diff options
| author | W. J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2021-09-16 19:40:39 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | W. J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2021-09-16 19:53:28 +0200 |
| commit | 71bdf0bff1be4df824099d69b03459d6dab5f80c (patch) | |
| tree | 6fd2d37f247690180aa514f1cdd8d03c86bf39e4 /src/validation.cpp | |
| parent | 698b4b8fac3d76ab9b9cfe08a1f186b7263630a8 (diff) | |
| parent | fa20f815a9cb438c5ab61e97a453612ddd8b21b5 (diff) | |
| download | bitcoin-71bdf0bff1be4df824099d69b03459d6dab5f80c.tar.xz | |
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22626: Remove txindex migration code
fa20f815a9cb438c5ab61e97a453612ddd8b21b5 Remove txindex migration code (MarcoFalke)
fae878603345854527c211ebb7d1967f12c8bb9d doc: Fix validation typo (MarcoFalke)
fab89006d656261770503e54fdd01ac9167bdd49 Add missing includes and forward declarations, remove unused ones (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
No supported version of Bitcoin Core used the legacy txindex, so all relevant nodes can be assumed to have upgraded. Thus, there is no need to keep this code any longer.
As a temporary courtesy, provide a one-time warning on how to free the disk space used by the legacy txindex.
Fixes #22615
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa20f815a9cb438c5ab61e97a453612ddd8b21b5
hebasto:
ACK fa20f815a9cb438c5ab61e97a453612ddd8b21b5, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (x86_64).
Zero-1729:
crACK fa20f815a9cb438c5ab61e97a453612ddd8b21b5
theStack:
Approach ACK fa20f815a9cb438c5ab61e97a453612ddd8b21b5
Tree-SHA512: 68aa32d064d1e3932e6e382816a4b5de417bd7e82861fea1ee50660e8c397f4efeb88ae4ed54a8ad1952c3563eb0b8449d7ccf883c353cc4d4dc7e15c53d78e8
Diffstat (limited to 'src/validation.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/validation.cpp | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index 8696f1af85..cc87f98913 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ bool CheckFinalTx(const CBlockIndex* active_chain_tip, const CTransaction &tx, i // CheckFinalTx() uses active_chain_tip.Height()+1 to evaluate // nLockTime because when IsFinalTx() is called within - // CBlock::AcceptBlock(), the height of the block *being* + // AcceptBlock(), the height of the block *being* // evaluated is what is used. Thus if we want to know if a // transaction can be part of the *next* block, we need to call // IsFinalTx() with one more than active_chain_tip.Height(). |