diff options
| author | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2018-08-20 13:26:17 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2018-08-20 13:26:30 -0400 |
| commit | 4732fa133abdf374790825abbf1bbf56819cc806 (patch) | |
| tree | 1460ea935434a9e6a2b961a9d5b8834a971e8cdc /src/utiltime.cpp | |
| parent | 2a583406c00761c0ac1d162531256b401d5b16c3 (diff) | |
| parent | d795c610d3095eeff1bfe5c1a34877cf0a841823 (diff) | |
Merge #12818: [qt] TransactionView: highlight replacement tx after fee bump
d795c610d3 [qt] TransactionView: highlight replacement tx after fee bump (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Consistent with #12421 which highlights the transaction after send.
<img width="747" alt="1" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/38036280-a7358ea4-32a6-11e8-8f92-417e9e1e3e8b.png">
<img width="685" alt="2" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/38036289-aac87040-32a6-11e8-9f94-81745ff6c592.png">
~I'm not too proud of the `QTimer::singleShot(10` bit; any suggestions on how to properly wait for the transactions table to become aware of the new transaction?~
Although I could have called `focusTransaction()` directly from `TransactionView::bumpFee()` I'm using the same signal as the send screen. This should make it easier to move fee bump / transaction replacement functionality around later.
Tree-SHA512: 242055b7c3d32c7b2cf871f5ceda2581221902fd53fa29e0b092713fc16d3191adbe8cbb28417d522dda9febec8cc05e07afe3489cd7caaecd33460c1dde6fbc
Diffstat (limited to 'src/utiltime.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions