Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21009: Remove RewindBlockIndex logic

d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd [validation] RewindBlockIndex no longer needed (Dhruv Mehta)

Pull request description:

  Closes #17862

  Context from [original comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17862#issuecomment-744285188) (minor edits):

  `RewindBlockIndex()` is a mechanism to allow nodes to be upgraded after segwit activation, while still keeping their chainstate/datadir in a consistent state. It works as follows:

  - A pre-segwit (i.e. v0.13.0 or older) node is running.
  -  Segwit activates. The pre-segwit node remains sync'ed to the tip, but is not enforcing the new segwit rules.
  - The user upgrades the node to a segwit-aware version (v0.13.1 or newer).
  - On startup, in `AppInitMain()`, `RewindBlockIndex()` is called. This walks the chain backwards from the tip, disconnecting and erasing blocks that from after segwit activation that weren't validated with segwit rules.
  - those blocks are then redownloaded (with witness data) and validated with segwit rules.

  This logic probably isn't required any more since:

  - Segwit activated at height 481824, when the block chain was 130GB and the total number of txs was 250 million. Today, we're at height 667704, the blockchain is over 315GB and the total number of txs is over 600 million. Even if 20% of that added data is witness data (a high estimate), then around 150GB of transactions would need to be rewound to get back to segwit activation height. It'd probably be faster to simply validate from genesis, especially since we won't be validating any scripts before the assumevalid block. It's also unclear whether rewinding 150GB of transactions would even work. It's certainly never been tested.
  - Bitcoin Core v0.13 is hardly used any more. https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html shows less than 50 nodes running it. The software was EOL on Aug 1st 2018. It's very unlikely that anyone is running 0.13 and will want to upgrade to 0.22.

  This PR introduces `NeedsRedownload()` which merely checks for insufficiently validated segwit blocks and requests that the user restarts the node with `-reindex`. Reindexing the block files upon restart will make the node rebuild chain state and block index from the `blk*.dat` files on disk. The node won't be able to index the blocks with `BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS`, so they will be missing from the chain and be re-downloaded, with witness data.

  Removing this code allows the following (done in follow-up #21090):

  - removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
  - in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
  - that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
  - that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    utACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd
  jamesob:
    ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21009/commits/d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd
  laanwj:
    Cursory code review ACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd. Agree with the direction of the change, thanks for simplifying the logic here.
  glozow:
    utACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd

Tree-SHA512: 3eddf5121ccd081ad7f15a5c6478ef867083edc8ba0bf1ee759e87bc070ee3d2f0698a3feba8db8dc087987c8452887b6f72cff05b3e178f41cb10a515fb8053

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 130 deletions

diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index 2bf505e26b..09b7bb4398 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -4289,143 +4289,23 @@ bool CChainState::ReplayBlocks(const CChainParams& params)
     return true;
 }
 
-//! Helper for CChainState::RewindBlockIndex
-void CChainState::EraseBlockData(CBlockIndex* index)
+bool CChainState::NeedsRedownload(const CChainParams& params) const
 {
     AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
-    assert(!m_chain.Contains(index)); // Make sure this block isn't active
-
-    // Reduce validity
-    index->nStatus = std::min<unsigned int>(index->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK, BLOCK_VALID_TREE) | (index->nStatus & ~BLOCK_VALID_MASK);
-    // Remove have-data flags.
-    index->nStatus &= ~(BLOCK_HAVE_DATA | BLOCK_HAVE_UNDO);
-    // Remove storage location.
-    index->nFile = 0;
-    index->nDataPos = 0;
-    index->nUndoPos = 0;
-    // Remove various other things
-    index->nTx = 0;
-    index->nChainTx = 0;
-    index->nSequenceId = 0;
-    // Make sure it gets written.
-    setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(index);
-    // Update indexes
-    setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(index);
-    auto ret = m_blockman.m_blocks_unlinked.equal_range(index->pprev);
-    while (ret.first != ret.second) {
-        if (ret.first->second == index) {
-            m_blockman.m_blocks_unlinked.erase(ret.first++);
-        } else {
-            ++ret.first;
-        }
-    }
-    // Mark parent as eligible for main chain again
-    if (index->pprev && index->pprev->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS) && index->pprev->HaveTxsDownloaded()) {
-        setBlockIndexCandidates.insert(index->pprev);
-    }
-}
-
-bool CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(const CChainParams& params)
-{
-    // Note that during -reindex-chainstate we are called with an empty m_chain!
 
-    // First erase all post-segwit blocks without witness not in the main chain,
-    // as this can we done without costly DisconnectTip calls. Active
-    // blocks will be dealt with below (releasing cs_main in between).
-    {
-        LOCK(cs_main);
-        for (const auto& entry : m_blockman.m_block_index) {
-            if (IsWitnessEnabled(entry.second->pprev, params.GetConsensus()) && !(entry.second->nStatus & BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS) && !m_chain.Contains(entry.second)) {
-                EraseBlockData(entry.second);
-            }
-        }
-    }
+    // At and above params.SegwitHeight, segwit consensus rules must be validated
+    CBlockIndex* block{m_chain.Tip()};
+    const int segwit_height{params.GetConsensus().SegwitHeight};
 
-    // Find what height we need to reorganize to.
-    CBlockIndex *tip;
-    int nHeight = 1;
-    {
-        LOCK(cs_main);
-        while (nHeight <= m_chain.Height()) {
-            // Although SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS is now generally enforced on all
-            // blocks in ConnectBlock, we don't need to go back and
-            // re-download/re-verify blocks from before segwit actually activated.
-            if (IsWitnessEnabled(m_chain[nHeight - 1], params.GetConsensus()) && !(m_chain[nHeight]->nStatus & BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS)) {
-                break;
-            }
-            nHeight++;
-        }
-
-        tip = m_chain.Tip();
-    }
-    // nHeight is now the height of the first insufficiently-validated block, or tipheight + 1
-
-    BlockValidationState state;
-    // Loop until the tip is below nHeight, or we reach a pruned block.
-    while (!ShutdownRequested()) {
-        {
-            LOCK(cs_main);
-            LOCK(m_mempool.cs);
-            // Make sure nothing changed from under us (this won't happen because RewindBlockIndex runs before importing/network are active)
-            assert(tip == m_chain.Tip());
-            if (tip == nullptr || tip->nHeight < nHeight) break;
-            if (fPruneMode && !(tip->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA)) {
-                // If pruning, don't try rewinding past the HAVE_DATA point;
-                // since older blocks can't be served anyway, there's
-                // no need to walk further, and trying to DisconnectTip()
-                // will fail (and require a needless reindex/redownload
-                // of the blockchain).
-                break;
-            }
-
-            // Disconnect block
-            if (!DisconnectTip(state, params, nullptr)) {
-                return error("RewindBlockIndex: unable to disconnect block at height %i (%s)", tip->nHeight, state.ToString());
-            }
-
-            // Reduce validity flag and have-data flags.
-            // We do this after actual disconnecting, otherwise we'll end up writing the lack of data
-            // to disk before writing the chainstate, resulting in a failure to continue if interrupted.
-            // Note: If we encounter an insufficiently validated block that
-            // is on m_chain, it must be because we are a pruning node, and
-            // this block or some successor doesn't HAVE_DATA, so we were unable to
-            // rewind all the way.  Blocks remaining on m_chain at this point
-            // must not have their validity reduced.
-            EraseBlockData(tip);
-
-            tip = tip->pprev;
-        }
-        // Make sure the queue of validation callbacks doesn't grow unboundedly.
-        LimitValidationInterfaceQueue();
-
-        // Occasionally flush state to disk.
-        if (!FlushStateToDisk(params, state, FlushStateMode::PERIODIC)) {
-            LogPrintf("RewindBlockIndex: unable to flush state to disk (%s)\n", state.ToString());
-            return false;
-        }
-    }
-
-    {
-        LOCK(cs_main);
-        if (m_chain.Tip() != nullptr) {
-            // We can't prune block index candidates based on our tip if we have
-            // no tip due to m_chain being empty!
-            PruneBlockIndexCandidates();
-
-            CheckBlockIndex(params.GetConsensus());
-
-            // FlushStateToDisk can possibly read ::ChainActive(). Be conservative
-            // and skip it here, we're about to -reindex-chainstate anyway, so
-            // it'll get called a bunch real soon.
-            BlockValidationState state;
-            if (!FlushStateToDisk(params, state, FlushStateMode::ALWAYS)) {
-                LogPrintf("RewindBlockIndex: unable to flush state to disk (%s)\n", state.ToString());
-                return false;
-            }
+    while (block != nullptr && block->nHeight >= segwit_height) {
+        if (!(block->nStatus & BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS)) {
+            // block is insufficiently validated for a segwit client
+            return true;
         }
+        block = block->pprev;
     }
 
-    return true;
+    return false;
 }
 
 void CChainState::UnloadBlockIndex() {