aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/validation.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>2022-01-18 21:49:30 +1000
committerAnthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>2022-05-10 12:09:33 +1000
commit38860f93b680f152fc6fc3d9ae574a4c0659e775 (patch)
treeacc29f37fd6d9f96aa10ed59bf588ac51734989b /src/validation.cpp
parent69675ea4e73dcf5e9dd0f94802bd3463e4262081 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-38860f93b680f152fc6fc3d9ae574a4c0659e775.tar.xz
validation: remove redundant CChainParams params from ChainstateManager methods
Diffstat (limited to 'src/validation.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/validation.cpp20
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index b5d6a66088..fb05b9c18e 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -3576,13 +3576,13 @@ static bool ContextualCheckBlock(const CBlock& block, BlockValidationState& stat
return true;
}
-bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex** ppindex)
+bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValidationState& state, CBlockIndex** ppindex)
{
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
// Check for duplicate
uint256 hash = block.GetHash();
BlockMap::iterator miSelf{m_blockman.m_block_index.find(hash)};
- if (hash != chainparams.GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock) {
+ if (hash != GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock) {
if (miSelf != m_blockman.m_block_index.end()) {
// Block header is already known.
CBlockIndex* pindex = &(miSelf->second);
@@ -3595,7 +3595,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValida
return true;
}
- if (!CheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus())) {
+ if (!CheckBlockHeader(block, state, GetConsensus())) {
LogPrint(BCLog::VALIDATION, "%s: Consensus::CheckBlockHeader: %s, %s\n", __func__, hash.ToString(), state.ToString());
return false;
}
@@ -3612,7 +3612,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValida
LogPrint(BCLog::VALIDATION, "%s: %s prev block invalid\n", __func__, hash.ToString());
return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV, "bad-prevblk");
}
- if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, m_blockman, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime())) {
+ if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, m_blockman, GetParams(), pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime())) {
LogPrint(BCLog::VALIDATION, "%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s, %s\n", __func__, hash.ToString(), state.ToString());
return false;
}
@@ -3665,14 +3665,14 @@ bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValida
}
// Exposed wrapper for AcceptBlockHeader
-bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlockIndex** ppindex)
+bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers, BlockValidationState& state, const CBlockIndex** ppindex)
{
AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
for (const CBlockHeader& header : headers) {
CBlockIndex *pindex = nullptr; // Use a temp pindex instead of ppindex to avoid a const_cast
- bool accepted{AcceptBlockHeader(header, state, chainparams, &pindex)};
+ bool accepted{AcceptBlockHeader(header, state, &pindex)};
ActiveChainstate().CheckBlockIndex();
if (!accepted) {
@@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlockHeaders(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>&
if (NotifyHeaderTip(ActiveChainstate())) {
if (ActiveChainstate().IsInitialBlockDownload() && ppindex && *ppindex) {
const CBlockIndex& last_accepted{**ppindex};
- const int64_t blocks_left{(GetTime() - last_accepted.GetBlockTime()) / chainparams.GetConsensus().nPowTargetSpacing};
+ const int64_t blocks_left{(GetTime() - last_accepted.GetBlockTime()) / GetConsensus().nPowTargetSpacing};
const double progress{100.0 * last_accepted.nHeight / (last_accepted.nHeight + blocks_left)};
LogPrintf("Synchronizing blockheaders, height: %d (~%.2f%%)\n", last_accepted.nHeight, progress);
}
@@ -3705,7 +3705,7 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, Block
CBlockIndex *pindexDummy = nullptr;
CBlockIndex *&pindex = ppindex ? *ppindex : pindexDummy;
- bool accepted_header{m_chainman.AcceptBlockHeader(block, state, m_params, &pindex)};
+ bool accepted_header{m_chainman.AcceptBlockHeader(block, state, &pindex)};
CheckBlockIndex();
if (!accepted_header)
@@ -3778,7 +3778,7 @@ bool CChainState::AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, Block
return true;
}
-bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock(const CChainParams& chainparams, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& block, bool force_processing, bool* new_block)
+bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& block, bool force_processing, bool* new_block)
{
AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main);
@@ -3796,7 +3796,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock(const CChainParams& chainparams, const s
// malleability that cause CheckBlock() to fail; see e.g. CVE-2012-2459 and
// https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-February/016697.html. Because CheckBlock() is
// not very expensive, the anti-DoS benefits of caching failure (of a definitely-invalid block) are not substantial.
- bool ret = CheckBlock(*block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus());
+ bool ret = CheckBlock(*block, state, GetConsensus());
if (ret) {
// Store to disk
ret = ActiveChainstate().AcceptBlock(block, state, &pindex, force_processing, nullptr, new_block);