aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2018-09-20 17:57:13 -0400
committerMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2018-09-20 17:57:20 -0400
commit2796c6e5ec9055545e987023b04eb5ebe64d5320 (patch)
tree4ab72e1699f43cb0e860a6f3f401644d59eaaeb3 /src/test
parent9a3a984bb884c1153866b64845db7300121966b3 (diff)
parent3ccfa34b32b7ed9d7bef05baa36827b4b262197e (diff)
Merge #14214: convert C-style (void) parameter lists to C++ style ()
3ccfa34b32 convert C-style (void) parameter lists to C++ style () (Arvid Norberg) Pull request description: In C, an empty parameter list, `()`, means the function takes any arguments, and `(void)` means the function does not take any parameters. In C++, an empty parameter list means the function does not take any parameters. So, C++ still supports `(void)` parameter lists with the same semantics, why change to `()`? 1. removing the redundant `void` improves signal-to-noise ratio of the code 2. using `(void)` exposes a rare inconsistency in that a template taking a template `(T)` parameter list, cannot be instantiated with `T=void` Tree-SHA512: be2897b6c5e474873aa878ed6bac098382cd21866aec33752fe40b089a6331aa6263cae749aba1b4a41e8467f1a47086d32eb74abaf09927fd5a2f44a4b2109a
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
-rw-r--r--src/test/crypto_tests.cpp2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/crypto_tests.cpp b/src/test/crypto_tests.cpp
index 19521027a9..713e3e2ded 100644
--- a/src/test/crypto_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/crypto_tests.cpp
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void TestChaCha20(const std::string &hexkey, uint64_t nonce, uint64_t see
BOOST_CHECK(out == outres);
}
-static std::string LongTestString(void) {
+static std::string LongTestString() {
std::string ret;
for (int i=0; i<200000; i++) {
ret += (unsigned char)(i);