aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/validation.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-08-07 15:33:02 +0200
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-08-07 15:45:37 +0200
commite7ea858729d3274ec3881688a21bc450b3f58aee (patch)
tree8c37e04247b6183517f25e60c622e28ae49f6068 /src/validation.cpp
parentb413ba027312bc21e35c37e74a071c47d67676c8 (diff)
parentfaa24441ec047ec336b86f586016b9d318c1c0ad (diff)
Merge #13527: policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags
faa24441ec047ec336b86f586016b9d318c1c0ad policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: It seems odd to clutter validation code with features that can only ever be used for testing (testnet or regtest). Removing that test-only code makes the mempool logic less painful to understand and easier to reason about when changed or refactored in the future. Tree-SHA512: 3b897aa9604ac8d82ebe9573c6efd468c93ddaa08d378ebc902e247b7aa6c68fcde71e5b449c08f17a067146cdc66dc50a67ce06d07607c27e5189a49c3fba3f
Diffstat (limited to 'src/validation.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/validation.cpp19
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index 702a8d7e05..fceb135854 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -894,10 +894,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
}
}
- unsigned int scriptVerifyFlags = STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS;
- if (!chainparams.RequireStandard()) {
- scriptVerifyFlags = gArgs.GetArg("-promiscuousmempoolflags", scriptVerifyFlags);
- }
+ constexpr unsigned int scriptVerifyFlags = STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS;
// Check against previous transactions
// This is done last to help prevent CPU exhaustion denial-of-service attacks.
@@ -932,20 +929,8 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
// transactions into the mempool can be exploited as a DoS attack.
unsigned int currentBlockScriptVerifyFlags = GetBlockScriptFlags(chainActive.Tip(), Params().GetConsensus());
if (!CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache(tx, state, view, pool, currentBlockScriptVerifyFlags, true, txdata)) {
- // If we're using promiscuousmempoolflags, we may hit this normally
- // Check if current block has some flags that scriptVerifyFlags
- // does not before printing an ominous warning
- if (!(~scriptVerifyFlags & currentBlockScriptVerifyFlags)) {
- return error("%s: BUG! PLEASE REPORT THIS! ConnectInputs failed against latest-block but not STANDARD flags %s, %s",
+ return error("%s: BUG! PLEASE REPORT THIS! CheckInputs failed against latest-block but not STANDARD flags %s, %s",
__func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
- } else {
- if (!CheckInputs(tx, state, view, true, MANDATORY_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS, true, false, txdata)) {
- return error("%s: ConnectInputs failed against MANDATORY but not STANDARD flags due to promiscuous mempool %s, %s",
- __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
- } else {
- LogPrintf("Warning: -promiscuousmempool flags set to not include currently enforced soft forks, this may break mining or otherwise cause instability!\n");
- }
- }
}
if (test_accept) {