aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/txmempool.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Chow <github@achow101.com>2023-01-03 16:24:21 -0500
committerAndrew Chow <github@achow101.com>2023-01-03 16:30:55 -0500
commit80fc1af096273c7eebbf0a2a607cb90c7dc5a208 (patch)
treec1b8259e204321e47ce793fb99e2b3a06d62167b /src/txmempool.cpp
parentf301bf52ab0096dc5d233d89b468885d6a3f12a6 (diff)
parent47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990 (diff)
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26289: Use util::Result in for calculating mempool ancestors
47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990 mempool: log/halt when CalculateMemPoolAncestors fails unexpectedly (stickies-v) 5481f65849313ff947f38433b1ac28285a7f7694 mempool: add AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors helper function (stickies-v) f911bdfff95eba3793fffaf71a31cc8bfc6f80c9 mempool: use util::Result for CalculateMemPoolAncestors (stickies-v) 66e028f7399b6511f9b73b1cef54b6a6ac38a024 mempool: use util::Result for CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (stickies-v) Pull request description: Upon reviewing the documentation for `CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors`, I noticed `setAncestors` was meant to be an `out` parameter but actually is an `in,out` parameter, as can be observed by adding `assert(setAncestors.empty());` as the first line in the function and running `make check`. This PR fixes this unexpected behaviour and introduces refactoring improvements to make intents and effects of the code more clear. ## Unexpected behaviour This behaviour occurs only in the package acceptance path, currently only triggered by `testmempoolaccept` and `submitpackage` RPCs. In `MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions()`, we first call `PreChecks()` and then `SubmitPackage()` with the same `Workspace ws` reference. `PreChecks` leaves `ws.m_ancestors` in a potentially non-empty state, before it is passed on to `MemPoolAccept::SubmitPackage`. `SubmitPackage` is the only place where `setAncestors` isn't guaranteed to be empty before calling `CalculateMemPoolAncestors`. The most straightforward fix is to just forcefully clear `setAncestors` at the beginning of CalculateMemPoolAncestors, which is done in the first bugfix commit. ## Improvements ### Return value instead of out-parameters This PR updates the function signatures for `CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors` and `CTxMemPool::CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits` to use a `util::Result` return type and eliminate both the `setAncestors` `in,out`-parameter as well as the error string. It simplifies the code and makes the intent and effects more explicit. ### Observability There are 7 instances where we currently call `CalculateMemPoolAncestors` without actually checking if the function succeeded because we assume that it can't fail, such as in [miner.cpp](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/69b10212ea5370606c7a5aa500a70c36b4cbb58f/src/node/miner.cpp#L399). This PR adds a new wrapper `AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors` function that logs such unexpected failures, or in case of debug builds even halts the program. It's not crucial to the objective, more of an observability improvement that seems sensible to add on here. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990 w0xlt: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26289/commits/47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990 glozow: ACK 47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990 furszy: light code review ACK 47c4b1f5 aureleoules: ACK 47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990 Tree-SHA512: d908dad00d1a5645eb865c4877cc0bae74b9cd3332a3641eb4a285431aef119f9fc78172d38b55c592168a73dae83242e6af3348815f7b37cbe2d448a3a58648
Diffstat (limited to 'src/txmempool.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/txmempool.cpp103
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/src/txmempool.cpp b/src/txmempool.cpp
index 83020117a7..50cd34dde4 100644
--- a/src/txmempool.cpp
+++ b/src/txmempool.cpp
@@ -17,12 +17,16 @@
#include <util/check.h>
#include <util/moneystr.h>
#include <util/overflow.h>
+#include <util/result.h>
#include <util/system.h>
#include <util/time.h>
+#include <util/translation.h>
#include <validationinterface.h>
#include <cmath>
#include <optional>
+#include <string_view>
+#include <utility>
bool TestLockPointValidity(CChain& active_chain, const LockPoints& lp)
{
@@ -147,32 +151,29 @@ void CTxMemPool::UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector<uint256>& vHashes
}
}
-bool CTxMemPool::CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(size_t entry_size,
- size_t entry_count,
- setEntries& setAncestors,
- CTxMemPoolEntry::Parents& staged_ancestors,
- const Limits& limits,
- std::string &errString) const
+util::Result<CTxMemPool::setEntries> CTxMemPool::CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(
+ size_t entry_size,
+ size_t entry_count,
+ CTxMemPoolEntry::Parents& staged_ancestors,
+ const Limits& limits) const
{
size_t totalSizeWithAncestors = entry_size;
+ setEntries ancestors;
while (!staged_ancestors.empty()) {
const CTxMemPoolEntry& stage = staged_ancestors.begin()->get();
txiter stageit = mapTx.iterator_to(stage);
- setAncestors.insert(stageit);
+ ancestors.insert(stageit);
staged_ancestors.erase(stage);
totalSizeWithAncestors += stageit->GetTxSize();
if (stageit->GetSizeWithDescendants() + entry_size > static_cast<uint64_t>(limits.descendant_size_vbytes)) {
- errString = strprintf("exceeds descendant size limit for tx %s [limit: %u]", stageit->GetTx().GetHash().ToString(), limits.descendant_size_vbytes);
- return false;
+ return util::Error{Untranslated(strprintf("exceeds descendant size limit for tx %s [limit: %u]", stageit->GetTx().GetHash().ToString(), limits.descendant_size_vbytes))};
} else if (stageit->GetCountWithDescendants() + entry_count > static_cast<uint64_t>(limits.descendant_count)) {
- errString = strprintf("too many descendants for tx %s [limit: %u]", stageit->GetTx().GetHash().ToString(), limits.descendant_count);
- return false;
+ return util::Error{Untranslated(strprintf("too many descendants for tx %s [limit: %u]", stageit->GetTx().GetHash().ToString(), limits.descendant_count))};
} else if (totalSizeWithAncestors > static_cast<uint64_t>(limits.ancestor_size_vbytes)) {
- errString = strprintf("exceeds ancestor size limit [limit: %u]", limits.ancestor_size_vbytes);
- return false;
+ return util::Error{Untranslated(strprintf("exceeds ancestor size limit [limit: %u]", limits.ancestor_size_vbytes))};
}
const CTxMemPoolEntry::Parents& parents = stageit->GetMemPoolParentsConst();
@@ -180,17 +181,16 @@ bool CTxMemPool::CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(size_t entry_size,
txiter parent_it = mapTx.iterator_to(parent);
// If this is a new ancestor, add it.
- if (setAncestors.count(parent_it) == 0) {
+ if (ancestors.count(parent_it) == 0) {
staged_ancestors.insert(parent);
}
- if (staged_ancestors.size() + setAncestors.size() + entry_count > static_cast<uint64_t>(limits.ancestor_count)) {
- errString = strprintf("too many unconfirmed ancestors [limit: %u]", limits.ancestor_count);
- return false;
+ if (staged_ancestors.size() + ancestors.size() + entry_count > static_cast<uint64_t>(limits.ancestor_count)) {
+ return util::Error{Untranslated(strprintf("too many unconfirmed ancestors [limit: %u]", limits.ancestor_count))};
}
}
}
- return true;
+ return ancestors;
}
bool CTxMemPool::CheckPackageLimits(const Package& package,
@@ -215,20 +215,17 @@ bool CTxMemPool::CheckPackageLimits(const Package& package,
// When multiple transactions are passed in, the ancestors and descendants of all transactions
// considered together must be within limits even if they are not interdependent. This may be
// stricter than the limits for each individual transaction.
- setEntries setAncestors;
- const auto ret = CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(total_size, package.size(),
- setAncestors, staged_ancestors,
- limits, errString);
+ const auto ancestors{CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(total_size, package.size(),
+ staged_ancestors, limits)};
// It's possible to overestimate the ancestor/descendant totals.
- if (!ret) errString.insert(0, "possibly ");
- return ret;
+ if (!ancestors.has_value()) errString = "possibly " + util::ErrorString(ancestors).original;
+ return ancestors.has_value();
}
-bool CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors(const CTxMemPoolEntry &entry,
- setEntries &setAncestors,
- const Limits& limits,
- std::string &errString,
- bool fSearchForParents /* = true */) const
+util::Result<CTxMemPool::setEntries> CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors(
+ const CTxMemPoolEntry &entry,
+ const Limits& limits,
+ bool fSearchForParents /* = true */) const
{
CTxMemPoolEntry::Parents staged_ancestors;
const CTransaction &tx = entry.GetTx();
@@ -242,8 +239,7 @@ bool CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors(const CTxMemPoolEntry &entry,
if (piter) {
staged_ancestors.insert(**piter);
if (staged_ancestors.size() + 1 > static_cast<uint64_t>(limits.ancestor_count)) {
- errString = strprintf("too many unconfirmed parents [limit: %u]", limits.ancestor_count);
- return false;
+ return util::Error{Untranslated(strprintf("too many unconfirmed parents [limit: %u]", limits.ancestor_count))};
}
}
}
@@ -254,9 +250,22 @@ bool CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors(const CTxMemPoolEntry &entry,
staged_ancestors = it->GetMemPoolParentsConst();
}
- return CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(entry.GetTxSize(), /*entry_count=*/1,
- setAncestors, staged_ancestors,
- limits, errString);
+ return CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(entry.GetTxSize(), /*entry_count=*/1, staged_ancestors,
+ limits);
+}
+
+CTxMemPool::setEntries CTxMemPool::AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors(
+ std::string_view calling_fn_name,
+ const CTxMemPoolEntry &entry,
+ const Limits& limits,
+ bool fSearchForParents /* = true */) const
+{
+ auto result{Assume(CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, limits, fSearchForParents))};
+ if (!result) {
+ LogPrintLevel(BCLog::MEMPOOL, BCLog::Level::Error, "%s: CalculateMemPoolAncestors failed unexpectedly, continuing with empty ancestor set (%s)\n",
+ calling_fn_name, util::ErrorString(result).original);
+ }
+ return std::move(result).value_or(CTxMemPool::setEntries{});
}
void CTxMemPool::UpdateAncestorsOf(bool add, txiter it, setEntries &setAncestors)
@@ -320,9 +329,7 @@ void CTxMemPool::UpdateForRemoveFromMempool(const setEntries &entriesToRemove, b
}
}
for (txiter removeIt : entriesToRemove) {
- setEntries setAncestors;
const CTxMemPoolEntry &entry = *removeIt;
- std::string dummy;
// Since this is a tx that is already in the mempool, we can call CMPA
// with fSearchForParents = false. If the mempool is in a consistent
// state, then using true or false should both be correct, though false
@@ -342,10 +349,10 @@ void CTxMemPool::UpdateForRemoveFromMempool(const setEntries &entriesToRemove, b
// mempool parents we'd calculate by searching, and it's important that
// we use the cached notion of ancestor transactions as the set of
// things to update for removal.
- CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, setAncestors, Limits::NoLimits(), dummy, false);
+ auto ancestors{AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors(__func__, entry, Limits::NoLimits(), /*fSearchForParents=*/false)};
// Note that UpdateAncestorsOf severs the child links that point to
// removeIt in the entries for the parents of removeIt.
- UpdateAncestorsOf(false, removeIt, setAncestors);
+ UpdateAncestorsOf(false, removeIt, ancestors);
}
// After updating all the ancestor sizes, we can now sever the link between each
// transaction being removed and any mempool children (ie, update CTxMemPoolEntry::m_parents
@@ -695,15 +702,13 @@ void CTxMemPool::check(const CCoinsViewCache& active_coins_tip, int64_t spendhei
assert(setParentCheck.size() == it->GetMemPoolParentsConst().size());
assert(std::equal(setParentCheck.begin(), setParentCheck.end(), it->GetMemPoolParentsConst().begin(), comp));
// Verify ancestor state is correct.
- setEntries setAncestors;
- std::string dummy;
- CalculateMemPoolAncestors(*it, setAncestors, Limits::NoLimits(), dummy);
- uint64_t nCountCheck = setAncestors.size() + 1;
+ auto ancestors{AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors(__func__, *it, Limits::NoLimits())};
+ uint64_t nCountCheck = ancestors.size() + 1;
uint64_t nSizeCheck = it->GetTxSize();
CAmount nFeesCheck = it->GetModifiedFee();
int64_t nSigOpCheck = it->GetSigOpCost();
- for (txiter ancestorIt : setAncestors) {
+ for (txiter ancestorIt : ancestors) {
nSizeCheck += ancestorIt->GetTxSize();
nFeesCheck += ancestorIt->GetModifiedFee();
nSigOpCheck += ancestorIt->GetSigOpCost();
@@ -858,10 +863,8 @@ void CTxMemPool::PrioritiseTransaction(const uint256& hash, const CAmount& nFeeD
if (it != mapTx.end()) {
mapTx.modify(it, [&nFeeDelta](CTxMemPoolEntry& e) { e.UpdateModifiedFee(nFeeDelta); });
// Now update all ancestors' modified fees with descendants
- setEntries setAncestors;
- std::string dummy;
- CalculateMemPoolAncestors(*it, setAncestors, Limits::NoLimits(), dummy, false);
- for (txiter ancestorIt : setAncestors) {
+ auto ancestors{AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors(__func__, *it, Limits::NoLimits(), /*fSearchForParents=*/false)};
+ for (txiter ancestorIt : ancestors) {
mapTx.modify(ancestorIt, [=](CTxMemPoolEntry& e){ e.UpdateDescendantState(0, nFeeDelta, 0);});
}
// Now update all descendants' modified fees with ancestors
@@ -998,10 +1001,8 @@ int CTxMemPool::Expire(std::chrono::seconds time)
void CTxMemPool::addUnchecked(const CTxMemPoolEntry &entry, bool validFeeEstimate)
{
- setEntries setAncestors;
- std::string dummy;
- CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, setAncestors, Limits::NoLimits(), dummy);
- return addUnchecked(entry, setAncestors, validFeeEstimate);
+ auto ancestors{AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors(__func__, entry, Limits::NoLimits())};
+ return addUnchecked(entry, ancestors, validFeeEstimate);
}
void CTxMemPool::UpdateChild(txiter entry, txiter child, bool add)