diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2018-08-07 15:33:02 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2018-08-07 15:45:37 +0200 |
commit | e7ea858729d3274ec3881688a21bc450b3f58aee (patch) | |
tree | 8c37e04247b6183517f25e60c622e28ae49f6068 /src/validation.cpp | |
parent | b413ba027312bc21e35c37e74a071c47d67676c8 (diff) | |
parent | faa24441ec047ec336b86f586016b9d318c1c0ad (diff) |
Merge #13527: policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags
faa24441ec047ec336b86f586016b9d318c1c0ad policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It seems odd to clutter validation code with features that can only ever be used for testing (testnet or regtest). Removing that test-only code makes the mempool logic less painful to understand and easier to reason about when changed or refactored in the future.
Tree-SHA512: 3b897aa9604ac8d82ebe9573c6efd468c93ddaa08d378ebc902e247b7aa6c68fcde71e5b449c08f17a067146cdc66dc50a67ce06d07607c27e5189a49c3fba3f
Diffstat (limited to 'src/validation.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/validation.cpp | 19 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index 702a8d7e05..fceb135854 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -894,10 +894,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool } } - unsigned int scriptVerifyFlags = STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS; - if (!chainparams.RequireStandard()) { - scriptVerifyFlags = gArgs.GetArg("-promiscuousmempoolflags", scriptVerifyFlags); - } + constexpr unsigned int scriptVerifyFlags = STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS; // Check against previous transactions // This is done last to help prevent CPU exhaustion denial-of-service attacks. @@ -932,20 +929,8 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool // transactions into the mempool can be exploited as a DoS attack. unsigned int currentBlockScriptVerifyFlags = GetBlockScriptFlags(chainActive.Tip(), Params().GetConsensus()); if (!CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache(tx, state, view, pool, currentBlockScriptVerifyFlags, true, txdata)) { - // If we're using promiscuousmempoolflags, we may hit this normally - // Check if current block has some flags that scriptVerifyFlags - // does not before printing an ominous warning - if (!(~scriptVerifyFlags & currentBlockScriptVerifyFlags)) { - return error("%s: BUG! PLEASE REPORT THIS! ConnectInputs failed against latest-block but not STANDARD flags %s, %s", + return error("%s: BUG! PLEASE REPORT THIS! CheckInputs failed against latest-block but not STANDARD flags %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); - } else { - if (!CheckInputs(tx, state, view, true, MANDATORY_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS, true, false, txdata)) { - return error("%s: ConnectInputs failed against MANDATORY but not STANDARD flags due to promiscuous mempool %s, %s", - __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); - } else { - LogPrintf("Warning: -promiscuousmempool flags set to not include currently enforced soft forks, this may break mining or otherwise cause instability!\n"); - } - } } if (test_accept) { |