aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-02-08 19:44:52 +0100
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-02-08 19:48:21 +0100
commitd405beea26c1569f46cf50ef71b376c9487ce361 (patch)
treeb7032a576cd9cd140a6a21698d00633d70be8ef2 /src
parent663911ed581d2ab40f49fdc232f189d92264d45a (diff)
parent2f960b50703a9599b82b7291139b428f4a9b96c3 (diff)
Merge #12333: Make CWallet::ListCoins atomic
2f960b5 [wallet] Indent only change of CWallet::AvailableCoins (João Barbosa) 1beea7a [wallet] Make CWallet::ListCoins atomic (João Barbosa) Pull request description: Fix a potencial race in `CWallet::ListCoins`. Replaces `cs_main` and `cs_wallet` locks by assertions in `CWallet::AvailableCoins`. Tree-SHA512: 09109f44a08b4b53f7605d950ab506d3f748490ab9aed474aa200e93f7b0b9f96f9bf60abe1c5f658240fd13d9e3267c0dd43fd3c1695d82384198ce1da8109f
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp18
-rw-r--r--src/wallet/wallet.cpp160
2 files changed, 91 insertions, 87 deletions
diff --git a/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp b/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp
index f39471b871..161372784b 100644
--- a/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp
@@ -676,18 +676,24 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(ListCoins, ListCoinsTestingSetup)
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(list.begin()->second.size(), 2);
// Lock both coins. Confirm number of available coins drops to 0.
- std::vector<COutput> available;
- wallet->AvailableCoins(available);
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(available.size(), 2);
+ {
+ LOCK2(cs_main, wallet->cs_wallet);
+ std::vector<COutput> available;
+ wallet->AvailableCoins(available);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(available.size(), 2);
+ }
for (const auto& group : list) {
for (const auto& coin : group.second) {
LOCK(wallet->cs_wallet);
wallet->LockCoin(COutPoint(coin.tx->GetHash(), coin.i));
}
}
- wallet->AvailableCoins(available);
- BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(available.size(), 0);
-
+ {
+ LOCK2(cs_main, wallet->cs_wallet);
+ std::vector<COutput> available;
+ wallet->AvailableCoins(available);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(available.size(), 0);
+ }
// Confirm ListCoins still returns same result as before, despite coins
// being locked.
list = wallet->ListCoins();
diff --git a/src/wallet/wallet.cpp b/src/wallet/wallet.cpp
index 1b3a3ee50f..7f36aefeaf 100644
--- a/src/wallet/wallet.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/wallet.cpp
@@ -2198,111 +2198,109 @@ CAmount CWallet::GetAvailableBalance(const CCoinControl* coinControl) const
void CWallet::AvailableCoins(std::vector<COutput> &vCoins, bool fOnlySafe, const CCoinControl *coinControl, const CAmount &nMinimumAmount, const CAmount &nMaximumAmount, const CAmount &nMinimumSumAmount, const uint64_t nMaximumCount, const int nMinDepth, const int nMaxDepth) const
{
+ AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
+ AssertLockHeld(cs_wallet);
+
vCoins.clear();
+ CAmount nTotal = 0;
+ for (const auto& entry : mapWallet)
{
- LOCK2(cs_main, cs_wallet);
+ const uint256& wtxid = entry.first;
+ const CWalletTx* pcoin = &entry.second;
- CAmount nTotal = 0;
+ if (!CheckFinalTx(*pcoin->tx))
+ continue;
- for (const auto& entry : mapWallet)
- {
- const uint256& wtxid = entry.first;
- const CWalletTx* pcoin = &entry.second;
+ if (pcoin->IsCoinBase() && pcoin->GetBlocksToMaturity() > 0)
+ continue;
- if (!CheckFinalTx(*pcoin->tx))
- continue;
+ int nDepth = pcoin->GetDepthInMainChain();
+ if (nDepth < 0)
+ continue;
- if (pcoin->IsCoinBase() && pcoin->GetBlocksToMaturity() > 0)
- continue;
+ // We should not consider coins which aren't at least in our mempool
+ // It's possible for these to be conflicted via ancestors which we may never be able to detect
+ if (nDepth == 0 && !pcoin->InMempool())
+ continue;
- int nDepth = pcoin->GetDepthInMainChain();
- if (nDepth < 0)
- continue;
+ bool safeTx = pcoin->IsTrusted();
+
+ // We should not consider coins from transactions that are replacing
+ // other transactions.
+ //
+ // Example: There is a transaction A which is replaced by bumpfee
+ // transaction B. In this case, we want to prevent creation of
+ // a transaction B' which spends an output of B.
+ //
+ // Reason: If transaction A were initially confirmed, transactions B
+ // and B' would no longer be valid, so the user would have to create
+ // a new transaction C to replace B'. However, in the case of a
+ // one-block reorg, transactions B' and C might BOTH be accepted,
+ // when the user only wanted one of them. Specifically, there could
+ // be a 1-block reorg away from the chain where transactions A and C
+ // were accepted to another chain where B, B', and C were all
+ // accepted.
+ if (nDepth == 0 && pcoin->mapValue.count("replaces_txid")) {
+ safeTx = false;
+ }
- // We should not consider coins which aren't at least in our mempool
- // It's possible for these to be conflicted via ancestors which we may never be able to detect
- if (nDepth == 0 && !pcoin->InMempool())
- continue;
+ // Similarly, we should not consider coins from transactions that
+ // have been replaced. In the example above, we would want to prevent
+ // creation of a transaction A' spending an output of A, because if
+ // transaction B were initially confirmed, conflicting with A and
+ // A', we wouldn't want to the user to create a transaction D
+ // intending to replace A', but potentially resulting in a scenario
+ // where A, A', and D could all be accepted (instead of just B and
+ // D, or just A and A' like the user would want).
+ if (nDepth == 0 && pcoin->mapValue.count("replaced_by_txid")) {
+ safeTx = false;
+ }
- bool safeTx = pcoin->IsTrusted();
-
- // We should not consider coins from transactions that are replacing
- // other transactions.
- //
- // Example: There is a transaction A which is replaced by bumpfee
- // transaction B. In this case, we want to prevent creation of
- // a transaction B' which spends an output of B.
- //
- // Reason: If transaction A were initially confirmed, transactions B
- // and B' would no longer be valid, so the user would have to create
- // a new transaction C to replace B'. However, in the case of a
- // one-block reorg, transactions B' and C might BOTH be accepted,
- // when the user only wanted one of them. Specifically, there could
- // be a 1-block reorg away from the chain where transactions A and C
- // were accepted to another chain where B, B', and C were all
- // accepted.
- if (nDepth == 0 && pcoin->mapValue.count("replaces_txid")) {
- safeTx = false;
- }
+ if (fOnlySafe && !safeTx) {
+ continue;
+ }
- // Similarly, we should not consider coins from transactions that
- // have been replaced. In the example above, we would want to prevent
- // creation of a transaction A' spending an output of A, because if
- // transaction B were initially confirmed, conflicting with A and
- // A', we wouldn't want to the user to create a transaction D
- // intending to replace A', but potentially resulting in a scenario
- // where A, A', and D could all be accepted (instead of just B and
- // D, or just A and A' like the user would want).
- if (nDepth == 0 && pcoin->mapValue.count("replaced_by_txid")) {
- safeTx = false;
- }
+ if (nDepth < nMinDepth || nDepth > nMaxDepth)
+ continue;
- if (fOnlySafe && !safeTx) {
+ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < pcoin->tx->vout.size(); i++) {
+ if (pcoin->tx->vout[i].nValue < nMinimumAmount || pcoin->tx->vout[i].nValue > nMaximumAmount)
continue;
- }
- if (nDepth < nMinDepth || nDepth > nMaxDepth)
+ if (coinControl && coinControl->HasSelected() && !coinControl->fAllowOtherInputs && !coinControl->IsSelected(COutPoint(entry.first, i)))
continue;
- for (unsigned int i = 0; i < pcoin->tx->vout.size(); i++) {
- if (pcoin->tx->vout[i].nValue < nMinimumAmount || pcoin->tx->vout[i].nValue > nMaximumAmount)
- continue;
-
- if (coinControl && coinControl->HasSelected() && !coinControl->fAllowOtherInputs && !coinControl->IsSelected(COutPoint(entry.first, i)))
- continue;
-
- if (IsLockedCoin(entry.first, i))
- continue;
-
- if (IsSpent(wtxid, i))
- continue;
+ if (IsLockedCoin(entry.first, i))
+ continue;
- isminetype mine = IsMine(pcoin->tx->vout[i]);
+ if (IsSpent(wtxid, i))
+ continue;
- if (mine == ISMINE_NO) {
- continue;
- }
+ isminetype mine = IsMine(pcoin->tx->vout[i]);
- bool fSpendableIn = ((mine & ISMINE_SPENDABLE) != ISMINE_NO) || (coinControl && coinControl->fAllowWatchOnly && (mine & ISMINE_WATCH_SOLVABLE) != ISMINE_NO);
- bool fSolvableIn = (mine & (ISMINE_SPENDABLE | ISMINE_WATCH_SOLVABLE)) != ISMINE_NO;
+ if (mine == ISMINE_NO) {
+ continue;
+ }
- vCoins.push_back(COutput(pcoin, i, nDepth, fSpendableIn, fSolvableIn, safeTx));
+ bool fSpendableIn = ((mine & ISMINE_SPENDABLE) != ISMINE_NO) || (coinControl && coinControl->fAllowWatchOnly && (mine & ISMINE_WATCH_SOLVABLE) != ISMINE_NO);
+ bool fSolvableIn = (mine & (ISMINE_SPENDABLE | ISMINE_WATCH_SOLVABLE)) != ISMINE_NO;
- // Checks the sum amount of all UTXO's.
- if (nMinimumSumAmount != MAX_MONEY) {
- nTotal += pcoin->tx->vout[i].nValue;
+ vCoins.push_back(COutput(pcoin, i, nDepth, fSpendableIn, fSolvableIn, safeTx));
- if (nTotal >= nMinimumSumAmount) {
- return;
- }
- }
+ // Checks the sum amount of all UTXO's.
+ if (nMinimumSumAmount != MAX_MONEY) {
+ nTotal += pcoin->tx->vout[i].nValue;
- // Checks the maximum number of UTXO's.
- if (nMaximumCount > 0 && vCoins.size() >= nMaximumCount) {
+ if (nTotal >= nMinimumSumAmount) {
return;
}
}
+
+ // Checks the maximum number of UTXO's.
+ if (nMaximumCount > 0 && vCoins.size() >= nMaximumCount) {
+ return;
+ }
}
}
}
@@ -2320,11 +2318,11 @@ std::map<CTxDestination, std::vector<COutput>> CWallet::ListCoins() const
// avoid adding some extra complexity to the Qt code.
std::map<CTxDestination, std::vector<COutput>> result;
-
std::vector<COutput> availableCoins;
- AvailableCoins(availableCoins);
LOCK2(cs_main, cs_wallet);
+ AvailableCoins(availableCoins);
+
for (auto& coin : availableCoins) {
CTxDestination address;
if (coin.fSpendable &&