diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2021-02-24 09:07:10 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2021-02-24 09:57:21 +0100 |
commit | b59f2787e53318caad6d3292de2cc6e17995d277 (patch) | |
tree | bb9418e42c437df99130c8ad220d53336120836c /src/txmempool.h | |
parent | 587c986ccf88daef5e979eaa91163349e36a544d (diff) | |
parent | fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d (diff) |
Merge #18017: txmempool: split epoch logic into class
fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d [refactor] txmempool: split epoch logic into class (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Splits the epoch logic introduced in #17925 into a separate class.
Uses clang's thread safety annotations and encapsulates the data more strongly to reduce chances of bugs from API misuse.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d using clang thread safety annotations looks like a very good idea, and the encapsulation this change adds should improve robustness (and possible unit test-ability) of the code. Verified that changing some of the locking duly provoked build-time warnings with Clang 9 on Debian and that small changes in the new `Epoch` class were covered by failing functional test assertions in `mempool_updatefromblock.py`, `mempool_resurrect.py`, and `mempool_reorg.py`
hebasto:
re-ACK fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d, since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18017#pullrequestreview-569619362) review:
Tree-SHA512: 7004623faa02b56639aa05ab7a078320a6d8d54ec62d8022876221e33f350f47df51ddff056c0de5be798f8eb39b5c03c2d3f035698555d70abc218e950f2f8c
Diffstat (limited to 'src/txmempool.h')
-rw-r--r-- | src/txmempool.h | 55 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/src/txmempool.h b/src/txmempool.h index b8de326737..143048b205 100644 --- a/src/txmempool.h +++ b/src/txmempool.h @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include <primitives/transaction.h> #include <random.h> #include <sync.h> +#include <util/epochguard.h> #include <util/hasher.h> #include <boost/multi_index_container.hpp> @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ struct CompareIteratorByHash { return a->GetTx().GetHash() < b->GetTx().GetHash(); } }; + /** \class CTxMemPoolEntry * * CTxMemPoolEntry stores data about the corresponding transaction, as well @@ -156,7 +158,7 @@ public: Children& GetMemPoolChildren() const { return m_children; } mutable size_t vTxHashesIdx; //!< Index in mempool's vTxHashes - mutable uint64_t m_epoch; //!< epoch when last touched, useful for graph algorithms + mutable Epoch::Marker m_epoch_marker; //!< epoch when last touched, useful for graph algorithms }; // Helpers for modifying CTxMemPool::mapTx, which is a boost multi_index. @@ -486,8 +488,7 @@ private: mutable int64_t lastRollingFeeUpdate; mutable bool blockSinceLastRollingFeeBump; mutable double rollingMinimumFeeRate; //!< minimum fee to get into the pool, decreases exponentially - mutable uint64_t m_epoch{0}; - mutable bool m_has_epoch_guard{false}; + mutable Epoch m_epoch GUARDED_BY(cs); // In-memory counter for external mempool tracking purposes. // This number is incremented once every time a transaction @@ -666,7 +667,7 @@ public: * for). Note: vHashesToUpdate should be the set of transactions from the * disconnected block that have been accepted back into the mempool. */ - void UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector<uint256>& vHashesToUpdate) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main); + void UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector<uint256>& vHashesToUpdate) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main) LOCKS_EXCLUDED(m_epoch); /** Try to calculate all in-mempool ancestors of entry. * (these are all calculated including the tx itself) @@ -827,52 +828,22 @@ private: */ void removeUnchecked(txiter entry, MemPoolRemovalReason reason) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs); public: - /** EpochGuard: RAII-style guard for using epoch-based graph traversal algorithms. - * When walking ancestors or descendants, we generally want to avoid - * visiting the same transactions twice. Some traversal algorithms use - * std::set (or setEntries) to deduplicate the transaction we visit. - * However, use of std::set is algorithmically undesirable because it both - * adds an asymptotic factor of O(log n) to traverals cost and triggers O(n) - * more dynamic memory allocations. - * In many algorithms we can replace std::set with an internal mempool - * counter to track the time (or, "epoch") that we began a traversal, and - * check + update a per-transaction epoch for each transaction we look at to - * determine if that transaction has not yet been visited during the current - * traversal's epoch. - * Algorithms using std::set can be replaced on a one by one basis. - * Both techniques are not fundamentally incompatible across the codebase. - * Generally speaking, however, the remaining use of std::set for mempool - * traversal should be viewed as a TODO for replacement with an epoch based - * traversal, rather than a preference for std::set over epochs in that - * algorithm. - */ - class EpochGuard { - const CTxMemPool& pool; - public: - explicit EpochGuard(const CTxMemPool& in); - ~EpochGuard(); - }; - // N.B. GetFreshEpoch modifies mutable state via the EpochGuard construction - // (and later destruction) - EpochGuard GetFreshEpoch() const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs); - /** visited marks a CTxMemPoolEntry as having been traversed - * during the lifetime of the most recently created EpochGuard + * during the lifetime of the most recently created Epoch::Guard * and returns false if we are the first visitor, true otherwise. * - * An EpochGuard must be held when visited is called or an assert will be + * An Epoch::Guard must be held when visited is called or an assert will be * triggered. * */ - bool visited(txiter it) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs) { - assert(m_has_epoch_guard); - bool ret = it->m_epoch >= m_epoch; - it->m_epoch = std::max(it->m_epoch, m_epoch); - return ret; + bool visited(const txiter it) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, m_epoch) + { + return m_epoch.visited(it->m_epoch_marker); } - bool visited(Optional<txiter> it) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs) { - assert(m_has_epoch_guard); + bool visited(Optional<txiter> it) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, m_epoch) + { + assert(m_epoch.guarded()); // verify guard even when it==nullopt return !it || visited(*it); } }; |