Fixed multiple typos

A few "a->an" and "an->a".
"Shows, if the supplied default SOCKS5 proxy" -> "Shows if the supplied default SOCKS5 proxy". Change made on 3 occurrences.
"without fully understanding the ramification of a command" -> "without fully understanding the ramifications of a command".
Removed duplicate words such as "the the".

3 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/test/arith_uint256_tests.cpp b/src/test/arith_uint256_tests.cpp
index 45ae7d4636..2c98fbcfd6 100644
--- a/src/test/arith_uint256_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/arith_uint256_tests.cpp
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE( unaryOperators ) // !    ~    -
 
 
 // Check if doing _A_ _OP_ _B_ results in the same as applying _OP_ onto each
-// element of Aarray and Barray, and then converting the result into a arith_uint256.
+// element of Aarray and Barray, and then converting the result into an arith_uint256.
 #define CHECKBITWISEOPERATOR(_A_,_B_,_OP_)                              \
     for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 32; ++i) { TmpArray[i] = _A_##Array[i] _OP_ _B_##Array[i]; } \
     BOOST_CHECK(arith_uint256V(std::vector<unsigned char>(TmpArray,TmpArray+32)) == (_A_##L _OP_ _B_##L));
diff --git a/src/test/data/script_tests.json b/src/test/data/script_tests.json
index e35a7ce569..0390d6806d 100644
--- a/src/test/data/script_tests.json
+++ b/src/test/data/script_tests.json
@@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@
 ],
 
 ["CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY tests"],
-["", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "INVALID_STACK_OPERATION", "CSV automatically fails on a empty stack"],
+["", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "INVALID_STACK_OPERATION", "CSV automatically fails on an empty stack"],
 ["-1", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "NEGATIVE_LOCKTIME", "CSV automatically fails if stack top is negative"],
 ["0x0100", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY,MINIMALDATA", "UNKNOWN_ERROR", "CSV fails if stack top is not minimally encoded"],
 ["0", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY", "UNSATISFIED_LOCKTIME", "CSV fails if stack top bit 1 << 31 is set and the tx version < 2"],
diff --git a/src/test/data/tx_valid.json b/src/test/data/tx_valid.json
index d70fa54333..e6b382af13 100644
--- a/src/test/data/tx_valid.json
+++ b/src/test/data/tx_valid.json
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
 [[["5a6b0021a6042a686b6b94abc36b387bef9109847774e8b1e51eb8cc55c53921", 1, "DUP HASH160 0x14 0xee5a6aa40facefb2655ac23c0c28c57c65c41f9b EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG"]],
 "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", "P2SH"],
 
-["Finally CHECKMULTISIG removes all signatures prior to hashing the script containing those signatures. In conjunction with the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug this lets us test whether or not FindAndDelete() is actually present in scriptPubKey/redeemScript evaluation by including a signature of the digest 0x01 We can compute in advance for our pubkey, embed it it in the scriptPubKey, and then also using a normal SIGHASH_ALL signature. If FindAndDelete() wasn't run, the 'bugged' signature would still be in the hashed script, and the normal signature would fail."],
+["Finally CHECKMULTISIG removes all signatures prior to hashing the script containing those signatures. In conjunction with the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug this lets us test whether or not FindAndDelete() is actually present in scriptPubKey/redeemScript evaluation by including a signature of the digest 0x01 We can compute in advance for our pubkey, embed it in the scriptPubKey, and then also using a normal SIGHASH_ALL signature. If FindAndDelete() wasn't run, the 'bugged' signature would still be in the hashed script, and the normal signature would fail."],
 
 ["Here's an example on mainnet within a P2SH redeemScript. Remarkably it's a standard transaction in <0.9"],
 [[["b5b598de91787439afd5938116654e0b16b7a0d0f82742ba37564219c5afcbf9", 0, "DUP HASH160 0x14 0xf6f365c40f0739b61de827a44751e5e99032ed8f EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG"],