diff options
author | Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com> | 2017-04-26 18:15:07 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com> | 2017-05-02 11:01:39 -0700 |
commit | ed36de59e484ecdc22f464948d08a94a8b7fadbb (patch) | |
tree | 85bdd01e3bcd98c0ba403913a6a27e74fe773730 /src/test | |
parent | 8f3e38477e30abd9dd0e24a4d612126117f7793c (diff) |
[tests] Update Unit Test for addrman.h/addrman.cpp
Add test for adding multiple addresses to address manager
Clean up unnecessary modulo operations
Add test for GetNewBucket's alternate method signature
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/addrman_tests.cpp | 26 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp index 39fa381dd0..a1194bae3b 100644 --- a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple) // Test 2: Does Addrman::Add work as expected. CService addr1 = ResolveService("250.1.1.1", 8333); - addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1, NODE_NONE), source); + BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1, NODE_NONE), source)); BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 1); CAddrInfo addr_ret1 = addrman.Select(); BOOST_CHECK(addr_ret1.ToString() == "250.1.1.1:8333"); @@ -99,14 +99,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple) // Test 3: Does IP address deduplication work correctly. // Expected dup IP should not be added. CService addr1_dup = ResolveService("250.1.1.1", 8333); - addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1_dup, NODE_NONE), source); + BOOST_CHECK(!addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1_dup, NODE_NONE), source)); BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 1); // Test 5: New table has one addr and we add a diff addr we should // have two addrs. CService addr2 = ResolveService("250.1.1.2", 8333); - addrman.Add(CAddress(addr2, NODE_NONE), source); + BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(CAddress(addr2, NODE_NONE), source)); BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2); // Test 6: AddrMan::Clear() should empty the new table. @@ -114,6 +114,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple) BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 0); CAddrInfo addr_null2 = addrman.Select(); BOOST_CHECK(addr_null2.ToString() == "[::]:0"); + + // Test 6.5: AddrMan::Add multiple addresses works as expected + std::vector<CAddress> vAddr; + vAddr.push_back(CAddress(ResolveService("250.1.1.3", 8333), NODE_NONE)); + vAddr.push_back(CAddress(ResolveService("250.1.1.4", 8333), NODE_NONE)); + BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(vAddr, source)); + BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_ports) @@ -398,9 +405,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_getaddr) // Test 25: Ensure GetAddr still returns 23% when addrman has many addrs. for (unsigned int i = 1; i < (8 * 256); i++) { int octet1 = i % 256; - int octet2 = (i / 256) % 256; - int octet3 = (i / (256 * 2)) % 256; - std::string strAddr = boost::to_string(octet1) + "." + boost::to_string(octet2) + "." + boost::to_string(octet3) + ".23"; + int octet2 = i >> 8 % 256; + std::string strAddr = boost::to_string(octet1) + "." + boost::to_string(octet2) + ".1.23"; CAddress addr = CAddress(ResolveService(strAddr), NODE_NONE); // Ensure that for all addrs in addrman, isTerrible == false. @@ -412,10 +418,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_getaddr) std::vector<CAddress> vAddr = addrman.GetAddr(); size_t percent23 = (addrman.size() * 23) / 100; - BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == percent23); - BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == 461); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(vAddr.size(), percent23); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(vAddr.size(), 461); // (Addrman.size() < number of addresses added) due to address collisions. - BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2007); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(addrman.size(), 2006); } @@ -493,7 +499,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(caddrinfo_get_new_bucket) uint256 nKey1 = (uint256)(CHashWriter(SER_GETHASH, 0) << 1).GetHash(); uint256 nKey2 = (uint256)(CHashWriter(SER_GETHASH, 0) << 2).GetHash(); + // Test 29.5: Make sure the buckets are what we expect BOOST_CHECK(info1.GetNewBucket(nKey1) == 786); + BOOST_CHECK(info1.GetNewBucket(nKey1, source1) == 786); // Test 30: Make sure key actually randomizes bucket placement. A fail on // this test could be a security issue. |