diff options
author | Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com> | 2024-02-15 11:52:04 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com> | 2024-03-18 10:32:00 -0400 |
commit | 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8 (patch) | |
tree | b80da12f819c6afc731b8d70b6b980b1e872ae03 /src | |
parent | b767e6bd47cb0fb8f7aea3fb10c597e59a35bf74 (diff) |
Unit tests for CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/rbf_tests.cpp | 158 |
1 files changed, 158 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/rbf_tests.cpp b/src/test/rbf_tests.cpp index 90d8c65956..961fd62fe4 100644 --- a/src/test/rbf_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/rbf_tests.cpp @@ -334,6 +334,164 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(improves_feerate, TestChain100Setup) BOOST_CHECK(res3.has_value()); BOOST_CHECK(res3.value().first == DiagramCheckError::UNCALCULABLE); BOOST_CHECK(res3.value().second == strprintf("%s has 2 descendants, max 1 allowed", tx1->GetHash().GetHex())); + +} + +BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(calc_feerate_diagram_rbf, TestChain100Setup) +{ + CTxMemPool& pool = *Assert(m_node.mempool); + LOCK2(::cs_main, pool.cs); + TestMemPoolEntryHelper entry; + + const CAmount low_fee{CENT/100}; + const CAmount normal_fee{CENT/10}; + const CAmount high_fee{CENT}; + + // low -> high -> medium fee transactions that would result in two chunks together + const auto low_tx = make_tx(/*inputs=*/ {m_coinbase_txns[0]}, /*output_values=*/ {10 * COIN}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(low_fee).FromTx(low_tx)); + + const auto entry_low = pool.GetIter(low_tx->GetHash()).value(); + const auto low_size = entry_low->GetTxSize(); + + std::vector<FeeFrac> old_diagram, new_diagram; + + // Replacement of size 1 + const auto replace_one{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/0, /*replacement_vsize=*/1, {entry_low}, {entry_low})}; + BOOST_CHECK(replace_one.has_value()); + old_diagram = replace_one->first; + new_diagram = replace_one->second; + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(low_fee, low_size)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(0, 1)); + + // Non-zero replacement fee/size + const auto replace_one_fee{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low})}; + BOOST_CHECK(replace_one_fee.has_value()); + old_diagram = replace_one_fee->first; + new_diagram = replace_one_fee->second; + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(low_fee, low_size)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(high_fee, low_size)); + + // Add a second transaction to the cluster that will make a single chunk, to be evicted in the RBF + const auto high_tx = make_tx(/*inputs=*/ {low_tx}, /*output_values=*/ {995 * CENT}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(high_fee).FromTx(high_tx)); + const auto entry_high = pool.GetIter(high_tx->GetHash()).value(); + const auto high_size = entry_high->GetTxSize(); + + const auto replace_single_chunk{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low, entry_high})}; + BOOST_CHECK(replace_single_chunk.has_value()); + old_diagram = replace_single_chunk->first; + new_diagram = replace_single_chunk->second; + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(low_fee + high_fee, low_size + high_size)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(high_fee, low_size)); + + // Conflict with the 2nd tx, resulting in new diagram with three entries + const auto replace_cpfp_child{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_high}, {entry_high})}; + BOOST_CHECK(replace_cpfp_child.has_value()); + old_diagram = replace_cpfp_child->first; + new_diagram = replace_cpfp_child->second; + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram.size() == 3); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(low_fee + high_fee, low_size + high_size)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(high_fee, low_size)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[2] == FeeFrac(low_fee + high_fee, low_size + low_size)); + + // third transaction causes the topology check to fail + const auto normal_tx = make_tx(/*inputs=*/ {high_tx}, /*output_values=*/ {995 * CENT}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(normal_fee).FromTx(normal_tx)); + const auto entry_normal = pool.GetIter(normal_tx->GetHash()).value(); + const auto normal_size = entry_normal->GetTxSize(); + + const auto replace_too_large{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/normal_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/normal_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low, entry_high, entry_normal})}; + BOOST_CHECK(!replace_too_large.has_value()); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(util::ErrorString(replace_too_large).original, strprintf("%s has 2 descendants, max 1 allowed", low_tx->GetHash().GetHex())); + old_diagram.clear(); + new_diagram.clear(); + + // Make a size 2 cluster that is itself two chunks; evict both txns + const auto high_tx_2 = make_tx(/*inputs=*/ {m_coinbase_txns[1]}, /*output_values=*/ {10 * COIN}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(high_fee).FromTx(high_tx_2)); + const auto entry_high_2 = pool.GetIter(high_tx_2->GetHash()).value(); + const auto high_size_2 = entry_high_2->GetTxSize(); + + const auto low_tx_2 = make_tx(/*inputs=*/ {high_tx_2}, /*output_values=*/ {9 * COIN}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(low_fee).FromTx(low_tx_2)); + const auto entry_low_2 = pool.GetIter(low_tx_2->GetHash()).value(); + const auto low_size_2 = entry_low_2->GetTxSize(); + + const auto replace_two_chunks_single_cluster{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_high_2}, {entry_high_2, entry_low_2})}; + BOOST_CHECK(replace_two_chunks_single_cluster.has_value()); + old_diagram = replace_two_chunks_single_cluster->first; + new_diagram = replace_two_chunks_single_cluster->second; + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram.size() == 3); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(high_fee, high_size_2)); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram[2] == FeeFrac(low_fee + high_fee, low_size_2 + high_size_2)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[0] == FeeFrac(0, 0)); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram[1] == FeeFrac(high_fee, low_size_2)); + + // You can have more than two direct conflicts if the there are multiple effected clusters, all of size 2 or less + const auto conflict_1 = make_tx(/*inputs=*/ {m_coinbase_txns[2]}, /*output_values=*/ {10 * COIN}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(low_fee).FromTx(conflict_1)); + const auto conflict_1_entry = pool.GetIter(conflict_1->GetHash()).value(); + + const auto conflict_2 = make_tx(/*inputs=*/ {m_coinbase_txns[3]}, /*output_values=*/ {10 * COIN}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(low_fee).FromTx(conflict_2)); + const auto conflict_2_entry = pool.GetIter(conflict_2->GetHash()).value(); + + const auto conflict_3 = make_tx(/*inputs=*/ {m_coinbase_txns[4]}, /*output_values=*/ {10 * COIN}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(low_fee).FromTx(conflict_3)); + const auto conflict_3_entry = pool.GetIter(conflict_3->GetHash()).value(); + + const auto replace_multiple_clusters{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry})}; + + BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters.has_value()); + old_diagram = replace_multiple_clusters->first; + new_diagram = replace_multiple_clusters->second; + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram.size() == 4); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram.size() == 2); + + // Add a child transaction to conflict_1 and make it cluster size 2, still one chunk due to same feerate + const auto conflict_1_child = make_tx(/*inputs=*/{conflict_1}, /*output_values=*/ {995 * CENT}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(low_fee).FromTx(conflict_1_child)); + const auto conflict_1_child_entry = pool.GetIter(conflict_1_child->GetHash()).value(); + + const auto replace_multiple_clusters_2{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry, conflict_1_child_entry})}; + + BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters_2.has_value()); + old_diagram = replace_multiple_clusters_2->first; + new_diagram = replace_multiple_clusters_2->second; + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram.size() == 4); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram.size() == 2); + old_diagram.clear(); + new_diagram.clear(); + + // Add another descendant to conflict_1, making the cluster size > 2 should fail at this point. + const auto conflict_1_grand_child = make_tx(/*inputs=*/{conflict_1_child}, /*output_values=*/ {995 * CENT}); + pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(high_fee).FromTx(conflict_1_grand_child)); + const auto conflict_1_grand_child_entry = pool.GetIter(conflict_1_child->GetHash()).value(); + + const auto replace_cluster_size_3{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry, conflict_1_child_entry, conflict_1_grand_child_entry})}; + + BOOST_CHECK(!replace_cluster_size_3.has_value()); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(util::ErrorString(replace_cluster_size_3).original, strprintf("%s has 2 descendants, max 1 allowed", conflict_1->GetHash().GetHex())); + BOOST_CHECK(old_diagram.empty()); + BOOST_CHECK(new_diagram.empty()); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(feerate_diagram_utilities) |