diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2017-10-11 10:42:55 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2017-10-11 10:45:22 +0200 |
commit | 0e3a411351578d8cb372407205b320dcb72279c4 (patch) | |
tree | 3f1a95b201d6d6bcdc57a4c0f12d521d5aab5adc /src | |
parent | 5a9da37fb3f4b53f556e1d46509b94dc3c661d75 (diff) | |
parent | 4e955c58e13cfe089208f6b23b195d395ad99baa (diff) |
Merge #8498: Near-Bugfix: Optimization: Minimize the number of times it is checked that no money...
4e955c5 Near-Bugfix: Reestablish consensus check removed in 8d7849b (Jorge Timón)
3e8c916 Introduce CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins static wrapper in txmempool.cpp (Jorge Timón)
832e074 Optimization: Minimize the number of times it is checked that no money is created (Jorge Timón)
3f0ee3e Proper indentation for CheckTxInputs and other minor fixes (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
...is created by individual transactions to 2 places (but call only once in each):
- ConnectBlock ( before calculated fees per txs twice )
- AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker ( before called CheckTxInputs 4 times and calculated
fees per tx one extra time )
Also call tx.GetValueOut() only once per call of CheckTxInputs (instead of 2)
For more motivation:
~~https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1493~~
https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/compare/0.13-consensus-inputs...jtimon:0.13-consensus-inputs-comments
EDIT: partially replaces #6445
Near-Bugfix as pointed out in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8498#discussion_r124346132
Tree-SHA512: c71188e7c7c2425c9170ed7b803896755a92fd22f43b136eedaa6e554106696f0b10271d0ef0d0127c1eaafbc31d12eb19143df4f1b6882feecedf6ef05ea346
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp | 76 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/consensus/tx_verify.h | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/txmempool.cpp | 22 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/validation.cpp | 28 |
4 files changed, 69 insertions, 62 deletions
diff --git a/src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp b/src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp index 0a71915d1d..70aa9d7006 100644 --- a/src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp +++ b/src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ #include "chain.h" #include "coins.h" #include "utilmoneystr.h" - + bool IsFinalTx(const CTransaction &tx, int nBlockHeight, int64_t nBlockTime) { if (tx.nLockTime == 0) @@ -205,46 +205,46 @@ bool CheckTransaction(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, bool fChe return true; } -bool Consensus::CheckTxInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState& state, const CCoinsViewCache& inputs, int nSpendHeight) +bool Consensus::CheckTxInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState& state, const CCoinsViewCache& inputs, int nSpendHeight, CAmount& txfee) { - // This doesn't trigger the DoS code on purpose; if it did, it would make it easier - // for an attacker to attempt to split the network. - if (!inputs.HaveInputs(tx)) - return state.Invalid(false, 0, "", "Inputs unavailable"); - - CAmount nValueIn = 0; - CAmount nFees = 0; - for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vin.size(); i++) - { - const COutPoint &prevout = tx.vin[i].prevout; - const Coin& coin = inputs.AccessCoin(prevout); - assert(!coin.IsSpent()); - - // If prev is coinbase, check that it's matured - if (coin.IsCoinBase()) { - if (nSpendHeight - coin.nHeight < COINBASE_MATURITY) - return state.Invalid(false, - REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase", - strprintf("tried to spend coinbase at depth %d", nSpendHeight - coin.nHeight)); - } - - // Check for negative or overflow input values - nValueIn += coin.out.nValue; - if (!MoneyRange(coin.out.nValue) || !MoneyRange(nValueIn)) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-inputvalues-outofrange"); + // are the actual inputs available? + if (!inputs.HaveInputs(tx)) { + return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent", false, + strprintf("%s: inputs missing/spent", __func__)); + } + + CAmount nValueIn = 0; + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vin.size(); ++i) { + const COutPoint &prevout = tx.vin[i].prevout; + const Coin& coin = inputs.AccessCoin(prevout); + assert(!coin.IsSpent()); + + // If prev is coinbase, check that it's matured + if (coin.IsCoinBase() && nSpendHeight - coin.nHeight < COINBASE_MATURITY) { + return state.Invalid(false, + REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase", + strprintf("tried to spend coinbase at depth %d", nSpendHeight - coin.nHeight)); + } + // Check for negative or overflow input values + nValueIn += coin.out.nValue; + if (!MoneyRange(coin.out.nValue) || !MoneyRange(nValueIn)) { + return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-inputvalues-outofrange"); } + } + + const CAmount value_out = tx.GetValueOut(); + if (nValueIn < value_out) { + return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-in-belowout", false, + strprintf("value in (%s) < value out (%s)", FormatMoney(nValueIn), FormatMoney(value_out))); + } + + // Tally transaction fees + const CAmount txfee_aux = nValueIn - value_out; + if (!MoneyRange(txfee_aux)) { + return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-fee-outofrange"); + } - if (nValueIn < tx.GetValueOut()) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-in-belowout", false, - strprintf("value in (%s) < value out (%s)", FormatMoney(nValueIn), FormatMoney(tx.GetValueOut()))); - - // Tally transaction fees - CAmount nTxFee = nValueIn - tx.GetValueOut(); - if (nTxFee < 0) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-fee-negative"); - nFees += nTxFee; - if (!MoneyRange(nFees)) - return state.DoS(100, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-fee-outofrange"); + txfee = txfee_aux; return true; } diff --git a/src/consensus/tx_verify.h b/src/consensus/tx_verify.h index d46d3294ca..288892462d 100644 --- a/src/consensus/tx_verify.h +++ b/src/consensus/tx_verify.h @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ #ifndef BITCOIN_CONSENSUS_TX_VERIFY_H #define BITCOIN_CONSENSUS_TX_VERIFY_H +#include "amount.h" + #include <stdint.h> #include <vector> @@ -22,9 +24,10 @@ namespace Consensus { /** * Check whether all inputs of this transaction are valid (no double spends and amounts) * This does not modify the UTXO set. This does not check scripts and sigs. + * @param[out] txfee Set to the transaction fee if successful. * Preconditions: tx.IsCoinBase() is false. */ -bool CheckTxInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState& state, const CCoinsViewCache& inputs, int nSpendHeight); +bool CheckTxInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState& state, const CCoinsViewCache& inputs, int nSpendHeight, CAmount& txfee); } // namespace Consensus /** Auxiliary functions for transaction validation (ideally should not be exposed) */ diff --git a/src/txmempool.cpp b/src/txmempool.cpp index 776d3f36ca..b0306811cb 100644 --- a/src/txmempool.cpp +++ b/src/txmempool.cpp @@ -607,6 +607,15 @@ void CTxMemPool::clear() _clear(); } +static void CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins(const CTransaction& tx, CCoinsViewCache& mempoolDuplicate, const int64_t spendheight) +{ + CValidationState state; + CAmount txfee = 0; + bool fCheckResult = tx.IsCoinBase() || Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, mempoolDuplicate, spendheight, txfee); + assert(fCheckResult); + UpdateCoins(tx, mempoolDuplicate, 1000000); +} + void CTxMemPool::check(const CCoinsViewCache *pcoins) const { if (nCheckFrequency == 0) @@ -621,7 +630,7 @@ void CTxMemPool::check(const CCoinsViewCache *pcoins) const uint64_t innerUsage = 0; CCoinsViewCache mempoolDuplicate(const_cast<CCoinsViewCache*>(pcoins)); - const int64_t nSpendHeight = GetSpendHeight(mempoolDuplicate); + const int64_t spendheight = GetSpendHeight(mempoolDuplicate); LOCK(cs); std::list<const CTxMemPoolEntry*> waitingOnDependants; @@ -700,11 +709,7 @@ void CTxMemPool::check(const CCoinsViewCache *pcoins) const if (fDependsWait) waitingOnDependants.push_back(&(*it)); else { - CValidationState state; - bool fCheckResult = tx.IsCoinBase() || - Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, mempoolDuplicate, nSpendHeight); - assert(fCheckResult); - UpdateCoins(tx, mempoolDuplicate, 1000000); + CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins(tx, mempoolDuplicate, spendheight); } } unsigned int stepsSinceLastRemove = 0; @@ -717,10 +722,7 @@ void CTxMemPool::check(const CCoinsViewCache *pcoins) const stepsSinceLastRemove++; assert(stepsSinceLastRemove < waitingOnDependants.size()); } else { - bool fCheckResult = entry->GetTx().IsCoinBase() || - Consensus::CheckTxInputs(entry->GetTx(), state, mempoolDuplicate, nSpendHeight); - assert(fCheckResult); - UpdateCoins(entry->GetTx(), mempoolDuplicate, 1000000); + CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins(entry->GetTx(), mempoolDuplicate, spendheight); stepsSinceLastRemove = 0; } } diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index e098de5d3d..a073e3d1c0 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -534,7 +534,6 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool CCoinsView dummy; CCoinsViewCache view(&dummy); - CAmount nValueIn = 0; LockPoints lp; { LOCK(pool.cs); @@ -565,8 +564,6 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool // Bring the best block into scope view.GetBestBlock(); - nValueIn = view.GetValueIn(tx); - // we have all inputs cached now, so switch back to dummy, so we don't need to keep lock on mempool view.SetBackend(dummy); @@ -577,6 +574,12 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool // CoinsViewCache instead of create its own if (!CheckSequenceLocks(tx, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS, &lp)) return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "non-BIP68-final"); + + } // end LOCK(pool.cs) + + CAmount nFees = 0; + if (!Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, view, GetSpendHeight(view), nFees)) { + return error("%s: Consensus::CheckTxInputs: %s, %s", __func__, tx.GetHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); } // Check for non-standard pay-to-script-hash in inputs @@ -589,8 +592,6 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool int64_t nSigOpsCost = GetTransactionSigOpCost(tx, view, STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS); - CAmount nValueOut = tx.GetValueOut(); - CAmount nFees = nValueIn-nValueOut; // nModifiedFees includes any fee deltas from PrioritiseTransaction CAmount nModifiedFees = nFees; pool.ApplyDelta(hash, nModifiedFees); @@ -1247,9 +1248,6 @@ bool CheckInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, const CCoinsVi { if (!tx.IsCoinBase()) { - if (!Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, inputs, GetSpendHeight(inputs))) - return false; - if (pvChecks) pvChecks->reserve(tx.vin.size()); @@ -1762,9 +1760,15 @@ static bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockInd if (!tx.IsCoinBase()) { - if (!view.HaveInputs(tx)) - return state.DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock(): inputs missing/spent"), - REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent"); + CAmount txfee = 0; + if (!Consensus::CheckTxInputs(tx, state, view, pindex->nHeight, txfee)) { + return error("%s: Consensus::CheckTxInputs: %s, %s", __func__, tx.GetHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); + } + nFees += txfee; + if (!MoneyRange(nFees)) { + return state.DoS(100, error("%s: accumulated fee in the block out of range.", __func__), + REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-accumulated-fee-outofrange"); + } // Check that transaction is BIP68 final // BIP68 lock checks (as opposed to nLockTime checks) must @@ -1792,8 +1796,6 @@ static bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockInd txdata.emplace_back(tx); if (!tx.IsCoinBase()) { - nFees += view.GetValueIn(tx)-tx.GetValueOut(); - std::vector<CScriptCheck> vChecks; bool fCacheResults = fJustCheck; /* Don't cache results if we're actually connecting blocks (still consult the cache, though) */ if (!CheckInputs(tx, state, view, fScriptChecks, flags, fCacheResults, fCacheResults, txdata[i], nScriptCheckThreads ? &vChecks : nullptr)) |