diff options
| author | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2018-09-20 17:57:13 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2018-09-20 17:57:20 -0400 |
| commit | 2796c6e5ec9055545e987023b04eb5ebe64d5320 (patch) | |
| tree | 4ab72e1699f43cb0e860a6f3f401644d59eaaeb3 /src/util.h | |
| parent | 9a3a984bb884c1153866b64845db7300121966b3 (diff) | |
| parent | 3ccfa34b32b7ed9d7bef05baa36827b4b262197e (diff) | |
Merge #14214: convert C-style (void) parameter lists to C++ style ()
3ccfa34b32 convert C-style (void) parameter lists to C++ style () (Arvid Norberg)
Pull request description:
In C, an empty parameter list, `()`, means the function takes any arguments, and `(void)` means the function does not take any parameters.
In C++, an empty parameter list means the function does not take any parameters.
So, C++ still supports `(void)` parameter lists with the same semantics, why change to `()`?
1. removing the redundant `void` improves signal-to-noise ratio of the code
2. using `(void)` exposes a rare inconsistency in that a template taking a template `(T)` parameter list, cannot be instantiated with `T=void`
Tree-SHA512: be2897b6c5e474873aa878ed6bac098382cd21866aec33752fe40b089a6331aa6263cae749aba1b4a41e8467f1a47086d32eb74abaf09927fd5a2f44a4b2109a
Diffstat (limited to 'src/util.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/util.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/util.h b/src/util.h index 7bf9fdbe12..f119385e48 100644 --- a/src/util.h +++ b/src/util.h @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ std::string CopyrightHolders(const std::string& strPrefix); * @return The return value of sched_setschedule(), or 1 on systems without * sched_setschedule(). */ -int ScheduleBatchPriority(void); +int ScheduleBatchPriority(); namespace util { |