRecv,
+ const std::chrono::microseconds time_received, const CChainParams& chainparams,
+ const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc);
+
private:
int64_t m_stale_tip_check_time; //!< Next time to check for stale tip
+
};
struct CNodeStateStats {
diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
index 0115803e58..c0a2fca9ca 100644
--- a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(denialofservice_tests, TestingSetup)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
{
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
- auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*connman, nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
// Mock an outbound peer
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidat
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
{
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnmanTest>(0x1337, 0x1337);
- auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*connman, nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus();
constexpr int max_outbound_full_relay = MAX_OUTBOUND_FULL_RELAY_CONNECTIONS;
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
{
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
- auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*connman, banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
banman->ClearBanned();
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
{
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
- auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*connman, banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
banman->ClearBanned();
int64_t nStartTime = GetTime();
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
index 677b87a47a..ec09acc6c6 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/process_message.cpp
@@ -30,18 +30,6 @@
#include <string>
#include <vector>
-void ProcessMessage(
- CNode& pfrom,
- const std::string& msg_type,
- CDataStream& vRecv,
- const std::chrono::microseconds time_received,
- const CChainParams& chainparams,
- ChainstateManager& chainman,
- CTxMemPool& mempool,
- CConnman& connman,
- BanMan* banman,
- const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc);
-
namespace {
#ifdef MESSAGE_TYPE
@@ -87,10 +75,9 @@ void test_one_input(const std::vector<uint8_t>& buffer)
connman.AddTestNode(p2p_node);
g_setup->m_node.peer_logic->InitializeNode(&p2p_node);
try {
- ProcessMessage(p2p_node, random_message_type, random_bytes_data_stream, GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>(),
- Params(), *g_setup->m_node.chainman, *g_setup->m_node.mempool,
- *g_setup->m_node.connman, g_setup->m_node.banman.get(),
- std::atomic<bool>{false});
+ g_setup->m_node.peer_logic->ProcessMessage(p2p_node, random_message_type, random_bytes_data_stream,
+ GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>(), Params(),
+ std::atomic<bool>{false});
} catch (const std::ios_base::failure&) {
}
SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue();
diff --git a/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp b/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
index b2ae1cb845..9d63aad672 100644
--- a/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
+++ b/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ TestingSetup::TestingSetup(const std::string& chainName, const std::vector<const
m_node.mempool->setSanityCheck(1.0);
m_node.banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
m_node.connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337); // Deterministic randomness for tests.
- m_node.peer_logic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(m_node.connman.get(), m_node.banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
+ m_node.peer_logic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(*m_node.connman, m_node.banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
{
CConnman::Options options;
options.m_msgproc = m_node.peer_logic.get();