diff options
author | Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> | 2022-01-18 21:49:30 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> | 2022-05-10 12:09:33 +1000 |
commit | 38860f93b680f152fc6fc3d9ae574a4c0659e775 (patch) | |
tree | acc29f37fd6d9f96aa10ed59bf588ac51734989b /src/validation.cpp | |
parent | 69675ea4e73dcf5e9dd0f94802bd3463e4262081 (diff) | |
download | bitcoin-38860f93b680f152fc6fc3d9ae574a4c0659e775.tar.xz |
validation: remove redundant CChainParams params from ChainstateManager methods
Diffstat (limited to 'src/validation.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/validation.cpp | 20 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index b5d6a66088..fb05b9c18e 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -3576,13 +3576,13 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, BlockValidationState& stat return true; } -bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex** ppindex) +bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValidationState& state, CBlockIndex** ppindex) { AssertLockHeld(cs_main); // Check for duplicate uint256 hash = block.GetHash(); BlockMap::iterator miSelf{m_blockman.m_block_index.find(hash)}; - if (hash != chainparams.GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock) { + if (hash != GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock) { if (miSelf != m_blockman.m_block_index.end()) { // Block header is already known. CBlockIndex* pindex = &(miSelf->second); @@ -3595,7 +3595,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValida return true; } - if (!CheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus())) { + if (!CheckBlockHeader(block, state, GetConsensus())) { LogPrint(BCLog::VALIDATION, "%s: Consensus::CheckBlockHeader: %s, %s\n", __func__, hash.ToString(), state.ToString()); return false; } @@ -3612,7 +3612,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValida LogPrint(BCLog::VALIDATION, "%s: %s prev block invalid\n", __func__, hash.ToString()); return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV, "bad-prevblk"); } - if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, m_blockman, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime())) { + if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, m_blockman, GetParams(), pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime())) { LogPrint(BCLog::VALIDATION, "%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s, %s\n", __func__, hash.ToString(), state.ToString()); return false; } @@ -3665,14 +3665,14 @@ bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValida } // Exposed wrapper for AcceptBlockHeader -bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlockIndex** ppindex) +bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, BlockValidationState& state, const CBlockIndex** ppindex) { AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main); { LOCK(cs_main); for (const CBlockHeader& header : headers) { CBlockIndex *pindex = nullptr; // Use a temp pindex instead of ppindex to avoid a const_cast - bool accepted{AcceptBlockHeader(header, state, chainparams, &pindex)}; + bool accepted{AcceptBlockHeader(header, state, &pindex)}; ActiveChainstate().CheckBlockIndex(); if (!accepted) { @@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& if (NotifyHeaderTip(ActiveChainstate())) { if (ActiveChainstate().IsInitialBlockDownload() && ppindex && *ppindex) { const CBlockIndex& last_accepted{**ppindex}; - const int64_t blocks_left{(GetTime() - last_accepted.GetBlockTime()) / chainparams.GetConsensus().nPowTargetSpacing}; + const int64_t blocks_left{(GetTime() - last_accepted.GetBlockTime()) / GetConsensus().nPowTargetSpacing}; const double progress{100.0 * last_accepted.nHeight / (last_accepted.nHeight + blocks_left)}; LogPrintf("Synchronizing blockheaders, height: %d (~%.2f%%)\n", last_accepted.nHeight, progress); } @@ -3705,7 +3705,7 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, Block CBlockIndex *pindexDummy = nullptr; CBlockIndex *&pindex = ppindex ? *ppindex : pindexDummy; - bool accepted_header{m_chainman.AcceptBlockHeader(block, state, m_params, &pindex)}; + bool accepted_header{m_chainman.AcceptBlockHeader(block, state, &pindex)}; CheckBlockIndex(); if (!accepted_header) @@ -3778,7 +3778,7 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, Block return true; } -bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock(const CChainParams& chainparams, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& block, bool force_processing, bool* new_block) +bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& block, bool force_processing, bool* new_block) { AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main); @@ -3796,7 +3796,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock(const CChainParams& chainparams, const s // malleability that cause CheckBlock() to fail; see e.g. CVE-2012-2459 and // https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-February/016697.html. Because CheckBlock() is // not very expensive, the anti-DoS benefits of caching failure (of a definitely-invalid block) are not substantial. - bool ret = CheckBlock(*block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus()); + bool ret = CheckBlock(*block, state, GetConsensus()); if (ret) { // Store to disk ret = ActiveChainstate().AcceptBlock(block, state, &pindex, force_processing, nullptr, new_block); |